Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Methodological Challenge of Networked Learning: (Post)disciplinarity and Critical Emancipation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning

Part of the book series: Research in Networked Learning ((RINL))

Abstract

This chapter explores the contemporary shift towards postdisciplinarity in networked learning research through the lens of emancipatory interest and critical theory, and defines the question of disciplinarity as a battlefield between various values and ideologies. It explores the rise of disciplinarity and the relationships between disciplinarity and technique. It places disciplinarity into the context of the network society, and explores emancipatory potentials of various (post)disciplinary approaches. Traditional disciplinarity is dialectically intertwined with education and class. Multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity creatively re-arrange traditional disciplinary knowledge without disturbing its core epistemic assumptions—more efficient in practice than traditional disciplinarity, they still reproduce traditional power relationships and offer little opportunity for emancipation. Transdiciplinarity challenges hegemonic discourses and enables critical social action, and antidisciplinarity completely rejects disciplinarity thus creating an egalitarian research universe. However, research methods in contemporary networked learning are always a hybrid between disciplinarity and postdisciplinarity. Even the most advanced postdisciplinary approaches cannot be conceived without some elements of traditional disciplinarity; even the strictest disciplinary approaches break at least some disciplinary borders. On that basis, the chapter invites readers to embrace the hybrid nature of research methodologies in networked learning, include emancipatory interest in their methodological considerations, and seek an appropriate balance between complex and often contradictory forces which constitute networked learning as we know it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bambach, C., Stern, R., & Manges, A. (2003). Leonardo da Vinci, master draftsman. New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braben, D. W. (2002). Blue Skies Research and the global economy. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 314, 768–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckler, J. A. (2004). Towards a new model of general education at Harvard College. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic733185.files/Buckler.pdf.

  • Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (2001). Cicero on the ideal orator (De Oratore). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2010). Theory and methodology in networked learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference Hotseat. Available online at http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/ view/2881. Accessed 11 Aug 2015.

  • Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (Ed.). (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Rethinking educational boundaries. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, D., & Karmis, D. (2012). Call for papers: Cahiers de l’idiotie No 6 – Université/University. Ottawa: Cahiers de l’idiotie. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://www.cahiers-idiotie.org/.

  • Giroux, H. A., & Searls Giroux, S. (2004). Take back higher education: Race, youth and the crisis of democracy in the post-civil rights era. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Introduction. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goral, T. (2014). Unintended consequences: The rise-and fall-of adjuncts in higher education. University Business, 17(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interest. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1981). “Only a God Can Save Us”: The Spiegel interview. In T. Sheehan (Ed.), Heidegger: The man and the thinker (pp. 45–67). Chicago, IL: Precedent Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (2008). The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, & E. Zemp (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Berlin: Springer, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V., De Laat, M., McConnell, D., & Ryberg, T. (Eds.). (2014). The design, experience and practice of networked learning. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V., McConnell, D., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). The theory, practice and pedagogy of networked learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. 291–307). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. & Boras, D. (Eds.). (2015). Critical learning in digital networks. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P., & Boras, D. (2012). Critical e-learning: Struggle for power and meaning in the network society. Zagreb: FF Press & The Polytechnic of Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1988). “Really useful knowledge” 1790–1850: Memories for education in the 1980s. In T. Lovett (Ed.), Radical approaches to adult education: A reader (pp. 3–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.T. (2006). Resources for interdisciplinary studies. Change, 38(2): 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, R. G., & Claycomb, R. M. (Eds.). (2010). Writing against the curriculum: Anti-disciplinarity in the writing and cultural studies classroom. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudera, A. (2010). Fight for your long day. Washington, DC: Atticus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. J., & Després, C. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotrecchiano, G.R. (2010). Complexity leadership in transdisciplinary (TD) learning environments: A knowledge feedback loop. International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research, 5(1), 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Herbert Marcuse Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. C., & Joseph, T. A. (2008). Are all part-time faculty underemployed? The influence of faculty status preference on satisfaction and commitment. Higher Education, 55(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (Ed.). (1995). Postmodernism, post-colonialism and pedagogy. Albert Park, VIC: James Nicholas Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2005). Teaching against global capitalism and the new imperialism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. & Kumar, R. (2009). Peter McLaren in an interview with Ravi Kumar: Being, Becoming and Breaking-Free: Peter McLaren and the Pedagogy of Liberation. Radical Notes, February 19. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://radicalnotes.com/2009/02/19/being-becoming-and-breaking-free-peter-mclaren-and-the-pedagogy-of-liberation/.

  • Miller, L. R. (2004). Teaching amidst the neon palm trees. Miami, FL: 1st Book Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (2008). In vitro and in vivo knowledge – Methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity – Theory and practice (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novy, A. (2012). “Unequal diversity” as a knowledge alliance: An encounter of Paulo Freire’s dialogical approach and transdisciplinarity. Multicultural Education and Technology, 6(3), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • One laptop per child initiative. (2015). Mission. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from http://one.laptop.org/about/mission.

  • Parchoma, G. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in technology enhanced/networked learning practices. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, & P. Sloep (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 496–497). Maastricht: Maastricht School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchoma, G., & Keefer, J. M. (2012). Contested disciplinarity in international doctoral supervision. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, & P. Sloep (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 498–505). Maastricht: Maastricht School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, H. (1890). The seven liberal arts. The English Historical Review, 5(19), 417–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1972). Education and the educated man. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, & R. S. Peters (Eds.), Education and the development of reason (pp. 3–19). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickover, C. A. (2008). Archimedes to hawking: Laws of science and the great minds behind them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, S. J. (2011). Interdisciplinarity: Some lessons from John Dewey. American Dialectic, 1(2), 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2014). A precariat charter: From denizens to citizens. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. (2005). Digital media and disciplinarity. The Information Society, 21, 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2007). Technoscience and Reproduction. Parallax, 13(4), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R., Eagle, S., & Joubert, M. (2012). A vision and strategy for technology enhanced learning: Report from the STELLAR Network of Excellence. Bristol: University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, R. (2007). Women in computing: The role of geek culture. Science as Culture, 16(4), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Christine Sinclair, Sarah Hayes, Constantine D. Skordoulis, Sian Bayne, Thomas Ryberg, Maarten de Laat, and anonymous reviewers, for their valuable criticisms and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia

    Petar Jandrić

Authors
  1. Petar Jandrić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petar Jandrić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Thomas Ryberg

  2. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Christine Sinclair

  3. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Sian Bayne

  4. Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Maarten de Laat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jandrić, P. (2016). The Methodological Challenge of Networked Learning: (Post)disciplinarity and Critical Emancipation. In: Ryberg, T., Sinclair, C., Bayne, S., de Laat, M. (eds) Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31128-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31130-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation