Skip to main content

Contact Allergy to Dental Materials and Implants

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

Dental professionals and dental patients are exposed to the same sensitizers, but the outcome is very different. Dental professionals suffer predominantly from irritant contact dermatitis and to a lesser degree from allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates and rubber products. Dental patients rarely have allergic contact stomatitis. In this chapter, the reader will learn about the multiple factors that lead to irritant contact dermatitis and also about the major sensitizers, e.g., methacrylates in dentin bonding agents, dental composite resins (DCR), and prostheses, in addition to rubber chemicals, metals, fragrances, and disinfectants. The various sensitizers that may give lichenoid reactions in patients are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lyapina M, Krasteva A, Dencheva M, Tzekova M, Deliverska M, Kisselova-Yaneva A (2014) Health risk assessment of exposure to formaldehyde in dental materials. Published Online: 13 Feb 2014. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-013-0264-4

  2. Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis in dental personnel. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kanerva L, Lahtinen A, Toikkanen J et al (1999) Increase in occupational skin diseases of dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 40:104–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Estlander T et al (2000) Statistics on occupational dermatitis from (meth)acrylates in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 42:175–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrangsjö K, Swartling C, Meding B (2001) Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: contact dermatitis with special reference to (meth)acrylates in 174 patients. Contact Dermatitis 45:158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindberg M, Silverdahl M (2000) The use of protective gloves and the prevalence of hand eczema, skin complaints and allergy to natural rubber latex among dental personnel in the county of Uppsala, Sweden. Contact Dermatitis 43:4–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohlson C-G, Svensson L, Mossberg B et al (2001) Prevalence of contact dermatitis among dental personnel in a Swedish rural county. Swed Dent J 25:13–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lönnroth EC, Shahnavaz H (1998) Adverse health reactions in skin, eyes, and respiratory tract among dental personnel in Sweden. Swed Dent J 22:33–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Munksgaard EC, Hansen EK, Engen T et al (1996) Self reported occupational dermatological reactions among Danish dentists. Eur J Oral Sci 104:396–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wallenhammar L-M, Örtengren U, Andreasson H et al (2000) Contact allergy and hand eczema in Swedish dentists. Contact Dermatitis 43:192–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunisada M, Adachi A, Asano H et al (2002) Anaphylaxis due to formaldehyde released from root canal disinfectant. Contact Dermatitis 47:215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alanko K, Susitaival P, Jolanki R et al (2004) Occupational skin diseases among dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis 50:77–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gawkrodger DJ (2005) Investigation of reactions to dental materials. Br J Dermatol 153:479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanerva L, Estlander T (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from colophony in 2 dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis 41:342–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mürer AJL, Poulsen OM, Roed-Petersen J et al (1995) Skin problems among Danish dental technicians. A cross-sectional study. Contact Dermatitis 33:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ (1996) Occupational skin disease in dental laboratory workers. (I) Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis 34:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mürer AJL, Poulsen OM, Tüchsen F et al (1995) Rapid increase in skin problems among dental technicians trainees working with acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 33:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meding B, Hosseiny S, Wrangsjö K et al (2004) Hand eczema, skin exposure and glove use in dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis 50:203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cockayne SE, Murphy R, Gawkrodger DJ (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis from colophonium in a dental technician. Contact Dermatitis 44:42–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kocak O, Gul U (2014) Patch test results of the dental personnel with contact dermatitis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 33:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rai R, Dinakar D, Kurian SS, Bndoo YA (2014) Investigation of contact allergy to dental materials by patch testing. Indian Dermatol Online J 5:282–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramos L, Cabral R, Gonçalo M (2014) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates and methacrylates – a 7-year study. Contact Dermatitis 71:102–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Agrawal A, Bhatt N, Shivlingesh KK, Singh K, Chaundhary H, Asawa K (2010) Prevalence of allergy to latex gloves among dental professionals in Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. Oral Health Prev Dent 8:345–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Estlander T, Rajaniemi R, Jolanki R (1984) Hand dermatitis in dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis 10:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Uveges RE, Grimwood RE, Slawsky LD et al (1995) Epidemiology of hand dermatitis in dental personnel. Mil Med 160:335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobsen N, Aasenden R, Hensten-Pettersen A (1991) Occupational health complaints and adverse patient reactions as perceived by personnel in public dentistry. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 19:155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Camarasa JG (1995) Health personnel. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rumayor Piña A, Martinez Martinez M, Toral Rizo VH, Ajudarte Lopes M, Paes de Almeida O (2012) Cutaneous amalgam tattoo in a dental professional: an unreported occupational argyria. Br J Dermatol 167:1184–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. LeSueur BW, Yiannias JA (2003) Contact stomatitis. Dermatol Clin 21:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buchner A, Hansen LS (1980) Amalgam pigmentation (amalgam tattoo) of the oral mucosa. A clinicopathologic study of 268 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 49(2):139–147. ISSN: 0030-4220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goon ATJ, Isaksson M, Zimerson E et al (2006) Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 55:219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O et al (2007) Methacrylate and acrylate allergy in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 57:324–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanerva L, Mikola H-E (1998) Fingertip paresthesia and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylics in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 38:114–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanerva L, Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Estlander T et al (1997) Dentist’s occupational allergic paronychia and contact dermatitis caused by acrylics. Eur J Dermatol 7:177–180

