Abstract
Instructors often write feedback on students’ proofs even if there is no expectation for the students to revise and resubmit the work. It is not known, however, what students do with that feedback or if they understand the professor’s intentions. To this end, we asked eight advanced mathematics undergraduates to respond to professor comments on four written proofs by interpreting and implementing the comments. We analyzed the student’s responses using the categories of corrective feedback for language acquisition, viewing the language of mathematical proof as a register of academic English.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock, L. (2013). How to study as a mathematics major. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, D. S., & DeAlba, L. M. (1997). Groups for proofs: Collaborative learning in a mathematics reasoning course. Primus, 7, 193–207.
Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Chartrand, G., Polimeni, A. D., & Zhang, P. (2012). Mathematical proofs: A transition to advanced mathematics (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2000). Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cupillari, A. (2013). The nuts and bolts of proof: An introduction to mathematical proofs (4th ed.). Waltham: Academic Press.
De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 7–24 Retrieved from http://mzone.mweb.co.za/residents/profmd/proofa.pdf.
De Villiers, M. (1999). Rethinking proof with sketchpad. Oakland: Key Curriculum Press.
Dubinsky, E., & Yiparaki, O. (2000). On student understanding of AE and EA quantification. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, C. Kessel, & M. Keynes (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics IV (pp. 239–289). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Epp, S. S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. American Mathematical Monthly, 110, 886–899.
Franklin, J., & Daoud, A. (2011). Proof in mathematics: An introduction. Sydney: Kew Books.
Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2005). Thoughts on learning advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25, 33–35.
Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2016). Responsibility for proving and defining in abstract algebra class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 5, 1–17. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1114159.
Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (Vol. 27). Malden: Blackwell.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). Charlotte: Information Age.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
Herschensohn, J., & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Cambridge handbook for second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 358–390.
Ko, Y., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32, 20–35.
Lai, Y., Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on features of a good pedagogical proof. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 146–169.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leeman, J. (2007). Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 111–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162–198.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
Mills, M. (2011). Mathematicians’ pedagogical thoughts and practices in proof presentation. In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 283–297). Oregon: Portland Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME_XIV_Proceedings_Volume_2.pdf.
Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249–266.
Moore, R. C. (2016). Mathematics professors’ evaluation of students’ proofs: A complex teaching practice. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 246–278. doi:10.1007/s40753-016-0029-y.
Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.
Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge & K. Paul.
Pinker, S. (2009). Language learnability and language development, with new commentary by the author (Vol. 7). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(1), 5–41.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 139–159.
Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4–36.
Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2008). Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning to understand and construct proofs. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 95–110). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Smith, D. D., Eggen, M., & St. Andre, R. (2014). A transition to advanced mathematics (8th ed.) Boston: Cengage Learning.
Strickland, S., & Rand, B. (2016). Learning proofs via composition instruction techniques. In R. Schwell, A. Steurer, & J.F. Vasquez (Eds.), Beyond Lecture: Resources and pedagogical techniques for enhancing the teaching of proof-writing across the curriculum. Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Stylianides, G., Stylianides, A., & Weber, K. (in press). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Reston.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tedick, D. J., & de Gortari, B. (1998). Research on error correction and implications for classroom teaching. ACIE Newsletter, 1(3), 1–6.
Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 101–119.
Weber, K. (2006). Investigating and teaching the processes used to construct proofs. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 6, 197–232.
Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2014). Students’ sense-making frames in mathematics lectures. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 168–179.
Zerr, J. M., & Zerr, R. J. (2011). Learning from their mistakes: Using students’ incorrect proofs as a pedagogical tool. Primus, 21, 530–544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Appendix
Proofs A, B, C, and D were presented to the participants during the interviews. For each proof, first the interviewer presented to the participant a version of the proof without the professor’s comments, then later presented a version of the proof with the professor’s comments. The participants did not see the numbering of the comments. (PDF 1940 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Byrne, M., Hanusch, S., Moore, R.C. et al. Student Interpretations of Written Comments on Graded Proofs. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. 4, 228–253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0059-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0059-0