Highlights
-
Concept of “Semi-implantable Bioelectronics” is raised to cover the major advances and emphasize new insights into building external device.
-
The principle and strategies of semi-implantable device for cell applications are summarized to discuss the typical methodologies to access to intracellular environment by cell penetration and various efficient applications.
-
The principle and strategies of semi-implantable device for in vivo applications are highlighted to discuss the various types of transdermal devices, brain electrodes and microneedle devices for the applications.
Abstract
Developing techniques to effectively and real-time monitor and regulate the interior environment of biological objects is significantly important for many biomedical engineering and scientific applications, including drug delivery, electrophysiological recording and regulation of intracellular activities. Semi-implantable bioelectronics is currently a hot spot in biomedical engineering research area, because it not only meets the increasing technical demands for precise detection or regulation of biological activities, but also provides a desirable platform for externally incorporating complex functionalities and electronic integration. Although there is less definition and summary to distinguish it from the well-reviewed non-invasive bioelectronics and fully implantable bioelectronics, semi-implantable bioelectronics have emerged as highly unique technology to boost the development of biochips and smart wearable device. Here, we reviewed the recent progress in this field and raised the concept of “Semi-implantable bioelectronics”, summarizing the principle and strategies of semi-implantable device for cell applications and in vivo applications, discussing the typical methodologies to access to intracellular environment or in vivo environment, biosafety aspects and typical applications. This review is meaningful for understanding in-depth the design principles, materials fabrication techniques, device integration processes, cell/tissue penetration methodologies, biosafety aspects, and applications strategies that are essential to the development of future minimally invasive bioelectronics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In modern society, health monitoring and disease treatments are extensively concerned by human. To improve life quality, personalized healthcare emerges to optimize the diagnosis and treatment according treatment according to individual individual person’s unique state, which would improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the adverse effects. With the personalized preventive care or personalized drug therapy strategies, the efficacy and cost of healthcare can be well regulated to benefit the individual patient. To achieve this goal, real-time, in situ detection and regulation of bioinformation is of great importance to understand the life science and develop the new generation technologies of diagnosis and treatment. Precise acquisition of bioinformation, such as detection of the specific physiological biomarkers or indicators, facilitates to guide the optimization of diagnosis and treatment strategies for the specific patients. Chip-based sensors have achieved promising progress in collecting information of body and extracellular fluid. These sensors are designed for the detection of DNA, RNA, peptides, proteins, ions, metabolites, and other bioactive molecules. For example, the gene chip and protein chip-based sensors are powerful to perform the genomes or proteomics analysis for body or extracellular samples in a simultaneous, efficient and accurate manner, and these chip sensors have been widely applied in disease diagnosis, drug screening, personalized medicine, environmental monitoring, bioinformatics, and other related fields. However, these biochips usually detect the samples by extraction of biofluid such as blood sampling, or from tissue by biopsy, which hampers the real-time and in situ information detection.
The rapid developments of wearable and implantable electronics have also paved a promising way for the personalized and precise medicine. Nowadays, flexible and stretchable characteristics of electronics are emerging development trends, where non-invasive and implantable electronics are often self-adaptive and conformal to couple on the curved and deformable tissue surface, which is of great superiority compared to the conventional rigid planar electronics. With the advanced micro/nanofabrication technologies and versatile functional materials, the high-throughput, multiplexed, high-sensitivity, and miniaturized biosensors are developed and integrated into non-invasive wearable or implantable devices to continuously monitor the physiological and biochemical signals. Meanwhile, the portable and miniaturized wearable or implantable bioelectronics provides promising strategies for personalized healthcare and precise therapy, which are both based on continuous monitoring and diagnosis. Remarkably, the real-time closed-loop regulation is the advanced characteristic and function of wearable non-invasive and implantable electronics.
Wearable device is often noninvasive and biocompatible to collect bioinformation from the body surface. The noninvasive electrophysiology recording systems for ECG, electrocorticogram (EEG), or EMG are successful cases of applications of wearable device, and these bioelectrical signals can greatly facilitate the acquisition of information to directly reflect the health and function status of heart, brain, or muscle. In addition to medical devices, noninvasive wearable recording systems (e.g., smart watch, smart band) are attractive hotspots in recent decade for the monitoring of biophysical and biochemical signals (ECG, pulse, blood pressure, bioactive molecules, and other metabolites) from living body. Meanwhile, commercial implantable devices, such as fully implantable glucose sensors, generally including sensor probe, electronics modules, data transmission module, and battery in an integrated device, can provide real-time monitor of blood glucose level and support the extensive application for months. Heart pacemaker is another successful case of implantable device, which consists of pulse generator or electrode wires. By rhythmically stimulating the local cardiomyocytes, the heart pacemaker facilitates electrical signals to spread to the entire heart, which could regulate the functions of contraction and blood pumping, while the electrode wires also transmit the ECG of heart cavity to pack-maker device for feedback control.
In spite of the early success of wearable device and implantable devices for health regulation by real-time diagnosis and close-loop treatment, the functional scope of them is still suggested to inherit limitations. The wearable devices conventionally attached on the outer surface of skin can only measure the physiological signals on the body surface, such as ECG, pulse, or blood pressure. The sweat-based biomarker detection relies on sufficient sweat samples, and the result accuracy is insufficient to reflect the actual states of analytes in blood or interstitial fluids, which is rarely able to actually achieve the disease-related information in the body. On the other hand, the implantable devices can record the information deeply inside the body, while the power supply, volume, and material safety of implantable devices are demanded to be developed for the successful and further application. In addition to the devices for human body monitoring, a large number of devices are designed to record the electrophysiological and biochemical signals of cells. Though the micro- or nanodevice can record the weak extracellular electrical signals or trace biomarkers of cells, the extracellular information is insufficient and inaccurate to reflect the physiological status of cells. For example, the electrophysiological devices can only record the extracellular potentials rather than intracellular ones, and signals distortion cannot be avoided due to passing through the cellular membrane. The electrochemical devices can only detect the metabolites in the extracellular microenvironment, and rarely able to accurately reflect the intracellular metabolism. Taking these limitations of noninvasive and implantable device into account, the forms of device between wearable and implantable device may be an effective complement for these potential shortcomings.
Here we raise the concept of “Semi-implantable bioelectronics,” referring to functional or electronic devices that could access to the interior environment of biological objects such as cells, tissues, or animal/human bodies, while the connected bulk devices remained on the surface of the biological objects. Compared with other bioelectronics, such as wearable bioelectronics or fully implantable bioelectronics, semi-implantable bioelectronics establish a platform to precisely detect or regulate biological activities insides biological objects and perform externally incorporated functionalities by electronic integration. In the past decade, we witnessed the significant experimental and theoretical advances on various types of semi-implantable bioelectronics, yet they have not been clearly defined and summarized to distinguish them from the well-reviewed wearable bioelectronics and full-implantable bioelectronics.
With the rapid technologies’ advances of bioelectronics, the semi-implantable bioelectronics based on nanoneedles for cell penetration have played important role in the recording and regulation of intracellular activity. Cell is separated from the outside environment by phospholipid bilayer, limiting the access of external to the rich information inside the cell. To investigate the intracellular activities, it is necessary to reach the inside the cell through the phospholipid bilayer. Meanwhile, cell lipid bilayer is also a barrier for external tools to explore the intracellular biological and physiological events [1]. The conventional extracellular recording technology collects low-quality biochemical and electrophysiological signals due to the barrier of cell membrane, and extracellular drug delivery suffers from low efficiency and large cell damage [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Consequently, it is urgently demanded to seek the safe and efficient intracellular operation or recording approaches. Due to the unique properties to pierce the cell membrane based on nanoneedle structures [8,9,10,11,12,13,14], semi-implantable bioelectronics present effective cell penetration approaches for the biochemical and biophysical access, so that the high-efficiency molecule/drug delivery and high-quality intracellular electrophysiological/biochemical sensing could be readily achieved [15,16,17].
The cell penetration efficacy of semi-implantable devices is realized by spontaneous penetration [18,19,20] or artificially assisted penetration, e.g., based on chemical coating [21,22,23], electroporation [24,25,26], mechanical force [27, 28], or optoporation [29, 30]. Once the semi-implantable device penetrates cell membrane, a large amount of intracellular sensing and regulating operations (e.g., electrical recording [31, 32], biochemical sensing [33,34,35], and drug delivery [36,37,38]) can be readily performed. For intracellular operation, the semi-implantable devices have emerged as the powerful tools that have attracted a broad research interests.
In addition to the in cellular application, with the rapid technologies’ advances of biocompatible materials and flexible electronics, semi-implantable electronic devices present promising prospect in real-time and continuous monitoring of multiple physiological parameters in vivo, involving detection of basic electrophysiology and biochemical markers. Due to the semi-implantable feature, issues associated with skin barrier, signal integrity and power supply can be effectively addressed, while these limitations and restriction have been widely encountered by conventional noninvasive device or fully implantable devices. The investigation of semi-implantable bioelectronic system can not only provide new opportunity to monitor the biomarkers of interstitial fluid (ISF) and record electrophysiology of subcutaneous tissues by the semi-implantable sensors, but also deliver drugs and apply optical/electrical stimuli to the target tissues by the semi-implantable stimulating probe/tubing. For example, the commercial continuous glucose monitoring devices are usually semi-implanted into the body, remaining the measurement, data transmission, and power modules outside the body [39,40,41]. Compared with wearable noninvasive devices, the accuracy of glucose measurement based on this semi-implantable strategy is greatly improved. Compared with fully implantable devices, the power durability and data transmission integrity are effectively ensured by integration with external module on body surface, so that frequent surgical operation could be avoided. Consequently, the semi-implantable devices combine the advantages of wearable noninvasive and implantable devices, which are successful to achieve a wide variety of applications in vivo and meet the clinical applications. Based on the accurate measurement results of semi-implantable strategy, close-loop function (refers to the processing with a feedback component, which makes the detection more accurate through a feedback system) can be reliably perform for controlled drug delivery, which could prompt the semi-implantable strategy into highly intelligent device. On the other hand, the electrophysiological signals in vivo using semi-implantable devices mainly include electrocorticogram (EEG) and intracortical signals without filtering by skull, so they could record more accurate signals than the noninvasive EEG [42,43,44]. To record the high-throughput and high-quality signals, a large number of semi-implantable brain electrodes serve as utility tools for the electrical signal recording under the skull. In addition to the signal recording function, the regulating functions such as drug delivery and optical/electrical stimulation are also developed and integrated in the semi-implantable devices [45,46,47]. For the in vivo application, the semi-implantable bioelectronics will be an optimal option taking the accuracy, practicability, and safety into account.
In this comprehensive review article, we will raise the concept of “Semi-implantable Bioelectronics,” cover the major progresses with the most general applicability and emphasize new insights into the development of building external device that could access to the interior environment of biological objects to precisely detect or regulate biological activities. To do so, we will first summarize the principle and strategies of semi-implantable device for cell applications, discussing the typical methodologies to access to intracellular environment by cell penetration and their biosafety aspects, and various efficient applications including drug delivery, biochemical sensing and electrical recording insides cells. Then, we will highlight the principle and strategies of semi-implantable device for in vivo applications, discussing the various types of transdermal devices, brain electrodes and microneedle devices for the applications including electrical recording, biochemical sensing, drug delivery, and stimulation in vivo. This summary of design principles, materials fabrication techniques, device integration processes, cell/tissue penetration methodologies, biosafety aspects, and applications strategies outlines the potential of Semi-implantable Bioelectronics as a practical biomedical engineering solution.
2 Semi-Implantable Device for Cell Applications
2.1 Principle and Strategies
Cell is enclosed by a phospholipid bilayer called plasma membrane, which effectively insulates the internal from external microenvironment and maintains the homeostasis [1]. It is important to regulate the cell behavior for emerging biomedical research (e.g., gene editing), while these types of tools lead to attractive research hotspots to explore the interior of live cells through the plasma membrane [48,49,50]. In most cases, the cell membrane with thickness of ~ 6 nm is an insurmountable barrier due to the unique lipid bilayer structure, preventing most aqueous compounds and probes from reaching the intracellular region. Therefore, cell membrane penetration methodologies for intracellular operations are a focused mission in the scientific research and therapeutic applications (e.g., electrophysiological recording, biochemical detection, and molecular delivery). In the recent decades, a large amount of nanodevices emerge by advanced micro/nanofabrication technology to facilitate accessing to the in-cell area in a semi-implanted way [51,52,53,54]. Particularly, one-dimensional nanostructures (e.g., nanowires, nanowires, nanotubes, nanopillars) enable penetration of the cell membrane by local high pressure of their sharp nanotips [55,56,57,58]. The functions of these nanoscale platforms for cell penetration can be based on nanoarray or individual functional nanostructure. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) or micromanipulators are common tool to assist single nanoprobe devices (e.g., nanowire) to record and regulate the intracellular activities [59, 60]. It is meaningful to perform the high spatiotemporal resolution sensing and operating in single cells for exploring the cellular micro/nano-environment, detecting intracellular biochemical indicators, and revealing the intercellular differences at a subcellular/nanoscale resolution.
However, the wide applications of single nanowire platforms are hindered due to low throughput, which is difficult to synchronously perform the operation for numerous individual cells [61, 62]. To solve this limitation, vertical aligned nanowire arrays provide a unique platform for the large-scale and high-throughput of cells with even single-cell manipulation [63, 64]. Spontaneously, the cell-nanostructure-interface can form locally higher tension on cell membrane based on the cellular force at the sharp nanotips [65, 66]. In the practical applications, vertical nanowire devices can even penetrate the cell membrane based on their 3D sharp feature. However, this spontaneous penetration usually presents low-efficiency, and consequently, chemical coating [21,22,23], electroporation [24,25,26], optoporation [29, 30], or mechanical force [27, 28] are often introduced to assist the cell penetration. Nanowires that penetrate cell membrane can form a semi-implanted profile into the cell, and various intracellular applications (e.g., electrophysiological recording [31, 32], biochemical sensing [33,34,35], and molecule delivery [36,37,38]) can be versatilely carried out. For the electrophysiological and biochemical recordings, semi-implantable nanoprobes can directly contact with cytosolic contents, which allows high-sensitivity detection of the intracellular electrophysiological and biochemical signals. For the molecule delivery, the various nanowires-based semi-implantable device can efficiently achieve synchronous delivery into a large amount of cell types [18, 67], which effectively avoids the endocytotic degradation of conventional molecule delivery methodologies. To improve the practicability of these semi-implantable nanodevice, it is of great significance to deeply explore the mechanism of cell–nanowires interactions [68,69,70].
2.2 Materials and Devices
2.2.1 Single Nanowire Platform
For the intracellular access, single nanowire-equipped cantilevers are employed for the probing intracellular environment with high spatial resolution at single cell resolution, and nanoscale probes also greatly reduce the interference and damage of cell during membrane penetration. These 1D nanostructure-based device is semi-implantable into cells, with a tiny probe in diameter of 1–1000 nm assembled on a supporting pipette or cantilever. Due to the nanoscale size and semi-implantable property, the nanoprobe allows the precise and long-term positioning into cell, where the nanoprobes can be consisting of various materials, such as carbon nanotubes, silicon nanowires, and gold nanopillars. Due to the 3D operation demand, AFM is a common assembly platform for nanoprobe to guide the probe to the cell position and to complete cell penetration. Nawarathna et al. developed a heavy-doped silicon nanoprobe, named as dielectrophoretic nanotweezer (DENT), to extract RNA and DNA from targeted cells [71,72,73]. The conductive silicon nanoprobe surface was insulated by a SiO2 layer, and metal layer (Cr/Au) was then deposited on the passivation layer. To extract nucleic acid molecule, a 120 kHz AC, 5 VPP AV sine voltage are applied between the core and surface conductive layers for ~ 1 min, where a strong dielectrophoretic force was generated to adsorb nucleic acid molecules at the DENT nanotip (Fig. 1a). The nucleic acids can be extracted from the cytosol and transferred into the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for amplification, and thus, the DENT-integrated AFM probe allows nanoscale resolution positioning of targeted cells. Besides, the nanoprobe could maintain the good viability of the living cell with minimally destruction. The detection can be extended for specific collection of targeted mRNAs, where specific-primers could be functionalized on the DENT for enrichment of mRNA.
For the investigation of intracellular electrophysiological signals, patch clamp is a powerful tool which enables recording of single ion channel behavior. However, the low throughput and complicated operation of patch clamp are main shortcoming during large-scale synchronized study of individual cell. To overcome these drawbacks, Lieber et al. developed 3D nanoFETs by advanced silicon nanowire (SiNW) fabrication to record intracellular electrical signals of excitable cells. The essential component of the device contained kinked NWs to form a 3D nanoFET architecture [74], where the bend-up kinked structure enabled cell membrane penetration with the assistants of phospholipid modification to facilitate membrane rupture (Fig. 1b). The 3D kinked nanoFET initially recorded the extracellular action potentials, and the extracellular signals gradually changed into intracellular action potentials with amplitude of ∼80 mV, which have similar amplitudes with the gold-standard signals (70–100 mV). Based on the similar principle, branched SiO2 nanotube-based 3D FET (Fig. 1c) was developed in 2012 by the same group [75], which could also penetrate into cardiomyocytes by a phospholipid bilayer coating on the nanotube surface. After rupture of cell membrane, the cytosol could infuse and contact to the SiNW FET through the nanotube, so that intracellular action potentials can be subsequently recorded by the potential changes of the electrolyte gate.
Besides detection of cellular electrical signals, single nanoprobe-based semi-implantable device could also enable detection of biochemical molecules within cells. While glass micropipettes are common tools for the suction of cell membrane, the large rupture size on membrane of micropipettes-based devices may damage the cells during penetration or detection. Singhal et al. invented nanoendoscope for intracellular biochemical detection and regulation at the single organelle resolution (Fig. 1d) [59], employing ultra-sharp multiwalled carbon nanotube possessing diameter of ~ 100 nm and length of 50–60 mm as the essential cell penetration substrate. Owing to the high spatial resolution of the small nanotube structure, this nanoendoscope can either access to the intracellular environment of a single cell for biosensing, or even analyze the interior of sub-cell organelles. Moreover, the hollow nanotube on the nanoendoscope could serve as a nanochannel for intracellular drug delivery or extraction of cytosolic molecules. Since the single nanoprobe-based semi-implantable device match the size of single cell, it is a promising tool to perform intracellular probing and stimulation, although the operations need multiple steps of alignment and micro-manipulation.
2.2.2 Nanowire Array Platform
Nanowire array can serve as powerful semi-implantable platform to treat multiple cells simultaneously. Due to the low throughput of single nanowire platform, nanowires aligned in array could improve the throughput of interfacing with multiple cells. The cells could be cultured on top of nanowire array in vitro, where the nanowires could penetrate cell membrane with assistance of poration techniques, so that the cytosolic content could be accessed. Nanowires can be prepared by a large number of material types, where silicon is a common nanowire material for intracellular exploration with good biocompatibility and stability in microenvironment of biological cells [76,77,78]. Other materials, (e.g., GaP [79], InAs [80], SiO2 [81, 82], Al2O3 [83], ZnO [84], SnO2 [85, 86], carbon [87], diamond [88], and Pt [89, 90]) also present good biocompatibility to cells, and the advanced nanowire fabrication technology can now tune the structures, sizes, compositions, and physical/chemical properties of nanowires in well-controlled manner. These characteristics enable the versatile functions of nanowire array for electronic, photonic, and magnetic applications besides biological cells [91,92,93,94,95].
For applications of intracellular molecule delivery, solid nanowire array-based semi-implantable devices are constructed to penetrate cell membrane and to mediate the transportation of biomolecules into cells in vitro by drug elution from nanowire surface [96, 97]. In recent work, a self-powered nano-electroporation system was established on the basis of a triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG), and this nanowire array-based electroporation system can achieve intracellular delivery in vivo (Fig. 2a) [98]. TENG-based nano-electroporation system harvested energy by body movements and subsequently generated electric field on the nanowires, which would porate cell membrane to allow high-efficiency of drug delivery into cells in vivo. In addition to solid nanowire arrays, hollow nanowire arrays with unique nanochannels, which were called “nanostraws,” could directly bridge the external reservoir to intracellular environment and facilitate the delivery into target cells [99, 100]. In our recent work, vertical nanostraw array was fabricated with branched nanospikes, which was employed to deliver biomolecules into captured circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for in situ regulation or re-program of the cells (Fig. 2b) [84]. The nanostraws could porate cell membrane with high efficiency by coupling with electroporation and thus, allow gene delivery into cells, and extract the intracellular cytosol from cells with minimally invasiveness.
