Abstract
Demonstrating that there had been an ancient logical tradition native to the Tamil society, Nirmal Selvamony has, in a paper entitled, “The Syllogistic Circle in tolkaappiyam” (1990, 2000), identified the five-member syllogism central to the tradition. He has also shown that kaaNTikai had perfect application to Tamil didactic texts and was significantly different from the universally adopted Aristotelian three-member syllogism. The early tendency of the Tamils was to identify logic with philosophy and religion. Taking a departure from this tendency, he recovers the original definition of kaaNTikai from iLampuuraNaar’s commentary on tolkaappiyam. This chapter tries to identify the structure of arguments in Tamil didactic verses employing the kaaNTikai form. The application of kaaNTikai to diverse Tamil texts as an analytic tool has no hermeneutic intent, but the tool gets itself defined in the process. The argument of this chapter is that the efficiency of the different members of kaaNTikai can be better appreciated when their correspondence to those of the jurisprudential model of argument, described by Stephen Toulmin, is traced. Taking a clue from Toulmin, it is also argued that many Tamil didactic texts have what Collingwood calls “absolute presuppositions” and that these presuppositions have correspondence to “warrants” in the jurisprudential structure of argument. The ubiquitous analogy and recursive analogical reasoning found in Tamil texts can also be accommodated in this model of argument when the features of an analogy are seen as the “datum” in the jurisprudential model. This helps us overcome the problem in claiming application of logic to didactic texts of preceptorial tone, the arguments of which, though often seen as assertions and affirmations on authority, do have warrants and also backing for their warrants. The arguments of Tamil didactic verses, when cast in the kaaNTikai form of argument thus eclectically constructed, allow us to clearly see the unstated presupposition of every one of them.
References
Bartha, Paul. 2013. Analogy and analogical reasoning (3.2. “Aristotle’s Theory”). In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/reasoning-analogy/
Bose, Ram Chandra. 1986. Hindu philosophy popularly explained – The orthodox systems. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services.
Hiriyanna, M. 2013. Outlines of Indian philosophy. New Delhi: Surjeet Publications.
Kanakasabhai, V. 2000. The Tamils 1800 years ago. Tinnevelly: The Thirunelveli South India Saiva Siddhantha Works Publishing Society Ltd., Tinnevelly.
Llewelyn, John E. 1961. Collingwood’s doctrine of absolute presuppositions. The Philosophical Quarterly 11(42): 49–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2216679?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ramakrishnan, S. 2012. tamiz ilakkiya varalaaRu. Chennai: New Century Book House (P) Ltd.
Selvamony, Nirmal. 1990. The syllogistic circle in tolkaappiyam. 65th Session of the Indian Philosophical Congress. Madurai-Kamaraj University, Madurai, 27–29 Dec. Unpublished Paper.
Selvamony, Nirmal. 1996. tamizk kaaTci neRiyiyal [Methodology of tamiz philosophy]. International Institute of Tamil Studies: Chennai.
Selvamony, Nirmal. 2000. The syllogistic circle in tolkaappiyam. Journal of Tamil Studies 57 & 58: 117–134.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1964. The uses of argument. London: Cambridge University Press.
vanmiikanaatan, koo., trans. 2007. tirukkuRaL uraikkottu (with English translation of tirukkuRaL verses). Ed. taa. ma. veLLaivaaraNan. tiruppanantaaL: Sri kaacimaTam.
(The English translation of all Tamil verses, except those from tirukkuRaL, are by Thanga Jayaraman, the author of this essay)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature India Private Limited
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jayaraman, T. (2019). Logic in Tamil Didactic Literature. In: Sarukkai, S., Chakraborty, M. (eds) Handbook of Logical Thought in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_8-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_8-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1812-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Logic in Tamil Didactic Literature- Published:
- 31 December 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_8-3
-
Logic in Tamil Didactic Literature
- Published:
- 13 December 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_8-2
-
Original
Logic in Tamil Didactic Literature- Published:
- 27 September 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1812-8_8-1