Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative studies of pyruvate kinase from PSE and normal pig muscles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fast breakdown of glycogen is observed in muscles of stress-susceptible pigs leading to pale, soft and exudative (PSE) meat. We report a comparative study of pyruvate kinase from muscles of normal and PSE-prone pigs. Compared with the enzyme from normal muscle, pyruvate kinase isolated from PSE muscle shows a five times lower Michaelis constant,K m, for phosphoenol pyruvate and a more than ten times higherk cat/K m value. The pH dependency of the enzymatic activity is shifted to more acidic values for pyruvate kinase from PSE muscles. According to isoelectric focusing, pyruvate kinase from PSE muscle consists of three isoforms, while only two isoforms are detectable in pyruvate kinase preparations from normal pigs. The various isoforms were isolated by preparative isoelectric focusing and their steady-state properties were compared. Isoform 3, which is found only in PSE muscle, shows a 10-fold higher specific activity, a 30-fold lowerK m value and a 100-fold increasedk cat/K m value for phosphoenol pyruvate as compared to isoform 1. The presence of isoform 3 in PSE muscle appears to be responsible for the high activity of this enzyme under the more acidic conditions prevailing in PSE muscle. In vitro phosphorylation and dephosphorylation experiments using total enzyme and purified isoenzyme 1 suggest that isoforms 2 and 3 arise from isoform 1 by phosphorylation. Thus protein phosphorylation seems to be responsible for the shift in activity of pyruvate kinase, a key enzyme of glycolysis, under the acidic conditions of PSE muscles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briskey EJ (1964) Adv Food Res 13: 89–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Briskey EJ, Kastenschmidt LL, Forrest JC, Beecher CR, Judge MD, Cassens RG, Hoekstra WG (1966) J Argic Food Chem 14: 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bendall JR, Wismer-Pedersen J (1962) J Food Sci 27: 144–159

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwägele F, Lopez P, Haschke C, Honikel KO (1994) Fleischwirtschaft 74: 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altrogge DM, Topel DG, Cooper MA, Hallberg JH, Drapper DD (1980) J Anim Sci 51: 74–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rock E, Kozat-Reiss G (1987) Arch Biochem Biophys 256: 703–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim DH, Sreter FA, Tsuyoshi Onishi S, Ryan JF, Roberts J, Allen PD, Meszaros LG, Antoniu B, Ikemoto N (1984) Biochim Biophys Acta 775: 320–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fill M, Coronado R, Mickelson JR, Vilveen J, Ma J, Jacobson BA, Louis CF (1990) Biophys J 57: 471–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark MG, Williams CH, Pfeifer WF, Bloxham DP, Holland PC, Taylor CA, Lardy HA (1973) Nature 245: 99–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheah KS, Cheah AM (1981) Biochim Biophys Acta 634: 70–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheah KS (1984) Biochem Soc Trans 12: 358–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheah KS, Cheah AM, Waring JC (1986) Meat Sci 17: 37–53

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eikelenboom G, van den Bergh SG (1973) J Anim Sci 37: 692–696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwägele F, Honikel KO (1989) In: Hofmann JG, Schmidt A (eds) Malignant hyperthermia an update. Verlag Volk und Gesundheit, Berlin, pp 307–311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer K, Augustini C, Festerling A, Schmitten F (1987) Züchtungskunde 59: 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scopes RK (1977) Biochem J 161: 265–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scopes RK (1977) Biochem J 161: 253–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 227: 680–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodbard D, Chrambach A (1974) In: Allen RC, Maurer HR (eds) Electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 28–61

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frey MD, Kinzhofer A, Atta BM, Radola BJ (1986) Electrophoresis 7: 28–40

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pharmacia LKB (1989) In: 2117 Multiphor II electrophoresis system. Pharmacia LKB, Uppsala, Sweden, pp 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hjelmquist G, Andersson J, Edlund B, Engström L (1974) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2: 559–563

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barman TE (1969) Enzyme Handbook I and II. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ashizawa K, McPhie P, Lin KH, Cheng SY (1991) Biochemistry 30: 7105–7111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rijksen G, Van der Heijden MCM, Oskam R, Staal GEJ (1988) FEBS Lett 233: 69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kutzbach K, Bischofberger H, Hess B, Zimmermann-Telschow H (1973) Hoppe-Seylers Z Physiol Chem 354: 1473–1489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiffmeyer WR, Farrar WW (1991) J Prot Chem 10: 585–591

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berglund L, Ljungstrom O, Engstrom L (1977) J Biol Chem 252: 6108–6111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Engstrom L, Berglund L, Bergstrom G, Hjelmquist G, Ljungstrom O (1974) In: Richter D (ed) Lipman Symposium: Energy, regulation and biosynthesis in molecular biology. de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, pp 192–204

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matsuura R, Tanigawa Y, Tsuchiya M, Mishima K, Yoshimura Y, Shimoyama M (1988) Biochim Biophys Acta 969: 57–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oude W, Paschal A, Rijksen G, Mascini EM, Gerard EJ (1992) Biochim Biophys Acta 1121: 61–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoar CG, Nicoll GW, Schiltz E, Schmitt W, Bloxham DP, Byford MF, Dunbar B, Fothergill LA (1984) FEBS Lett 171: 293–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwägele, F., Haschke, C., Krauss, G. et al. Comparative studies of pyruvate kinase from PSE and normal pig muscles. Z Lebensm Unters Forch 203, 14–20 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267763

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267763

Key words

Navigation