Background

Malaria is a major health problem worldwide with 3.3 billion individuals at risk leading to morbidity and mortality, especially among children under five years of age and pregnant women [13]. In the Eastern Mediterranean region, which consists of 10 countries including Yemen, 300 million people are at risk of malaria [3].

A majority of the Yemeni population (i.e., 65%) is exposed to malaria transmission, with 43% being at high-risk of acquiring the infection [3, 4]. Plasmodium falciparum, the most dangerous species is the major Plasmodium species in Yemen with only minimal cases caused by Plasmodium vivax [5]. Although Anopheles arabiensis has been reported as the main vector within the country, Anopheles culicifacies is an important vector in the coastal areas, and Anopheles sergenti has been reported to be a vector in the mountainous hinterland and highland areas [3, 6]. Following the emergence of chloroquine resistance and the WHO recommendation to withdraw artemisinin-based monotherapies, the antimalarial treatment policy shifted to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) with artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) as the first-line, and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the second line therapy for uncomplicated malaria [3]. However, chloroquine is still being used by clinicians in both public and private health facilities because of the limited and poor knowledge of the newer treatment policy [7].

The National Control Malaria Program (NCMP), Yemen, is proactive in combating malaria through the implementation of several interventions that include distribution of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), proper diagnosis, proper treatment, and reactive and proactive case surveillance. However, Yemen is not on track to achieve the Global Malaria Action Plan (GMAP)’s objective, which is to reduce global malaria cases by 75% by the end of 2015 [8]. Previous studies showed high prevalence of malaria in Yemen with mortality rates ranging from 2.1 – 4.7% in children [46, 9, 10]. Although Yemen has been classified as being in the control phase, the 2013 World Malaria Report stated that the data (collected in 2011) on which the report is based were insufficient to estimate the trend of malaria case incidence. By contrast, Saudi Arabia, the northern neighbouring country of Yemen, showed more than 75% reduction in malaria case incidences placing it in the elimination phase, and Oman, the eastern neighbouring country of Yemen is now in the prevention of re-introduction phase [3, 8, 11].

In light of the current malaria situation, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of malaria in the southeast of Yemen, and to explore the residents’ knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) toward malaria. It is hoped the findings from this study could assist in identifying factors that impede progress to the elimination phase.

Methods

Study areas and study population

The study was conducted in the Hadhramout governorate in the south-east Yemen, the largest governorate, accounting for half of the country’s surface area. The population of this governorate was estimated at 1,028,556 [12]. Malaria transmission in Yemen differs between the regions. In the coastal areas, peak transmission occurs in winter (October - April), which is the case in Hadhramout, while in the mountainous hinterland areas it usually peaks in summer (May - September). However, in highland areas located above 2000 meters above sea-level, transmission occurs throughout the year [13]. The sources of income of the population under study include funds transferred from natives working in neighbouring Gulf countries, agriculture, fishing, livestock or handicraft. A total of 735 participants of all ages and genders were enrolled in this study; 221 participants from three villages in Hajer district and 514 participants from four villages in Al-Raydah-Qusyer district (Figure 1). Informed consent was obtained from each participant, and for children, consent was obtained from their parents after a clear explanation of the study objectives. The study protocol was approved by the Faculty of Medicine, Hadhramout University for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health and Population, Yemen, and the Malaria National Control Program division in Hadhramout governorate.

Figure 1
figure 1

A geographic map of the study area.

Samples

A household survey was conducted by surveyors who had previous experience with malaria surveys. Households were randomly selected and all household members were invited to participate. Data were collected during transmission seasons from July 2011 to May 2012. Blood samples were collected by the finger prick method and thin and thick blood smears were made, allowed to air-dry (the thin smears were fixed with methanol within three hours), and then brought back to the laboratory to be stained with Giemsa. Haemoglobin levels were measured in the field directly from capillary blood using the HemoCue haemoglobinometer (HemoCue, AB, Angelhom, Sweden). Coordinates of each village was recorded using a global positioning system (GPS) (Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx, Tonopah, AZ, USA).