    Google Scholar 

  35. Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Svedman C (2007) Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from methacrylates in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 57:371–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaaber S, Thulin H, Nielsen E (1979) Skin sensitivity to denture base materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis 5:90–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Waakker-Garritsen BG, Timmer LH, Nater JP (1975) Etiological factors in the denture sore mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis 1:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Peluso AM (1997) Contact and irritant stomatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg 16:314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman S, Stephens R (1999) Cheilitis: analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic. Am J Contact Dermat 10:198–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Andersen KE (1978) Contact allergy to toothpaste flavors. Contact Dermatitis 4:195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Le Coz C-J, Bezard M (1999) Allergic contact cheilitis due to effervescent dental cleanser: combined responsibilities of the allergen persulfate and prosthesis porosity. Contact Dermatitis 41:268–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schena D, Fantuzzi F, Girolomoni G (2008) Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 18:688–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Holmes G, Freeman S (2001) Cheilitis caused by contact urticaria to mint flavoured toothpaste. Australas J Dermatol 42:43–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Muris J, Goossens A, Gonçalo M, Bircher AJ, Giménez-Arnau A, Foti C, Rustemeyer T, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ (2015) Sensitization to palladium and nickel in Europe and the relationship with oral disease and dental alloys. Contact Dermatitis 72:286–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Martin MD, Broughton S, Drangsholt M (2003) Oral lichen planus and dental materials: a case-control study. Contact Dermatitis 48:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Götrick B (2009) Lichen i munhålan. (in Swedish). Läkemedelsbulletinen 3:3

    Google Scholar 

  47. McParland H, Warnakulasuriya S (2012) Oral lichenoid contact lesions to mercury and dental amalgam-a review. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:589569. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/589569. Epub Jul 24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Pang BK, Freeman S (1995) Oral lichenoid lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings. Contact Dermatitis 33:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Laine J, Kalimo K, Happonen R-P (1997) Contact allergy to dental restorative materials in patients with oral lichenoid lesions. Contact Dermatitis 36:141–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Scalf LA, Fowler JF Jr, Morgan KW (2001) Dental metal allergy in patients with oral, cutaneous, and genital lichenoid reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 12:146–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yiannias JA, el-Azhary RA, Hand JH et al (2000) Relevant contact sensitivities in patients with the diagnosis of oral lichen planus. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Athavale PN, Shum KW, Yeoman CM, Gawkrodger DJ (2003) Oral lichenoid lesions and contact allergy to dental mercury and gold. Contact Dermatitis 49:264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dunsche A, Kastel I, Terheyden H et al (2003) Oral lichenoid reactions associated with amalgam: improvement after amalgam removal. Br J Dermatol 148:70–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Koch P, Bahmer FA (1999) Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical, allergological and histologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol 41:422–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wong L, Freeman S (2003) Oral lichenoid lesions and mercury in amalgam fillings. Contact Dermatitis 48:74–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sockanathan S, Setterfield J, Wakelin S (2003) Oral lichenoid reaction due to chromate/cobalt in dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 48:342–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Thanyavuthi A, Boonchai W, Kasemsarn P (2016) Amalgam contact allergy in oral lichenoid lesions. Dermatitis 27:215–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kaaber S (1990) Allergy to dental materials with special reference to the use of amalgam and polymethylmethacrylate. Int Dent J 40:359–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kroona L, Warfvinge G, Isaksson M, Ahlgren C, Dahlin J, Sörensen Ö, Bruze M (2017) Quantification of l-carvone in toothpastes available on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis 77:224–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. International Fragrance Association. l-carvone: 6485-40-1, 2009. http://www.infraorg.org/en-us/standards. Updated 2009. Accessed 15 Aug 2016

