Plant Transgenesis

  • Alicja Ziemienowicz
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 631)


Epigenetic effects such as gene silencing and variable expression are unintended consequences of plant transformation, a problem that is present in the transformation of all plant species. There is not yet a reliable way to prevent epigenetic silencing; however, the probability of epigenetic effects may be reduced by choosing an appropriate method of transgene introduction into a plant cell. Most methods used in plant biotechnology, such as direct gene transfer and particle bombardment, result in the introduction of multiple DNA molecules and, as a consequence, multi-copy multi-locus insertion patterns. These multiple insertions may lead to variations in transgene expression, epigenetic silencing being the most extreme. In contrast, Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation procedures rarely cause such unintended effects. In this chapter, we present advantages and disadvantages of the Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation method as well as protocols for transformation of Arabidopsis generative tissues and tobacco seedlings as the most classical techniques in these model plants, i.e., vacuum infiltration of explants and floral dip methods. Moreover, epigenetic effects of transgenes such as silencing related to the position and insertion effects as well as effects of the regeneration procedure causing somaclonal variation will be briefly discussed.

Key words

Agrobacterium T-DNA tagging Vacuum infiltration Floral dip Arabidopsis Tobacco Transgene silencing Position effect Insertion effect Somaclonal variation OE lines KO lines 



The author would like to thank Prof. Barbara Hohn and her co-workers for establishing the protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tobacco seedlings, Dr. Igor Kovalchuk for his advice and encouragement, and Dr. Valentina Titova for language revision.


  1. 1.
    Birch RG (1997) Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:297-326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chawla HS (2002) Gene transfer in plants. In: Introduction to plant biotechnology, 2nd edn. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, NH, USA, pp 359-395Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Slater A, Scott NW, Fowler MR (2008) Techniques for plant transformation. In: Plant biotechnology: the genetic manipulation of plants, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, USA pp 54-74Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tzfira T, Citovsky V (2008) Agrobacterium: from biology to biotechnology. Springer, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matzke AJM, Matzke MA (1998) Position effects and epigenetic silencing of plant transgenes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1:142-148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matzke MA, Matzke AJM (1998) Epigenetic silencing of plant transgenes as a consequence of diverse cellular defense responses. Cell Mol Life Sci 54:94-103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler H, Rhee Y (2000) Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 43:179-188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Filipecki M, Malepszy S (2006) Unintended consequences of plant transformation: a molecular insight. J Appl Genet 47:277-286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE (2007) Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 447:418-424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gendrel A-V, Colot V (2005) Arabidopsis epigenetics: when RNA meets chromatin. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:142-147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Madlund A, Comai L (2004) The effect of stress on genome regulation and structure. Ann Bot 94:481-495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonnard G, Tinland B, Paulus F, Szegedi E, Otten L (1989) Nucleotide sequence, evolutionary origin and biological role of a rearranged cytokinin gene isolated from a wide host range biotype III Agrobacterium strain. Mol Gen Genet 216:428-438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinland B, Schoumacher F, Gloeckler V, Bravo-Angel AM, Hohn B (1995) The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence D2 protein is responsible for precise integration of T-DNA into the plant genome. EMBO J 14:3585-3595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rossi L, Escudero J, Hohn B, Tinland B (1993) Efficient and sensitive assay for T-DNA-dependent transient gene expression. Plant Mol Biol Rep 11:220-229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chawla HS (2003) In vitro amplification of DNA by PCR: detection of transgenes. In: Plant biotechnology: a practical approach. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, NH, USA, pp 215-222Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chawla HS (2003) Sothern blotting, Southern hybridization. In: Plant biotechnology: a practical approach. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, NH, USA, pp 237-252Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Stam P (2006) Genetic analysis. In: Salinas J, Sanchez-Serrano JJ (eds) Arabidopsis protocols, 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 65-77Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desfeux C, Clough SJ, Bent AF (2000) Female reproductive tissues are primary target of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by the Arabidopsis floral-dip method. Plant Physiol 123:895-904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alicja Ziemienowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations