1 Introduction

Differential equations of fractional order have recently proved to be valuable tools in the modeling of many phenomena in various fields of science and engineering. Indeed, we can find numerous applications in viscoelasticity, electrochemistry, control, porous media, electromagnetism, etc[15]. There has been a significant development in the study of fractional differential equations and inclusions in recent years; see the monographs of Kilbas et al. [6], Lakshmikantham et al. [7], Podlubny [4], and the survey by Agarwal et al. [8]. For some recent contributions on fractional differential equations, see [928] and the references therein. Very recently in [10, 11, 21, 22] the authors and other researchers studied the existence and uniqueness of solutions of some classes of fractional differential equations with delay. For more details on the geometric and physical interpretation for fractional derivatives of both the Caputo types see [5, 23]. Baleanu and Mustafa [16] have considered

{ D α ( x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ) = f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t > 0 , x ( 0 ) = x 0
(1)

where Dαis the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and f : ℝ≥0 × ℝ → ℝ is a given continuous function. They have shown that the initial value problem (1) has unique solution in ℝ≥0 = [0, ∞), if |f(t, x) - f(t, y)| ≤ F(t)|x - y| for all t ≥ 0, x, y ∈ ℝ, where F : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0 is a continuous function.

In this article, we consider the following initial value problem:

{ ( D ) ( x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ) = f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t > 0 , x ( 0 ) = x 0 , I 1 α x ( t ) | t = 0 = 0 , I 1 β x ( t ) | t = 0 = 0 ,
(2)

where L ( D ) = D α -γ t n D β , n is nonnegative integer, γ ∈ ℝ, 0 < βα < 1 and Dαand Dβare the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. Here f : ℝ≥0 × ℝ → ℝ is a given nonlinear continuous function and ℝ≥0 has its usual meaning of nonnegative semi-axis. We prove the solution for Equation (2) is exist and under some conditions on f (t, x) and on the range of function F, this solution is unique. Note that, Equation (1) is a particular case of Equation (2), that is if γ = 0 then Equation (2) reduces to Equation (1).

The article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give basic definitions of Riemann-Liouville fractional calculus. Existence and uniqueness solution have been derived in Section 3 and also an example is given to illustrate our results.

2 Basic definitions and preliminaries

Definitions of Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative/integral and some of their properties are given below which could be found in [4, 19, 20].

Definition 2.1 The left sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of a function x ∈ L1 ([a, b], ℝ) of order α > 0 is defined as

I a + α x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) a t x ( s ) ( t - s ) 1 - α d s , t > a ,

where Γ ( α ) = 0 + e - t t α - 1 dt.

The fractional integral of x(t) = (t - a) β, a ≥ 0, β > -1 is given as

I a + α x ( t ) = Γ ( β + 1 ) Γ ( β + α + 1 ) ( t - a ) β + α .

Definition 2.2 The left sided Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of a function x defined as

D a + α x ( t ) = d d t I a + 1 - α x ( t ) , α ( 0 , 1 ) .

We denote D a + α x ( t ) by D a α x ( t ) and I a + α x ( t ) by I a α x ( t ) . Also Dαx(t) and Iαx(t) refer to D 0 + α x ( t ) and I 0 + α x ( t ) , respectively.

Proposition 2.3 [4, pp. 71-72] Suppose that x(t) is continuous function on [0, ) then

D 0 β x ( t ) is integrable,

I α D β x ( t ) = I α - β x ( t ) - I 1 - β x ( t ) t = 0 t α - 1 Γ ( α ) , 0 < β < 1 , β α ,
(3)
D α I β x ( t ) = I α - β x ( t ) .
(4)

Further, If I1-βx(t)|t =0= 0 then Equation (3) reduces to

I 0 α D 0 β x ( t ) = I 0 α - β x t , 0 < β < 1 , β α .
(5)

Proposition 2.4 Let × be continuous on [0, +) and 0 < β < 1, β ≤ α. If I1-βx(t)|t =0=0 then

(i) I α ( t n x ( t ) ) = k = 0 n ( α k ) [ d k t n d t k ] [ I α + k x ( t ) ] = k = 0 n ( α k ) n ! t n k ( n k ) ! I α + k x ( t ) ,

(ii) I α ( t n D β x ( t ) ) = k = 0 n ( α k ) n ! t n k ( n k ) ! I α β + k x ( t ) ,

where n is a nonnegative integer and,

( α k ) = ( 1 ) k α ( α + 1 ) ( α + k 1 ) k ! = ( 1 ) k Γ ( α + k ) k ! Γ ( α )

Proof. (i) can be found in [19, p. 53] and (ii) is an immediate consequence of Equation (3) and (i) with together I1-βx(t)|t =0= 0.

3 Existence and uniqueness

In this section, our objective is to find solutions to the initial value problem (2) with some conditions on f (t, x) and on the range of function F so that this solution is unique on unbounded domain [0, ∞). First in the following lemma, we prove that the solution of Equation (2) is equivalent to the solution of an integral equation using Proposition 2.4.

