Logic in Tamil Didactic Literature

Abstract

Demonstrating that there had been an ancient logical tradition native to the Tamil society, Nirmal Selvamony has, in his tamizk kaaTci neRiyiyal (1996), identified the five-member syllogism central to the tradition. kaaNTikai, an ancient Tamil word and concept, which Selvamony seeks to revivify and reconstruct, is a syllogism in the Tamil logical tradition. He also demonstrates that kaaNTikai has perfect application to Tamil didactic texts and is significantly different from the universally adopted Aristotelian three-member syllogism. The early tendency of the Tamils was to identify logic with philosophy and religion. Taking a departure, Selvamony (tamizk kaaTci neRiyiyal (Methodology of tamil philosophy). International Institute of Tamil Studies, Chennai (in Tamil), 1996) recovers and establishes Tamil logic in terms of the tradition, which he finds in the commentary of iLampuuraNaar on tolkaappiyam. Relying for the best part of its argument, on the work of Selvamony (tamizk kaaTci neRiyiyal (Methodology of tamil philosophy). International Institute of Tamil Studies, Chennai (in Tamil), 1996), which is as authoritative on the subject as it is exhaustive, this chapter tries to identify the structure of arguments in Tamil didactic verses employing kaaNTikai form. The application of kaaNTikai to texts as an analytic tool has no hermeneutic intent, but the tool gets itself defined in the process of its application to diverse Tamil didactic texts. The argument of this chapter is that the efficiency of the different members of kaaNTikai can be better appreciated when the correspondence of the members of kaaNTikai to those of the jurisprudential model of argument, described by Stephen Toulmin, is traced. Taking a clue from Toulmin, it is also argued that much of Tamil didactic texts have what Collingwood calls “absolute presuppositions” and that these presuppositions have a correspondence to “warrants” in the jurisprudential structure of argument. The ubiquitous analogy and recursive analogical reasoning found in Tamil texts can also be accommodated in this model of argument when the features of an analogy are seen as the “datum” in the jurisprudential model. This helps us overcome the problem in claiming application of logic to didactic texts of preceptorial tone, the arguments of which, though often seen as assertions and affirmations on authority, do have warrants and also backing for their warrants. The arguments of Tamil didactic verses, when cast in the kaaNTikai form of argument thus eclectically constructed, allow us to clearly see the unstated presupposition of every one of them.