  61. Ahlgren C, Axéll T, Möller H, Isaksson M, Liedholm R, Bruze M (2014) Contact allergies to potential allergens in patients with oral lichen lesions. Clin Oral Investig 18:227–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kroona L, Isaksson M, Ahlgren C, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Warfvinge G (2018) Carvone contact allergy in Southern Sweden: a 21-year retrospective study. Acta Derm Venereol 98:938–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kroona L, Ahlgren C, Bruze M, Dahlin J, Isaksson M, Warfvinge G (2018) Use test with l-carvone in toothpaste on sensitized individuals. Kroona L. Doctoral thesis, Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology. https://doi.org/10.24834/978-91-7104-966-7

  64. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1994) Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession. Dermatol Clin 12:517–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1995) Dental problems. In: Guin JD (ed) Practical contact dermatitis. A handbook for the practitioner. McGraw-Hill, New York/St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  66. Moody WL (1941) Severe reaction from acrylic liquid. Dent Digest 47:305

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stevenson WJ (1941) Methyl-methacrylate dermatitis. Contact Point 18:171–173

    Google Scholar 

  68. Fisher AA (1954) Allergic sensitization of skin and oral mucosa to acrylic denture materials. J Am Med Assoc 156:238–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fisher AA (1975) Contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lowney ED (1968) Tolerance of a control sensitizer in man. Lancet 11:1137

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 20:201–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bowen RL (1962) Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bisphenol A and glycidyl acrylate. US Patent 3,066,112

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nethercott JR (1981) Allergic contact dermatitis due to an epoxy acrylate. Br J Dermatol 104:697–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Axell T, Björkner B, Fregert S, Niklasson B (1983) Standard patch test series for screening of contact allergy to dental materials. Contact Dermatitis 9:82–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS (2017) New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res 96:1085–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Boaro LC, Gonçalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, Braga RR (2010) Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low shrinkage restorative composites. Dent Mater 26:1144–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Magno MB, Nascimento GCR, da Rocha YSP, d’Paula Gonçalves Ribeiro B, Loretto SC, Maia LC (2016) Silorane-based composite resin restorations are not better than conventional composites – a meta-analysis of clinical studies. J Adhes Dent 18:375–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre JP (2014) Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater 30:16–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wu J, Weir MD, Melo MA, Xu HH (2015) Development of novel self-healing and antibacterial dental composite containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles. J Dent 43:317–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 21:1201–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Son SA, Park JK, Seo DG, Ko CC, Kwon YH (2017) How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites? Clin Oral Investig 21:559–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Yuan H, Li M, Guo B, Gao Y, Liu H, Li J (2015) Evaluation of microtensile bond strength and microleakage of a self-adhering flowable composite. J Adhes Dent 17:535–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang N, Chen C, Melo MA, Bai YX, Cheng L, Xu HH (2015) A novel protein repellent dental composite containing 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine. Int J Oral Sci 7:103–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Geukens S, Goossens A (2001) Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 44:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Niinimäki A, Rosberg J, Saari S (1983) Allergic stomatitis from acrylic compounds. Contact Dermatitis 9:148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kanerva L, Alanko K (1998) Stomatitis and perioral dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylates in dental composite resins. J Am Acad Dermatol 38:116–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Martin N, Bell HK, Longman LP et al (2003) Orofacial reactions to methacrylates in dental materials: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 90:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Guerra L, Vincenzi C, Peluso AM et al (1993) Role of contact sensitizer in the burning mouth syndrome. Am J Contact Dermat 4:154–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Suuronen K, Jolanki R et al (2004) Methacrylates in dental restorative materials. Contact Dermatitis 50:233–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Aalto-Korte K, Jungewelter S, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R (2009) Contact allergy to epoxy (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 61:9–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R et al (1992) Occupational pharyngitis associated with allergic patch test reactions from acrylics. Allergy 47:571–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Kari O et al (1996) Occupational conjunctivitis associated with type IV allergy to methacrylates. Allergy 51:56–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sala E, Hytönen M, Tupasela O et al (1996) Occupational laryngitis with immediate allergic or immediate type specific chemical hypersensitivity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 21:42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lindström M, Alanko K, Keskinen H, Kanerva L (2002) Dentist’s occupational asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and allergic contact dermatitis from methacrylates. Allergy 57:543–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Agner T, Menné T (1994) Sensitization to acrylates in a dental patient. Contact Dermatitis 30:249–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Rolls S, Chowdhury MM, Cooper S et al (2019) Recommendation to include hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate in the British baseline patch test series. Br J Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17708