Lemma 3.1 The solution of the initial value problem (2) is equivalent to the Voltra integral equation

x ( t ) = x ( 0 ) + γ k = 0 n ( k α ) n ! t n k ( n k ) ! I α β + k [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t > 0 = x ( 0 ) + γ k = 0 n μ ( k , n , α ) t n k I α β + k [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) ,
(6)

where,

μ ( k , n , α ) := ( α k ) n ! ( n k ) ! , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , n .

Proof: Suppose the Equation (2) is given, then Iα {(Dα -γtnDβ )[x(t)-x(0)]}= Iαf(x, x(t)). With assumptions I1-αx(t)|t =0=0 and I1-βx(t)|t =0=0, Equation (3) gives Iα {Dα [x(t)-x(0)]}=x(t)-x(0) and using Proposition 2.4 (ii) the integral equation (4) is obtained (notice that I α x ( 0 ) | t = 0 = x ( 0 ) Γ ( 1 + α ) t α | t = 0 = 0 ) . Conversely, assume that the integral equation (6) is given hence

γ k = 0 n ( α k ) n ! t n k ( n k ) ! I α β + k [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) = γ k = 0 n ( α k ) [ D k t n ] [ I α + k D β [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] + I 1 β [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] t = 0 ] + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) , = γ I α ( t n D β [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] ) + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) = I α { γ t n D β [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] + f ( t , x ( t ) } = x ( t ) x ( 0 ) = I α { D α [ x ( t ) x ( 0 ) ] } .

Notice that by using Equation (3) we have

I α D α x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) = x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) - I 1 - α x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) t = 0 .

Hence the initial condition of I 0 1 - α x ( t ) | t = 0 =0 yields

I α D α x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) = x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) .

Thus Dα {Iα [γtnDβ [x(t)-x(0)]+f(x, x(t))]}=Dα {Iα(Dα [x(t)-x(0)])}. Therefore γtnDβ [x(t)-x(0)]+f(x, x(t))=Dα [x(t)-x(0)] and we obtain the Equation (2). This proves that x(t) is a solution of initial value problem (2) and the proof is complete. In the following theorem, we try to prove that the integral equation (6) under some conditions has unique solution in [0, ∞) so that this unique solution is the unique solution of Equation (2).

Theorem 3.2 Assume that there exists the continuous function F : ℝ≥0 → [1, +∞) such that |f(t, x)-f(t, y)| ≤ F(t)|x-y| for all t ≥ 0, x, y ∈ ℝ (notice that F(t) 1 for each t ≥ 0). Then the integral equation ( 5 ) has unique solution defined in≥0.

Proof. Introduce the continuous functions

h ( t ) = 1 + x ( 0 ) + γ k = 0 n μ ( k , n , α ) t n - k I α - β + k x ( 0 ) - x ( 0 ) + I α f t , x 0 = 1 + x ( 0 ) + 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t f s , x 0 ( t - s ) 1 - α d s ,

and

H λ ( t ) = h ( t ) exp ( ( n + 1 ) t + λ q 0 t [ h ( s ) F ( s ) ] q d s ) ) , t 0

for a fixed λ > 0. Hence (notice that h(t) ≥ 1),

exp λ q 0 t [ h ( s ) F ( s ) ] q d s = exp λ 0 t [ h ( s ) F ( s ) ] q d s 1 q = H λ ( t ) h ( t ) e - ( n + 1 ) t H λ ( t ) e - ( n + 1 ) t
(7)

Here, q is taken such that,

1 p + 1 q = 1 and  1 < p < min 1 α , 1 1 - α , 1 1 - α + β .

Introduce the complete metric space Ω = (χ, d λ ), where χ is the set of all element of C(ℝ≥0, ℝ) that behave as O(H λ (t)) when t goes to +∞ and

d λ ( x , y ) = sup t 0 | x ( t ) - y ( t ) | H λ ( t )

for any x, yX. Since H λ (t) ≥ 1, all the constant functions belong to X.

Given the operator T : Ω → C(ℝ≥0, ℝ) with the formula

( T x ) ( t ) = x ( 0 ) + γ k = 0 n μ ( k , n , α ) t n - k I α - β + k [ x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) ] + I α f ( t , x ( t ) ) = x ( 0 ) + γ k = 0 n μ ( k , n , α ) 0 t ( t - s ) α - β + k - 1 [ x ( s ) - x ( 0 ) ] Γ ( α - β + k ) d s + 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t - s ) α - 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

