Abstract
Purpose
Considering potential roles of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and placental growth factor (PlGF) in ovarian function and embryo implantation, in the present study we have evaluated the association of these factors and also PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio with the ovarian response and implantation rate by dividing patients according to the OSI.
Methods
In a cross-sectional study, 90 infertile women who were undergoing ICSI cycle using long protocol were recruited. The patients were divided according to ovarian sensitivity index (OSI). ICSI cycle outcomes were evaluated for each patient and PlGF, sFlt-1 and sRAGE levels of follicular fluid were assayed using commercial ELISA kits.
Results
Follicular fluid (FF) sRAGE levels and PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio were statistically greater in high-responder women than other responders (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were obtained between sRAGE level with the number of oocytes, follicles and OSI level. sRAGE levels with cutoff value of 4.83 (ng/ml) for evaluating the pregnancy outcome showed 81.8 % sensitivity and 60.7 % specificity. Furthermore, there were positive associations between PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio with the number of oocytes, embryos and OSI level.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the results of current study supported that good ovarian response is independent of pregnancy outcome. Our results showed that FF levels of sRAGE and PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio could be used as markers for determining the high-responder women. Also, FF sRAGE levels could be a good predictor for ART outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- OSI:
-
Ovarian sensitivity index
- PlGF:
-
Placental growth factor
- AMH:
-
Anti-mullerian hormone
- sFlt-1:
-
Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1
- AGEs:
-
Advanced glycation end products
- RAGE:
-
Receptor for advanced glycation end products
- sRAGE:
-
Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products
References
Li HW, Lee VC, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho P, Ng EH (2013) Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis. PLoS One 8(4):e61095
Delvigne A (2009) Epidemiology of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online 19(1):8–13
Li HW, Lee VC, Ho P, Ng EH (2014) Ovarian sensitivity index is a better measure of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation than the number of oocytes during in-vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 31(2):199–203
Huber M, Hadziosmanovic N, Berglund L, Holte J (2013) Using the ovarian sensitivity index to define poor, normal, and high response after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol: suggestions for a new principle to solve an old problem. Fertil Steril 100(5):1270–1276 (e1273)
Carmeliet P, Moons L, Luttun A, Vincenti V, Compernolle V, De Mol M, Wu Y, Bono F, Devy L, Beck H (2001) Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions. Nat Med 7(5):575–583
Tal R, Seifer DB, Grazi RV, Malter HE (2014) Follicular fluid placental growth factor is increased in polycystic ovarian syndrome: correlation with ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12(1):82
Hou L, Taylor R, Shu Y, Johnston-MacAnanny E, Yalcinkaya T (2014) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PLGF) directly correlate with ovarian follicle size in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fertil Steril 3(102):e256
Santi A, Felser RS, Mueller MD, Wunder DM, McKinnon B, Bersinger NA (2011) Increased endometrial placenta growth factor (PLGF) gene expression in women with successful implantation. Fertil Steril 96(3):663–668
Merhi Z (2013) Advanced glycation end products and their relevance in female reproduction. Hum Reprod:det383
Basta G, Sironi AM, Lazzerini G, Del Turco S, Buzzigoli E, Casolaro A, Natali A, Ferrannini E, Gastaldelli A (2006) Circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is inversely associated with glycemic control and S100A12 protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(11):4628–4634
Malíčková K, Jarošová R, Řežábek K, Fait T, Jr Mašata, Janatková I, Zima T, Kalousova M (2009) Concentrations of sRAGE in serum and follicular fluid in assisted reproductive cycles–a preliminary study. Clin Lab 56(9–10):377–384
Merhi Z, Irani M, Doswell AD, Ambroggio J (2013) Follicular fluid soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE): a potential indicator of ovarian reserve. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(2):E226–E233
Broer S, Dolleman M, Opmeer B, Fauser B, Mol B, Broekmans F (2011) AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Updat 17(1):46–54
Setti PL, Alviggi C, Colombo G, Pisanelli C, Ripellino C, Longobardi S, Canonico P, De Placido G (2015) Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation. J Endocrinol Invest 38(5):497–503