  97. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R et al (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis 28:268–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer E-U (2004) Residual methyl methacrylate monomers, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 92:72–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Finnish Advisory Board of Chemicals (1992) Acrylate compounds: uses and evaluation of health effects. Government Printing Centre, Helsinki, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R et al (1994) Dermatitis from acrylates in dental personnel. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  101. Van der Walle HB (1982) Sensitizing potential of acrylic monomers in guinea pig. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, Krips Repro Meppel, pp 1–112

    Google Scholar 

  102. Kobayashi T, Sakuraoka K, Hasegawa Y et al (1996) Contact dermatitis to an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 35:370–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Kanzaki T, Kabasawa Y, Jinno T et al (1989) Contact stomatitis due to methyl methacrylate monomer. Contact Dermatitis 20:146–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. van Joost TH, van Ulsen J, van Loon LAJ (1988) Contact allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis 18:97–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Corazza M, Virgili A, Martina S (1992) Allergic contact stomatitis from methyl methacrylate in a dental prosthesis, with persistent patch test reaction. Contact Dermatitis 26:210–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Ölveti É (1991) Contact dermatitis from an acrylic-metal dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 24:57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Ruiz-Genao DP, Moreno de Vega MJ, Sánchez Pérez J et al (2003) Labial edema due to an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 48:273–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Menni S, Lodi A, Coassini A et al (2003) Unusual widespread vesicular eruption related to dental composite resin sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 48:174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Lunder T, Rogi-Butina M (2000) Chronic urticaria from acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 43:232–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Bauer A, Wollina U (1998) Denture-induced local and systemic reactions to acrylate. Allergy 53:722–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Calnan CD, Stevenson CJ (1963) Studies in contact dermatitis. XV. Dental materials. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol 49:9–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Kanerva L, Tarvainen K, Estlander T et al (1994) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by mercury and benzoyl peroxide. Eur J Dermatol 4:359–361

