Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university Thed N. van LeeuwenErik van WijkPaul F. Wouters OriginalPaper Open access 12 November 2015 Pages: 1 - 16
The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis Yutao SunSeamus Grimes OriginalPaper 26 October 2015 Pages: 17 - 40
A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures Xiaoxi LingYu LiuCheng Li OriginalPaper 03 November 2015 Pages: 41 - 50
Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions Henk F. Moed OriginalPaper 13 November 2015 Pages: 51 - 65
Orientations and outcome of interdisciplinary research: the case of research behaviour in translational medical science Finn ValentinMaria Theresa NornLars Alkaersig OriginalPaper 02 November 2015 Pages: 67 - 90
Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network Darrin J. GriffinSan BolkanFrank Tutzauer OriginalPaper 26 October 2015 Pages: 91 - 104
Lung cancer researchers, 2008–2013: their sex and ethnicity Grant LewisonPhilip RoeRichard Sullivan OriginalPaper Open access 12 November 2015 Pages: 105 - 117
Gender bias in academic recruitment Giovanni AbramoCiriaco Andrea D’AngeloFrancesco Rosati OriginalPaper 03 November 2015 Pages: 119 - 141
Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study Peter van den BesselaarUlf Sandström OriginalPaper Open access 12 November 2015 Pages: 143 - 162
The stability of co-authorship structures Marjan CugmasAnuška FerligojLuka Kronegger OriginalPaper Open access 20 November 2015 Pages: 163 - 186
Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? Jurriën BakkerDennis VerhoevenBart Van Looy OriginalPaper 02 November 2015 Pages: 187 - 211
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis Philippe MongeonAdèle Paul-Hus OriginalPaper 19 October 2015 Pages: 213 - 228
Computing a journal meta-ranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimators Laura VanaRonald HochreiterKurt Hornik OriginalPaper 15 October 2015 Pages: 229 - 251
Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field Mario De MarchiEdoardo Lorenzetti OriginalPaper 13 November 2015 Pages: 253 - 261
Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis Chérifa Boukacem-ZeghmouriPascal BadorHélène Prost OriginalPaper 27 October 2015 Pages: 263 - 280
Differentiation of U.S. ecologists into professional guilds based on professional traits William A. ReinersDerek S. ReinersJeffrey A. Lockwood OriginalPaper 20 November 2015 Pages: 281 - 298
Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj OriginalPaper 26 October 2015 Pages: 299 - 317
The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene Krzysztof Klincewicz OriginalPaper 26 October 2015 Pages: 319 - 345
Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf’s law Marcel AusloosOlgica NedicPiotr Fronczak OriginalPaper 05 September 2015 Pages: 347 - 368
The Dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005–2013) Lin ZhangWolfgang GlänzelFred Y. Ye OriginalPaper 29 August 2015 Pages: 369 - 381
Decreasing diversity in Japanese science, evidence from in-depth analyses of science maps Masatsura IgamiAyaka Saka OriginalPaper 12 August 2015 Pages: 383 - 403
Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe Dragan BabićĐuro KutlačaDušica Semenčenko OriginalPaper 20 August 2015 Pages: 405 - 434
The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives Lili Wang OriginalPaper 13 August 2015 Pages: 435 - 452
Detecting editorial bias in medical publishing David HsiehchenMagdalena Espinoza Letter 23 September 2015 Pages: 453 - 456
High time for a common plagiarism detection system Ivan Jarić Letter 23 September 2015 Pages: 457 - 459
The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do Fabrício BenevenutoAlberto H. F. LaenderBruno L. Alves OriginalPaper 20 October 2015 Pages: 469 - 474