For high-quality electrical signal recording, nanoelectrode arrays pave a new way for intracellular electrophysiological recording by minimally invasively penetrating cell membrane. Robinson et al. established vertical nanowire electrode array (VNEA) by advanced ‘top-down’ nanofabrication (Fig. 2c) [101], where each nanowire electrode with the diameter of ~ 150 nm consisted of a conductive Si core and an insulated SiO2 shell, and the nanotip was sputtered with a conductive Ti/Au layer. The VNEA formed a semi-implanting patch to probe the intracellular action potential. With optimal nano-electroporation condition, the VNEA could achieve synchronous intracellular electrical stimulating and recording of neurons. In these systems, the cell membrane penetration by nanowires is the key step for achieving semi-implantable access to the intracellular environment.
2.3 Cell Penetration Methods
The cell-nanowire interfaces are attractive research hotspots to understand the interaction between nanowires and cells, and to optimize the efficiency of cell penetration, yet the mechanism of nanowire cell penetration is still not fully revealed. Spontaneous penetration theory has revealed that part of nanowires initially penetrates into cell due to the sharp physical geometry of nanowires, and the gravity or adhesion forces of cells generates locally higher tension to induce the membrane penetration [65, 66]. While many studies have proved the feasibility of spontaneous penetration and semi-implantable cellular access by nanowires [18,19,20], the efficiency of spontaneous penetration rate is observed to be low and limits the intracellular access. To improve penetration efficiency, other assisting strategies such as electroporation [83, 90], optoporation [29, 30], chemical coating [21], or mechanical forces [102] are developed to enhance cell penetration. Many works have demonstrated that lipid membranes can be permeated by the applications of external forces (e.g., force, electricity, and light) as well as by chemical agents to be coupled with vertical nanowires devices. Three main assisting strategies of coupling external forces for cell penetration possess their own advantages and disadvantages. Electroporation coupling can lead to the induction of nanopores in cell membranes, but may disrupt cellular activity, and the resealing of nanopores can hamper long-term recording. Optoporation coupling with vertical nanowires can prevent the defect of electrical interference, but exists the problem of low-throughput regulation. The application of external mechanical forces with nanowires on cells appears to be a direct method to increase membrane penetration, but the penetration efficiency is relatively lower than the electroporation or optoporation methods. For example, Xie et al. developed nanopillar-electroporation system by focused ion beam. Initially, no intracellular potentials can be recorded by culturing cardiomyocytes on the Pt nanopillars, demonstrating no spontaneous penetration (Fig. 3a). When low voltage electroporation was applied on the Pt nanopillars, nanopores were introduced in the plasma membrane, and high-quality intracellular potentials were recorded for several minutes. Moreover, these nanopillar-electroporation system can be performed on the same cell repeatedly in continuous days. In addition to electroporation, phospholipid bilayer coating on nanowires is another assisting penetration method to improve membrane rupture by membrane fusion with coated nanowires [23, 103]. The chemical coating penetration strategies have previously been applied on single nanotubes or kinked nanowires devices to record intracellular potentials [75, 104, 105]. In recent work, Zhao et al. designed a U-shaped nanowire FET arrays [106], where high-quality intracellular potentials of neurons were recorded by inserting the nanowire FET into cells (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, optoporation is also proposed as effective method to improve nanowire cell penetration, where focused high-power laser pulses at the cell-nanowire interface are introduced to porate cell membrane, allowing simultaneously recording of both extracellular and intracellular potentials from neurons and cardiomyocytes (Fig. 3c).
2.4 Cell Safety
Semi-implantable nanowires-based devices have been widely utilized as regulating tools for cells in a precisely spatial resolution and low-perturbation manner. Initially, the main indicators to assess the perturbation of nanowires-device on cells are chronic cell viability and cell membrane integrity. The safety of semi-implantable nanowire devices was evaluated by culturing different cell types with various nanowire materials in vitro. In one study, cell viability was examined by culturing mouse embryonic stem cells and HEK 293 T cells on SiNW arrays [107], where the cell viability was observed to be about ~ 78% after 3 days culturing on 90-nm-diameter and 6-µm-height NWs, where increase in NW diameter seemed to induce lower viability. Hӓllstrӧm et al. demonstrated neurons cultured on GaP nanowires possessed higher viability than those cultured on planar substrates. In addition to the cell viability, more comprehensive cellular functionality involving cell adhesion, enzyme activity, membrane protein expression, mRNA expression, the maturation pathway, etc., after cultured on short and thin NWs (e.g., ~ 100 nm diameter, < 3 µm height) was investigated (Fig. 4b) [108, 109], where the results demonstrated that the shorter nanowires minimally affect the basic cell viability and functionality.
In addition to the safety evaluation, the cell behaviors on nanowire devices have also been explored. Based on the morphology observation and biological active molecule analysis, it is found that Si nanowire arrays improve the cell attachment, while cell migration and spreading are also restrained (Fig. 4a) [110]. Similar results have also been observed in other study, where nanopillars tightly fixed the cells and restrict cell mobility (Fig. 4c) [111]. Besides, Persson et al. found that the longer nanowires (e.g., ~ 7 µm height) could negatively impact cells, by inducing high stress and high respiration rates for cells, leading to reactive oxygen species elevation and gene damage (Fig. 4d) [112].
2.5 Applications
Efficient cell penetration by semi-implantable nanowire devices enables a large amount of biomedical research and practical applications, including electrophysiological recording, biochemical sensing, and biochemical detection. Nanowire penetration facilitates the bridging between intracellular and extracellular microenvironment, enables the transportation of exterior cargo into the cytosol, and achieves the detection of intracellular information with excellent spatiotemporal resolution.
2.5.1 Molecule Delivery
Conventional molecule delivery relies on cell endocytosis-based pathways, yet the cargo degradation, low delivery efficiency, and cell cytotoxicity are main issues during this delivery process. In contrast to traditional delivery, semi-implantable nanowire device could mediate intracellular delivery with a broad delivery substance for various cell types. To minimalize the disturbance to cells and improve transfection efficiency, semi-implantable nanowire devices can be designed with ultra-small nanoscale feature, so that the nanostructures protruding into cells cause minimal effects to the cells [99, 113, 114]. Intracellular molecule delivery into individual targeted cells is greatly significant for diagnostics and therapeutics toward the personalized medicine in biomedical field. The bulk electroporation techniques have been conventionally employed for cell transfection in the past decade, yet the low-resolution and requirement of high voltage supply resulting in unstable molecule delivery for bulk electroporation. In contrast to conventional bulk electroporation, nano-electroporation could provide highly localized and precise electroporation on cells and thus, significantly improve poration efficiency and cell viability (Fig. 5a) [115, 116]. In theory, the nanowire-electroporation effect usually occurs at the tip of cell-nano-interface, where low voltage is sufficient to reach the critical condition for cell membrane perforation due to good coupling of cell membrane with nanostructure. For example, nanofountain probe (NFP) technology could precisely perform gentle electroporation and intracellular delivery on cells, which mediated transfection of HeLa cells with fluorescent molecules with high transfection efficiency (> 95%) and high viability (> 92%).
Although the single nanowire devices can successfully achieve high efficiency of intracellular delivery into single cell, the low-throughput feature of single nanoprobe platform due to complicated and time-consuming operations greatly imped their practical applications. To increase the delivery throughput, nanowire arrays devices are widely employed for intracellular drug delivery with high efficiency and viability [117,118,119,120], which reduces the complexity of device architecture and operations [121]. Xie et al. developed Al2O3 nanostraw-electroporation system to achieve high efficiency of transfection with high cell viability (Fig. 5b, c) [83]. The nanostraws are fabricated on a polycarbonate template followed by Cl2 etching and O2 plasma, where the diameter of nanostraws can be tunable based on different templates and fabrication conditions. In addition, the tight seal between the cell membrane and nanostraws can induce enhanced electric field on the nanostraw-cell interface, which dramatically reduced the amplitude of electroporation voltage for porating cell. It is worth noting that the delivery efficiency will be affected by cell types, such as cells lines (e.g., CHO, HEK 293), and hard-transfected cells including human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), human embryonic stem cells (HSCs), and mouse primary neuron cells (MNs). [67]. Transfection efficiency of primary cells could reach ~ 60% to 85%, which indicates the wide applicability for transfecting various cell types. Besides, diverse biomolecules (e.g., DNA, mRNA, and proteins) can be precisely delivered into cells by the nanostraw platform with controllable dose, where the intracellular is also spatially and temporally controllable. By regulating the delivery dose of mRNA or DNA, the intracellular expression of different proteins can be well controlled over time, which paves a new way to improve the practicability of delivery by multimodal gene regulation.
2.5.2 Biochemical Sensing
Biochemical markers can indicate the cell state, yet the measurement of biomarkers based on secreted biomarkers in extracellular medium cannot effectively reflect the corresponding intracellular information. Consequently, end-point cell lysis is usually carried out for the detection of intracellular biomolecules. Meanwhile, imaging analysis methods (e.g., fluorescent dyes or functional nanoparticles) have been employed for dynamic tracking of intracellular activity [122, 123], yet label-based technologies have limited spatiotemporal resolution, phototoxicity, and chemical adverse effects. To perform dynamic and biocompatible recording, semi-implantable nanowires are developed as intracellular biosensing tools, aiming at the precise measurement of intracellular biomarkers based on their unique cell penetration capacity [33]. Compared with the conventional cell lysis, the nanodevices can directly detect biomarkers in a quantitative and sensitive way without large analytical instruments [124, 125]. Moreover, the semi-implantable nanodevices enable the repeatable extraction from intracellular content and achieve the high-throughput parallel sensing.
Nanopipettes are typical semi-implantable tools which are fabricated with a submicron or nanoscale opening tip to provide a transport channel for intracellular operations. To precisely extract contents from targeted cells, nanopipettes were integrated on a scanning ion conductance microscope (SICM). An SICM integrated electrochemical to syringe is designed for the RNA and organelles extraction (Fig. 6a) [126]. In principle, ion current at the SICM nanopipette tip was kept positive to prevent the aqueous solution entrance when approaching cell. After the nanopipette penetrate the cell, the potential inside the nanopipette will be negative, and the cytosol can be collected. The collected mRNA and organelles can be analyzed by amplifying or sequencing. Furthermore, a double-barrel SICM probe was employed (Fig. 6b) [127], where barrel with aqueous was used for morphological mapping, and barrel with organic solution was used as the electrochemical syringe for the high-resolution imaging.
Semi-implantable devices can be applied for extracellular electrochemical detection by monitoring the redox currents of vesicle content secreted by cells. In one study, carbon-fiber microelectrodes with conical nanotips are employed to detect catecholamine of individual nanoscale vesicles from intracellular microenvironment (Fig. 6c) [128]. The nanotip minimalized the damage to the cell during the intracellular detection. After the penetration, the limiting current drops to a low level, which indicates good sealing between the cell and nanoelectrodes. Besides, the limiting current recovers to 95% of initial one after electrode withdrawal from the cell, implying the good stability after semi-implantable operation. Recently, dielectrophoretic nanotweezers (DENT) were proposed as a powerful tool to extract mRNA from intracellular microenvironment. Using minimally invasive nanotweezers, the precise and spatial sample extraction can be performed from living cells (Fig. 6d) [129]. DENT usually consists of 10–20 nm nanoelectrodes for trapping of DNA, protein, mitochondrion by dielectrophoretic. This attractive DENT provides the precise single-molecule or organelle manipulation to understand the living cells.
Melosh et al. developed a nanostraw-electroporation system defined as nanostraw extraction (NEX) for subcellular content analysis [130]. NEX device is based on a porous polymer membrane with hollow nanostraw array. Indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate and a Pt electrode were assembled for the electroporation (Fig. 6e). After the electrical pulses are applied, the nanopore will appear on the cell membrane, and the intracellular content such as mRNA or protein can be extracted. The main extraction process depends on the diffusion of intracellular content to the external reservoir, while the positive electrical pulses from ITO improve the negative charged contents moving toward the lower reservoir. Based on this nanostraw-extraction strategy, the extraction can be repeated on the same set of cells with high cell viability (> 95%). Moreover, gene analysis in extracted cytoplasmic substance extracted by the NEX platform was analyzed in detail, where 41 mRNA molecules were accurately detected in a quantitative manner. Further, the NEX can also efficiently collect proteins such as lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB), where the quantitative analysis of extracted LDHB suggested the good repeatability and consistency of NEX for protein extraction and downstream analysis.
2.5.3 Electrophysiological Recording
Neuroscience and cardiology are both the research focus in biomedical field. In vitro cell models (e.g., neurons, cardiomyocytes) are widely adopted for studies, since in vivo experiments are more inconvenient to perform. Though extracellular electrophysiology is well developed for current neuroscience, intracellular electrophysiology is concerned as more attractive way to explore the activities of neural network or brain [131,132,133,134]. Patch clamp, as the gold standard electrophysiological invasive devices, provides recording of high-quality action potential by forming a coupling interface with intracellular environment through suction of cell membrane. However, this invasive working mode is difficult to perform for long-term and high-throughput recording. The glass micropipettes of patch clamp are relatively large for single cells, which induces larger damage to the cells. Multielectrode arrays, a noninvasive device, can chronically record the extracellular signals from multiple cells in network, which possess high cell viability. However, signal quality of extracellular recording is limited due to the weak coupling of electrode with cells, rarely able to reflect the detail information of action potential. Compared with invasive devices and noninvasive devices, semi-implanted electronics could provide intracellular recording with a high-quality and long-term profile, which seldom affect cell viability and became applicable for the recording of vast excitable cells for the neuroscience and cardiology. To overcome these limitations, nanoscale devices have emerged for high-throughput recording of intracellular electrical signals in a minimally invasive manner to the cells. Nanoelectrode platforms could provide intracellular recording with a high-quality and long-term profile, which became applicable for the recording of vast excitable cells for the neuroscience and cardiology. For example, carbon-based nanoelectrodes were developed and utilized by Schrlau et al. for the minimally invasive intracellular recording (Fig. 7a) [135], where carbon nanopipettes (CNPs) were integrated in the pulled glass capillaries to monitor the HT-22 neurons using a patch clamp current amplifier mode. Moreover, CNPs possess multifunctional properties such as intracellular chemical injection and electrical measurement without damage. In addition to passive nanoelectrodes, active nanostructure of 3D FET nanobioprobes were successfully applied as semi-implantable device for intracellular electrophysiological investigation. Based on the previous research of kinked-SiNW [74], free-standing 3D nanoFET was fabricated by Qing et al. (Fig. 7b) [105], which can facilitate the large-scale and precise positioning recording on cardiomyocytes. In contrast to the free-standing patch clamp, the 3D nanoFET can record the action potential from the cardiomyocytes with high consistency. The semi-implantable nanowire device guides a promising direction to establish a biocompatible and high-coupling cell-nanointerface for the investigation of intracellular information.
The pioneering work on nanowires-based semi-implantable devices for excitable cells recording demonstrates the feasibility of high-throughput intracellular recording by patterned nanowire array [90, 101]. Abbott et al. integrated Pt/SiO2 nanowire arrays with complementary metal-oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) device for high-resolution and high-throughput intracellular recording for in vitro cells (Fig. 7c) [82]. The nanoelectrodes array worked in pixel unit, which was coupled on amplifier and stimulator modules to record or stimulate the cells. By electroporation of stimulation module, 5 mV amplitude intracellular signals are recorded. Owing to the high-resolution pixel integrated circuit, electrophysiological activities of cell network can be visually monitored. In recent study, intracellular recording of thousands of neurons was performed simultaneously by the same group (Fig. 7d) [32]. The device contains two working mode, the pseudo current-clamp mode and pseudo voltage-clamp mode. In pseudo voltage-clamp mode, the ion channel currents can reflect the drug effects, while intracellular action potentials and postsynaptic potentials of neurons can be recorded in pseudo current-clamp mode. Pixel nanoelectrodes can map the excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activities from a large number of neurons in long-term manner. This high-throughput and high-resolution intracellular recording can provide a unique visualized platform for the large-scale neural networks.
2.6 Limitation and Future Trends for Cellular Applications
Semi-implantable devices can achieve the precise manipulation or sensing in cells by the specialized nanointerface. The nanowire arrays significantly enhance the throughput of single-cell regulation. By various powerful assisting strategies, the efficiency of penetrate can be significantly improved while the cell viability can maintain at a high level. Though these semi-implantable nanowire devices present versatile performance for cell applications, limitations still exist and need to be improved in the future: (I) Reducing nanofabrication difficulty. For nanofabrication, the advanced and complicate instruments should be applied which hampers the low-cost, high-efficiency, and large-scale production. (II) Improving the penetration success ratio. The cell penetration is improved by the semi-implantable platform, yet the ratio is still low. More strategies should be developed for the higher penetration probability. (III) Designing the multifunctional semi-implantable device. In most cases, the semi-implantable nanodevices possess single function, which lack the recording of high-content intracellular synchronous information. With the rapid development of semi-implantable nanodevice, the intracellular research will be more deeply and widely prompted in the near future.
3 Semi-implantable Device for In Vivo Applications
3.1 Principle and Strategies
Thousands of complex life activities widely spread in human or animal body, while the understanding of the real-time mechanism of these activities requires detection and analysis in vivo. The advantage of recording biological information in the tissue feature with noninvasion and convenience, yet the recording accuracy and timeliness are compromised due to the barriers of skin or skull. To overcome these barriers, semi-implantable devices that integrated with penetrating probes could serve as promising tool to bypass biological barriers to assess the in vivo tissue. The in vivo semi-implantable devices are generally consisted of the transdermal sensor and external control circuit system for in vivo signal sensing and external interventional modulating. To maximally avoid tissue damage or caused pain of the living animal or human body after probe insertion or implantation, these implanted probes are developed toward miniaturization and flexibility. Moreover, the coating of the probe surface with biocompatible coating materials could reduce the adverse inflammation or fibrosis effects caused by the implanted probes, while the bulk external circuit systems remained on the body surface could be further flexibly designed for practical applications. Dependent on the applications and target tissues, the sensing probes or interventional modules of these functional devices are generally implanted into the transdermal tissue, soft tissue, or brain tissue by assist of the tiny sharp tip-feature of their probes, or by externally assisting metal needles which guide the probes to the target site in vivo. To ensure the effective and safe application in vivo, the designs and developments of semi-implantable devices should take the following issues into account: (1) Minimal invasion; (2) Biocompatibility; (3) Accuracy and sensitivity of detection; (4) Long-term, real-time and in situ applications. Based on the above design principles, the development of in vivo semi-implantable bioelectronic devices have achieved reasonable progress during the past decades, particularly with transdermal devices, microneedles devices and brain electrodes as typical successful examples. For examples, transdermal devices and microneedles devices are designed to penetrate skin layer so that the probes could electrochemically sense or regulate the in vivo tissue environments, which have been emerging as new generation tools for the diagnosis and treatments of diseases such as diabetes. In addition, brain electrodes, which are designed to record or stimulate electrical signals in brain tissues by placement of implanted electrode in the target brain area, have also shown great potentials not only on the treatments of diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and so on, but also have been demonstrated as powerful tools to monitor and map the electrical activities of brain that could facilitate understanding of brain in nature.
3.2 Devices and Applications
3.2.1 Transdermal Device
For biomedical diagnosis, many indicators in blood reflect the health status. For example, the blood glucose level reflects the health of pancreas, cholesterol and triglycerides level presents the health of cardiovascular, and protein level indicates the health of other organs. Moreover, the metabolism monitoring of drug concentration in vivo is of critical important in clinical therapeutics. A large amount of point-of-care test (POCT)-based blood monitoring has been widely employed in clinical practice. If the blood analysis can be detected in situ, the pain of frequent blood drawing can be relieved. Significantly, in situ detection can achieve the real-time monitoring to understand the dynamic changes of diseases. While biomarkers that are generally rich in blood could directly reflect the health status, the access to blood vessel with external probe or devices possesses undesirable risks of arterial or venous bleeding or infections. Therefore, the applications of implanted sensors that directly access to the blood vessels have not been widely explored. Instead, transdermal device that could access to the tissue in epidermis or dermis has been developed to detect biomarkers in the interstitial fluids, which could somehow reflect the states of biomarkers in the blood vessels. For example, the concentration of glucose in interstitial fluids has been found to be positively correlated with the concentration of glucose in the blood, although the change of glucose concentration in the interstitial fluids existed a 5–10 min-delay compared to the glucose change in blood. In addition, many types of small molecules, such as reactive oxygen species, lactic acids, uric acids, and nitric oxides, have been demonstrated to be detected from interstitial fluids as biomarkers for diseases. Transdermal devices are effective tools to detect or regulate biochemical activities in the subcutaneous tissue, with typical examples of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), glucose microdialysis probes, CGM-based close-loop insulin delivery system, and hemodialysis circulation system. To date, the CGM based on enzyme-based electrochemical detection of glucose concentrations is one of the most successful technologies of transdermal devices and has been commercialized for clinical applications. CGM as transdermal sensors possesses enzyme-based glucose electrode inserted through the skin to detect glucose concentration in the interstitial fluidic environment. Enzyme-based CGM biosensors are sensitive and selective to glucose due to the specific glucose oxidase (GOx) that could catalyze glucose into hydrogen peroxide production. At present, the CGM technologies of three companies, Dexcom [39], Abbott, and Metronic [136], can achieve continuous measurement of blood glucose changes in ISF [40]. In contrast to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), CGM can continuously track blood glucose trends in long term. In principle, the glucose detection can be amperometrically performed by measuring the oxygen consumption or hydrogen peroxide production [137, 138]. Under the catalysis by GOx, the glucose was oxidated to gluconic acid which the oxygen was reduced to hydrogen peroxide, so the glucose concentration can be quantified by amperometric signal from the produced hydrogen peroxide (~ + 0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl) or the consumed oxygen (~ -0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl). Based on the specific enzyme catalytic reaction, the electrochemical biosensor is one of the most popular and utilized platform for clinical CGM device (Fig. 8a) [41, 139]. The performance of glucose biosensors is related to electrode design, enzyme coating status, and biocompatible membrane. However, the performance of these biosensors is limited by lack of oxygen or interference of hydrogen peroxide detection by other electroactive endogenous components such as ascorbic acid, uric acid, and acetaminophen [140]. To solve these limitations, anti-biofouling permselective membranes (e.g., Nafion, polycarbonate) are employed to reduce the glucose and electroactive interference diffusion around the enzymatic biosensor, which is effective to relieve the O2 deficiency and electroactive interferences [141,142,143,144]. To eliminate the O2 deficiency, the glucose dehydrogenases (GDHs) was employed in glucose sensors, which can work without O2 supply with various cofactors, such as flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) [NAD(P)] [145, 146]. Though the GDH is independent of O2 concentration, the FAD/PQQ-GDH can overestimate the glucose concentration due to catalyzing the other biomarkers such as maltose, while the oxidization of NAD(P)H produces other polymerized oxidation products to foul the electrode and increase the overpotential [147,148,149,150,151].