    Google Scholar 

  113. Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  114. Quirce S, Olaguibel JM, Garcia BE et al (1993) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis due to benzoylperoxide. Contact Dermatitis 29:165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Boecker AF, Morton D, Poser S, Dette KE (2008) Release of dibenzoyl peroxide from polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins: an in vitro evaluation. Dent Mater 24:1602–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Tosti A, Bardazzi F, Piancastelli E et al (1990) Contact stomatitis due to N, N-dimethyl-paratoluidine. Contact Dermatitis 22:113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Verschueren GLA, Bryunzeel DP (1991) Allergy to N, N-dimethyl-p-toluidine in dental materials. Contact Dermatitis 24:149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1993) Dentist’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut diethanolamide, N-ethyl-4-toluene sulphonamide and 4-tolyldiethanolamine. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 73:126–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Chaubal TV, Bapat RA, Shetty D (2017) Allergic contact stomatitis caused by camphorquinone in a light cure periodontal dressing. Contact Dermatitis 77:250–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Torres V, Mano-Azul AC, Correia T et al (1993) Allergic contact cheilitis and stomatitis from hydroquinone in an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 29:102–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Björkner B, Niklasson B (1997) Contact allergy to the UV absorber Tinuvin P in a dental restorative material. Am J Contact Dermat 8:6–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman M-L et al (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from bisphenol A in PVC gloves. Contact Dermatitis 49:202–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylate in ultraviolet-light-cured paint, and bisphenol A in dental composite resin. Contact Dermatitis 33:94–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Koch P (2003) Allergic contact stomatitis from BIS-GMA and epoxy resins in dental bonding agents. Contact Dermatitis 49:104–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Johns DA, Hemaraj S, Varoli RK (2014) The patch tests revealed a strong positive reaction to bis-GMA tested 2% in pet. Indian J Dent Res 25(2):266–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Tomb RR, Lepoittevin J-P, Durepaire F et al (1993) Ectopic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate instant adhesives. Contact Dermatitis 28:206–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Isaksson M, Siemund I, Bruze M (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylcyanoacrylate in an office worker with artificial nails led to months of sick leave. Contact Dermatitis 57:346–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Nicholson JW, Czarnacka B (2008) The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 24:1702–1708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1997) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic tri-cure glass ionomer. Contact Dermatitis 37:49–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Ryokawa H, Miyazaki F, FUjishima A et al (2006) The mechanical properties of dental thermoplastic materials in a simulated intraoral environmental. Orthod Waves 65:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Thavarajah R, Thennukoda RA (2015) Analysis of adverse events with use of orthodontic sequential aligners as reported in the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. Indian J Dent Res 26(6):582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Awosika O, Kao S, Rengifo-Pardo M, Ehrlich A (2017) Angioedema, stomatitis, and urticaria caused by contact allergy to Invisalign. Dermatitis 28:323–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Ölveti É, Hegedus C (1994) Contact allergy reactions to Silodent impression material (in Hungarian). Fogorv Sz 87:115–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Batchelor JM, Todd PM (2010) Allergic contact stomatitis caused by a polyether dental impression material. Contact Dermatitis 63:296–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Mittermuller P, Szeimies RM, Landthaler M, Schmalz G (2012) A rare allergy to polyether impression dental material. Clin Oral Investig 16:1111–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Rice CD, Barker BF, Kestenbaum T et al (1992) Intraoral vesicles occurring after alginate impressions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74:698–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Camarasa G (1975) Occupational dermatitis from beeswax. Contact Dermatitis 1:124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Van Ketel WG (1977) Reactions to dental impression materials. Contact Dermatitis 3:55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Kanerva L (1997) Product analysis of acrylic resins compared to information given in material safety data sheets. Contact Dermatitis 36:164–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Bruze M, Trulsson L, Bendsoe N (1992) Patch testing with ultrasonic bath extracts. Am J Contact Dermat 3:133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Aalto-Korte K, Ackermann L, Henriks-Eckerman ML et al (2007) 1, 2-benzisothiazolin-3-one in disposable polyvinyl chloride gloves for medical use. Contact Dermatitis 57:365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Mäkelä EA, Väänänen V, Alanko K et al (1999) Resistance of disposable gloves to permeation by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Occup Hyg 5:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  143. Boman A, Röndell E, Sandborgh-Englund G et al (1999) Contamination and protection during dental work. In: 12th International contact dermatitis symposium, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  144. Andersson T, Bruze M, Björkner B (1999) In vivo testing of the protection of gloves against acrylates in dentin-bonding systems on patients with known contact allergy to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 41:254–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Andersson T, Bruze M, Gruvberger B et al (2000) In vivo testing of the protection provided by non-latex gloves against a 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-containing acetone-based dentin-bonding product. Acta Derm Venereol 80:435–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Vilaplana J, Romaguera C, Cornellana F (1994) Contact dermatitis and adverse oral mucous membrane reactions related to the use of dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis 30:80–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Spiechowicz E, Glantz PO, Axell T et al (1999) A long-term follow-up of allergy to nickel among fixed prostheses wearers. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 7:41–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Haberman AL, Pratt M, Storrs FJ (1993) Contact dermatitis from beryllium in dental alloys. Contact Dermatitis 28:157–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Veien NK, Borchorst E, Hattel T et al (1994) Stomatitis or systemically-induced contact dermatitis from metal wire in orthodontic materials. Contact Dermatitis 30:210–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Hensten-Pettersen A, Gjerdet NR, Kvam E et al (1984) Nikkelallergi og kjeveortopedisk behandling. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid (in Norwegian) 94:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  151. Kanerva L, Rantanen T, Aalto-Korte K et al (2001) A multicenter study of patch test reactions with dental screening series. Am J Contact Dermat 12:83–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Khamaysi Z, Bergman R, Weltfriend S (2006) Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Contact Dermatitis 55:216–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Pföhler C, Vogt T, Müller CS (2016) Contact allergic gastritis: rare manifestation of a metal allergy. Hautarzt 67(5):359–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-016-3773-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Wahlberg JE (2000) Other metals. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  155. Müller-Quernheim J, Zissel G, Schopf R et al (1996) Differential diagnosis of berylliosis/sarcoidosis in a dental technician (in German). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 121:1462–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Burrows D (1986) Hypersensitivity to mercury, nickel and chromium in relation to dental materials. Int Dent J 36:30–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Guimaraens D, Gonzalez MA, Condé-Salazar L (1994) Systemic contact dermatitis from dental crowns. Contact Dermatitis 30:124–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Hubler WR Jr, Hubler WR Sr (1983) Dermatitis from chromium dental plate. Contact Dermatitis 9:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Uter W, Rämsch C, Aberer W et al (2009) The European baseline series in 10 European countries, 2005/2006 – results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis 61:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Imam H, Benetti AR, Özhayat EB, Pedersen AML, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP, Jellesen MS, Gotfredsen K (2016) Cobalt release and complications resulting from the use of dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis 75:377–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Glendenning WE (1971) Allergy to cobalt in metal denture as a cause of hand dermatitis. Contact Dermat Newslett 10:225–226