Broer SL, Mol BWJ, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ (2009) The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 91(3):705–714
Heidar Z, Bakhtiyari M, Mirzamoradi M, Zadehmodarres S, Sarfjoo F, Mansournia M (2015) Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Müllerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF. J Endocrinol Invest 38(9):1007–1015
Broekmans F, Kwee J, Hendriks D, Mol B, Lambalk C (2006) A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Updat 12(6):685–718
Biasoni V, Patriarca A, Dalmasso P, Bertagna A, Manieri C, Benedetto C, Revelli A (2011) Ovarian sensitivity index is strongly related to circulating AMH and may be used to predict ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropins in IVF. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9(112):b19
Saldeen P, Källen K, Sundström P (2007) The probability of successful IVF outcome after poor ovarian response. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(4):457–461
Wei Z, Cheng X, Li H, Cao Y, Cong L, Zhou P, Li J (2010) Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8(1):26
Kan A, Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC (2006) Perifollicular vascularity in poor ovarian responders during IVF. Hum Reprod 21(6):1539–1544
Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez-Bernal A, Barlow D (1999) Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertilization worthwhile? Hum Reprod 14(4):964–969
Tayade C, Fang Y, Hilchie D, Croy BA (2007) Lymphocyte contributions to altered endometrial angiogenesis during early and midgestation fetal loss. J Leukoc Biol 82(4):877–886
Catteau-Jonard S, Jamin SP, Leclerc A, Gonzalès J, Dewailly D, di Clemente N (2008) Anti-Mullerian hormone, its receptor, FSH receptor, and androgen receptor genes are overexpressed by granulosa cells from stimulated follicles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(11):4456–4461
Weerakiet S, Lertvikool S, Tingthanatikul Y, Wansumrith S, Leelaphiwat S, Jultanmas R (2007) Ovarian reserve in women with polycystic ovary syndrome who underwent laparoscopic ovarian drilling. Gynecol Endocrinol 23(8):455–460
Dewerchin M, Carmeliet P (2012) PlGF: a multitasking cytokine with disease-restricted activity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(8):a011056
Savchev SI, Moragianni VA, Senger D, Penzias AS, Thornton K, Usheva A (2010) Follicular fluid-specific distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms and sFlt-1 in patients undergoing IVF and their correlation with treatment outcomes. Reprod Sci 17(11):1036–1042
Neulen J, Wenzel D, Hornig C, Wünsch E, Weissenborn U, Grunwald K, Büttner R, Weich H (2001) Poor responder–high responder: the importance of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 in ovarian stimulation protocols. Hum Reprod 16(4):621–626
Kaczmarek M, Kiewisz J, Schams D, Ziecik A (2009) Expression of VEGF-receptor system in conceptus during peri-implantation period and endometrial and luteal expression of soluble VEGFR-1 in the pig. Theriogenology 71(8):1298–1306
Irani M, Minkoff H, Seifer DB, Merhi Z (2014) Vitamin D increases serum levels of the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in women with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(5):E886–E890
Bonetti TC, Borges E, Braga DP, Iaconelli A, Kleine JP, Silva ID (2013) Intrafollicular soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and embryo quality in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 26(1):62–67
Bhutada S, Basak T, Savardekar L, Katkam R, Jadhav G, Metkari S, Chaudhari U, Kumari D, Kholkute S, Sengupta S (2014) High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein in human uterine fluid and its relevance in implantation. Hum Reprod 29(4):763–780
Jinno M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe A, Teruya K, Hirohama J, Eguchi N, Miyazaki A (2011) Advanced glycation end-products accumulation compromises embryonic development and achievement of pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 26(3):604–610
Acknowledgments
The current work was supported by a Grant (Research Project Number 5/4/1870) from the Women’s Reproductive Health Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and this article was extracted from the M.Sc. thesis of Hamid Reza Nejabati.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The agreement of the Ethical Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences was obtained.
Informed consent
All patients gave written informed consent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nejabati, H.R., Mota, A., Farzadi, L. et al. Follicular fluid PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end–products correlate with ovarian sensitivity index in women undergoing A.R.T.. J Endocrinol Invest 40, 207–215 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0550-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0550-5