Since the glucose concentration in ISF is correlated with that in blood, the ISF glucose could be continuously monitored by the transdermal probe [152,153,154,155]. The implanted electrodes-type sensors have been widely employed to accurately reflect the blood glucose level in real time due to their advantages of timeliness and portability as wearable medical system. The in vivo continuous blood glucose monitoring was first proposed in 1982 [156], and the implanted electrodes-based CGM system was approved and commercialized by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999 [157]. Though ISF-based CGM system still lacks accuracy compared with the blood glucose meter, they have been successfully demonstrated to achieve the glycemic control and reduce the hypoglycemic events [158,159,160]. Most of the commercially available CGMs transdermally measure ISF glucose to reflect the blood glucose level in a given interval of 5–15 min. The transdermal electrode is inserted into a defined area of human body by the assistance of metal needles pushed by a mechanical device. The current change on electrodes in response to glucose levels is received by the external sensor attached on skin, and the CGM transmitter sends the glycemic data to receiver by wireless communication. Due to the blood glucose dynamic balance between the vessel and ISF, the calibration algorithm is established based on the plenty of clinical data from CGM to calibrate the blood glucose delay of ISF. Generally, the blood glucose delay in ISF is 5–10 min. Compared with intermittent capillary blood glucose measurement, CGM can perform the continuous glycemic measurements using semi-implantable enzyme-tipped electrodes, and these transdermal sensors can stay in vivo for 1–2 weeks before taking them out for calibration [161,162,163,164].
However, issues of system reliability, noise interference, and frequent calibrations hinder the marketing, until the new Libre CGM system emerges to be approved by FDA [165,166,167,168]. Traditional sensors of CGM generate the large noise during 1–3 days of initial implantation, while the reasons are still unclarified [168,169,170]. Consequently, the FDA had approved traditional CGMs can be employed for 1 to 2 weeks after implantation, while SMBG (finger-prick blood test strip) should be applied for frequent recalibrations (i.e., 4 time on initial day and once every 12 h later) [165, 171]. The inaccuracy from noise issue prolongs around 30% to 50% approved period of CGM products, while the frequent recalibration operations lower humanization and are painful for the users, resulting in the unreliable blood glucose measurements [172,173,174]. To reduce the noise and improve the accuracy, the various materials are used as an antifouling coating on glucose sensors. Hu et al. polymerized zwitterionic sulfobetaine methacrylate monomers on the GOx-coated sensor with bromination. It is demonstrated that the antifouling coating can diminish 99% nonspecific protein adsorption, maintain long-term high sensitivity, and improve the inaccuracy, compared to the commercial glucose sensors [175]. Another antifouling polymer-coated glucose sensor was fabricated by a zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PSBEDOT) by one-step electropolymerization. By this antifouling polymer coating, the sensor presents a high linearity (R2 = 0.9874) from 0.1 to 0.5 mM. In contrast to antifouling properties of PEDOT–GOx coating, PSBEDOT–GOx showed better antifouling properties for blood plasma and fibrinogen proteins [176].
In recent work, Xie et al. developed a high-performance poly(MPC) from 64 types of zwitterionic polymers by combinatorial chemical approaches as an antifouling coating on the Medtronic CGM to relieve the inflammation and potential signal noise [177]. Using the biocompatible polymer, the CGM performance was significantly improved with lower signal noise. To verify the practical applications, the polymer-coated sensors were assessed by mice and non-human primates, and the sensors can measure the accurate blood glucose without recalibration. Moreover, the immune responses were proved to be inhibited by this polymer by histology and inflammation-associated protease, and gene expression of inflammation biomarkers. Significantly, the polymer coating will be promising approach to enable CGM as a standalone device. In addition to continuously record glucose fluctuation in real time, the regulation of glucose levels in vivo could be achieved by the insulin pump. Insulin pump is an intelligent system that biomimics the secretion of human pancreas. Via the artificial intelligence control, the insulin pump simulates the regulation of basic insulin in the body by a tunable pulse subcutaneous infusion. Insulin pump system typically includes artificial intelligence control system with microelectronic chips, battery-powered mechanical pump system, drug reservoir, connected infusion tubings, and subcutaneous infusion catheter. One end of the infusion tube can be implanted under the skin of the patient. In the operating state, the pump mechanical system receives commands from the control system to drive the piston of reservoir, which will eventually work as a pancreas to provide the insulin.
The crucial significance of CGM function is associated with insulin pump to be a smart system. To automatically and accurately regulate the daily blood glucose of diabetics, CGM-based close-loop insulin pump is established as an artificial pancreas (Fig. 8b), which is an advanced in vivo medical system with a semi-implantable device for routine glycemic regulation of diabetics [178,179,180,181,182]. CGM works as a sensor during the glycemic monitoring, while insulin pump serves as an actuator. Self-inserted Teflon or steel catheter is connected with the insulin reservoir of pump by a long tubing. With the development of manufacturing technology, the volume of CGM-based close-loop insulin pump system has been dramatically reduced and facilitates to carry, learn, and operate, where the dose adjustment is more accurate and stable. Consequently, it has been widely applied in clinical practice. At present, the technology of insulin pump is more advanced in that it can precisely simulate the physiological secretion of insulin. Briefly, the insulin pump can be regulated by artificial intelligence to simulate the basal insulin secretion in the body by an tunable pulsed subcutaneous infusion. Generally, the closed-loop insulin system usually delivers the insulin directed by a control algorithm according to the real-time ISF glucose concentration from matched CGM system [161, 178, 183].
In addition to enzymatic electrochemical glucose biosensor, semi-implantable microdialysis technique is an alternative way to collect the dialysate from blood [184,185,186] or ISF [187,188,189], which could be further analyzed by an external glucose sensor (Fig. 8c). The microdialysis probe is coated with a semipermeable membrane and inserted into the tissue, and the glucose in collected dialysate could continuously perfuse to the measuring module of glucose sensor. Compared with the ISF microdialysis, the intravenous microdialysis possesses the advantages that can accurately measure glucose [190] directly from the blood, yet the intravenous nature is more invasive. Microdialysis technique has a readout lag (~ 5 min) due to time-consuming dialysate transportation to the glucose sensor. While microdialysis could potentially enable multiplexed detections by directly extracting fluids compared to implanted electrodes, the various peripheral devices (e.g., pump, tubing, and sensor) more significantly affect the physical activities of users than form of implanted electrodes, which limits its applications to the clinical diagnosis [191,192,193,194]. In addition, though microdialysis-based glucose derives the ISF or blood sample to measure the glucose concentration ex vivo, this method is unstable due to the foreign body response (FBR) with the disadvantages of longer analytical time for glucose measuring [140, 195, 196].
In addition to the CGM-insulin pump system that mimics the natural pancreas, hemodialysis monitor is another widely used transdermal device system that could mimic the kidney to remove the waste and purify the blood [197,198,199]. By this way, the hemodialysis system could regulate the blood physiological environment. When the transdermal tubings are fixed on the patient’s body (Fig. 8d), the blood is continuously treated in the hemodialysis machine consisting of key water system and dialyzer. The water system mainly contains dialysate and heparin pump to refresh the blood and prevent clotting, while the dialyzer is employed to filter the creatinine, urea and water from the blood. For the safety consideration, the newest dialysis machines are continuously monitor an group of safety–related parameters, such as blood and dialysate flow rate, blood pressure, dialysis solution conductivity, pH, and temperature to eliminate the potential risk of blood leakage or air formation.
3.2.2 Microneedle Device
Commercial medical transdermal devices (e.g., CGM, glucose microdialysis probes, close-loop insulin delivery system, and hemodialysis circulation system) can efficiently achieve the sensing, delivery, or sampling from the in vivo environment. However, the large needles or implanted probes induce uncomfortable experience or potential medical risk due to the nerve or blood contact. Microneedles technology has emerged as a novel form of transdermal devices with 500–800 μm-length needles in an array, which could subcutaneously penetrate skin layer in a painless and minimally invasive way. The short microneedles were intentionally intended to penetrate the stratum corneum, which is the outermost layer of the skin, but without reaching to the nerve endings or blood capillaries in the dermis layer, enabling penetration of skin in a painless manner. Moreover, the microneedle technique reduces the operational complexity of well-trained medical personnel, which makes it a convenient tool for non-professional personnel. Furthermore, the minimal invasive and in situ feature effectively avoids the blood extraction and reduces the possibility of undesired problems as blood infections, sample contamination and so on, which pave a convenient and alternative path for transdermal applications. Combined with the well-established portable detection or delivering system, the detection tasks could be performed by the patients without the concerns or risks of tissue damages or infections caused by metal needles.
Transdermal deliveries of drugs, vaccines or diagnostic agents are important application of microneedle technique in the past decade. The strategies of medicine deliveries are generally determined by the physical forms of microneedles. Traditional forms of delivery-purpose microneedles are summarized in Fig. 9a [200]. Solid microneedles can be used to create micron-scale pores in the skin surface, following by drug formulations applied to the skin or tip-coated drugs remaining in the skin for slow diffusion. Water-soluble or swellable microneedles encapsulate the medicines within the tips, thereby releasing them slowly along with the tips dissolving or degrading in the skin. Hollow microneedles can be used for delivery liquid formulations in precise dose. In recent years, emerging porous microneedles were proved to be another solution for transdermal controlled release, with relatively facile fabrication, as shown in Fig. 9b [201,202,203]. Specific physical forms were developed for unique applications as well, such as integrating soluble microneedle tips and bubble structure into a separatable microneedles (Fig. 9c) [204] and grooved microneedles inspired by snake fangs (Fig. 9d) [205] for efficient transdermal and liquid-formulations delivery.
In addition to traditional photolithography and etching methods, researchers have developed a number of strategies to fabricate and optimize the structures of microneedles, including hot embossing, magnetorheological lithography (Fig. 9e) and 3D printing (Fig. 9f). Hot embossing is a common method for fabricating microstructures into shapes, which can make solid microneedles, is low-cost and easy to handle, but has high requirements for molds [206, 207]. Magnetorheological lithography can effectively fabricate microneedles without the use of molds, which is efficient and more flexible, but has limited material options [208, 209]. 3D printing is a relatively new fabrication with high design flexibility, high efficiency, and greatly reduced manufacturing difficulty, but also has the disadvantage of limited material options [210,211,212,213].
In recent years, water-soluble or biodegradable microneedles became the most studied category due to the convenience in preparation and the versatility in treating diseases. Sullivan et al. developed dissolving microneedle patches encapsulating inactivated influenza virus vaccine that targeting delivery to skin’s antigen-presenting cells, providing facilitated vaccination and improved immunogenicity on mice model compared to conventional intramuscular injection (Fig. 10a) [214]. Wang et al. introduced nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) treatment on local skin before inserting the influenza vaccine-packaged, biodegradable microneedles, achieving lesion-free cutaneous vaccination and broadened cross-protective immunity owing to the NAFL-mediated adjuvanticity [215]. Subcutaneous insulin delivery via biodegradable microneedles is another hotspot (Fig. 10b) [216, 217] as they can provide the essential continuous delivery for protein drugs. For instance, Seong et al. developed swellable PS-PAA microneedles with high percentage of effective insulin dose loaded in the swollen polymer network, leading to prolonged release insulin rather than a burst release (Fig. 10c) [218]. Moreover, Yu and co-workers designed and fabricated gelatin/calcium sulfate and gelatin/hydroxyapatite composite microneedles for insulin delivery, which presented longer hypoglycemic effect than subcutaneous injection route in diabetic rats model (Fig. 10d) [219, 220]. Localized therapy for avoiding systemic side effects is another advantage of microneedle-based drug delivery. Xie et al. utilized dissolvable microneedle to transdermally deliver selective CGRP antagonist peptide for curing localized neuropathic pain on rats model in a painless and irritation-free manner, without disturbing the normal nociception and motor function (Fig. 10e) [221]. This advantage also provides a promising dosage form for antineoplastic drugs with systemic toxicity and side effects. Su’s team reported a safe subcutaneous delivery of lipid-coated cisplatin nanoparticles via dissolving microneedles, resulting in remarkable reduction in tumor volume and weight within a xenograft tumor animal model, and non-organ toxicity was detected in the meantime (Fig. 10f) [222]. On the other hand, capillaries in subcutaneous tissues can allow fast diffusion of small-molecule drugs from the dermis into the systemic circulation, offering new opportunities for self-administrable cardiovascular diseases therapeutics. Li and co-workers successfully developed biodegradable microneedles for combinative delivery of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) for treating hypertensive emergencies and sodium thiosulfate for suppressing side effects induced by SNP, on the spontaneous hypertensive model (Fig. 10g) [223].
Based on micro-nano fabrication technology, microneedles are feasible to combine with other advanced technologies for achieving more complex functionalities, e.g., on-demand drug release. Wei et al. integrated conductive microneedles electrodes with electroporation device for in vivo DNA and siRNA delivery under safe voltage, achieving efficient and localized delivery of plasmid DNA (in healthy muscle tissue) and siRNA (into tumor) in mice model (Fig. 11a) [224]. Chen’s team encapsulated photothermal conversion nanomaterial (LaB6) and chemotherapy drug molecules in polycaprolactone microneedles with low melting point (~ 60 °C) to establish a near-infrared (NIR)-light-triggered transdermal controlled-release system [225,226,227]. Benefitting from the simultaneous photothermal therapy and chemotherapy to superficial tumors, this microneedle system demonstrated good synergistic effect that eradicated 4T1 tumors within 1 week on mice model, without recurrence and significant weight loss (Fig. 11b) [228]. Gu’s team integrated carefully designed glucose-responsive vesicles or matrix with insulin loaded into swellable microneedles for establishing closed-loop insulin delivery systems [229, 230]. The essential glucose-sensing composites such as glucose oxidase and phenylboronic acid can sensitively respond to hyperglycemic conditions and lead to the dissociation of glucose-responsive components, then releasing insulin into systemic circulation via subcutaneous vascular and lymph capillary networks. These systems demonstrated the effectiveness of blood glucose regulation on both insulin-deficient diabetic mice and minipigs models (Fig. 11c, d).
Being as a powerful transdermal drug delivery platform, microneedles technique provided exciting novel possibilities for the development of integrated diagnosis & treatment system, by combining with wearable biosensing system. Representative research on closed-loop diabetes monitoring and therapy was reported by Kim’s team [231]. The stretchable skin-mounted system presented in Fig. 12a was mainly composed of a multi-layer sweat-based glucose-sensing patch and an electro-thermal triggered therapeutic microneedle patch. The glucose-sensing module includes a core electrochemical glucose sensor and other humidity, temperature, pH and strain sensors for glucose level correction and hypoglycemic states prediction, all based on graphene (GP)-hybrid materials. For delivery metformin into ISF, the microneedles with dissolvable PVP body and phase-change material (PCM) coating were warmed by the electro-resistive heater, leading to the melting of PCM (transition temperature 41–42 °C) and the dissolving of PVP, thereby releasing loaded drugs. On the diabetic mice model, the measured over-threshold sweat glucose level triggered the heating of microneedle patch to regulate the blood glucose, forming a feedback-controlled drug delivery system. In their later work, a similar but upgraded system with more efficient sweat glucose monitoring and two-stage metformin controlled release was developed [232]. The innovative microneedles were made by dissolvable hyaluronic acid hydrogel coated with PCM, and loaded metformin was encapsulated in two types of phase-change nanoparticles (PCN1 and PCN2, melting transition temperature at 38 and 43 °C, respectively) (Fig. 12b). This realized precise and multistage drug release in response to the monitored glucose level.
On the other hand, microneedles themselves can be developed in to wearable biosensing devices. In fact, microneedle-based biosensing technique has achieved optimistic progress in recent years. Fabricating microneedles from conductive or semi-conductive materials as transdermal sensing electrodes matrix, and performing sensing via three-electrode electrochemistry or bioimpedance measurement, is the fundamental principles of microneedle-based biosensing (Fig. 12c). Typically, to guarantee the sensing specificity, microneedle tips are modified with certain enzymes or antibodies for targeting the analytes. Similarly, micro-nano-materials/structures are widely used at the tips for enhancing the specific surface area and surface conductance, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of microneedle electrodes. Aside from solid microneedles, hollow microneedles can also provide a technical strategy for biosensing, that utilize micro-channels inside microneedle tips to transfer interstitial fluid (ISF) from the dermis or the endothelium for in vitro analyzing or on-device monitoring via fully integrated microneedle biosensors.
The strength of microneedle biosensing is its minimal invasiveness and convenience in in situ monitoring of subcutaneous bio-signals, while the submicron scale microneedle tips are a double-edged sword that limited its application. First, processing, modifying and integrating tiny microneedles into biosensors challenge the preparation technique, especially for quantity production required by practical application. Second, small microneedle electrodes imply limited surface area that results in weak sensing signals, which typically requires integrating micro-nano-materials/structures at microneedle tips to enhance the specific surface area. It leads to complicated fabricating process and fragile surface structures of microneedle electrodes. Third, the length of microneedle electrodes confines the sensing depth to dermis, lacking the detecting ability in deeper tissue or inside blood vessels at present.
Although there are multiple limitations, microneedle-based biosensing is still well suited for continuous physiological signals monitoring and in vivo biomarkers detecting, particularly in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) [233,234,235]. Instead of pain and inconvenience caused by frequent finger-stick measurements, or inflammation risks induced by long metallic probe (several millimeters) of commercial CGM devices, microneedle CGM sensors can provide noninvasive or minimally invasive experience for diabetic patients. Invernale et al. demonstrated a representative design of electrochemical working electrode for glucose sensing, utilizing conductive polymer PEDOT to immobilize glucose-specific enzyme GOx on Pt coated stainless steel microneedles (Fig. 13a, b) [236]. High linearity that almost covered the most physiological glucose range of diabetic patients (0–432 mg dL−1) and good biosafety were demonstrated in vitro. Another more integrated glucose sensor was developed based on silicon microneedles by Yoon et al.[237]. An entire piece of microneedles arrays was functional zoned into three subareas: the working electrode (WE), the counter electrode (CE) and the reference electrode (RE), via shadow-mask-assisted sputtering (Fig. 13c–f). Iron catalyst, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), and Pt nanoparticle were subsequently modified on the WE and the CE, resulting in good linearity and sensitivity (17.73 ± 3 µA mM−1 cm−2) as an enzyme-free glucose sensor. Besides the direct electrochemical sensing by modified microneedle electrodes, Jina and co-workers developed a hollow-silicon-microneedle-arrays-based CGM system prototype [238, 239] and achieved good accuracy (overall mean absolute relative difference of 15%) from ten patients with insulin-dependent diabetes for up to 72 h [239]. The glucose in ISF diffused via microneedles’ lumens into the PBS filled sensing chamber, where electrochemical module with GOx-coated working electrode functioned.