    Google Scholar 

  162. Morris A, English J (1998) Copper is unlikely to cause contact allergy. BMJ 316:1902–1903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M et al (2001) Copper allergy revisited. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:863–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Karlberg A-T, Boman A, Wahlberg JE (1983) Copper – a rare sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 9:134–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  166. Santosh V, Ranjith K, Shenoi SD et al (1999) Results of patch testing with dental materials. Contact Dermatitis 40:50–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Gerhardsson L, Björkner B, Karlsteen M et al (2002) Copper allergy from dental copper amalgam? Sci Total Environ 290:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Bruze M, Björkner B (1996) Patch testing with gold sodium thio-sulfate. Abstract 49, Jadassohn Centenary Congress, London

    Google Scholar 

  169. Möller H, Ahnlide I, Gruvberger B et al (2004) Gold trichloride as a marker of contact allergy to gold. Contact Dermatitis 50:176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Ahlgren C, Ahnlide I, Björkner B et al (2002) Contact allergy to gold is correlated to dental gold. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 82:41–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Björkner B, Bruze M, Möller H (1994) High frequency of contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate. An indication of gold allergy? Contact Dermatitis 30:144–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Bruze M, Edman B, Björkner B et al (1994) Clinical relevance of contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate. J Am Acad Dermatol 31:579–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. McKenna KE, Dolan O, Walsh MY (1995) Contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis 32:143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Laeijendecker R, van Joost T (1994) Oral manifestations of gold allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Marcusson JA, Cederbrant K, Heilborn J (1998) Indium and iridium allergy in patients exposed to dental alloys. Contact Dermatitis 38:297–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Pardo J, Rodriguez-Serna M, de la Cuadra J et al (2004) Allergic contact stomatitis due to manganese in a dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 50:41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Jalili S, Bruze M, Isaksson M (2008) Contact allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Elective study. Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö

    Google Scholar 

  178. Ancona A, Ramos M, Suarez R et al (1982) Mercury sensitivity in a dentist. Contact Dermatitis 8:218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Goh CL, Ng SK (1988) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from metallic mercury. Contact Dermatitis 19:232–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Kanerva L, Komulainen M, Estlander T et al (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mercury. Contact Dermatitis 28:26–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E et al (1996) Nickel allergy in adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:148–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Volkmann KK, Inda MJ, Reichl PG et al (2007) Adverse reactions to orthodontic appliances in nickel-allergic patients. Allergy Asthma Proc 28:480–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Feilzer AJ, Laeijendecker R, Kleverlaan CJ (2008) Facial eczema because of orthodontic fixed retainer wires. Contact Dermatitis 59:118–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Shutty BG, Scheiman PL (2018) Allergic contact mucositis caused by metal: a covertly located permanent dental retainer. Contact Dermatitis 78:88–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Kerosuo H, Kanerva L (1997) Systemic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in a stainless steel orthodontic appliance. Contact Dermatitis 36:112–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Wataha JC, Hanks CT (1996) Biological effects of palladium and risk of using palladium in dental casting alloys. J Oral Rehabil 23:309–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Hindsén M, Spirén A, Bruze M (2005) Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 53:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Muris J, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ, Rustemeyer T (2008) Sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2[PdCl4]) as an improved test salt for palladium allergy patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 58:42–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Menné T, Andersen KE, Kaaber K et al (1987) Tin: an overlooked contact sensitizer? Contact Dermatitis 16:9–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Dunlapp CL, Vincent SK, Barker BF (1989) Allergic reaction to orthodontic wire. JAMA 118:449–450

