Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical investigation of flow with floating vegetation island

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floating vegetation island (FVI) provides an effective way to remove excessive nutrition and pollutants in rivers. The Reynolds stress model (RSM) is employed to investigate the hydrodynamic characteristics induced by varied canopy densities of FVI in an open channel. In longitudinal direction, four regions are subdivided according to the flow development process: upstream adjustment region (LUD), diverging flow region (LDF), shear layer growth region (LSD), and fully developed region. The increasing canopy density accelerates the flow adjustment in the diverging flow region and shear layer growth region, signaling a shorter distance to reach an equilibrium stage, while LUD keeps a constant. The vertical profiles of the normalized velocity are found to be self-similar downstream of the diverging flow region. In the vertical direction, the streamwise velocity profiles in the mixing layer collapse for all densities and obey the hyperbolic tangent law. Normalized penetration depth into the canopy was fitted as a function of dimensionless canopy density given by δc / hc = 0.404(CDahc)−0.316. This finding indicates a large space for rapid water renewal between the canopy region and the underlying water driven by the shear-scale vortices. In the lateral direction, the intensification of secondary current and the increasing number of secondary current cells with increasing canopy density reveal that dense floating canopies contribute to strong momentum exchange. The centers of vortices move as canopy density increases, while the vortices in canopy region do not merge with those in the gap region, as limited by the height and width of the canopy region. The distribution of longitudinal velocity in the transects is significantly influenced by secondary current.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Headley T. R., Tanner C. C. Application of floating wetlands for enhanced stormwater treatment: A review [C]. NIWA Client Report: HAM, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2006.

  2. Zhao M. D., Fan Z. L. Emergent vegetation flow with varying vertical porosity [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(5): 1043–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Z. H., Bai F. P., Huai W. X. Lattice Boltzmann method for simulating flows in open-channel with partial emergent rigid vegetation cover [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(4): 717–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanner C. C., Headley T. R. Components of floating emergent macrophyte treatment wetlands influencing removal of stormwater pollutants [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(3): 474–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murray-Gulde C. L., Huddleston G. M., Garber K. V. et al. Contributions of schoenoplectus californicus in a constructed wetland system receiving copper contaminated wastewater [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2005, 163(1): 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neori A., Reddy K., Čížková-Končalová H. et al. Bioactive chemicals and biological-biochemical activities and their functions in rhizospheres of wetland plants [J]. The Botanical Review, 2000, 66: 350–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belcher S. E., Jerram N., Hunt J. C. R. Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 488: 369–398.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Rominger J. T., Nepf H. M. Flow adjustment and interior flow associated with a rectangular porous obstruction [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 680: 636–659.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nepf H., Ghisalberti M., White B. et al. Retention time and dispersion associated with submerged aquatic canopies [J]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(4): W04422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghisalberti M., Nepf H. M. Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 2002, 107(2): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plew D. R. Depth-averaged drag coefficient for modeling flow through suspended canopies [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2011, 137(2): 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao F., Huai W. X., Li D. Numerical modeling of open channel flow with suspended canopy [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2017, 105: 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okamoto T., Nezu I. Spatial evolution of coherent motions in finite-length vegetation patch flow [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 13(5): 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huai W. X., Xue W. Y., Qian Z. D. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent rectangular open-channel flow with an emergent rigid vegetation patch [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 80: 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu W. Y., Jiang C. B., Shi Y. et al. Experimental study of the impact of the floating-vegetation island on mean and turbulence structure [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(5): 922–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White B. L., Nepf H. M. Shear instability and coherent structures in shallow flow adjacent to a porous layer [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 593: 1–32.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Huai W. X., Zhang J., Katul G. G. et al. The structure of turbulent flow through submerged flexible vegetation [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(2): 274–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dupuis V., Proust S., Berni C. et al. Mixing layer development in compound channel flows with submerged and emergent rigid vegetation over the floodplains [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2017, 58(4): 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Proust S., Fernandes J. N., Peltier Y. et al. Turbulent nonuniform flows in straight compound open-channels [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2013, 51(6): 656–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi S., Kang H. Characteristics of mean flow and turbulence statistics of depth-limited flows with submerged vegetation in a rectangular open-channel [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2016, 54(5): 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi S., Kang H. Numerical investigations of mean flow and turbulence structures of partly-vegetated open-channel flows using the Reynolds stress model [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 44(2): 203–217.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sonnenwald F., Guymer I., Stovin V. A CFD-based mixing model for vegetated flows [J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(3): 2322–2347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. King A. T., Tinoco R. O., Cowen E. A. A k - ε turbulence model based on the scales of vertical shear and stem wakes valid for emergent and submerged vegetated flows [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 701: 1–39.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng W. W., Sun Z. C., Liang S. X. Numerical simulation of flow through suspended and submerged canopy [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 127: 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lien F. S., Leschziner M. A. Assessment of turbulence-transport models including non-linear RNG eddy-viscosity formulation and second-moment closure for flow over a backward-facing step [J]. Computers and Fluids, 1994, 23(8): 983–1004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Launder B. E. Second-moment closure and its use in modelling turbulent industrial flows [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1989, 9(8): 963–985.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Launder B. E. Second-moment closure: present … and future? [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 1989, 10(4): 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibson M. M., Launder B. E. Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86(3): 491–511.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu S., Launder B. E., Leschziner M. A. Modelling strongly swirling recirculating jet flow with Reynolds-stress transport closures [C]. 6th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Toulouse, France, 1987.