A similar hollow microneedle biosensing proof-of-concept demonstration was developed for protein detecting by Miller et al. [240]. Hollow microneedles fabricated by two photon polymerization were integrated with fluidic channels and electrochemical electrodes arrays (Fig. 14a), targeting for myoglobin/troponin detection in ISF. However, this ISF transfer strategy leads to relative long sensing lag time (several min to more than 10 min), which confines its application in detecting large molecules that diffuse slow or therapeutic serum levels that vary fast. Ranamukhaarachchi et al. firstly integrated a hollow-microneedle-optofluidic biosensor for rapid in vitro vancomycin (VAN) sensing [241]. The microneedle lumen immobilized with high-density peptides for VAN recognition acting as the reactive chamber led to low sample volume needed (0.6 nL) and fast responding (< 5 min), while the integrated optofluidic module provided high sensitivity (0.41 AU/decade) and low LoD (84 nM) for VAN quantifying (Fig. 14b–d). Unfortunately, these prototypes are not fully integrated since the necessary modules including ICs and power supplies remain as great engineering challenges to volume and cost control. One clever solution is to directly collect serum samples from superficial vessels via relative long hollow microneedle for non-electronic analyzing (Fig. 14e–f) [242]. By applying the one-touch-activated blood multidiagnostic system (OBMS) on the superficial vessels, approximately 30 μL blood could be extracted into the sample chamber through biocompatible ultra-sharp nickel microneedle [242, 243]. Blood cells were then filtered when the blood flew through the polysulfone membrane. The remaining serum diffused to reaction zones for colorimetric assay. This system was applied on a rabbit ear artery and successfully measured the serum levels of glucose and cholesterol level within 3 min. It provided a powerful platform for diagnosing various biomarker by simply redesigning the paper-based sensor. Similar strategy was employed on glucose detection in ISF [244].
Apart from the glucose and protein sensing, researchers start to employ hypodermic-microneedle-based approaches for other important physiological biomarkers (pH, K+, NO, ROS, alcohol, etc.) monitoring instead of conventional routines. For instance, Miller and co-workers modified the myoglobin/troponin sensing setup (Fig. 15a) into a potassium-ions (K+) monitoring platform, by utilizing pyrolyzed carbon as ion selective electrode (the WE) for K+ detecting [245]. More recently, an all-solid-state potentiometric microneedles patch for potassium-selective detection was reported by Parrilla et al. [246] Multi-layer coating including potassium-selective membrane-modified microneedle WE directly monitored the K+ concentration variation in chicken or porcine skin ex vivo. Scientists also incorporate microneedle biosensors with medical imaging instrument into a powerful dual-diagnostic system [247]. As presented in Fig. 15b, a, hemin/PEDOT/polydopamine-modified PCL microneedle-based electrochemical sensor for highly sensitive NO detecting was mounted on the probe of an endomicroscope, and the probe was applied into the colon of the mice in vivo. Optical images of polyp regions and distinctive increase in cancer-specific NO signal were obtained simultaneously. Alcohol monitoring from ISF is also reported recently by Wang’s team [248]. Alcohol oxidase immobilized Pt wire, Pt and Ag wire electrodes were inserted into the lumens of the hollow microneedles for electrochemical sensing (Fig. 15c), providing a convenient strategy for functioned microneedle electrodes fabrication. Ex vivo mice skin model analysis demonstrated the efficaciousness of this transdermal alcohol monitor. In addition, to protect the fragile micro-nano-sensing structures on microneedle electrodes from mechanical damage in transdermal process, Xie’s team developed a strategy by spray coating dissolvable polymer (PVP) on the microneedle electrodes for in vivo biosensing of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [249, 250]. In this electrochemical sensing platform, PVP protective layer was coated on the microneedle WE that fragile rGO/Pt nanoparticles composites deposited. It provided sufficient mechanical strength to protect the nanostructures on microneedles from damage and dissolved rapidly (< 5 min) in IFS, thereby expose the microneedle surface to function correctly (Fig. 15d, e).
Although fully integrated microneedle-based biosensing and transdermal formation releasing system for in vivo diagnosis and treatment is still being developed, we can expect its appearance and clinical application in the coming future with optimism [235, 251, 252].
3.2.3 Brain Electrodes
Neuroscience becomes the recent research hotspot that mainly reveals the biophysical mechanism in brain, and electrophysiological study is performed to bridge the relationship between physiological activities and electrical responses of neurons. Understanding how single neurons communicate and contribute with each other in the large neuron network is still a big challenge in neuroscience [253,254,255]. Conventionally, the action potential or ion channel current of signal neuron recorded by single electrode (e.g., patch-clamp) is the gold standard to explore the neurophysiology [256,257,258,259,260]. The patch-clamp technique forms a high impedance seal between glass micropipette and cell membrane by vacuum. Neuron and brain slice are basic neural models for in vitro patch-clamp recording. With the development of patch clamp technique, the in vivo patch-clamp recording is also applied in the neuroscience study [261,262,263,264,265]. In contrast to in vitro recording, the advanced in vivo patch-clamp recording paves a new path for neuroscience of living organism. In vivo patch-clamp recording is commonly performed under a microscope to find and record the labeled neurons in the brain. To simplify the pre-labeling of neuron, Kitamura et al. developed a novel shadow patching method to visualize the neuron as a negative image by prefusing fluorescent dye in the extracellular environment (Fig. 16a, left) [261], and the recorded action potentials present the similar quality with the pre-labeled one [266]. Moreover, the plasmid DNA and fluorescent dye was also successful to be delivered into the neuron by electroporation of the same platform, which facilitates the signal recording, biomarker labeling, and genetic manipulating of single neuron in intact brain. Although the in vivo patch-clamp is a powerful tool to study the electrophysiology of single neurons, the manipulating skills are strictly required. To achieve the user-friendly operations, an automatic in vivo patch clamping system (Fig. 16a, right) was established to accurately position the cell by analyzing the cell-induced electrode impedance changes in algorithm with good performance of yield, throughput and signal quality [262]. Although the intracellular recording of single neuron is fundamental to understand the neurophysiology, the single-electrode system with complicated components is difficult to scale to a high-throughput system, and the invasive manners hamper the development of long-term recording.
For chronic neurophysiology study, electroencephalograph (EEG) recording featured with noninvasive and high-throughput properties is widely applied to record local electrical activities of brain, which is collected from the multiple electrodes on the scalp [42,43,44, 270, 271]. However, the spatial resolution is limited due to the electrode size, and the quality of EEG recording is also affected by the dura and skull [272,273,274]. To improve the spatiotemporal resolution of recording, the extracellular microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are designed to record the neuronal action potentials from local neuron network. In contrast to EEG recording, the semi-implantable MEA extracellular recording can not only distinguish signals (e.g., spike) from individual single neurons in local neural circuit, but stimulate single neurons in the deep brain as well. Significantly, the high spatial resolution MEA can map and explore the working mode of neuron network [275,276,277].
Microwire MEAs are the first semi-implantable brain electrodes to study the brain for decades (Fig. 16b) [278,279,280,281,282,283]. Microwires are manually made of insulated material coated stainless steel, tungsten, platinum, gold, iridium or nichrome wires with exposed conductive recording tips. Conventionally, the microwires are categorized into tetrodes and stereotrodes with throughput from several to over hundred electrodes, which are collected in a guide tube or aligned along the socket, respectively. The conductive tip end will be penetrated into the brain, and the other ends of microwire is soldered to a connector for signal recording [267, 284]. Much effort was made to long-term single neuron recording from the mammalian by microwires. To further improve recording sites in the brain, multiple boards can be stacked up to form a high-throughput microwire MEAs. Nicolelis et al. implants 96–704 microwires in monkeys, recording 421 single neurons for one month and 58 neurons for 18 months after implantation [284]. Due to less damage to the neurons, the microwire MEAs are qualified for the chronic, large-scale electrophysiological recording of mammalian [285,286,287]. However, the soft microwires are difficult to control during implanting into the curved brain surface.
With the development of micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) technologies, the complicated silicon-based MEAs emerge by efficient and standard microfabrication techniques. Utah electrode array (UEA) is similar with the stacked microwire MEAs, and its conventional configuration contains 10-by-10 needle shank with the exposed conductive silicon tips, which is originally developed at the University of Utah (Fig. 16c) [288, 289]. UEA is fabricated on a 3-mm silicon substrate, which make it a robust semi-implantable device in mammalian research [268, 290, 291]. Moreover, the successful human trials are usually based on this type of MEAs using brain–machine interface [292, 293]. Compared with the stacked microwires, UEA has a higher spatial resolution at the same brain depth, and the pitch between neighbor shanks is standard. To further improve spatial resolution in-depth, Utah slanted electrode array (USEA) is developed to detect the neuron signals at different depth [294, 295]. However, the spatial resolution in-depth is still limited due to intrinsic structure of UEA or USEA. To realize the recording from various depth of brain, Michigan electrodes (Fig. 16d) with single or multiple shanks are effective complement and development for functions of microwires and Utah electrodes, and Michigan fine neural probe was defined and released by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers [296, 297]. In contrast to tip recording sites of other two MEAs, Michigan electrodes have multiple recording sites along each shank for simultaneously exploring the neuronal activities at different brain layers, which greatly improve the depth spatial resolution [269, 298, 299]. Besides, Michigan electrode can be easily assembled as UEA by stacking the multiple-shank electrodes for three-dimensional high spatial resolution recording, while the recording brain depth (e.g., cortical or intracortical) is adjusted by the shank length [300].
Based on the high spatial resolution and controllable fabrication of Michigan-style electrodes, other functional components can be integrated into the same device. In neuroscience, neuronal regulation is another important approach to reveal neurons’ functionality and interaction in complex networks [309, 310]. Electrical stimulation is preferred to activate neurons due to the sensing electrodes can be multiplexed as a stimulating one, reducing the fabrication and integration complication of devices. However, the electrical stimulation has the disadvantages of lower spatial resolution and non-specificity [311]. To solve the limitation of electrical stimulation, optogenetics provide an advanced neuronal regulation strategy using specific wavelength optical stimulus at the neurons which are introduced the photosensitive proteins, and this novel optical simulation strategy can improve the neuron network analysis by the high spatiotemporal stimulation. According to this principle, the high-density microscale optical and optoelectronic components trend to be integrated on the Michigan-style probe by advanced MEMS technologies. To control distinct cells and field oscillations in animals, Wu et al. fabricated the neuron-size microscale light-emitting diodes (μLEDs) and recording electrodes on the same neural probe shank (Fig. 17a, left), demonstrating the versatile and precise optical simulation by this optogenetic tools [301]. To meet the freely moving animal applications, the wireless optogenetics was developed by Kim et al. [302], and the neural probe involved electrophysiological measurement (Pt microelectrode), optical measurement (Si microscale inorganic photodetector), optical stimulation (GaN inorganic light-emitting diodes), and temperature sensing (Pt serpentine resistor) on a microneedle substrate for injection into the brain (Fig. 17a, right). In addition to the MEMS μLED integrated device, the optical waveguide integrated probe is another optogenetic tool to deliver the external coupled optical source to the neural probe [312,313,314]. The waveguide can be fabricated by polymers such as SU-8 or dielectrics, and the path and stimulation sites of waveguide microscale pattern can be freely defined by photolithography [312, 315,316,317]. In addition to the electrical and optical stimulation, the chemical stimulation is also an alternative mean to regulate neurons in brain, so the microfluidic channels (Fig. 17b, top) were integrated on the neural probe shank to achieve simultaneous electrical recording and drug delivery in deep brain [47, 318,319,320,321,322]. Although the Michigan-style electrodes have high-density recording sites, the interconnection lines of passive probe arrays significantly limit the number of electrodes on each shank. Owing to complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) devices are addressable by multiplexing circuits via a small number of interconnection line. Therefore, the number and spatial resolution of recording sites (Fig. 17b, bottom) can be sharply improved by these active devices [274, 303, 323,324,325].
The silicon or metal-based electrodes are popular and utility tools for the neuronal signal recording; however, they also suffer from the mechanical mismatch with the soft brain tissue, leading to the chronic immune responses. To improve the neural probe and brain tissue interface, the flexible electrode arrays (FEA) are designed by the materials, (e.g., polyimide (PI), parylene, or SU-8) or configurations (e.g., ultrathin mesh) with the low Young's modulus and bending stiffness, achieving a high-quality and biocompatible coupling with brain tissue. For example, Kim et al. fabricated FEA on ultrathin polyimide substrate supported by bioresorbable substrates of silk (Fig. 17c, left), demonstrating 2.5-μm mesh PI-based FEA enabled conformal contact with soft curvilinear brain tissue. All the electrodes record the high-quality electrocorticogram (ECoG) without implantation immune response for 3–4 weeks [304]. To overcome the constraint of passive electrode interconnection line, Viventi et al. developed a ultrathin and flexible silicon nanomembrane transistors with thousands of recording sites [305], and this FEA device can be either placed on the brain or folded and inserted into interhemispheric fissure (Fig. 17c, right). FEA paves a utility tool for long-term continuous monitoring and coupling tightly with uneven brain surface, remaining precise delivery difficult in deep brain. To overcome this challenge, syringe injectable electronics was propose by Liu et al. [326]. The mesh FEA was delivered via 100 μm needle to achieve the tight integration in distinct regions of the brain with high device yield (> 90%) and low chronic immune responses in five weeks (Fig. 17d, left). For stable long-term chronic brain mapping, the mesh FEA was further designed with a lower bending stiffness close to one of neural tissue, and the injectable in vivo recording lasted for at least 8 months (Fig. 17d, right) [306]. To enrich the functions of FEA, the optical waveguide, recording electrodes, and microfluidic channels were integrated by fiber drawing process, and this device simplified the multiple optogenetic steps to single step (Fig. 17e) [308]. Via same drawing process, high-throughput and multifunctional fiber probes simultaneously carried out the optical stimulation, drug delivery and neural recording and drug delivery in freely moving mice with high-resolution study.
Bioresorbable materials are introduced in the semi-implantable device to enable the reliable implantation and good biocompatibility. Bioresorbable material-based electrodes provide another biocompatible strategy in neuroscience study. The key of these electrodes is the application of bioresorbable materials used as the thin substrate film or coating components, which can seamlessly biodegrade in the tissues over time [327,328,329]. Bioresorbable polymer coating (e.g., polyvinyl alcohol and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)) has been demonstrated to reduce glial scarring during the insertion of semi-implantable devices [327]. Bioresorbable silk coatings are an effective temporary stiffening agent for the soft polymer-based probes which are difficult to be implanted into the brain, and silk will gradually in the brain tissue [330].
In addition to organic materials, inorganic materials such as monocrystalline Si nanomembranes are demonstrated to fabricate a bioresorbable array [331]. These Si nanomembranes are hydrolyzed into biocompatible products (e.g., silicic acid) when immersed in the biofluidic environment. The 300-nm-thick phosphorous-doped Si nanomembrane dissolves with the rate of 11 nm/day in 37 °C and pH 7.4 artificial cerebrospinal fluid, while the rates of 100-nm-thick passivated SiO2 layer and 30-µm-thick PLGA are both 8.2 nm/day, respectively. Significantly, in vivo biocompatibility bioassays verified these bioresorbable devices activate small-scale microglials. Those study proves the bioresorbable semi-implantable devices serve as the brain exploration tools in comfortable and biocompatible manner based on the highly precise microfabrication technologies. To lower the stiffness of electrodes, the low-modulus conductive polymers are adopted in the neuro-device fabrication to provide a good mechanical match for brain tissue [332]. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) is a common conductive polymer, which can replace the gold, platinum, iridium, and tungsten materials as recording and stimulation electrodes. The PEDOT/poly (styrene sulfonate) (PSS) recording electrodes are widely reported in many studies, while the PEDOT/paratoluene sulfonate (pTS) is preferred material as the stimulation electrode. PEDOT/pTS-coated platinum electrodes exhibit a lower impedance and larger charge injection capacity than those of bare ones [333]. Due to the higher surface area, these conductive polymer-based electrodes present a higher charge transfer capacity for the in vivo models [334]. To future clinical applications, these conductive polymer-based semi-implantable devices require more rigorous validation in nonhuman primate models to ensure the chronic stability and biocompatibility [335].
3.3 Applications
For the fundamental neuroscience research, electrical recording is a powerful technology to analyze the activities of neural networks, which are related to physiological and biological mechanisms. MEAs are commonly employed semi-implantable devices for high-throughput and long-term electrophysiological recording. The traditional MEAs consist of multichannel individual passive sensors; however, their interconnectors occupy large space, which significantly limited the high spatial resolution for the in vivo neuroscience studies. Viventi et al. employed a silicon nanomembrane-based transistor array for the ECoG recording to overcome this limitation [305]. Based on architecture of the flexible transistor array, the thousands of integrated sensors can be operated by fewer wires in a multiplex way. The in vivo activities of brain cortex, such as sleep, visual stimulus, and seizure, were recorded and mapped by 360 electrodes. From the feline seizure model, it can be found the typical feature of seizures is spiral waves which propagate in the cortex, and the high spatial resolution devices can visually display in the form of high spatiotemporal resolution pseudo-color movies (Fig. 18a).
For brain electrodes, fully implantable electronics facilitate the maximum free movement of the subject without the influence of external structures; while semi-implantable electronics focus more on the fidelity of signal transmission. Since fully implantable electronics need to meet the requirements of wireless transmission, and the current development of fully implantable electronics, the wireless transmission requirements of fully implantable electronics are far from the expected goal, especially the EEG signal and its complex and cranial will seriously affect the transmission of the signal. In addition to the high-throughput property of devices, long-term chronic electrical recording is also required in neural electrophysiological study. For the stable in vivo neuroscience investigation, the semi-implantable device can achieve the single cell spatiotemporal resolution; however, the motion damage and chronic inflammation will affect the function and performance of implanted probes during long-term monitoring. Fu et al. fabricated a flexible mesh electronic device, which was biocompatible with neuron-like stiffness to support the high-quality neuron signal recordings from mouse brains for 34 weeks (Fig. 18b) [306]. The neuron-like device can record the robust single-neuron signals from freely behaving mice, which paves a promising way to investigate the cognition and neurodegenerative in vivo models. Therefore, under the premise of requiring signal fidelity, the current semi-implantable electronics are more widely used in the field of brain electrodes.
To integrated high-throughput and long-term properties of neural activity recording, the fully integrated silicon probe was developed for the high-density recording. The Michigan-style shank integrated 960 complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) recording sites (Fig. 18c), which can perform the hundreds of neuron for each semi-implantable device [303]. Employing only two shanks, at least 700 individual neurons were recorded from five brain regions in a freely moving mouse. Moreover, more than 100 neurons were stably chronic recordings over 150 days by a semi-implantable COMS device in the mouse brain. Significantly, the functionalized small devices allowed the simultaneous and large-scale recording from different brain regions of awake animals. Combing the high-throughput and long-term performance, this advanced brain electrodes open up future study of large-scale ECoG recording in both local field potentials and spikes.
3.3.1 Biochemical Sensing
Due to the existence of skull structure, it is not suitable for the detection of brain biochemical indexes with common transdermal detection. Discoveries in optical sensing [45, 336, 337] and electrochemical sensing [338,339,340,341] are of great importance to the development of neuroscience.
Most of the initial optical sensing was based on single-electrode sensing of fluorescent proteins. This single-electrode optical biochemical sensor provides a solution for in vivo research in neuroscience and lays the foundation for the development of modern precision electrodes. For example, GRABNE single-electrode sensor detects optogenetically and behaviorally triggered NE release in live mice, live zebrafish, and free-ranging mice (Fig. 19a) [342]. As shown in Fig. 19b, the ultra-sensitive protein calcium sensor GCaMP6 reliably detects individual action potentials in neuronal cytosol and directionally regulated synaptic calcium transients in individual dendritic spines [343]. Thus, the optical sensor provides a new avenue to the organization and dynamics of neural circuits at multiple temporal and spatial scales. With the development of single-electrode imaging, two-photon imaging [344] and high-precision and multifunctional [337, 345, 346] imaging are maturing. The easy detection characteristics of these versatile, high-precision optical sensors make it possible to monitor neural activity in vivo in real time. Acetylcholine, which is involved in a variety of neural activities but has always been difficult to detect, was successfully detected in vivo by a semi-implanted fluorescent, two-photon imaging device (Fig. 19c). As shown in Fig. 19d, the behavior of acute GABA release can be monitored, and the amount of instantaneous change in dopamine can be measured. In terms of application prospects, wavelength division multiplexing sensing of optical sensors will be applied to more scenarios. A calcium-sensitive near-infrared probe (NIR GECO1) combined with other optogenetic indicators and actuators has been reported to open up new prospects for multicolor Ca2+ imaging (Fig. 19e). In the future, it will be a trend to use wireless, passive, multiplexed implantable optical sensors to monitor and modulate neural activities in freely moving animals. The important progress in brain sensing was also extended to the development of electrochemical (EC) sensors.