Questionnaire

A pretested standard questionnaire was used to collect information about personal profile, socioeconomic, and environmental background. A checklist was used for malaria clinical signs and symptoms, as observed by a team of physicians, and any history of previous antimalarial treatment. Knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) were investigated using a standard questionnaire. The data were collected from the household members, or from the parents on behalf of children, via face-to-face interviews conducted by well-trained interviewers. During the interviews, direct observation was made for the type of household building, wall, floor; for the availability and the type of toilet facilities, piped water, clothes-wearing habits, electricity, telephone, mosquito nets, and finally in the presence of nearby pools or rivers. The signs and symptoms recorded included fever and jaundice. Parasitaemia was expressed as the total number of Plasmodium asexual forms per microliter of blood. Parasite levels were classified as low (1 - 999/μL), moderate (1000 - 9999/μL), or high (>10000/μL). Hemoglobin levels were considered as normal (>11 g/dl), low anaemia (9–11 g/dl), moderate anaemia (7–8.9 g/dl), and severe anaemia (<7 g/dl) [14].

Microscopic examination

Blood films were stained with 10% Giemsa stain and examined by three trained malaria microscopists following standard procedures. Species identification was performed in the laboratory of the National Malaria Control Program in Hadhramout governorate by three expert microscopists. Parasitaemia per μl of blood was calculated from thick smears by counting the number of asexual parasites per 200 leukocytes using an assumed leukocyte count of 8000 WBC/μl. A smear was recorded as negative after screening at least 100 high power microscope fields.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS) version 19.0. The significance of the associations and between proportions of variables was tested using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests. A significance level of 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) and odd ratios (OR) were computed. A stepwise conditional logistic regression model was developed for those variables with p value <0.05. The significance level was considered as P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristic of study population

A total of 735 people voluntarily participated in this study, 423 males (42.4%) and 312 (57.6%) females. Forty-seven percent of the study population had no formal education and 61.6% were farmers. Approximately half of the study population had no access to electricity or communication media such as radio or television. The study population lived in simple houses with mud or uncemented brick walls and mud or cement floors (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of study subjects

Prevalence and factors associated with malaria

The overall malaria prevalence in the persons sampled in the Hadhramout governorate of Yemen was 18.8%. Plasmodium falciparum was the predominant species (99.3%) followed by P. vivax (0.7%). The overall prevalence in the districts of Al-Raydah and Qusyer and of Hajer were 21.8% and 11.8%, respectively. However, broad variation in the prevalence was equally noted between the villages from both districts, with Qusyer showing the highest prevalence (31.8%) and Al-Raydah the lowest (5.6%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence and distribution of malaria stratified by areas

The number of parasite positive individuals was higher in men than in children and women. Persons whose household’s head had primary education were at higher risk of being infected (OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.35 – 74.5), as did fishermen (OR = 11.3, 95%CI: 3.13 – 40.5) and farmers (OR = 4.84, 95%CI: 1.73 – 13.6). A number of socio-economic indicators were also associated with increased prevalence: living in houses with walls made of uncemented bricks (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.32 – 3.30), no access to toilets (OR = 1.6, 95%CI: 1.05 – 2.32), no fridge (OR = 1.6, 95%CI: 1.05 – 2.30), or no TV (OR = 1.6, (95%CI: 1.05 – 2.30). People living in houses with distance of water collection points less than 200 meters were also at higher risk of acquiring malaria (OR = 1.6, 95%CI: 1.05 – 2.30) (Table 3). Multivariate analysis using stepwise forward logistic regression confirmed that the significant risk factors were living in uncemented brick wall houses and being a fisherman or a farmer.

Table 3 Factors associated with malaria in Hadhramout governorate of Yemen

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP)

The survey of the villagers’ knowledge, attitude and practices toward malaria indicated that although they are all aware of malaria, its mode of transmission, and its clinical symptoms and severity, their knowledge of and attitude towards malaria prevention were poor. Thus, only 7% and 2% of study participants mentioned the importance of sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) or using indoor residual spraying (IRS) as methods of malaria prevention, respectively. This concorded with a low usage of ITNs (8%). Furthermore, in all cases, the windows in the houses were kept open at night (Table 4).

Table 4 Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAPs) of study subjects with regards to malaria in the rural areas of Southeast of Yemen (n = 130)*

Clinical manifestations

More than half of malaria cases detected by microscopy were asymptomatic. The symptomatic cases presented with fever, shivering, jaundice and anaemia. The parasitaemias were recorded as low, moderate and severe in 52%, 35% and 13% of malaria cases, respectively. A positive association between clinical symptoms and parasitaemia was observed (χ2 = 422, p <0.001) (Table 5).

