Skip to main content
Log in

The Postdigital Human: Making the History of the Future

  • Interviews
  • Published:
Postdigital Science and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barron, C. (2003). A strong distinction between humans and non-humans is no longer required for research purposes: A debate between Bruno Latour and Steve fuller. History of the Human Sciences, 16(2), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From anthropocentric humanism to critical Posthumanism in digital education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, F. (2011). Science studies as naturalized philosophy. Springer Science+Business Media.

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1988/2002). Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1989/1993). Philosophy of science and its discontents. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1996). Recent work in social epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1999). The science wars: Who exactly is the enemy? Social Epistemology, 13(3–4), 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2000). The Governance of Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2003). Kuhn vs. popper: The struggle for the soul of science. Cambridge: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2006a). The philosophy of science and technology studies. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2006b). The new sociological imagination. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2013). Preparing for life in humanity 2.0. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2015a). Knowledge: The philosophical quest in history. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2015b). Customised science as a reflection of ‘Protscience’. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 46(4), 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2015c). Intelligent Design: Ten Years after Dover. ABC Religion & Ethics, 22 December. http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2015/12/22/4376838.htm. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Fuller, S. (2016a). The academic Caesar: University leadership is hard. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2016b). Science has always been a bit ‘post-truth’. The Guardian, 15 December. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/dec/15/science-has-always-been-a-bit-post-truth. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Fuller, S. (2017). Review of The Age of Em: Love, Work and Life when Robots Rule the Earth by R. Hanson. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2018). Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game. London: Anthem.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. & Collier, J. H. (2004/2012). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning for Science and Technology Studies. (Orig. 1993, by fuller). New York: Routledge.

  • Fuller, S., & Lipinska, V. (2014). The Proactionary imperative: A Foundation for transhumanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordin, M. (2015). Scientific babel: From the fall of Latin to the rise of English. London: Profile.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (Ed.). (2011). The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. (1893). Romanes Lecture. Oxford Magazine, May. https://mathcs.clarku.edu/huxley/comm/OxfMag/Romanes93.html. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Jandrić, P. (2016). The methodological challenge of networked learning: (post) disciplinarity and critical emancipation. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 165–181). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. (2018). Post-truth and critical pedagogy of trust. In M. A. Peters, S. Rider, M. Hyvönen, & T. Besley (Eds.), Post-truth, fake news: Viral Modernity & Higher Education (pp. 101–111). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, L. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, R. G., & Claycomb, R. M. (Eds.). (2010). Writing against the curriculum: Antidisciplinarity in the writing and cultural studies classroom. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. J., & Després, C. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1932). The German Ideology. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/index.htm. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976/1848). The Communist Manifesto. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2015). Revolutionary critical pedagogy is made by walking – In a world where many worlds coexist. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Pedagogy of Insurrection: From Resurrection to Revolution (pp. 255–298). New York: Peter Lang.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2017a). From liberation to salvation: Revolutionary critical pedagogy meets liberation theology. Policy Futures in Education, 15(5), 620–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2017b). Peter McLaren’s liberation theology: Karl Marx meets Jesus Christ. In J. S. Brooks & A. Normore (Eds.), Leading against the grain: Lessons for creating just and equitable schools (pp. 39–48). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2018). Karl Marx and liberation theology: Dialectical materialism and Christian spirituality in, against, and beyond contemporary capitalism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(2), 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, J. P. (1980). Marx against the Marxists: The Christian Humanism of Karl Marx. Trans. Drury J. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

  • Montgomery, S. (2000). Science in translation: Movements of knowledge through cultures and times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-ADV-B-00039-00001/1. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Nicolescu, B. (2008). In vitro and in vivo knowledge – Methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity – Theory and practice (pp. 1–22). New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida, E. (1964). Toward a science of translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, F. J. (1968). Planet of the Apes [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox.

  • Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life? Dublin: Trinity College. http://www.whatislife.ie/downloads/What-is-Life.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Shadish, W., & Fuller, S. (Eds.). (1993). The social psychology of science. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, K. (2016). Oxford’s word of the year for 2016 is ‘post-truth’. Time, November 15. http://time.com/4572592/oxford-word-of-theyear-2016-post-truth/. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Swanson, D. (1986). Undiscovered public knowledge. The Library Quarterly, 56(2), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Breakthrough Institute (2015). Breakthrough Dialogue 2015: The Good Anthropocene. https://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/dialogue/past-dialogues/breakthrough-dialogue-2015. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • U.S. District court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. (2005). 400 F. Supp. 2d 707. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/400/707/2414073/. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  • Weiss, S. (2012). Review of humanity 2.0 by Steve fuller. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 1(3), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2012). Russian cosmism: The esoteric futurism of Nikolai Federov and his followers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petar Jandrić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuller, S., Jandrić, P. The Postdigital Human: Making the History of the Future. Postdigit Sci Educ 1, 190–217 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0003-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0003-x

Navigation