Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics,
Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review,
Astin, H. S., & Bayer, A. (1979). Pervasive sex differences in the academic reward system: scholarship, marriage, and what else? In D. R. Lewis & W. E. Becker (Eds.), Academic Rewards in Higher Education (pp. 211–229). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics,
Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education,
Brouns, M. (2000). The gendered nature of assessment procedures in scientific research funding: The dutch case. Higher Education in Europe,
Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology,
Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2006). Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists on productivity. Information Economics and Policy,
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest.,
Cole JR and Zuckerman H (1984). The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In: P Maehr and MW Steinkamp. Advances in motivation and achievement 2. Greenwich, JAI Press. 217-258.
Cole JR and Zuckerman H (1991). Marriage, Motherhood, and Research Performance in Science. In: H Zuckerman, JR Cole and JT Bauer. The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York/London: Norton. [First published in Scientific American, 1987].
Dryler H (2011). Forskarkarriär för både kvinnor och män?—statistisk uppföljning och kunskapsöversikt (In Swedish). [Research Career for both women and men?] Högskoleverket—Swedish National Agency for Higher Education Report 2011:6 R [www.hsv.se].
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education,
Egghe, L. (2006). The dependence of the height of a Lorenz curve of a Zipf function on the size of the system. Mathematical and computer modeling,
Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science,
Fox, M. F., & Faver, C. A. (1985). Men, women, and publication productivity: patterns among social work academics. Sociological Quarterly,
Fox, M. F., Fonseca, C., & Bao, J. H. (2011). Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities. Social Studies of Science,
Fuchs, S., von Stebut, J., & Allmendinger, J. (2001). Gender, science, and scientific organizations in Germany. Minerva,
Hunter, L. A., & Leahey, E. (2010). Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods. Social Studies of Science,
Karamessini, M. (2004). Women’s representation and progression in science careers in Greece. Athens: KETHI Research Centre for Gender Equality.
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values,
Landino, R. A., & Owen, S. V. (1988). Self-efficacy in university faculty. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
Leahey, E. (2006). Gender differences in productivity—research specialization as a missing link. Gender and Society,
Ledin, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, F., & Wallon, G. (2007). A persistent problem - traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Reports,
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science,
Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces,
Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H. D., & O’Mara, A. (2009). Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research,
McNamee, S. J., Willis, C. L., & Rotchford, A. M. (1990). Gender differences in patterns of publication in leading sociology journals, 1960–1985. The American Sociologist,
Miller DI & Wai J (2015). The bachelor’s to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: a 30-year analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 6, Article 37
Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review? An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund. Zeitschrift für Psychologie,
Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology-Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie,
Pekkarinen, T. (2008). Gender differences in educational attainment: Evidence on the role of tracking from a Finnish quasi-experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics,
Penas, C. S., & Willett, P. (2006). Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science,
Powell, A., Hassan, T. M., Dainty, A. R. J., & Carter, C. (2009). Exploring gender differences in construction research: A European perspective. Construction Management and Economics,
Prozesky, H. (2008). A career-history analysis of gender differences in publication productivity among South African academics. Science Studies,
Prpic, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics,
Puuska, H. M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics,
Sandström, U. (2009a). Bibliometric evaluation of research programs: a study of scientific quality. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 6321.
Sandström, U. (2009b). Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: Mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation, 18(2),135–142.
Sandström, U. (2014). Bibliometric evaluation of SEPA-funded large research programs 2003–2013. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Report,
Sandström, U., &Wold, A. (2015). “Centres of excellence: Reward for gender or top-level research”, Thinking ahead: Research, funding and the future. In RJ yearbook 2015/16. Stockholm: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond and Makadam.
Sandström, U., & Hällsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics,
Sandström, U., & Sandström, E. (2009). The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions. Research Evaluation,
Snell, C., Sorensen, J., Rodriguez, J. J., & Kuanliang, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity among criminal justice and criminology scholars. Journal of Criminal Justice,
Symonds, M. R. E., Gemmell, N. J., Braisher, T. L., Gorringe, K. L., & Elga, M. A. (2006). Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE,
Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., et al. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal,
Timmers, T. M., Willemsen, T. M., & Tijdens, K. G. (2010). Gender diversity policies in universities: A multi-perspective framework of policy measures. Higher Education,
Tower, G., Plummer, J., & Ridgewall, B. (2007). A multidisciplinary study of gender based research productivity in the worlds’ best journals. Journal of Diversity Management,
Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity, a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics,
Van Balen, B., Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Determinants of academic careers. Higher Education Policy,
Van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Past performance, peer review, and project selection: A case study in the social and behavioral sciences. Research Evaluation,
Van den Besselaar P & Sandström U (2015). Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 826–838.
Van den Besselaar P, Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L (2014). Letter to the editor: Correction, Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 801.
Van den Brink M (2009). Behind the scenes of science: Gender in the recruitment and selection of professors in the Netherlands. PhD thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
Van den Brink, M., Brouns, M., & Waslander, S. (2006). Does excellence have a gender? A national research study on recruitment and gender. Employee Relations,
Verbree, M., Horlings, E., Groenewegen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2015). Organizational factors influencing scholarly performance: a multivariate study of biomedical research groups. Scientometrics,
Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature,
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review,
Zuckerman, H. (2001). The careers of men and women scientists: Gender differences in career attainment. In M. Wyer (Ed.), Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 69–78). New York: Routledge.