Similar to common electrochemical transdermal sensing, electrochemical sensing in brain relies on working electrode and electroanalytical techniques. Micro-/nano-electrode modified by aptamer has become a main way to detect biochemical substances in brain. For example, it was reported an electrochemical aptamer-based in vivo cocaine sensor capable of measuring cocaine directly from discrete brain locations. Besides, aptamer functionalized neural recording electrodes successfully probe electrochemical aptamer-based sensor and spontaneous neural activity in the brain (Fig. 20a). Another electrochemical aptamer-based sensor supporting continuous, real-time, multi-hours measurements detected four drugs in the bloodstream of even awake, ambulatory rat (Fig. 20b, c). This electrochemical aptamer-based sensor achieved high temporal resolution and precise molecular measurements at clinically relevant detection limits, providing an important approach to the study of physiology and pharmacokinetics. A recent paper describes a transparent, ultra-flexible, and active multielectrode array, for simultaneous optogenetics and electrochemical sensing. With the increasing of multifunctional semi-implantable sensors in brain biochemical detection, wireless multifunctional devices are booming. A wireless miniaturized microelectrode system for real-time optogenetic stimulation and dopamine detection in the deep brain of freely behaving mice was developed [347]. Such semi-implantable biochemical sensors provide important potential for neuroscience studies when combined with fluorescent and aptamer for mapping of biochemically active species.
3.3.2 Drug Delivery
Advances in the field of nano- and microfluidics have created opportunities to develop drug delivery platforms in a semi-implantable form. The advanced microfluidic systems allow precise temporal control of variety drugs, long-term independent infusion with minimal tissue damage and are designed to allow free movement of research animals. In recent years, drug delivery systems are often used in combination with multifunctional platforms such as photo-modulation and signal recording, and drug delivery channels have evolved and improved from single to multiple channels depending on the application requirements. As shown in Fig. 21a, different stimuli are applied at the cellular level to study and modulate neural circuits in vivo, which only a single microfluidic channel is used for drug delivery. In the example shown in Fig. 21b, neural electrodes with multiple functions are also capable of delivering multiple drugs. These in vivo results demonstrate that these electrodes with multifunctional delivery capabilities will be an effective tool for investigating the fundamental mechanisms behind brain disorders that modulate neural circuits by delivering neurotransmitters through a single implant. Multifunctional electrodes like the aforementioned one, which contain multiple drug delivery channels, can deliver not only common neurological drugs but also vector viruses carrying special genes (Fig. 21c). These flexible electrodes, which have multiple functions such as drug delivery, optical pathways, and signal recording, have achieved high fidelity (similar to the transmembrane potential and contains high-resolution details to explore ion channel properties) multimodal interrogation of brain circuits while minimizing tissue damage. But for accurate drug testing to be done in a free-moving, awake animal, smarter and easier drug delivery systems will be needed. Examples of wirelessly implantable drug-deliverable electrodes are shown in Fig. 21d-e. Figure 21d shows this wireless electrode can analyze dose response relationships for a single drug, or test the effects of several various drugs in a rodent brain. The main difference is the drug-fillable and flow-adjustable feature. The technique has the capability to target specific neuronal populations in freely moving animals. For the more demanding requirements of wireless, prolonged, repeated and precise drug delivery, the multichannel, wireless, controlled drug delivery shown in Fig. 21e provides a reliable solution. This scheme demonstrates the optofluidic device is an ability to selectively control specific mice via a Bluetooth application for smartphones, revealing the basis of neuropsychiatric disorders by observing changes in behavior and intracerebral features of the mice.
3.3.3 Stimulation
Modulating the activities of neural networks plays an essential role in neuroscience. Electrical and optical stimulation are common approaches to regulate the activities of neurons. Brain stimulation electrodes that are not permanently implanted inside the brain can be classified as semi-implantable devices because of their non-permanent use and because they can be controlled by an external device. To address the disadvantages of low spatial resolution and non-specificity, brain stimulation electrodes can be combined with optogenetics and advanced MEMS technology to activate neurons. It is of interest that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used to treat neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease, or depression. Currently, the main focus is on the versatility of semi-implantable devices to achieve closed-loop recording and treatment with DBS. Due to the excitability and conductivity of neurons, the electrical stimulation is generally applied to regulate them. The electrical stimulation electrodes are usually integrated in the electrical recording devices to check electrophysiological properties of neurons. These multifunctional semi-implantable devices can provide a simultaneous stimulation and recording tools for long-term monitoring and evaluation of single-neuron activities [306]. The emergence of optogenetics modified the gene of neurons into photosensitive ones which facilitates the optoelectronic regulation and greatly propels the neural regulation [353,354,355]. In contrast to the conventional electrical stimulation, optical stimulation can dramatically reduce the interference while signal recording is simultaneously performed. In the early research, the LEDs were physically attached on the brain recording probe with low resolution [356]. Recently, more efforts are focused on the integration of microLEDs on the neural probe with advanced microfabrication for the high-resolution optogenetic modulating and recording [301]. In recent study, the gamma frequency ontogenetic stimulation has been proved a hopeful DBS for AD treatment. It is demonstrated that 40 Hz optogenetic stimulation reduce the amyloid-β levels, and the microglia cells are activated to help clear amyloid-β.
To perform the optical stimulation, some studies have employed the thin optical fibers and waveguides with recording probes. For example, this optical fibers-microwire hybrid probes can achieve the simultaneous recording of single-neuron responses to the optical modulation. To further improve the resolution of optical modulation, the tip sizes of optical fibers were reduced to 5–20 µm to form an integrated optoelectrical interface [46, 357]. Another group has developed small and good flexible multifunctional probe by optical waveguides and recording electrodes, and this polymer-based multifunctional probes can be applied for optoelectronic operation on neural activity in the mouse brain [307, 308]. In one study, transparent and conductive zinc oxide pillars-based brain probe simultaneously performed the signal recording and optical regulation of optogenetic modified neurons in cortical regions. Based on this semi-implantable device technology, dynamics of light-perturbed brain circuit of transgenic mice and effects on behavior can be in-depth investigated [358].
In addition to the electrical and optogenetic stimulation, neural activities can also be modulated by chemical stimulation. For this purpose, the microfluidic channels were integrated onto the brain probes by deep reactive ion etching, and these channels were connected the exterior delivery of various neuroactive biochemical. In a study, the multiplex delivery microchannels were designed for simultaneous infusions of a stimulating chemical, a saline buffer solution, and label chemical into a local mouse brain for modulating neural activities and staining neurons at the target area. As a result, the neural activities were enhanced by the infusion of pilocarpine, while significantly inhibited by infusion of tetrodotoxin [47]. Moreover, the delivery function integrated neural probes were demonstrated to establish the in vivo disease model. By injection of baclofen, the seizure models can be built and specific neural signal patterns can be recorded simultaneously [47].
3.4 Biosafety
The biosafety indicators of semi-implantable devices are particularly concerned in both clinical practice and biomedical studies, mainly including inflammation, irritation, and fibrosis evaluation. Inflammation is a common defense mechanism in the body to eliminate harmful stimuli and activate the healing, when the immune system finds the pathogens, damaged cells, or irritants. However, inflammation sometimes can last longer than necessary, causing unexpected harm to the body. The effects of acute inflammation can be summarized as pain, redness, immobility, swelling, or heat signs, which only apply to inflammations of the skin. Irritation is defined as an inflammation or painful response status, which results in allergy or cell damage. For example, once the stimuli or agents induces the skin irritation, the skin may turn red. Fibrosis is another biosafety indicator, which is the formation of excess fibrous tissues or scar tissue, due to the injury or long-term inflammation. The formation of fibrosis has many potential causes such as injuries, burns, radiation, diseases, or treatment of diseases. The negative effects of fibrosis make the tissues harden or swell, which significantly affects the normal function of tissues.
Subcutaneously implanted electrodes or probes (e.g., CGM sensors) generally damage cells or stimulate skin, which will induce the inflammation. The early implantation has been proved to cause of sensor noise rather than the fibrosis [359]. The foreign-body response and wound injury will not lead to significant inflammation with insertion and immediate removal of the guide needles [177]. However, the implanted position is usually selected at fat region of abdomen, where the friction or touch will frequently occur during the sleeping or movements, so the long-term implantation of electrodes will result in subcutaneous inflammation, which will disturb the accurately blood glucose measurements. Besides, the tubing of insulin pump is easily blocked due to the similar reason, resulting in the dangerous hyperglycemia. For the brain electrode implantation, the foreign body response also leads to the wrapping of glia cells [359]. Generally, glia cells have been recognized as an encapsulating barrier and directly affect the communication between the implanted electrode and targeted neurons. Consequently, the glia will significantly influence the stimulation efficacy and the long-term performance of implanted devices. Due to the above reasons, the CGM sensors can only be implanted for 2 weeks to clean the probes, while the insulin pumps can last for 1 week to avoid the blockage. The brain electrode can continuously maintain the high-quality electrophysiological signals for several months, while the most of microneedles sensing and regulating system only present short-term applications.
3.5 Limitation and Future Trends for In Vivo Applications
Semi-implantable devices (e.g., CGM-based insulin pump systems, microneedles, brain electrodes) possess advantages of high sensitivity and rapid response for recording and regulating compared with the wearable devices. The electrically controllable property is convenient and reliable for the data transmission between the device and computer. In contrast to the fully implantable devices for in vivo application, the semi-implantable devices are safe without residues and convenient for power supply. For the in vitro cell application, the semi-implantable devices (e.g., nanoelectrode array, nanoFET, nanowire, and nanostraw) are efficient to penetrate the cell membrane in spontaneous or artificially assisted way. Due to the superiority of semi-implantable devices, the high-quality intracellular biophysical and biochemical signals can be recorded accurately, while the intracellular drug delivery can be precisely operated.
On the other hand, semi-implantable devices have obvious defects, such as limitation of long-term implanted, space for the in vitro intracellular environment, and imaging effect. Compared with the wearable devices, the long-term fixation on the human body causes inconvenient and uncomfortable feeling. Most of semi-implantable devices cannot be chronically implanted, which is easy to induce the inaccurate measurement or cause inflammation. Moreover, requirement of multiparameter simultaneous detection is difficult to be satisfied due to high standard for in vivo clinical practice and limit space for the in vitro intracellular environment. Furthermore, the detection sensitivity and selectivity of devices need to be improved. Spatial resolution and imaging effect is still at a low quality.
4 Summary and Perspective
Semi-implantable bioelectronic devices are desired to extensively promote the personalized and precise healthcare. They present the potential to serve as powerful tool for the biomedical clinical practice with the characteristics of high sensitivity, high selectivity, good biocompatibility, etc. With advances of micro/nanofabrication technologies, chemical/material preparations, and intelligent control algorithms/systems, the high-performance semi-implantable bioelectronic devices can sense and regulate the trace fluctuations (e.g., biophysical signals and biochemical markers) of physiological status. Microfluidics is another prospective technology for drug delivery and signal monitoring in combination with nanoelectrodes. The combination of electrical stimulation and nanoelectronics can modulate cellular activity and expression for precise stimulation and simultaneous monitoring. For personalized and precise healthcare, the universal semi-implantable bioelectronic platforms are compatible for various individuals, while the closed-loop regulation strategies can also be self-adaptive for individual requirements by artificial intelligence algorithms. For the in vitro cell applications, semi-implantable bioelectronics shows the superiorities of intracellular accurate signal recording and precise manipulations in a minimally invasive way, which collected high-quality intracellular bioinformation and achieve the efficient intracellular delivery.
In the recent decades, semi-implantable bioelectronic devices have unprecedented development in a variety of biomedical fields. To propel the wide practical applications of these semi-implantable bioelectronic devices, a large amount of current challenges and bottlenecks should be positively addressed for the future wide research and development. Here, we prospect the six future research trends for semi-implantable bioelectronic: (i) multifunctionality, (ii) microminiaturization, (iii) biocompatibility, (iv) intelligentization, (v) reliability, and (vi) commercial practicality. Multifunctionality is future trend in developing the semi-implantable bioelectronics. Multifunctional devices will not only perform the multiplex biochemical and biophysical signal recording, but conduct the electrical, optical, chemical regulating as well in vivo and in vitro. To explore the diversity and complexity of biological living from cell and tissue to living body, from extracellular environment and intracellular environment, the multifunctionalized semi-implantable bioelectronic devices are powerful tools to carry out the multiplexed signal collections for the multi-modality investigation.
Even if the current devices are miniaturized into a portable size, microminiaturization of the next-generation semi-implantable bioelectronic devices further helps the users ignore the existence of them. The microminiaturization with invisible properties should be developed with improved humanized design by integrating microminiaturized devices into daily necessities without uncomfortable implanting/carrying feelings. Meanwhile, the microminiaturization of semi-implantable devices for cells will greatly improve the chronic intracellular investigation with minimal damage.
For the long-term applications in vivo or in vitro, biocompatibility is one of key properties in the semi-implantable devices. For the in vivo studies, the materials of should be strictly screened to relieve the foreign body response, and the suppressive negative effect of semi-implantable devices will prolong the working life and reduce the recalibration frequency. For the in vitro studies, the biocompatible semi-implantable devices will enter into the cell and monitor the intracellular environment by a spontaneous and gentle endocytosis rather than artificial operations, which effectively maintain the cell viability and integrity of plasma membrane.
Though these semi-implantable devices can automatically perform regulation on biological subjects based on the collecting information, development into highly intelligent and close-loop system is still further required for personalized and precise healthcare. By integrating the artificial intelligence algorithms, the semi-implantable bioelectronic platforms are compatible and universal for various individuals. The closed-loop regulation strategies can also be supportive for individual requirements based on the precise deep learning or self-adaptive algorithms embedded into the control system of device.
Reliability of semi-implantable bioelectronic device is also essential aspect for the practical applications. The accuracy and precision of the measurement play a crucial role in the practical use, particularly in rigorous clinical trials. The fundamental performance, such as selectivity, sensitivity, long-term stability, and noise suppression, of semi-implantable bioelectronic devices should be further tested to assure an accurate measurement and regulation to exclude the interferences (e.g., non-targeted biochemical or biophysical signals, background noise). Reliability of devices should be also based on the further development toward biocompatibility and high-performance, while taking the maintenance of multifunctionality and device miniaturization into account.
With the advanced properties of semi-implantable bioelectronic device, the commercial practicality is leap development from laboratory to industry, or even from bench to the clinic. The inaccuracy or uncomfortable experiences of commercial semi-implantable bioelectronic devices will induce the distrust on its practical applications, which will rapidly cause the failure of commercial products. The translation from the prototype of semi-implantable electronic device to the commercial practical device suffers from the extremely high requirements and enormous challenges. However, for the future advances of biomedical practical application, these challenges of semi-implantable bioelectronics are meaningful to be achieved. The versatile semi-implantable bioelectronics will eventually provide the profound benefit of mankind from daily life to personalized healthcare.
References
D. Casares, P.V. Escribá, C.A. Rosselló, Membrane lipid composition: effect on membrane and organelle structure, function and compartmentalization and therapeutic avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(9), 2167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092167
V.P. Torchilin, Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4(2), 145–160 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1632
F. Wang, J. Xiao, S. Chen, H. Sun, B. Yang et al., Polymer vesicles: modular platforms for cancer theranostics. Adv. Mater. 30(17), 1705674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705674
Y. Ma, R.J.M. Nolte, J.L.M. Cornelissen, Virus-based nanocarriers for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64(9), 811–825 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.005
P. Vader, E.A. Mol, G. Pasterkamp, R.M. Schiffelers, Extracellular vesicles for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 106, 148–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.006
L.Y.T. Chou, K. Ming, W.C.W. Chan, Strategies for the intracellular delivery of nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40(1), 233–245 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00003E
X. Qin, C. Yu, J. Wei, L. Li, C. Zhang et al., Rational design of nanocarriers for intracellular protein delivery. Adv. Mater. 31(46), 1902791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902791
D.J. Stephens, R. Pepperkok, The many ways to cross the plasma membrane. PNAS 98(8), 4295 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.081065198
N.J. Yang, M.J. Hinner, Getting across the cell membrane: an overview for small molecules, peptides, and proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 1266, 29–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2272-7_3
W. Kang, R.L. McNaughton, H.D. Espinosa, Micro-and nanoscale technologies for delivery into adherent cells. Trends Biotechnol. 34(8), 665–678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.003
M.P. Stewart, A. Sharei, X. Ding, G. Sahay, R. Langer et al., In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery. Nature 538(7624), 183–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19764
P. Tiefenboeck, J.A. Kim, J.C. Leroux, Intracellular delivery of colloids: past and future contributions from microinjection. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 132, 3–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.013
B. Sakmann, E. Neher, Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 46, 455–472 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.46.030184.002323
J. Shi, Y. Ma, J. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Sun et al., A review on electroporation-based intracellular delivery. Molecules 23(11), 3044 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23113044
D. Xu, J. Mo, X. Xie, N. Hu, In-cell nanoelectronics: opening the door to intracellular electrophysiology. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00655-x
G. He, N. Hu, A.M. Xu, X. Li, Y. Zhao et al., Nanoneedle platforms: the many ways to pierce the cell membrane. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(21), 1909890 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909890
D. Xu, J. Fang, M. Zhang, H. Wang, T. Zhang et al., Synchronized intracellular and extracellular recording of action potentials by three-dimensional nanoroded electroporation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 192, 113501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113501
A.K. Shalek, J.T. Robinson, E.S. Karp, J.S. Lee, D.R. Ahn et al., Vertical silicon nanowires as a universal platform for delivering biomolecules into living cells. PNAS 107(5), 1870–1875 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909350107
C. Chiappini, J.O. Martinez, E.D. Rosa, C.S. Almeida, E. Tasciotti et al., Biodegradable nanoneedles for localized delivery of nanoparticles in vivo: exploring the biointerface. ACS Nano 9(5), 5500–5509 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b01490
C. Chiappini, E.D. Rosa, J. Martinez, X. Liu, J. Steele et al., Biodegradable silicon nanoneedles delivering nucleic acids intracellularly induce localized in vivo neovascularization. Nat. Mater. 14(5), 532–539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4249
E. Peer, A. Artzy-Schnirman, L. Gepstein, U. Sivan, Hollow nanoneedle array and its utilization for repeated administration of biomolecules to the same cells. ACS Nano 6(6), 4940–4946 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300443h
J.H. Lee, A. Zhang, S.S. You, C.M. Lieber, Spontaneous internalization of cell penetrating peptide-modified nanowires into primary neurons. Nano Lett. 16(2), 1509–1513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00020
B.D. Almquist, N.A. Melosh, Fusion of biomimetic stealth probes into lipid bilayer cores. PNAS 107(13), 5815–5820 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909250107
V. Caprettini, A. Cerea, G. Melle, L. Lovato, R. Capozza et al., Soft electroporation for delivering molecules into tightly adherent mammalian cells through 3D hollow nanoelectrodes. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 8524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08886-y
G. He, H.J. Chen, D. Liu, Y. Feng, C. Yang et al., Fabrication of various structures of nanostraw arrays and their applications in gene delivery. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5(10), 1701535 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201701535
C. Yang, G. Yang, Q. Ouyang, S. Kuang, P. Song et al., Nanowire-array-based gene electro-transfection system driven by human-motion operated triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 64, 103901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103901
S. Bae, S. Park, J. Kim, J.S. Choi, K.H. Kim et al., Exogenous gene integration for microalgal cell transformation using a nanowire-incorporated microdevice. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(49), 27554–27561 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b09964
D. Matsumoto, R.R. Sathuluri, Y. Kato, Y.R. Silberberg, R. Kawamura et al., Oscillating high-aspect-ratio monolithic silicon nanoneedle array enables efficient delivery of functional bio-macromolecules into living cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 15325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15325
