Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the microhardness, polymerization shrinkage, and translucency of bulk-fill composites (BFCs) which have different light attenuation properties and filler contents.

Materials and methods

Five BFCs [Filtek Bulk Fill (FB), SureFil SDR (SS), Venus Bulk Fill (VB), SonicFill (SF), and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TB)] and two resin-based composites (RBCs) [Tetric N-Ceram (TN) and Filtek Z350XT Flowable (ZF)] were chosen. Numbers of transmitted photons, refractive index, microhardness at different thicknesses, polymerization shrinkage, and translucency parameter (TP) were evaluated.

Results

Attenuation coefficients (ACs) based on measured photons ranged from −0.88 to −1.90. BFCs, except SF, had lower AC values than TN or ZF, and BFCs, except TN, had smaller refractive index decreases between top and bottom surfaces. Regardless of an exponential decrease in photon counts, microhardness decreased linearly as specimen thickens. Moreover, microhardness of BFCs showed smaller top-to-bottom decreases (11.5–48.8 %) than TN or ZF (57.3 and 71.5 %, respectively). BFCs with low filler contents showed lower microhardness and higher polymerization shrinkage than those of high filler contents. Also, BFCs had significantly higher (p < 0.001) TP values than TN or ZF.

Conclusion

BFCs attenuated light less than RBCs. However, some BFCs had much lower top surface microhardness and higher polymerization shrinkage than tested RBCs.

Clinical relevance

Despite the convenience of bulk filling, careful selection of BFC is advised because some BFCs have worse microhardness and polymerization shrinkage than RBCs due to their lower filler contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1988) Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 67:841–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai JH, Johnson AE (1993) Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 9:139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 27:29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2008) How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 24:1501–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U (2015) Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent 40:190–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ilie N, Stark K (2015) Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 19:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilie N, Stark K (2014) Curing behaviour of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent 42:977–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2013) Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 29:269–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P (2008) Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res 87:84–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita K, Nishiyama N, Nemoto K, Okada T, Ikemi T (2005) Effect of base monomer’s refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. Dent Mater J 24:403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taira M, Suzuki H, Toyooka H, Yamaki M (1994) Refractive index of inorganic fillers in seven visible-light-cured composite resins. J Mater Sci Lett 13:68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M (2013) Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 38:618–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V (2008) Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 24:901–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Saleh B, Nabih S (2016) Cuspal deflection of premolars restored with bulk-fill composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 28:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ (2012) Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent 40:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosatto CM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ (2015) Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent 43:1519–1528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G (2014) Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 42:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O (2002) The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87:642–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arikawa H, Kanie T, Fujii K, Takahashi H, Ban S (2007) Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. Dent Mater J 26:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Emami N, Sjodahl M, Soderholm K-JM (2005) How filler properties, filler fraction, sample thickness and light source affect light attenuation in particulate filled resin composites. Dent Mater 21:721–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Musanje L, Darvell BW (2005) Curing-light attenuation in filled-resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 22:804–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts DC, Cash AJ (1994) Analysis of optical transmission by 400-500 nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 22:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richerson DW (1982) Modern ceramic engineering. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fujita K, Ikemi T, Nishiyama N (2011) Effects of particle size of silica filler on polymerization conversion in a light-curing resin composite. Dent Mater 27:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirabayashi S, Hirasawa T (1990) Improvements to light transmittance in light-cured composite resins by the utilisation of low refractive index dimethacrylates. Dent Mater J 9:203–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ogunyinka A, Palin WM, Shortall AC, Marquis PM (2007) Photoinitiation chemistry affects light transmission and degree of conversion of curing experimental dental resin composites. Dent Mater 23:807–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S, Fey T, Belli R, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Taschner M (2015) Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 31:293–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR (2010) Contraction stress related to composite inorganic content. Dent Mater 26:704–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyasaka T, Okamura H (2009) Dimensional change measurements of conventional and flowable composite resins using a laser displacement sensor. Dent Mater J 28:544–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salgado VE, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, Schneider LF (2013) The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites. J Dent 41:e45–e53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Hoon Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The work has no source of funding to report.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Son, SA., Park, JK., Seo, DG. et al. How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites?. Clin Oral Invest 21, 559–565 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1920-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1920-2

Keywords

Navigation