    Google Scholar 

  191. Schweitzer A (1997) Erstfeststellung einer Titan-Allergie. Dermatosen 45:190

    Google Scholar 

  192. Jalili S, Bruze M, Isaksson M (2008) 11 years of patch testing with titanium in the dental series. In: Abstract European Society of Contact Dermatitis meeting, Estoril

    Google Scholar 

  193. Hosoki M, Nishigawa K, Miyamoto Y, Ohe G, Matsuka Y (2016) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by titanium screws and dental implants. J Prosthodont Res 60:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Fage SW, Muris J, Jakobsen SS, Thyssen JP (2016) Titanium: a review on exposure, release, penetration, allergy, epidemiology, and clinical reactivity. Contact Dermatitis 74:323–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G et al (2008) Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:823–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. de Graaf NPJ, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Bontkes H, Gibbs S, Rustemeyer T (2018) A retrospective study on titanium sensitivity: patch test materials and manifestations. Contact Dermatitis 79:85–90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Linauskiene K, Malinauskiene L, Blaziene A (2017) Metals are important contact sensitizers: an experience from Lithuania. Biomed Res Int 2017:3964045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3964045. Epub 2017 Mar 16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  198. Yanagi T, Shimizu T, Abe R et al (2005) Zinc dental fillings and palmoplantar pustulosis. Lancet 366:1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Flyvholm M-A (2000) Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  200. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Page E (1988) Occupational contact dermatitis due to glutaraldehyde in health care workers. Contact Dermatitis 18:193–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Cusano F, Luciano S (1993) Contact allergy to benzalkonium chloride and glutaraldehyde in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 28:127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Kanerva L, Miettinen P, Alanko K et al (2000) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from glyoxal, glutaraldehyde and neomycin sulfate in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 42:116–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Velázques D, Zamberk P, Suárez R et al (2009) Allergic contact dermatitis to povidone-iodine. Contact Dermatitis 60:348–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Ancona A, de la Torre RS, Macotela E (1985) Allergic contact dermatitis from povidone-iodine. Contact Dermatitis 13:66–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Kanerva L, Estlander T (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by povidone-iodine (Betadine). Environ Dermatol 6:101–104

    Google Scholar 

  206. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Jolanki R et al (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from potassium persulfate. Contact Dermatitis 40:116–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Bhalla M, Thami GP (2003) Acute urticaria due to dental eugenol. Allergy 58:158; 137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1998) Dental nurse’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis from eugenol used as a restorative dental material with polymethylmethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 38:339–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Sanchez-Herrero A, Vergara-de Caso E, Vera-Alvarez S, Espinosa-Hidalgo I, Silvestre Salvador JF (2019) Burning mouth syndrome triggered by cinnamal present in a denture fixative cream. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13267. [Epub ahead of print]