Set,

M = max { | γ μ ( k , n , α ) | Γ ( α β + k ) : k = 0 , 1 , , n } , = max { | γ ( k α ) n ! ( n k ) ! Γ ( α β + k ) : k = 0 , 1 , , n } ,

then we have the following estimates (notice that tn-kentfor each k = 0, 1, 2, ..., n and t ≥ 0)

| ( T x ) ( t ) - ( T y ) ( t ) | M e n t k = 0 n 0 t ( t - s ) α - β + k - 1 | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | d s + 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t - s ) α - 1 F ( s ) | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | d s M e n t k = 0 n 0 t e s ( t - s ) α - β + k - 1 F ( s ) | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | e s d s + 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t e s ( t - s ) α - 1 F ( s ) | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | e s d s M e n t k = 0 n I k ( t ) J ( x , y ) ( t ) + I ( t ) J ( x , y ) ( t ) ,
(8)

where for each k = 0, 1, 2, ..., n,

I k ( t ) = 0 t ( t - s ) p ( α - β + k - 1 ) e p s d s 1 p = e t 0 p t s p p ( α - β + k - 1 ) e - s d s p 1 p = p 1 q + β - α - k e t 0 p t s p ( α - β + k - 1 ) e - s d s 1 p p 1 q + β - α - k e t Γ ( 1 - p ( 1 - α + β - k ) ) = C ( p , α , β , k ) e t ,
(9)

where C ( p , α , β , k ) = p 1 q + β - α - k Γ ( 1 - p ( 1 - α + β - k ) ) .

J ( x , y ) ( t ) = 0 t ( F ( s ) ) q | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | q e s q d s 1 q = 0 t d d s exp λ 0 s [ h ( ρ ) F ( ρ ) ] q d ρ λ | x ( s ) - y ( s ) | H λ ( s ) q d s 1 q 0 t d d s exp λ 0 s [ h ( ρ ) F ( ρ ) ] q d ρ λ d s 1 q d λ ( x , y ) = λ - 1 q exp ( λ 0 s [ h ( ρ ) F ( ρ ) ] q d ρ ) 1 q d λ ( x , y ) .
(10)

Substituting Equation (7) into Equation (10) yields

J ( x , y ) ( t ) = λ - 1 q e - ( n + 1 ) t H λ ( t ) d λ ( x , y ) λ - 1 q e - t H λ ( t ) d λ ( x , y ) , t 0 .
(11)
I ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) { 0 t ( t s ) p ( α 1 e p s d s } 1 p = e t Γ ( α ) { 0 p t ( s p ) p ( α 1 ) ( e s ) d s p } 1 p = e t Γ ( α ) p 1 q α Γ ( 1 p ( 1 α ) ) = C 2 ( α , p ) e t ,
(12)

where C 2 ( α , p ) = 1 Γ ( α ) p 1 q - α Γ ( 1 - p ( 1 - α ) ) .

Hence, substituting (9), (11), and (12) into inequality (8) leads to

| ( T x ) ( t ) - ( T y ) ( t ) | M k = 0 n C 1 ( p , α , β , k ) λ - 1 q H λ ( t ) d λ ( x , y ) + C 2 ( α , p ) λ - 1 q H λ ( t ) d λ ( x , y ) .

Therefore,

d λ ( T x , T y ) M k = 0 n C 1 ( p , α , β , k ) + C 2 ( α , p ) λ - 1 q d λ ( x , y )

The formula is valid only if we establish that Txχ whenever xχ. This follows from the next estimates

| ( T x ) ( t ) | | ( T x ) ( t ) ( T x 0 ) ) ( t ) | + | ( T x 0 ) ( t ) | ( M k = 0 n C 1 ( p , α , β , k ) + C 2 ( α , p ) ) λ 1 q H λ ( t ) d λ ( x , x 0 ) + h ( t ) { ( M k = 0 n C 1 ( p , α , β , k ) + C 2 ( α , p ) ) λ 1 q d λ ( x , x 0 ) + 1 } H λ ( t ) = O ( H λ ( t ) ) as  t + .

In conclusion, the operator T : Ω → Ω is a contraction for every

λ > M k = 0 n C 1 ( p , α , β , k ) + C 2 ( α , p ) q .

Its unique fixed point is the unique solution of Equation (2) in C ([0, ∞), ℝ).

Example 3.3 The following fractional differential equation:

D 2 3 - t 3 D 1 2 [ x ( t ) - x ( 0 ) ] = sin 2 + t 2 x 1 + t 2 , t > 0 x ( 0 ) = x 0 , I 1 3 x ( t ) | t = 0 = 0 a n d I 1 2 x ( t ) | t = 0 = 0 ,

satisfying in Theorem 3.2. In this example we have,

f ( t , x ( t ) ) = sin 2 x 1 + t 2  and hence  | f ( t , x ) - f ( t , y ) | 2 + t 2 1 + t 2 | x - y | ,

so that F ( t ) = 2 + t 2 1 + t 2 1 for each t ∈ [0, +∞).

4 Conclusions

The existence and uniqueness of solutions for the nonlinear fractional differential equations with initial conditions comprising standard Riemann-Liouville derivatives have been discussed in C([0, +∞), ℝ). In order to obtain the results in this article the contraction principle had important role. Although the present study provides some insights in the equations encountered in the non-global existence solutions, this existence and uniqueness theorem may be explored for other classes of fractional differential equations which encounter in the global existence solutions, like recent contributions [16, 24], that is a subject for future study.