G.C. Messina, M. Dipalo, R.L. Rocca, P. Zilio, V. Caprettini et al., Spatially, temporally, and quantitatively controlled delivery of broad range of molecules into selected cells through plasmonic nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 27(44), 7145–7149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503252
M. Dipalo, H. Amin, L. Lovato, F. Moia, V. Caprettini et al., Intracellular and extracellular recording of spontaneous action potentials in mammalian neurons and cardiac cells with 3D plasmonic nanoelectrodes. Nano Lett. 17(6), 3932–3939 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01523
B. Tian, C.M. Lieber, Nanowired bioelectric interfaces. Chem. Rev. 119(15), 9136–9152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00795
J. Abbott, T. Ye, K. Krenek, R.S. Gertner, S. Ban et al., A nanoelectrode array for obtaining intracellular recordings from thousands of connected neurons. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4(2), 232–241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0455-7
C. Chiappini, Nanoneedle-based sensing in biological systems. ACS Sens. 2(8), 1086–1102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00350
P. Paulitschke, F. Keber, A. Lebedev, J. Stephan, H. Lorenz et al., Ultraflexible nanowire array for label-and distortion-free cellular force tracking. Nano Lett. 19(4), 2207–2214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02568
S. Mieda, Y. Amemiya, T. Kihara, T. Okada, T. Sato et al., Mechanical force-based probing of intracellular proteins from living cells using antibody-immobilized nanoneedles. Biosen. Bioelectron. 31(1), 323–329 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.039
A. Tay, N. Melosh, Nanostructured materials for intracellular cargo delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 52(9), 2462–2471 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00272
R. Elnathan, B. Delalat, D. Brodoceanu, H. Alhmoud, F.J. Harding et al., Maximizing transfection efficiency of vertically aligned silicon nanowire arrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(46), 7215–7225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201503465
Y. Qu, Y. Zheng, L. Yu, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang et al., A universal platform for high-efficiency “engineering” living cells: integration of cell capture, intracellular delivery of biomolecules, and cell harvesting functions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(3), 1906362 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906362
C.M. Girardin, C. Huot, M. Gonthier, E. Delvin, Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of biochemical perspectives and clinical use in type 1 diabetes. Clin. Biochem. 42(3), 136–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.112
R. Gifford, Continuous glucose monitoring: 40 years, what we’ve learned and what’s next. ChemPhysChem 14(10), 2032–2044 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201300172
S.P. Nichols, A. Koh, W.L. Storm, J.H. Shin, M.H. Schoenfisch, Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices. Chem. Rev. 113(4), 2528–2549 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300387j
N. Sheehy, Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 47(6), 654 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.47.6.654-a
M. Mahmood, D. Mzurikwao, Y.S. Kim, Y. Lee, S. Mishra et al., Fully portable and wireless universal brain–machine interfaces enabled by flexible scalp electronics and deep learning algorithm. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1(9), 412–422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0091-7
L.J. Gabard-Durnam, C. Wilkinson, K. Kapur, H. Tager-Flusberg, A.R. Levin et al., Longitudinal EEG power in the first postnatal year differentiates autism outcomes. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 4188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12202-9
W.H. Zhang, M.K. Herde, J.A. Mitchell, J.H. Whitfield, A.B. Wulff et al., Monitoring hippocampal glycine with the computationally designed optical sensor GlyFS. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14(9), 861–869 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0108-2
J. Wang, F. Wagner, D.A. Borton, J. Zhang, I. Ozden et al., Integrated device for combined optical neuromodulation and electrical recording for chronicin vivoapplications. J. Neural Eng. 9(1), 016001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/9/1/016001
H. Shin, H.J. Lee, U. Chae, H. Kim, J. Kim et al., Neural probes with multi-drug delivery capability. Lab Chip 15(18), 3730–3737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00582E
S.R. Husain, J. Han, P. Au, K. Shannon, R.K. Puri, Gene therapy for cancer: regulatory considerations for approval. Cancer Gene Ther. 22, 554–563 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2015.58
J. Liu, T. Gaj, Y. Yang, N. Wang, S. Shui et al., Efficient delivery of nuclease proteins for genome editing in human stem cells and primary cells. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1842–1859 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.117
D. Wilbie, J. Walther, E. Mastrobattista, Delivery aspects of CRISPR/Cas for in vivo genome editing. Acc. Chem. Res. 52(6), 1555–1564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00106
L. Yan, J. Zhang, C.S. Lee, X. Chen, Micro-and nanotechnologies for intracellular delivery. Small 10(22), 4487–4504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201401532
M.Y. Rotenberg, B. Tian, Talking to cells: semiconductor nanomaterials at the cellular interface. Adv. Biosys. 2(4), 1700242 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201700242
L. Chang, Y.C. Wang, F. Ershad, R. Yang, C. Yu et al., Wearable devices for single-cell sensing and transfection. Trends Biotechnol. 37(11), 1175–1188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.04.001
A.K. Fajrial, X. Ding, Advanced nanostructures for cell membrane poration. Nanotechnology 30(26), 264002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab096b
K. Yum, N. Wang, M.F. Yu, Nanoneedle: a multifunctional tool for biological studies in living cells. Nanoscale 2(3), 363–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/B9NR00231F
R. Elnathan, M. Kwiat, F. Patolsky, N. Voelcker, Engineering vertically aligned semiconductor nanowire arrays for applications in the life sciences. Nano Today 9(2), 172–196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2014.04.001
K. Lee, N. Lingampalli, A.P. Pisano, N. Murthy, H. So, Physical delivery of macromolecules using high-aspect ratio nanostructured materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(42), 23387–23397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b05520
E. Lestrell, F. Patolsky, N.H. Voelcker, R. Elnathan, Engineered nano-bio interfaces for intracellular delivery and sampling: applications, agency and artefacts. Mater. Today 33, 87–104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.012
R. Singhal, Z. Orynbayeva, R.V.K. Sundaram, J.J. Niu, S. Bhattacharyya et al., Multifunctional carbon-nanotube cellular endoscopes. Nat. Nanotech. 6(1), 57–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.241
N. Fan, H. Jiang, Z. Ye, G. Wu, Y. Kang et al., The insertion mechanism of a living cell determined by the stress segmentation effect of the cell membrane during the tip–cell interaction. Small 14(22), 1703868 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703868
X. Chen, A. Kis, A. Zettl, C.R. Bertozzi, A cell nanoinjector based on carbon nanotubes. PNAS 104(20), 8218 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700567104
X.T. Zheng, C.M. Li, Single cell analysis at the nanoscale. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41(6), 2061–2071 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15265C
M. Kwak, L. Han, J.J. Chen, R. Fan, Interfacing inorganic nanowire arrays and living cells for cellular function analysis. Small 11(42), 5600–5610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201501236
L. Yan, Y. Yang, W. Zhang, X. Chen, Advanced materials and nanotechnology for drug delivery. Adv. Mater. 26(31), 5533–5540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305683
X. Xie, A.M. Xu, M.R. Angle, N. Tayebi, P. Verma et al., Mechanical model of vertical nanowire cell penetration. Nano Lett. 13(12), 6002–6008 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403201a
X. Xie, A. Aalipour, S.V. Gupta, N.A. Melosh, Determining the time window for dynamic nanowire cell penetration processes. ACS Nano 9(12), 11667–11677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05498
Y. Cao, H. Chen, R. Qiu, M. Hanna, E. Ma et al., Universal intracellular biomolecule delivery with precise dosage control. Sci. Adv. 4(10), aat8131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat8131
C.J. Bettinger, R. Langer, J.T. Borenstein, Engineering substrate topography at the micro-and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48(30), 5406–5415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200805179
S. Bonde, N. Buch-Månson, K.R. Rostgaard, T.K. Andersen, T. Berthing et al., Exploring arrays of vertical one-dimensional nanostructures for cellular investigations. Nanotechnology 25(36), 362001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/36/362001
B.S. Gomes, B. Simões, P.M. Mendes, The increasing dynamic, functional complexity of bio-interface materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2(3), 0120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-018-0120
D. Nawarathna, T. Turan, H.K. Wickramasinghe, Selective probing of mRNA expression levels within a living cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(8), 83117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3213343
Y. Tao, H.K. Wickramasinghe, Coaxial atomic force microscope probes for dielectrophoresis of DNA under different buffer conditions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110(7), 073701 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974939
X. Li, Y. Tao, D.H. Lee, H.K. Wickramasinghe, A.P. Lee, In situ mrna isolation from a microfluidic single-cell array using an external afm nanoprobe. Lab Chip 17(9), 1635–1644 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc00133a
B. Tian, T. Cohen-Karni, Q. Qing, X. Duan, P. Xie et al., Three-dimensional, flexible nanoscale field-effect transistors as localized bioprobes. Science 329(5993), 830–834 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192033
X. Duan, R. Gao, P. Xie, T. Cohen-Karni, Q. Qing et al., Intracellular recordings of action potentials by an extracellular nanoscale field-effect transistor. Nat. Nanotech. 7(3), 174–179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.223
Z. Li, J. Song, G. Mantini, M.Y. Lu, H. Fang et al., Quantifying the traction force of a single cell by aligned silicon nanowire array. Nano Lett. 9(10), 3575–3580 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901774m
R. Liu, R. Chen, A.T. Elthakeb, S.H. Lee, S. Hinckley et al., High density individually addressable nanowire arrays record intracellular activity from primary rodent and human stem cell derived neurons. Nano Lett. 17(5), 2757–2764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04752
H. Alhmoud, B. Delalat, R. Elnathan, A. Cifuentes-Rius, A. Chaix et al., Porous silicon nanodiscs for targeted drug delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(7), 1137–1145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201403414
W. Hällström, M. Lexholm, D.B. Suyatin, G. Hammarin, D. Hessman et al., Fifteen-piconewton force detection from neural growth cones using nanowire arrays. Nano Lett. 10(3), 782–787 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902675h
S. Bonde, T. Berthing, M.H. Madsen, T.K. Andersen, N. Buch-Månson et al., Tuning InAs nanowire density for HEK293 cell viability, adhesion, and morphology: perspectives for nanowire-based biosensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(21), 10510–10519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/am402070k
C. Xie, L. Hanson, Y. Cui, B. Cui, Vertical nanopillars for highly localized fluorescence imaging. PNAS 108(10), 3894–3899 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015589108
J. Abbott, T. Ye, L. Qin, M. Jorgolli, R.S. Gertner et al., CMOS nanoelectrode array for all-electrical intracellular electrophysiological imaging. Nat. Nanotech. 12(5), 460–466 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.3
X. Xie, A.M. Xu, S. Leal-Ortiz, Y. Cao, C.C. Garner et al., Nanostraw–electroporation system for highly efficient intracellular delivery and transfection. ACS Nano 7(5), 4351–4358 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn400874a
G. He, J. Feng, A. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. Wen et al., Multifunctional branched nanostraw-electroporation platform for intracellular regulation and monitoring of circulating tumor cells. Nano Lett. 19(10), 7201–7209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02790
R. Yan, J.H. Park, Y. Choi, C.J. Heo, S.M. Yang et al., Nanowire-based single-cell endoscopy. Nat. Nanotech. 7(3), 191–196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.226
M. Galic, S. Jeong, F.C. Tsai, L.M. Joubert, Y.I. Wu et al., External push and internal pull forces recruit curvature-sensing n-bar domain proteins to the plasma membrane. Nat. Cell Biol. 14(8), 874–881 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2533
T.E. McKnight, A.V. Melechko, G.D. Griffin, M.A. Guillorn, V.I. Merkulov et al., Intracellular integration of synthetic nanostructures with viable cells for controlled biochemical manipulation. Nanotechnology 14(5), 551–556 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/5/313
Y. Wang, Y. Yang, L. Yan, S.Y. Kwok, W. Li et al., Poking cells for efficient vector-free intracellular delivery. Nat. Commun. 5, 4466 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5466
R. Wen, A.H. Zhang, D. Liu, J. Feng, J. Yang et al., Intracellular delivery and sensing system based on electroplated conductive nanostraw arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(47), 43936–43948 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b15619
C. Xie, Z. Lin, L. Hanson, Y. Cui, B. Cui, Intracellular recording of action potentials by nanopillar electroporation. Nat. Nanotech. 7(3), 185–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.8
A. Zhang, C.M. Lieber, Nano-bioelectronics. Chem. Rev. 116(1), 215–257 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00608
C. Jia, Z. Lin, Y. Huang, X. Duan, Nanowire electronics: from nanoscale to macroscale. Chem. Rev. 119(15), 9074–9135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00164
L.N. Quan, J. Kang, C.Z. Ning, P. Yang, Nanowires for photonics. Chem. Rev. 119(15), 9153–9169 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00240
L. Xu, Y. Zhao, K.A. Owusu, Z. Zhuang, Q. Liu et al., Recent advances in nanowire-biosystem interfaces: from chemical conversion, energy production to electrophysiology. Chemistry 4(7), 1538–1559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.04.004
J. Kammhuber, M.C. Cassidy, H. Zhang, Ö. Gül, F. Pei et al., Conductance quantization at zero magnetic field in InSb nanowires. Nano Lett. 16(6), 3482–3486 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00051
M.S. Chan, P.K. Lo, Nanoneedle-assisted delivery of site-selective peptide-functionalized DNA nanocages for targeting mitochondria and nuclei. Small 10(7), 1255–1260 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201302993
B.G. Nair, K. Hagiwara, M. Ueda, H.H. Yu, H.R. Tseng et al., High density of aligned nanowire treated with polydopamine for efficient gene silencing by sirna according to cell membrane perturbation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(29), 18693–18700 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b04913
Z. Liu, J. Nie, B. Miao, J. Li, Y. Cui et al., Self-powered intracellular drug delivery by a biomechanical energy-driven triboelectric nanogenerator. Adv. Mater. 31(12), 1807795 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201807795
J.J. VanDersarl, A.M. Xu, N.A. Melosh, Nanostraws for direct fluidic intracellular access. Nano Lett. 12(8), 3881–3886 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204051v
G. He, C. Yang, T. Hang, D. Liu, H.J. Chen et al., Hollow nanoneedle-electroporation system to extract intracellular protein repetitively and nondestructively. ACS Sens. 3(9), 1675–1682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b00367
J.T. Robinson, M. Jorgolli, A.K. Shalek, M.H. Yoon, R.S. Gertner et al., Vertical nanowire electrode arrays as a scalable platform for intracellular interfacing to neuronal circuits. Nat. Nanotech. 7(3), 180–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.249
X. Zhu, M.F. Yuen, L. Yan, Z. Zhang, F. Ai et al., Diamond-nanoneedle-array-facilitated intracellular delivery and the potential influence on cell physiology. Adv. Health Mater. 5(10), 1157–1168 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500990
T.M. Fu, X. Duan, Z. Jiang, X. Dai, P. Xie et al., Sub-10-nm intracellular bioelectronic probes from nanowire–nanotube heterostructures. PNAS 111(4), 1259–1264 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323389111
R. Gao, S. Strehle, B. Tian, T. Cohen-Karni, P. Xie et al., Outside looking in: nanotube transistor intracellular sensors. Nano Lett. 12(6), 3329–3333 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301623p
Q. Qing, Z. Jiang, L. Xu, R. Gao, L. Mai et al., Free-standing kinked nanowire transistor probes for targeted intracellular recording in three dimensions. Nat. Nanotech. 9(2), 142–147 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.273
Y. Zhao, S.S. You, A. Zhang, J.H. Lee, J. Huang et al., Scalable ultrasmall three-dimensional nanowire transistor probes for intracellular recording. Nat. Nanotech. 14, 783–790 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0478-y
W. Kim, J.K. Ng, M.E. Kunitake, B.R. Conklin, P. Yang, Interfacing silicon nanowires with mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 7228–7229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja071456k
T. Berthing, S. Bonde, C.B. Sørensen, P. Utko, J. Nygård et al., Intact mammalian cell function on semiconductor nanowire arrays: new perspectives for cell-based biosensing. Small 7(5), 640–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201001642
J.J. VanDersarl, A.M. Xu, N.A. Melosh, Nanostraws for direct fluidic intracellular access. Nano Lett. 12(8), 3881–3886 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204051v
S. Qi, C. Yi, S. Ji, C.C. Fong, M. Yang, Cell adhesion and spreading behavior on vertically aligned silicon nanowire arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1(1), 30–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/am800027d
C. Xie, L. Hanson, W. Xie, Z. Lin, B. Cui et al., Noninvasive neuron pinning with nanopillar arrays. Nano Lett. 10(10), 4020–4024 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101950x
H. Persson, C. Købler, K. Mølhave, L. Samuelson, J.O. Tegenfeldt et al., Fibroblasts cultured on nanowires exhibit low motility, impaired cell division, and DNA damage. Small 9(23), 4006–4016 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201300644
A. Tay, N. Melosh, Transfection with nanostructure electro-injection is minimally perturbative. Adv. Therap. 2(12), 1900133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.201900133
M.P. Stewart, R. Langer, K.F. Jensen, Intracellular delivery by membrane disruption: mechanisms, strategies, and concepts. Chem. Rev. 118(16), 7409–7531 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678
W. Kang, F. Yavari, M. Minary-Jolandan, J.P. Giraldo-Vela, A. Safi et al., Nanofountain probe electroporation (NFP-E) of single cells. Nano Lett. 13(6), 2448–2457 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400423c
R. Yang, V. Lemaître, C. Huang, A. Haddadi, R. McNaughton et al., Monoclonal cell line generation and CRISPR/Cas9 manipulation via single-cell electroporation. Small 14(12), 1702495 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702495
P.E. Boukany, A. Morss, W.C. Liao, B. Henslee, H. Jung et al., Nanochannel electroporation delivers precise amounts of biomolecules into living cells. Nat. Nanotech. 6(11), 747–754 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.164
X. Ding, M.P. Stewart, A. Sharei, J.C. Weaver, R.S. Langer et al., High-throughput nuclear delivery and rapid expression of DNA via mechanical and electrical cell-membrane disruption. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1(3), 0039 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0039
P. Mukherjee, S.S.P. Nathamgari, J.A. Kessler, H.D. Espinosa, Combined numerical and experimental investigation of localized electroporation-based cell transfection and sampling. ACS Nano 12(12), 12118–12128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b05473
Y. Cao, E. Ma, S. Cestellos-Blanco, B. Zhang, R. Qiu et al., Nontoxic nanopore electroporation for effective intracellular delivery of biological macromolecules. PNAS 116(16), 7899–7904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818553116
L. Chang, L. Li, J. Shi, Y. Sheng, W. Lu et al., Micro-/nanoscale electroporation. Lab Chip 16(21), 4047–4062 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00840B
S. Okumoto, A. Jones, W.B. Frommer, Quantitative imaging with fluorescent biosensors. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 63(1), 663–706 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103745
M. Hu, L. Li, H. Wu, Y. Su, P.Y. Yang et al., Multicolor, one- and two-photon imaging of enzymatic activities in live cells with fluorescently quenched activity-based probes (qABPs). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(31), 12009–12020 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200808y
K.D. Greis, Mass spectrometry for enzyme assays and inhibitor screening: an emerging application in pharmaceutical research. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 26(3), 324–339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20127
A. Liesener, U. Karst, Monitoring enzymatic conversions by mass spectrometry: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 382(7), 1451–1464 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3305-2
P. Actis, M.M. Maalouf, H.J. Kim, A. Lohith, B. Vilozny et al., Compartmental genomics in living cells revealed by single-cell nanobiopsy. ACS Nano 8(1), 546–553 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn405097u
Y. Nashimoto, Y. Takahashi, Y. Zhou, H. Ito, H. Ida et al., Evaluation of mRNA localization using double barrel scanning ion conductance microscopy. ACS Nano 10(7), 6915–6922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b02753
X. Li, S. Majdi, J. Dunevall, H. Fathali, A.G. Ewing, Quantitative measurement of transmitters in individual vesicles in the cytoplasm of single cells with nanotip electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(41), 11978–11982 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201504839
B.P. Nadappuram, P. Cadinu, A. Barik, A.J. Ainscough, M.J. Devine et al., Nanoscale tweezers for single-cell biopsies. Nat. Nanotech. 14(1), 80–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0315-8
Y. Cao, M. Hjort, H. Chen, F. Birey, S.A. Leal-Ortiz et al., Nondestructive nanostraw intracellular sampling for longitudinal cell monitoring. PNAS 114(10), E1866–E1874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615375114
J. Abbott, T. Ye, D. Ham, H. Park, Optimizing nanoelectrode arrays for scalable intracellular electrophysiology. Acc. Chem. Res. 51(3), 600–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00519
G. Hong, C.M. Lieber, Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6
S.R. Patel, C.M. Lieber, Precision electronic medicine in the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 37(9), 1007–1012 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0234-8
M.D. Ferro, N.A. Melosh, Electronic and ionic materials for neurointerfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(12), 1704335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201704335
M.G. Schrlau, N.J. Dun, H.H. Bau, Cell electrophysiology with carbon nanopipettes. ACS Nano 3(3), 563–568 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800851d
J.J. Mastrototaro, The minimed continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2, 13–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1089/15209150050214078
S.J. Updike, G.P. Hicks, The enzyme electrode. Nature 214(5092), 986–988 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/214986a0
G.G. Guilbault, G.J. Lubrano, An enzyme electrode for the amperometric determination of glucose. Anal. Chim. Acta 64(3), 439–455 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)82476-4
J. Wang, Electrochemical glucose biosensors. Chem. Rev. 108(2), 814–825 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068123a
S. Vaddiraju, D.J. Burgess, I. Tomazos, F.C. Jain, F. Papadimitrakopoulos, Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 4(6), 1540–1562 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681000400632
A. Heller, B. Feldman, Electrochemical glucose sensors and their applications in diabetes management. Chem. Rev. 108(7), 2482–2505 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068069y
J. Wang, In vivo glucose monitoring: towards ‘sense and act’ feedback-loop individualized medical systems. Talanta 75(3), 636–641 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2007.10.023
G.S. Wilson, R. Gifford, Biosensors for real-time in vivo measurements. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20(12), 2388–2403 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2004.12.003
I. Galeska, D. Chattopadhyay, F. Moussy, F. Papadimitrakopoulos, Calcification-resistant nafion/Fe3+ assemblies for implantable biosensors. Biomacromol 1(2), 202–207 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0002813