  210. Isaksson M, Bruze M, Björkner B, Niklasson B (1993) Contact allergy to Duraphat. Scand J Dent Res 101:49–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Hausen BM (1984) Zahnpasta-Allergie. Dtsch Med Wschr 109:300–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Morton CA, Garioch J, Todd P et al (1995) Contact sensitivity to menthol and peppermint in patients with intra-oral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis 32:281–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Larsen KR, Johansen JD, Reibel J, Zachariae C, Pedersen ML (2017) Symptomatic oral lesions may be associated with contact allergy to substances in oral hygiene products. Clin Oral Investig 21:2543–2551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Klein CE, Gall H (1991) Type IV allergy to amide-type local anesthetics. Contact Dermatitis 25:45–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Fregert S, Tegner E, Thelin I (1979) Contact allergy to lidocaine. Contact Dermatitis 5:185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K et al (2005) The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 53:292–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Bruze M, Hedman H, Björkner B et al (1995) The development and course of test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis 33:386–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Helton J, Storrs F (1994) The burning mouth syndrome: lack of a role for contact urticaria and contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 31:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Virgili A, Corazza M, Trombelli L et al (1996) Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 76:488–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. Dutree Meulenberg RO, Kozel MM, van Joost T (1992) Burning mouth syndrome: a possible etiological role for local contact hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:935–940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 18:10–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Kanerva L, Lauerma AI (1988) Iatrogenic acrylate allergy complicating amalgam allergy. Contact Dermatitis 38:58–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. Bruze M, Björkner B, Lepoittevin JP (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E et al (2008) Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 59:307–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. Goon ATJ, Bruze M, Zimerson E et al (2007) Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 57:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. Boxer MB, Grammer LC, Orfan N (1994) Gutta-percha allergy in a health care worker with latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 93:943–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K et al (1999) Incidence rates of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 40:329–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. Wrangsjö K, Osterman K, Hage-Hamsten M (1994) Glove-related skin symptoms among operating theatre and dental unit personnel. (II). Clinical examination, tests and laboratory findings indicating latex allergy. Contact Dermatitis 30:139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Leggat PA, Smith DR (2006) Prevalence of hand dermatoses related to latex exposure amongst dentists in Queensland, Australia. Int Dent J 56:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Piirilä P, Hodgson U, Estlander T et al (2002) Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity in dental personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:209–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  231. Kanerva L (1997) Contact urticaria from dental products. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome. CRC/LLC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  232. Grade AC, Martens BPM (1989) Chronic urticaria due to dental eugenol. Dermatologica 178:217–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Krautheim AB, Jermann THM, Bircher AJ (2004) Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 50:113–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Calnan CD (1962) Contact dermatitis from drugs. Proc R Soc Med 55:39–42

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  235. Torresani C, Caprari E, Manara GC (1993) Contact urticaria syndrome due to phenylmercuric acetate. Contact Dermatitis 29:282–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. Ockenfels HM, Seemann U, Goos M et al (1995) Allergy to fibrin tissue in dental medicine. Contact Dermatitis 32:363–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. Wüthrich B, Bianchi-Kusch E, Johansson SG (1996) Allergic urticaria and angioedema caused by a hemostatic sponge of bovine fibrin used in tooth extraction. Allergy 51:49–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Tupasela O et al (1993) Immediate and delayed allergy to nickel with contact urticaria, rhinitis, asthma and contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy 23:306–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. Espana A, Alonso ML, Soria C et al (1989) Chronic urticaria after implantation of 2 nickel-containing dental prostheses in a nickel-allergic patient. Contact Dermatitis 21:204–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. Schena D, Barba A, Costa G (1996) Occupational contact urticaria to cisplatin. Contact Dermatitis 34:220–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. Bergman A, Svedberg U, Nilsson E (1995) Contact urticaria and anaphylactic reactions caused by occupational exposure to iridium salt. Contact Dermatitis 32:14–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. Murdoch RD, Pepys J (1987) Platinum group metal sensitivity: reactivity to platinum group metal salts in platinum halide salt-sensitive workers. Ann Allergy 59:464–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  243. Murdoch RD, Pepys J, Hughes EG (1986) IgE-antibody response to platinum group metals: a large scale refinery survey. Br J Ind Med 43:37–43

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. Camarasa JG, Serra-Baldrich E, Lluch M et al (1993) Contact urticaria from sodium fluoride. Contact Dermatitis 28:294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  245. Sainio E-L, Kanerva L (1995) Contact allergens in toothpastes and a review of their hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 33:100–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Savonius B, Keskinen H, Tuppurainen M et al (1993) Occupational respiratory disease caused by acrylates. Clin Exp Allergy 23:416–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  247. Lozewicz S, Davison AG, Hopkirk A et al (1985) Occupational asthma due to methyl methacrylate and cyanoacrylates. Thorax 40:836–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  248. Piirilä P, Kanerva L, Keskinen H et al (1998) Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity caused by preparations containing acrylates in dental personnel. Clin Exp Allergy 28:1404–1411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Wenk KS, Ehrich A (2012) Isocyanates. Dermatitis 23:130–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  250. Premaraj T, Simet S, Beatty M et al (2014) Oral epithelial cell reaction after exposure to Invisalign plastic material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marléne Isaksson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Isaksson, M., Rustemeyer, T., Antelmi, A. (2020). Contact Allergy to Dental Materials and Implants. In: Johansen, J., Mahler, V., Lepoittevin, JP., Frosch, P. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_39-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_39-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Contact Allergy to Dental Materials and Implants
    Published:
    10 June 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_39-2

  2. Original

    Dental Materials and Implants
    Published:
    21 December 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_39-1