  30. Choi S., Kang H. Numerical investigations of mean flow and turbulence structures of partly-vegetated open-channel flows using the Reynolds stress model [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2006, 44(2): 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi S., Kang H. Reynolds stress modeling of vegetated open-channel flows [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2004, 42(1): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lopez F., Garcia M. H. Mean flow and turbulence structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2001, 127(5): 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim H. S., Kimura I., Park M. Numerical simulation of flow and suspended sediment deposition within and around a circular patch of vegetation on a rigid bed [J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(10): 7231–7251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dimitris S., Panayotis P. Effect of a vegetation patch on turbulent channel flow [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2011, 49(2): 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dimitris S., Panayotis P. Macroscopic turbulence models and their application in turbulent vegetated flows [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 137(3): 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu Z. W., Chen Y. C., Wu Y. Y. et al. Simulation of exchange flow between open water and floating vegetation using a modified RNG k — ε turbulence model [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 17(2): 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brito M., Fernandes J., Leal J. B. Porous media approach for rans simulation of compound open-channel flows with submerged vegetated floodplains [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 16(6): 1247–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Koftis T., Prinos P. Reynolds stress modelling of flow in compound channels with vegetated floodplains [J]. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 2018, 6(1): 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Morse A. P., Gardiner B. A., Marshall B. J. Mechanisms controlling turbulence development across a forest edge [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2002, 103(2): 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Z. B., Jiang C. B., Nepf H. Flow adjustment at the leading edge of a submerged aquatic canopy [J]. Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(9): 5537–5551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang B., Raupach M. R., Shaw R. H. et al. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: Flow statistics [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2006, 120(3): 377–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zong L. J., Nepf H. Flow and deposition in and around a finite patch of vegetation [J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 116(3–4): 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tseung H. L., Kikkert G. A., Plew D. Hydrodynamics of suspended canopies with limited length and width [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 16(1): 145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li W. Q., Wang D., Jiao J. L. et al. Effects of vegetation patch density on flow velocity characteristics inan open channel [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(5): 1052–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Coceal O., Belcher S. E. A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas [J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2004, 130(599): 1349–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Raupach M. R., Finnigan J. J., Brunei Y. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1996, 78(3): 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nepf H. M. Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2012, 50(3): 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yule A. Two-dimensional self-preserving turbulent mixing layers at different free stream velocity ratios [R]. London, UK: HM stationary Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ho C. M., Huerre P. Perturbed free shear layers [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1984, 16(1): 365–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Winant C. D., Browand F. K. Vortex pairing: The mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1974, 63: 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ghisalberti M., Nepf H. M. The limited growth of vegetated shear layers [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(7): W07502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yan C., Nepf H. M., Huang W. X. et al. Large eddy simulation of flow and scalar transport in a vegetated channel [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 17(3): 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Yi-dan Ai, Meng-yang Liu & Wen-xin Huai

Authors
  1. Yi-dan Ai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng-yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen-xin Huai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-xin Huai.

Additional information

Biography: Yi-dan Ai (1998-), Female, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ai, Yd., Liu, My. & Huai, Wx. Numerical investigation of flow with floating vegetation island. J Hydrodyn 32, 31–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0004-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0004-6

Key words

Search

Navigation