T.F. Tseng, Y.L. Yang, Y.J. Lin, S.L. Lou, Effects of electric potential treatment of a chromium hexacyanoferrate modified biosensor based on PQQ-dependent glucose dehydrogenase. Sensors 10(7), 6347–6360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/s100706347
H. Lee, Y.J. Hong, S. Baik, T. Hyeon, D.H. Kim, Enzyme-based glucose sensor: from invasive to wearable device. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7(8), 1701150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701150
S. Abdellaoui, R.D. Milton, T. Quah, S.D. Minteer, NAD-dependent dehydrogenase bioelectrocatalysis: the ability of a naphthoquinone redox polymer to regenerate NAD. Chem. Commun. 52(6), 1147–1150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC09161F
T.G. Schleis, Interference of maltose, icodextrin, galactose, or xylose with some blood glucose monitoring systems. Pharmacotherapy 27(9), 1313–1321 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.27.9.1313
S. Igarashi, T. Hirokawa, K. Sode, Engineering PQQ glucose dehydrogenase with improved substrate specificity: site-directed mutagenesis studies on the active center of PQQ glucose dehydrogenase. Biomol. Eng. 21(2), 81–89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2003.12.001
H. Yamaoka, Y. Yamashita, S. Ferri, K. Sode, Site directed mutagenesis studies of FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase catalytic subunit of burkholderia cepacia. Biotechnol. Lett. 30(11), 1967–1972 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9777-3
N. Hamamatsu, A. Suzumura, Y. Nomiya, M. Sato, T. Aita et al., Modified substrate specificity of pyrroloquinoline quinone glucose dehydrogenase by biased mutation assembling with optimized amino acid substitution. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 73(3), 607–617 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0521-4
S.R. Corrie, J.W. Coffey, J. Islam, K.A. Markey, M.A.F. Kendall, Blood, sweat, and tears: developing clinically relevant protein biosensors for integrated body fluid analysis. Analyst 140(13), 4350–4364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AN00464K
G. McGarraugh, The chemistry of commercial continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 11(S1), S17–S24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2008.0133
B.W.B.T.M. Gross, D. Einhorn, D.M. Kayne, J.H. Reed, N.H. White et al., Performance evaluation of the minimed® continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2(1), 49–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1089/152091500316737
F. Lucarelli, F. Ricci, F. Caprio, F. Valgimigli, C. Scuffi et al., Glucomen day continuous glucose monitoring system: a screening for enzymatic and electrochemical interferents. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 6(5), 1172–1181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681200600522
M. Shichiri, Y. Yamasaki, R. Kawamori, N. Hakui, H. Abe, Wearable artificial endocrine pancreas with needle-type glucose sensor. Lancet 320(8308), 1129–1131 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92788-X
J. Wang, Glucose biosensors: 40 years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis 13(12), 983–988 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1616-8984(200201)10:1%3c107::AID-SEUP107%3e3.0.CO;2-Q
I.B. Hirsch, Realistic expectations and practical use of continuous glucose monitoring for the endocrinologist. JCEM 94(7), 2232–2238 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2625
T. Battelino, M. Phillip, N. Bratina, R. Nimri, P. Oskarsson et al., Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34(4), 795–800 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1989
W.V. Tamborlane, R.W. Beck, Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Lancet 373(9677), 1744–1746 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60962-4
M. Tauschmann, R. Hovorka, Technology in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus—current status and future prospects. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14(8), 464–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-018-0044-y
L. Ringholm, P. Damm, E.R. Mathiesen, Improving pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes mellitus: modern management. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15(7), 406–416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0197-3
B.P. Kovatchev, Metrics for glycaemic control—from hba1c to continuous glucose monitoring. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 425–436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.3
F. Waldron-Lynch, K.C. Herold, Continuous glucose monitoring: long live the revolution! Nat. Clin. Practice Endocrinol. 5(2), 82–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet1044
D. Rodbard, Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 18(S2), S2-3-S2-13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2015.0417
C. N. Kotanen, F. G. Moussy, S. Carrara, A. Guiseppi-Elie. Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 35(1), 14–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016
M. Gerritsen, Problems associated with subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors. Diabetes Care 23(2), 143–145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.2.143
T. Danne, R. Nimri, T. Battelino, R. M. Bergenstal, K. L. Close, J. H. DeVries, S. Garg, L. Heinemann, I. Hirsch, S. A. Amiel, R. Beck, E. Bosi, B. Buckingham, C. Cobelli, E. Dassau, F. J. Doyle, 3rd, S. Heller, R. Hovorka, W. Jia, T. Jones, O. Kordonouri, B. Kovatchev, A. Kowalski, L. Laffel, D. Maahs, H. R. Murphy, K. Norgaard, C. G. Parkin, E. Renard, B. Saboo, M. Scharf, W. V. Tamborlane, S. A. Weinzimer, M. Phillip. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 40(12), 1631–1640 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1600
M. Gerritsen, J.A. Jansen, J.A. Lutterman, Performance of subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors for continuous monitoring. Neth. J. Med. 54(4), 167–179 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-2977(99)00006-6
M.T. Novak, F. Yuan, W.M. Reichert, Predicting glucose sensor behavior in blood using transport modeling: relative impacts of protein biofouling and cellular metabolic effects. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 7(6), 1547–1560 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681300700615
T. Jadviscokova, Z. Fajkusova, M. Pallayova, J. Luza, G. Kuzmina et al., Occurence of adverse events due to continuous glucose monitoring. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czech. 151(2), 263–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2007.044
M.S. Boyne, D.M. Silver, J. Kaplan, C.D. Saudek, Timing of changes in interstitial and venous blood glucose measured with a continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes 52(11), 2790–2794 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2790
J.M. Ellison, J.M. Stegmann, S.L. Colner, R.H. Michael, M.K. Sharma et al., Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites. Diabetes Care 25(6), 961–964 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.6.961
H.F. Sylvain, M.E. Pokorny, S.M. English, N.H. Benson, T.W. Whitley et al., Accuracy of fingerstick glucose values in shock patients. Am. J. Crit. Care 4(1), 44–48 (1995). https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.1.44
Y. Hu, B. Liang, L. Fang, G. Ma, G. Yang et al., Antifouling zwitterionic coating via electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization on enzyme-based glucose sensors for long-time stability in 37 ℃ serum. Langmuir 32(45), 11763–11770 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03016
H. Wu, C.J. Lee, H. Wang, Y. Hu, M. Young et al., Highly sensitive and stable zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PSBEDOT) glucose biosensor. Chem. Sci. 9(9), 2540–2546 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC05104B
X. Xie, J.C. Doloff, V. Yesilyurt, A. Sadraei, J.J. McGarrigle et al., Reduction of measurement noise in a continuous glucose monitor by coating the sensor with a zwitterionic polymer. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2(12), 894–906 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0273-3
R. Hovorka, Closed-loop insulin delivery: from bench to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 7(7), 385–395 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2011.32
G.M. Steil, A.E. Panteleon, K. Rebrin, Closed-loop insulin delivery—the path to physiological glucose control. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56(2), 125–144 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.011
S.A. Weinzimer, G.M. Steil, K.L. Swan, J. Dziura, N. Kurtz et al., Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 31(5), 934–939 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1967
R. Hovorka, J.M. Allen, D. Elleri, L.J. Chassin, J. Harris et al., Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet 375(9716), 743–751 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X
R. Hovorka, K. Kumareswaran, J. Harris, J.M. Allen, D. Elleri et al., Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ 342, d1855 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1855
R. Mo, T. Jiang, J. Di, W. Tai, Z. Gu, Emerging micro- and nanotechnology based synthetic approaches for insulin delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(10), 3595–3629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60436e
H.M. Heise, U. Damm, M. Bodenlenz, V.R. Kondepati, G. Kohler et al., Bedside monitoring of subcutaneous interstitial glucose in healthy individuals using microdialysis and infrared spectrometry. J. Biomed. Opt. 12(2), 024004 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2714907
O. Rooyackers, C. Blixt, P. Mattsson, J. Wernerman, Continuous glucose monitoring by intravenous microdialysis: influence of membrane length and dialysis flow rate. Acta Anaesth. Scand. 57(2), 214–219 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02787.x
C. Hage, L. Mellbin, L. Rydén, J. Wernerman, Glucose monitoring by means of an intravenous microdialysis catheter technique. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 12(4), 291–295 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2009.0150
T. Laurell, A continuous glucose monitoring system based on microdialysis. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 16(5), 187–193 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3109/03091909209021982
J. Bolincier, U. Ungerstedt, P. Arner, Microdialysis measurement of the absolute glucose concentration in subcutaneous adipose tissue allowing glucose monitoring in diabetic patients. Diabetologia 35(12), 1177–1180 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401374
E. Csöregi, T. Laurell, I. Katakis, A. Heller, L. Gorton, On-line glucose monitoring by using microdialysis sampling and amperometric detection based on ‘wired’ glucose oxidase in carbon paste. Microchim. Acta 121(1), 31–40 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248238
J.H. Leopold, R.T.M. Hooijdonk, M. Boshuizen, T. Winters, L.D. Bos et al., Point and trend accuracy of a continuous intravenous microdialysis-based glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study. Ann. Intensive Care 6(1), 68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0171-3
C. Blixt, O. Rooyackers, B. Isaksson, J. Wernerman, Continuous on-line glucose measurement by microdialysis in a central vein. A pilot study. Crit. Care 17(3), R87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12713
F. Schierenbeck, A. Franco-Cereceda, J. Liska, Accuracy of 2 different continuous glucose monitoring systems in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: intravascular microdialysis versus subcutaneous tissue monitoring. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 11(1), 108–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816651632
J.S. Krinsley, J.G. Chase, J. Gunst, J. Martensson, M.J. Schultz et al., Continuous glucose monitoring in the ICU: clinical considerations and consensus. Crit. Care 21(1), 197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1784-0
J. Wernerman, T. Desaive, S. Finfer, L. Foubert, A. Furnary et al., Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit. Care 18(3), 226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13921
N.S. Oliver, C. Toumazou, A.E.G. Cass, D.G. Johnston, Glucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology. Diabetic Med. 26(3), 197–210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02642.x
X. Mou, M.R. Lennartz, D.J. Loegering, J.A. Stenken, Long-term calibration considerations during subcutaneous microdialysis sampling in mobile rats. Biomaterials 31(16), 4530–4539 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.016
P.K.T. Li, K.M. Chow, Infectious complications in dialysis—epidemiology and outcomes. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 8(2), 77–88 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2011.194
D. Müller, S.L. Goldstein, Hemodialysis in children with end-stage renal disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7(11), 650–658 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2011.124
L.M. Yeh, S.Y.H. Chiu, P.C. Lai, The impact of vascular access types on hemodialysis patient long-term survival. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 10708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47065-z
Y.C. Kim, J.H. Park, M.R. Prausnitz, Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64(14), 1547–1568 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005
J. Yang, H. Zhang, T. Hu, C. Xu, L. Jiang et al., Recent advances of microneedles used towards stimuli-responsive drug delivery, disease theranostics, and bioinspired applications. Chem. Eng. J. 426, 130561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130561
S. Kusama, K. Sato, Y. Matsui, N. Kimura, H. Abe et al., Transdermal electroosmotic flow generated by a porous microneedle array patch. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 658 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20948-4
X. Li, X. Huang, J. Mo, H. Wang, X. Xie et al., A fully integrated closed-loop system based on mesoporous microneedles ontophoresis for diabetes treatment. Adv. Sci. 8(16), 2100827 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100827
W. Li, R.N. Terry, J. Tang, M.R. Feng, S.P. Schwendeman et al., Rapidly separable microneedle patch for the sustained release of a contraceptive. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3(3), 220–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0337-4
W.G. Bae, H. Ko, J.Y. So, H. Yi, C.H. Lee et al., Snake fang–inspired stamping patch for transdermal delivery of liquid formulations. Sci. Transl. Med. 11(503), eaaw3329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw3329
J. Li, Y. Zhou, J. Yang, R. Ye, J. Gao et al., Fabrication of gradient porous microneedle array by modified hot embossing for transdermal drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 96, 576–582 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.074
J. Yang, Z. Chen, R. Ye, J. Li, L. Jiang, Touch-actuated microneedle array patch for closed-loop transdermal drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 25(1), 1728–1739 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1507060
Z. Chen, L. Ren, J. Li, L. Yao, Y. Chen et al., Rapid fabrication of microneedles using magnetorheological drawing lithography. Acta Biomater. 65, 283–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.030
Z. Chen, Y. Lin, W. Lee, L. Ren, B. Liu et al., Additive manufacturing of honeybee-inspired microneedle for easy skin insertion and difficult removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(35), 29338–29346 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b09563
M.A. Luzuriaga, D.R. Berry, J.C. Reagan, R.A. Smaldone, J.J. Gassensmith, Biodegradable 3D printed polymer microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Lab Chip 18(8), 1223–1230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC00098K
P. Cristiane, S.N. Economidou, G. Lall, C. Ziraud, J.S. Boateng et al., 3D printed microneedles for insulin skin delivery. Int. J. Pharmaceut. 65, 425–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.031
H. Derakhshandeh, F. Aghabaglou, A. Mccarthy, A. Mostafavi, A. Tamayol, A wirelessly controlled smart bandage with 3D-printed miniaturized needle arrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(13), 1905544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201905544
D. Han, R.S. Morde, S. Mariani, A.A.L. Mattina, E. Vignali et al., 4D printing of a bioinspired microneedle array with backward-facing barbs for enhanced tissue adhesion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(11), 1909197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909197
S.P. Sullivan, D.G. Koutsonanos, M.D.P. Martin, J.W. Lee, V. Zarnitsyn et al., Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat. Med. 16(8), 915–920 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2182
J. Wang, B. Li, M.X. Wu, Effective and lesion-free cutaneous influenza vaccination. PNAS 112(16), 5005–5010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500408112
Y. Zhang, J. Yu, A.R. Kahkoska, J. Wang, J.B. Buse et al., Advances in transdermal insulin delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 112(16), 5005–5010 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.006
G. Chen, J. Yu, Z. Gu, Glucose-responsive microneedle patches for diabetes treatment. J. Diabetes Sc. Technol. 13(1), 41–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818778607
K.Y. Seong, M.S. Seo, D.Y. Hwang, E.D. O’Cearbhaill, S. Sreenan et al., A self-adherent, bullet-shaped microneedle patch for controlled transdermal delivery of insulin. J. Control. Release 265, 48–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.041
W. Yu, G. Jiang, D. Liu, L. Li, H. Chen et al., Fabrication of biodegradable composite microneedles based on calcium sulfate and gelatin for transdermal delivery of insulin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 71, 725–734 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.063
W. Yu, G. Jiang, D. Liu, L. Li, Z. Tong et al., Transdermal delivery of insulin with bioceramic composite microneedles fabricated by gelatin and hydroxyapatite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 73, 425–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.111
X. Xie, C. Pascual, C. Lieu, S. Oh, J. Wang et al., Analgesic microneedle patch for neuropathic pain therapy. ACS Nano 11(1), 395–406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b06104
X. Lan, J. She, D. Lin, Y. Xu, X. Li et al., Microneedle-mediated delivery of lipid-coated cisplatin nanoparticles for efficient and safe cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(39), 33060–33069 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b12926
Y. Li, F. Liu, C. Su, B. Yu, D. Liu et al., Biodegradable therapeutic microneedle patch for rapid antihypertensive treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(34), 30575–30584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b09697
Z. Wei, S. Zheng, R. Wang, X. Bu, H. Ma et al., A flexible microneedle array as low-voltage electroporation electrodes for in vivo DNA and sirna delivery. Lab Chip 14(20), 4093–4102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00800F
C.J. Chen, D.H. Chen, Preparation of LaB6 nanoparticles as a novel and effective near-infrared photothermal conversion material. Chem. Eng. J. 180, 337–342 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.035
M.C. Chen, K.W. Wang, D.H. Chen, M.H. Ling, C.Y. Liu, Remotely triggered release of small molecules from LaB6@SiO2-loaded polycaprolactone microneedles. Acta Biomater. 13, 344–353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.040
M.C. Chen, M.H. Ling, K.W. Wang, Z.W. Lin, B.H. Lai et al., Near-infrared light-responsive composite microneedles for on-demand transdermal drug delivery. Biomacromol 16(5), 1598–1607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00185
M.C. Chen, Z.W. Lin, M.H. Ling, Near-infrared light-activatable microneedle system for treating superficial tumors by combination of chemotherapy and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 10(1), 93–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05043
J. Yu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ye, R. DiSanto, W. Sun et al., Microneedle-array patches loaded with hypoxia-sensitive vesicles provide fast glucose-responsive insulin delivery. PNAS 112(27), 8260–8265 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505405112
J. Yu, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, G. Chen, W. Mao et al., Glucose-responsive insulin patch for the regulation of blood glucose in mice and minipigs. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 499–506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0508-y
H. Lee, T.K. Choi, Y.B. Lee, H.R. Cho, R. Ghaffari et al., A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat. Nanotech. 11(6), 566–572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.38
H. Lee, C. Song, Y.S. Hong, M.S. Kim, H.R. Cho et al., Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci. Adv. 3(3), e1601314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601314
L. Ventrelli, L.M. Strambini, G. Barillaro, Microneedles for transdermal biosensing: current picture and future direction. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4(17), 2606–2640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500450
J. Heikenfeld, A. Jajack, B. Feldman, S.W. Granger, S. Gaitonde et al., Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 37(4), 407–419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0040-3
G.S. Liu, Y. Kong, Y. Wang, Y. Luo, X. Fan et al., Microneedles for transdermal diagnostics: recent advances and new horizons. Biomaterials 232, 119740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119740
M.A. Invernale, B.C. Tang, R.L. York, L. Le, D.Y. Hou et al., Microneedle electrodes toward an amperometric glucose-sensing smart patch. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(3), 338–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201300142
Y. Yoon, G.S. Lee, K. Yoo, J.B. Lee, Fabrication of a microneedle/CNT hierarchical micro/nano surface electrochemical sensor and its in-vitro glucose sensing characterization. Sensors 13(12), 16672–16681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/s131216672
B. Chua, S.P. Desai, M.J. Tierney, J.A. Tamada, A.N. Jina, Effect of microneedles shape on skin penetration and minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring in vivo. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 203, 373–381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.09.026
A. Jina, M.J. Tierney, J.A. Tamada, S. McGill, S. Desai et al., Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 8(3), 483–487 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814526191
P. Miller, M. Moorman, R. Manginell, C. Ashlee, I. Brener et al., Towards an integrated microneedle total analysis chip for protein detection. Electroanalysis 28(6), 1305–1310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600063
S.A. Ranamukhaarachchi, C. Padeste, M. Dübner, U.O. Häfeli, B. Stoeber et al., Integrated hollow microneedle-optofluidic biosensor for therapeutic drug monitoring in sub-nanoliter volumes. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 29075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29075
C.G. Li, H.A. Joung, H. Noh, M.B. Song, M.G. Kim et al., One-touch-activated blood multidiagnostic system using a minimally invasive hollow microneedle integrated with a paper-based sensor. Lab Chip 15(16), 3286–3292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00669D
D.S. Lee, C.G. Li, C. Ihm, H. Jung, A three-dimensional and bevel-angled ultrahigh aspect ratio microneedle for minimally invasive and painless blood sampling. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 255, 384–390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.030
D. Nicholas, K.A. Logan, Y. Sheng, J. Gao, S. Farrell et al., Rapid paper based colorimetric detection of glucose using a hollow microneedle device. Int. J. Pharm. 547(1), 244–249 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.06.002
P.R. Miller, X. Xiao, I. Brener, D.B. Burckel, R. Narayan et al., Microneedle-based transdermal sensor for on-chip potentiometric determination of K+. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(6), 876–881 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201300541
M. Parrilla, M. Cuartero, S.P. Sánchez, M. Rajabi, N. Roxhed et al., Wearable all-solid-state potentiometric microneedle patch for intradermal potassium detection. Anal. Chem. 91(2), 1578–1586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04877
D.H. Keum, H.S. Jung, T. Wang, M.H. Shin, Y.E. Kim et al., Microneedle biosensor for real-time electrical detection of nitric oxide for in situ cancer diagnosis during endomicroscopy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4(8), 1153–1158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500012
A.M.V. Mohan, J.R. Windmiller, R.K. Mishra, J. Wang, Continuous minimally-invasive alcohol monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 91, 574–579 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.016
Q. Jin, H.J. Chen, X. Li, X. Huang, Q. Wu et al., Reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid–assembled microneedles as mini-invasive electrodes for real-time transdermal biosensing. Small 15(6), 1804298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201804298
F. Liu, Z. Lin, Q. Jin, Q. Wu, C. Yang et al., Protection of nano-structures-integrated microneedle biosensor using dissolvable polymer coating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(5), 4809–4819 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b18981
