Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current article suggests a possible synthesis of Skinner’s (1957) treatment of verbal behavior with the more recent behavioral interpretation of language known as relational frame theory. The rationale for attempting to combine these two approaches is first outlined. Subsequently, each of the verbal operants described by Skinner is examined and subjected to a relational frame analysis. In each case, two types of operants are identified; one based on direct contingencies of reinforcement and the other based on arbitrarily applicable relational responding. The latter operants are labeled verbal because they can be distinguished from other forms of social behavior, and they appear to possess the symbolic or referential qualities often ascribed to human language. By applying relational frame theory to Skinner’s verbal operants, we aim to contribute towards the development of a modern behavior-analytic research agenda in human language and cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Hampson, P. J. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Hampson, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relational responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system. In J. W. Donahoe & V. P. Dorsel (Eds.), Neural network interpretations of cognition: Biobehavioral foundations (pp. 496–521). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., Healy, O., & Hayes, S. C. (in press). Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes’, D., & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19– 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders’ commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of human sexuality. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (in press). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record.

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (in press). Establishing relational framing in children: The role of multiple-exemplar training. In S. C. Hayes & D. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • Chase, P. N., & Danforth, J. S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 205–225). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P. N., & Parrott, L. J. (1986). Psychological aspects of language: The West Virginia lectures. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251– 267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions through the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen wood, D., & Chase, P. N. (1997, May). A comparison of two behavioral training components: Rate building and component composite analysis. Paper presented at the 23rd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., & Mousetis, L. (1989). Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: Effects of peers’ expressive modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 245–259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (in press). Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Wilson, K. (1996). Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding as an operant. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 279–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Grundt, A. M. (1997). Metaphor, meaning, and relational frame theory. In C. Mandell & A. McCabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 117–146). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.),Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic view of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 115–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (in press). Understanding metaphor: An empirical model from relational frame theory. In S. C. Hayes & D. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • Streifel, S., Wetherby, B., & Karlan, G. (1976). Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, B. (1978). Miniature languages and the functional analysis of verbal behavior. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Bases of language intervention (pp. 397–448). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125– 144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland

    Dermot Barnes-Holmes & Yvonne Barnes-Holmes

  2. University College, Cork, Ireland

    Veronica Cullinan

Authors
  1. Dermot Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veronica Cullinan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article is dedicated to the memory of B. F. Skinner. We express our gratitude to the reviewers for providing many constructive and helpful comments on earlier versions of the current work. We also thank Steve Hayes for everything!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y. & Cullinan, V. Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. BEHAV ANALYST 23, 69–84 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392000

Key words

Search

Navigation