Table 5 Clinical manifestations of malaria cases (N = 138)

Discussion

Although Yemen is classified as in the control stage [15], Hadhramout governorate, located in the southeast of the country bordering Oman and Saudi Arabia, is considered to be in the pre-elimination phase and a bilateral collaboration between Yemen and Oman has been put in place with the aim of making this a malaria-free area (personnel communication). The purpose of the current survey was to evaluate the actual status of malaria in the Hadhramout community and to investigate factors that might challenge or slow the progress toward malaria elimination.

The overall microscopic prevalence recorded for malaria in the 735 persons sampled from the seven sites was 18.8%. These high values are inconsistent with a pre-elimination status, and rather placed this governorate in the control phase. Moreover, the prevalence of malaria in young children (2–9 years old) exceeds the 10% level indicative of high to moderate transmission [16]. This high prevalence could be attributed to several factors including the political instability in Yemen during the 2011 – 2012 period, which had a direct effect on the official programs to control and to combat malaria. It was noted that the last IRS was conducted one year before the field trip. It is also likely that new foci of malaria have emerged in this area, which had been considered of low endemicity. Although the prevalence of malaria cases is decreasing in Hajer district [17], in the traditional malaria endemic area in Hadhramout, an increase of prevalence was recorded in Al-Raydah and Qusyer districts, areas thought to be of low prevalence. This situation poses a challenge to control efforts.

Analyses of the data from the survey presented here have identified some factors that were associated to the increased risk of acquiring malaria. These factors should be taken into consideration when implementing future malaria control strategies. Thus, malaria was more prevalent in adults than in children, who generally constitute the high-risk group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that people whose household’s head are fishermen and farmers were at higher risk of being malaria positive. It should be mentioned that household members in Yemen actively contribute to the work of the head of the household. Such increased risk of malaria linked to occupational behavior has been noted in other endemic areas such as Malaysia [18], the Philippines [19] and Latin America [20, 21]. These observations indicated that exposure to the bite of infective mosquitoes occured outside the home. Consequently, the traditional vector control interventions (ITNs and IRS) that protect household members would be insufficient, and control measures should be implemented to reduce mosquito-human contact during outdoor activities. Occupation-based vector control interventions have been developed and have shown reduction in malaria cases in Pakistan [22], Afghanistan [23] and Vietnam [24]. Such interventions include topical repellents such as N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) [25], DEET-based soap [22], plant based repellant [26], long-lasting insecticide-treated hammocks for forest workers [27] and insecticide-treated personal clothes in refugee areas [23].

Nonetheless, transmission in and around the house remains significant, as indicated by the statistical analyses which showed that the type of housing, unavailability of in-house toilets, and the presence of uncovered water containers close to the houses are also significant predictors of malaria in Hadhramout. Thus, it will be important to improve the environment and economic status of the inhabitants if the government’s efforts to make Hadhramout free of malaria are to be fulfilled.

At present, the malaria control strategy in Yemen relies on the adequate distribution of and use of ITNs, as well as the deployment of the IRS as the main intervention for vector control. It is, therefore, of concern that in the present survey only 7% of the people expressed the belief that sleeping under ITNs protected them from malaria (only 8% actually indicated that they sleep under ITNs) and only 2% considered that IRS protects them from malaria. This unsatisfactory situation is not unique to this district, as a malaria indicator survey conducted in Yemen in 2008–2009 revealed that 4.2% of people and 7% of children under 5 years slept under long lasting insecticide-treated net (LLINs) [3]. This represents a major challenge that warrants an urgent action. Finally, the fact that more than half of malaria positive persons identified in the current study were asymptomatic with low parasite densities suggests that it is likely that these cases would be missed by passive surveillance and would thus remain as a source of malaria transmission [28, 29].

Conclusion

In conclusion, malaria remains an important public health concern in the southeast region of Yemen, where there seems to be an upward shift in malaria prevalence with the appearance of new endemic foci and occupational high-risk groups. This warrants innovative strategies that should focus on reducing both indoor and outdoor transmissions in order to achieve effective protection from malaria. Furthermore, active case detection (ACD) should be implemented as this would be crucial to identify and treat the substantial reservoir of asymptomatic persons in the community. In particular, the reversal of the perplexing low awareness of the importance of ITNs and IRS must become a priority for the malaria control policy makers.