E.M. Cahill, E.D. O’Cearbhaill, Toward biofunctional microneedles for stimulus responsive drug delivery. Bioconjugate Chem. 26(7), 1289–1296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00211
H. Lee, C. Song, S. Baik, D. Kim, T. Hyeon et al., Device-assisted transdermal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 127, 35–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.08.009
G. Buzsáki, Rhythms of the Brain (Oxford University Press, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001
M. Häusser, B. Mel, Dendrites: bug or feature? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13(3), 372–383 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00075-8
M.F. Bear, B.W. Connors, M.A. Paradiso, Neuroscience: exploring the brain. J. Child Fam. Stud. 5, 377–379 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234670
G.J. Stuart, H.U. Dodt, B. Sakmann, Patch-clamp recordings from the soma and dendrites of neurons in brain slices using infrared video microscopy. Pflügers Arch. 423(5), 511–518 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00374949
J.T. Davie, M.H.P. Kole, J.J. Letzkus, E.A. Rancz, N. Spruston et al., Dendritic patch-clamp recording. Nat. Protoc. 1(3), 1235–1247 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.164
J. Bischofberger, D. Engel, L. Li, J.R.P. Geiger, P. Jonas, Patch-clamp recording from mossy fiber terminals in hippocampal slices. Nat. Protoc. 1(4), 2075–2081 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.312
A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley, B. Katz, Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of loligo. J. Physiol. 116(4), 424–448 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004716
C.D. Harvey, C. Forrest, D.A. Dombeck, D.W. Tank, Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation. Nature 461(7266), 941–946 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08499
K. Kitamura, B. Judkewitz, M. Kano, W. Denk, M. Häusser, Targeted patch-clamp recordings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo. Nat. Methods 5(1), 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1150
S.B. Kodandaramaiah, G.T. Franzesi, B.Y. Chow, E.S. Boyden, C.R. Forest, Automated whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology of neurons in vivo. Nat. Methods 9(6), 585–587 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1993
R.R. Harrison, I. Kolb, S.B. Kodandaramaiah, A.A. Chubykin, A. Yang et al., Microchip amplifier for in vitro, in vivo, and automated whole cell patch-clamp recording. J. Neurophysiol. 113(4), 1275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00629.2014
T.W. Margrie, M. Brecht, B. Sakmann, In vivo, low-resistance, whole-cell recordings from neurons in the anaesthetized and awake mammalian brain. Pflügers Arch. 444(4), 491–498 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-002-0831-z
T.W. Margrie, A.H. Meyer, A. Caputi, H. Monyer, M.T. Hasan et al., Targeted whole-cell recordings in the mammalian brain in vivo. Neuron 39(6), 911–918 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2003.08.012
B. Jagadeesh, C. Gray, D. Ferster, Visually evoked oscillations of membrane potential in cells of cat visual cortex. Science 257(5069), 552–554 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1636094
W.T. Tseng, C.T. Yen, M.L. Tsai, A bundled microwire array for long-term chronic single-unit recording in deep brain regions of behaving rats. J. Neurosci. Meth. 201(2), 368–376 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.028
E. Fernández, B. Greger, P.A. House, I. Aranda, C. Botella et al., Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects. Front. Neuroeng. 7(24), 24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00024
M.R. Abidian, D.C. Martin, Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes. Biomaterials 29(9), 1273–1283 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.022
F.A. Gibbs, E.L. Gibbs, Atlas of Electroencephalography (1941).https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.53.5.452
S. Vanneste, J.J. Song, D.D. Ridder, Thalamocortical dysrhythmia detected by machine learning. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1103–1103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02820-0
S.E. John, N.L. Opie, Y.T. Wong, G.S. Rind, S.M. Ronayne et al., Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 8427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26457-7
D.T. Bundy, E. Zellmer, C.M. Gaona, M. Sharma, N. Szrama et al., Characterization of the effects of the human dura on macro- and micro-electrocorticographic recordings. J. Neural Eng. 11(1), 016006 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/1/016006
J.P. Seymour, W. Fan, K.D. Wise, E. Yoon, State-of-the-art mems and microsystem tools for brain research. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 3, 16066 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2016.66
D. Khodagholy, J.N. Gelinas, T. Thesen, W. Doyle, O. Devinsky et al., Neurogrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18(2), 310–315 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3905
G. Buzsáki, Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 7(5), 446 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1233
C.M. Gray, P.E. Maldonado, M. Wilson, B. Mcnaughton, Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods. 63(1–2), 43–54 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(95)00085-2
H.W. Steenland, B.L. McNaughton, Techniques for large-scale multiunit recording. Analysis and Modeling of Coordinated Multi-neuronal Activity. Springer Series in Comput. Neurosci. 12, 3–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1969-7_1
B.L. McNaughton, J. O’Keefe, C.A. Barnes, The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J. Neurosci. Meth. 8(4), 391–397 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(83)90097-3
D.A. Schwarz, M.A. Lebedev, T.L. Hanson, D.F. Dimitrov, G. Lehew et al., Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale brain activity in freely moving rhesus monkeys. Nat. Methods 11, 670–676 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2936
L. Cabrera, C. Sadle, E. Purcell, Neuroethical considerations of high-density electrode arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3(8), 586–589 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0407-2
Z. Qin, B. Zhang, K. Gao, L. Zhuang, N. Hu et al., A whole animal-based biosensor for fast detection of bitter compounds using extracellular potentials in rat gustatory cortex. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 239, 746–753 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.027
Z. Qin, B. Zhang, L. Hu, L. Zhuang, N. Hu et al., A novel bioelectronic tongue in vivo for highly sensitive bitterness detection with brain–machine interface. Biosens. Bioelectron. 78, 374–380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.078
M.A.L. Nicolelis, D. Dimitrov, J.M. Carmena, R. Crist, G. Lehew et al., Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys. PNAS 100(19), 11041–11046 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934665100
P.J. Rousche, R.A. Normann, Chronic recording capability of the utah intracortical electrode array in cat sensory cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 82(1), 1–15 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00031-4
E.M. Maynard, N.G. Hatsopoulos, C.L. Ojakangas, B.D. Acuna, J.N. Sanes et al., Neuronal interactions improve cortical population coding of movement direction. J. Neurosci. 19(18), 8083–8093 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-08083.1999
N.G. Hatsopoulos, C.L. Ojakangas, L. Paninski, J.P. Donoghue, Information about movement direction obtained from synchronous activity of motor cortical neurons. PNAS 95(26), 15706–15711 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.26.15706
K.E. Jones, P.K. Campbell, R.A. Normann, A glass/silicon composite intracortical electrode array. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 20(4), 423–437 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368134
C.T. Nordhausen, P.J. Rousche, R.A. Normann, Optimizing recording capabilities of the utah intracortical electrode array. Brain Res. 637(1–2), 27–36 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91213-0
J.C. Barrese, N. Rao, K. Paroo, C. Triebwasser, C. Vargasirwin et al., Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates. J. Neural Eng. 10(6), 066014 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066014
W. Truccolo, L.R. Hochberg, J.P. Donoghue, Collective dynamics in human and monkey sensorimotor cortex: predicting single neuron spikes. Nat. Neurosci. 13(1), 105–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2455
L.R. Hochberg, B. Daniel, J. Beata, N.Y. Masse, J.D. Simeral et al., Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485(7398), 372–375 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11076
E.K. Chadwick, D. Blana, J.D. Simeral, J. Lambrecht, S.P. Kim et al., Continuous neuronal ensemble control of simulated arm reaching by a human with tetraplegia. J. Neural Eng. 8(3), 034003 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/034003
A. Sharma, L. Rieth, P. Tathireddy, R. Harrison, F. Solzbacher, Long term in vitro stability of fully integrated wireless neural interfaces based on utah slant electrode array. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(7), 164 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3318251
A. Sharma, L. Rieth, P. Tathireddy, R. Harrison, H. Oppermann et al., Evaluation of the packaging and encapsulation reliability in fully integrated, fully wireless 100 channel utah slant electrode array (USEA): implications for long term functionality. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 188(8), 167–172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.11.015
P. Norlin, M. Kindlundh, A. Mouroux, K. Yoshida, U.G. Hofmann, A 32-site neural recording probe fabricated by drie of soi substrates. J. Micromech. Microeng. 12(12), 414–419 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/12/4/312
K.C. Cheung, K. Djupsund, Y. Dan, L.P. Lee, Implantable multichannel electrode array based on soi technology. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 12(2), 179–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2003.809962
D.R. Kipke, W. Shain, G. Buzsáki, E. Fetz, J.M. Henderson et al., Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities. J. Neurosci. 28(46), 11830–11838 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3879-08.2008
D.R. Kipke, S. William, G. Buzsáki, E. Fetz, J.M. Henderson et al., Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities. J. Neurosci. 28(46), 11830–11838 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3879-08.2008
G.E. Perlin, K.D. Wise, An ultra compact integrated front end for wireless neural recording microsystems. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 19(6), 1409–1421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2082496
F. Wu, E. Stark, P.C. Ku, K.D. Wise, G. Buzsáki et al., Monolithically integrated μLEDs on silicon neural probes for high-resolution optogenetic studies in behaving animals. Neuron 88(6), 1136–1148 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.032
T.I. Kim, J.G. McCall, Y.H. Jung, X. Huang, E.R. Siuda et al., Injectable, cellular-scale optoelectronics with applications for wireless optogenetics. Science 340(6129), 211–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232437
J.J. Jun, N.A. Steinmetz, J.H. Siegle, D.J. Denman, M. Bauza et al., Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551(7679), 232–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24636
D.H. Kim, J. Viventi, J.J. Amsden, J. Xiao, L. Vigeland et al., Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat. Mater. 9(6), 511 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2745
V. Jonathan, K. Dae-Hyeong, V. Leif, E.S. Frechette, J.A. Blanco et al., Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 14(12), 1599–1605 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2973
T.M. Fu, G. Hong, T. Zhou, T.G. Schuhmann, R.D. Viveros et al., Stable long-term chronic brain mapping at the single-neuron level. Nat. Methods 13(10), 875–882 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3969
C. Andres, J. Xiaoting, U.P. Froriep, R.A. Koppes, C.M. Tringides et al., Multifunctional fibers for simultaneous optical, electrical and chemical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33(3), 277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3093
S. Park, Y. Guo, X. Jia, K.C. Han, B. Grena et al., One-step optogenetics with multifunctional flexible polymer fibers. Nat. Neurosci. 20(4), 612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4510
N.K. Logothetis, M. Augath, Y. Murayama, A. Rauch, F. Sultan et al., The effects of electrical microstimulation on cortical signal propagation. Nat. Neurosci. 13(10), 1283–1291 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2631
D. Huber, L. Petreanu, N. Ghitani, S. Ranade, T. Hromádka et al., Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice. Nature 451(7174), 61–64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06445
B. Sergejus, S. Cornelius, Spatiotemporal effects of microstimulation in rat neocortex: a parametric study using multielectrode recordings. J. Neurophysiol. 90(5), 3024–3039 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00245.2003
F. Wu, E. Stark, M. Im, I.J. Cho, E.S. Yoon et al., An implantable neural probe with monolithically integrated dielectric waveguide and recording electrodes for optogenetics applications. J. Neural Eng. 10(5), 056012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056012
M. Schwaerzle, K. Seidl, U.T. Schwarz, O. Paul, P. Ruther, Ultracompact optrode with integrated laser diode chips and SU-8 waveguides for optogenetic applications, in IEEE 26th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst. 1029–1032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2013.6474424
J.G. Bernstein, P.A. Garrity, E.S. Boyden, Optogenetics and thermogenetics: technologies for controlling the activity of targeted cells within intact neural circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22(1), 61–71 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.023
M. Im, I.J. Cho, F. Wu, K.D. Wise, E. Yoon, A dual-shank neural probe integrated with double waveguides on each shank for optogenetic applications in Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 5480–5483 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091398
M. Im, I.J. Cho, W. Fan, K.D. Wise, Neural probes integrated with optical mixer/splitter waveguides and multiple stimulation sites, in IEEE 24th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst. 1051–1054 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2011.5734609
A.N. Zorzos, E.S. Boyden, C.G. Fonstad, A multi-waveguide implantable probe for light delivery to sets of distributed brain targets. Opt. Lett. 35(24), 4133–4135 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.004133
S. Spieth, A. Schumacher, T. Holtzman, P.D. Rich, D.E. Theobald et al., An intra-cerebral drug delivery system for freely moving animals. Biomed. Microdevices 14(5), 799–809 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-012-9659-2
O. Frey, P.D.V.D. Wal, S. Spieth, O. Brett, K. Seidl et al., Biosensor microprobes with integrated microfluidic channels for bi-directional neurochemical interaction. J. Neural Eng. 8(6), 066001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/066001
S. Spieth, O. Brett, K. Seidl, A.A.A. Aarts, M.A. Erismis et al., A floating 3D silicon microprobe array for neural drug delivery compatible with electrical recording. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21(12), 125001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/21/12/125001
A. Pongrácz, Z. Fekete, G. Márton, Z. Bérces, I. Ulbert et al., Deep-brain silicon multielectrodes for simultaneous in vivo neural recording and drug delivery. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 189(12), 97–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.01.032
H.J. Lee, Y. Son, J. Kim, C.J. Lee, E.S. Yoon et al., A multichannel neural probe with embedded microfluidic channels for simultaneous in vivo neural recording and drug delivery. Lab Chip 15(6), 1590–1597 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC01321B
K. Seidl, S. Herwik, Y. Nurcahyo, T. Torfs, M. Keller et al., CMOS-based high-density silicon microprobe array for electronic depth control in neural recording. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 20(6), 1439–1448 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2011.2167661
M.Y. Cheng, L. Yao, K.L. Tan, R. Lim, P. Li et al., 3D probe array integrated with a front-end 100-channel neural recording asic. J. Micromech. Microeng. 24(12), 125010 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/24/12/125010
R. Fiáth, P. Beregszászi, D. Horváth, L. Wittner, A.A. Aarts et al., Large-scale recording of thalamocortical circuits: in vivo electrophysiology with the two-dimensional electronic depth control silicon probe. J. Neurophysiol. 116(5), 2312–2330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00318.2016
L. Jia, F. Tian-Ming, C. Zengguang, H. Guosong, Z. Tao et al., Syringe-injectable electronics. Nat. Nanotech. 10(7), 629–636 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.115
J. Pas, A.L. Rutz, P.P. Quilichini, A. Slézia, A. Ghestem et al., A bilayered pva/plga-bioresorbable shuttle to improve the implantation of flexible neural probes. J. Neural Eng. 15(6), 065001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aadc1d
T.D.Y. Kozai, Z. Gugel, X. Li, P.J. Gilgunn, R. Khilwani et al., Chronic tissue response to carboxymethyl cellulose based dissolvable insertion needle for ultra-small neural probes. Biomaterials 35(34), 9255–9268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.039
R. Khilwani, P.J. Gilgunn, T.D.Y. Kozai, X.C. Ong, E. Korkmaz et al., Ultra-miniature ultra-compliant neural probes with dissolvable delivery needles: design, fabrication and characterization. Biomed. Microdevices 18(6), 97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-016-0125-4
F. Wu, L.W. Tien, F. Chen, J.D. Berke, D.L. Kaplan et al., Silk-backed structural optimization of high-density flexible intracortical neural probes. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 24(1), 62–69 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2375326
K.J. Yu, D. Kuzum, S.W. Hwang, B.H. Kim, H. Juul et al., Bioresorbable silicon electronics for transient spatiotemporal mapping of electrical activity from the cerebral cortex. Nat. Mater. 15(7), 782–791 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4624
R. Chen, A. Canales, P. Anikeeva, Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2(2), 16093 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.93
R.A. Green, P.B. Matteucci, R.T. Hassarati, B. Giraud, C.W.D. Dodds et al., Performance of conducting polymer electrodes for stimulating neuroprosthetics. J. Neural Eng. 10(1), 016009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/1/016009
S. Watanabe, H. Takahashi, K. Torimitsu, Electroconductive polymer-coated silk fiber electrodes for neural recording and stimulation in vivo. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 56(3), 037001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7567/jjap.56.037001
P. Fattahi, G. Yang, G. Kim, M.R. Abidian, A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces. Adv. Mater. 26(12), 1846–1885 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304496
W.W. Ward, S.H. Bokman, Reversible denaturation of aequorea green-fluorescent protein: physical separation and characterization of the renatured protein. Biochemistry 21(19), 4535–4540 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00262a003
Y. Qian, K.D. Piatkevich, B.M. Larney, A.S. Abdelfattah, S. Mehta et al., A genetically encoded near-infrared fluorescent calcium ion indicator. Nat. Methods 16(2), 171–174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0294-6
A.V. Leopold, D.M. Shcherbakova, V.V. Verkhusha, Fluorescent biosensors for neurotransmission and neuromodulation: engineering and applications. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13, 474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00474
A.I. Kostyuk, A.D. Demidovich, D.A. Kotova, V.V. Belousov, D.S. Bilan, Circularly permuted fluorescent protein-based indicators: history, principles, and classification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(17), 4200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174200
K.G. Chernov, T.A. Redchuk, E.S. Omelina, V.V. Verkhusha, Near-infrared fluorescent proteins, biosensors, and optogenetic tools engineered from phytochromes. Chem. Rev. 117(9), 6423–6446 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00700
B.T. Bajar, E.S. Wang, S. Zhang, M.Z. Lin, J. Chu, A guide to fluorescent protein fret pairs. Sensors 16(9), 1488 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091488
J. Feng, C. Zhang, J.E. Lischinsky, M. Jing, J. Zhou et al., A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor for rapid and specific in vivo detection of norepinephrine. Neuron 102(4), 745–761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.037
T.J.W.T. Chen, Y. Sun, S.R. Pulver, S.L. Renninger, A. Baohan et al., Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12354
M. Jing, P. Zhang, G. Wang, J. Feng, L. Mesik et al., A genetically encoded fluorescent acetylcholine indicator for in vitro and in vivo studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 36(8), 726–737 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4184
T. Patriarchi, J.R. Cho, K. Merten, M.W. Howe, A. Marley et al., Ultrafast neuronal imaging of dopamine dynamics with designed genetically encoded sensors. Science 360(6396), 4422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4422
J.S. Marvin, Y. Shimoda, V. Magloire, M. Leite, T. Kawashima et al., A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor for in vivo imaging of GABA. Nat. Methods 16(8), 763–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0471-2
C. Liu, Y. Zhao, X. Cai, Y. Xie, T. Wang et al., A wireless, implantable optoelectrochemical probe for optogenetic stimulation and dopamine detection. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 6(1), 64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-020-0176-9
I.M. Taylor, Z. Du, E.T. Bigelow, J.R. Eles, A.R. Horner et al., Aptamer-functionalized neural recording electrodes for the direct measurement of cocaine in vivo. J. Mater. Chem. B 5(13), 2445–2458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TB00095B
H. Shin, Y. Son, U. Chae, J. Kim, N. Choi et al., Multifunctional multi-shank neural probe for investigating and modulating long-range neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 3777 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11628-5
S. Park, Y. Guo, X. Jia, H.K. Choe, B. Grena et al., One-step optogenetics with multifunctional flexible polymer fibers. Nat. Neurosci. 20(4), 612–619 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4510
K.N. Noh, S.I. Park, R. Qazi, Z. Zou, A.D. Mickle et al., Miniaturized, battery-free optofluidic systems with potential for wireless pharmacology and optogenetics. Small 14(4), 1702479 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702479
R. Qazi, A.M. Gomez, D.C. Castro, Z. Zou, J.Y. Sim et al., Wireless optofluidic brain probes for chronic neuropharmacology and photostimulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3(8), 655–669 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0432-1
O. Yizhar, L.E. Fenno, T.J. Davidson, M. Mogri, K. Deisseroth, Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron 71(1), 9–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004
L. Fenno, O. Yizhar, K. Deisseroth, The development and application of optogenetics. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 34(1), 389–412 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113817
V. Gradinaru, F. Zhang, C. Ramakrishnan, J. Mattis, R. Prakash et al., Molecular and cellular approaches for diversifying and extending optogenetics. Cell 141(1), 154–165 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.037
E. Stark, T. Koos, G. Buzsáki, Diode probes for spatiotemporal optical control of multiple neurons in freely moving animals. J. Neurophysiol. 108(1), 349–363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00153.2012
S. Royer, B.V. Zemelman, M. Barbic, A. Losonczy, G. Buzsáki et al., Multi-array silicon probes with integrated optical fibers: light-assisted perturbation and recording of local neural circuits in the behaving animal. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31(12), 2279–2291 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07250.x
J. Lee, I. Ozden, Y.K. Song, A.V. Nurmikko, Transparent intracortical microprobe array for simultaneous spatiotemporal optical stimulation and multichannel electrical recording. Nat. Methods 12(12), 1157–1162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3620
J.C. Doloff, O. Veiseh, A.J. Vegas, H.H. Tam, S. Farah et al., Colony stimulating factor-1 receptor is a central component of the foreign body response to biomaterial implants in rodents and non-human primates. Nat. Mater. 16(6), 671–680 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4866
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32171399), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2021YFF1200700, 2021YFA0911100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32171456, 32171335, 61901535, 31900954, 62104264).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, J., Huang, S., Liu, F. et al. Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00818-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00818-4