Abstract
This chapter introduces Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797) as a woman, mother, scholar, writer, and wife/lover. The following entry describes how her tumultuous upbringing played a role in how she viewed society and how that influenced her later writings on rights for men and women. It then moves into her influences and motivations as an eighteenth-century English woman. From there, the authors analyze her key contributions to various disciplines such as education, feminism, politics, and philosophy. The new insights modern theorists gained from (re)analyzing her key works inform many current trends in those same disciplines and comprise the next section. But as with any prolific figure, her work and ideas are not without criticism, as the Legacies and Unfinished Business section delineate. The article concludes with references and a list for further reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker-Benfield, G. J. (1989). Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-century commonwealth women. Journal of the History of Ideas, 50(1), 95–115.
Botting, E. H. (2006). Mary Wollstonecraft’s enlightened legacy: The “modern social imaginary” of the egalitarian family. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(5), 687–701.
Burke, B. (2004). Mary Wollstonecraft on education. The encyclopedia of informal education. http://infed.org/mobi/mary-wollstonecraft-on-education/. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
Caine, B. (1997). Victorian feminism and the ghost of Mary Wollstonecraft. Women’s Writing, 4(2), 261–275.
Ford, T. H. (2009). Mary Wollstonecraft and the motherhood of feminism. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(3/4), 189–205.
Frazer, E. (2011). Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay on education. Oxford Review of Education, 37(5), 603–617.
Gubar, S. (1994). Feminist misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the paradox of “It takes one to know one”. Feminist Studies, 20(3), 453.
Hanley, K. (2013). Mary Wollstonecraft, pedagogy, and the practice of feminism. Routledge.
Hill, B. (1995). The links between Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay: New evidence. Women’s History Review, 4(2), 177–192.
Jones, V. (2020). Conduct literature. In N. E. Johnson & P. Keen (Eds.), Mary Wollstonecraft in context (pp. 238–245). Cambridge University Press.
Kirkley, L. (2019). The female philosopher and her afterlives: Mary Wollstonecraft, the British novel, and the transformations of feminism, 1796–1811. European Romantic Review, 30(4), 438–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2019.1638091
Manly, S. (2007). Mary Wollstonecraft and her legacy. In G. Plain & S. Sellers (Eds.), A history of feminist literary criticism (pp. 46–65). Cambridge University Press.
Mohamed, G., & Zerar, S. (2014). The clash of gendered referents in Mary Wollstonecraft’s a vindication of the rights of men. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(10), 1994.
Monroe, J. A. (1987). A feminist vindication of Mary Wollstonecraft. Iowa Journal of Literary Studies, 8(1), 143–152.
Murray, J. (2016). Mary Wollstonecraft and modernity. Women’s Writing, 23(3), 366–377.
Pedersen, J. S. (2009). The educational legacy of Mary Wollstonecraft. In J. Spence, S. Aiston, & M. M. Meikle (Eds.), Women, education, and agency, 1600–2000 (pp. 27–48). Routledge.
Ray, M. A. (2013). A vindication of Jane Austen: Mary Wollstonecraft’s feminist ideology embodied in “pride and prejudice” (order no. 1541851). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses global (1418802657). Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.osu-tulsa.okstate.edu/dissertations-theses/vindication-jane-austen-mary-wollstonecrafts/docview/1418802657/se-2
Reuter, M. (2017). Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the imagination. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(6), 1138–1160.
Richards, C. (2009). The body of her work, the work of her body: Accounting for the life and death of Mary Wollstonecraft. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 21(4), 565–592.
Richardson, A. (2002). Mary Wollstonecraft on education. In C. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 24–41). Cambridge University Press.
Strommer, D. W. (1979). Review of Mary, a fiction and the wrongs of woman, by G. Kelly. Modern Philology, 77(1), 96–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/437943
Taylor, N. (2007). The rights of woman as chimera: The political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Routledge.
Todd, J. (1976). The biographies of Mary Wollstonecraft. Signs, 1(3), 721–734.
Todd, J. (2000). Mary Wollstonecraft: A revolutionary life. Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Todd, J. (2004). Introduction. In The collected letters of Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. ix–xxix). Penguin Books.
Tomaselli, S. (2020). Mary Wollstonecraft. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2020 edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/wollstonecraft/
Wills, M. (2016, May 16). The mystery man in Mary Wollstonecraft’s life. JSTOR Daily. Retrieved 15 May 2022, from https://daily.jstor.org/the-mystery-man-in-mary-wollstonecrafts-life/
Wollstonecraft, M. (1787). Thoughts on the education of daughters: With reflections on female conduct, in the more important duties of life. Joseph Johnson.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1788). Mary, a fiction. Joseph Johnson.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1790). A vindication of the rights of men. J. Johnson.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1798). The wrongs of woman or Maria. Godwin.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1996). In C. Ward (Ed.), A vindication of the rights of woman. Dover Publications.
Further Reading
Caputi, M. (2016). “The manly virtues”: Macaulay’s influence, Wollstonecraft’s legacy. In L. Curtis-Wendlandt, P. Gibbard, & K. Green (Eds.), Political ideas of enlightenment women (pp. 185–200). Routledge.
Craciun, A. (Ed.). (2013). Mary Wollstonecraft’s a vindication of the rights of woman: A sourcebook. Routledge.
Gatens, M. (1991). Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on difference and equality. Wiley.
Johnson, C. L. (Ed.). (2002). The Cambridge companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, K., & O’Brien, K. E. (2009). Women and enlightenment in eighteenth-century Britain. Cambridge University Press.
Reuter, M. (2014). “Like a fanciful kind of half being”: Mary Wollstonecraft’s criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Hypatia, 29(4), 925–941.
Taylor, N. (2006). The rights of woman as chimera: The political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Routledge.
Tomaselli, S. (2020). Wollstonecraft: Philosophy, passion, and politics. Princeton University Press.
Weiss, D. (2017). The female philosopher and her afterlives: Mary Wollstonecraft, the British novel, and the transformations of feminism, 1796–1811. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ruby, M., El Sabbagh, J. (2023). Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797). In: Geier, B.A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Thinkers . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_72-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_72-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81037-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81037-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Mary Wollstonecraft- Published:
- 01 March 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_72-2
-
Original
Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797)- Published:
- 26 November 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_72-1