Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RFT as a Functional Analytic Approach to Understanding the Complexities of Human Behavior: A Reply to Killeen and Jacobs

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Namely, findings that support the suggestion that so-called “implicit evaluation” effects could be based on rules or propositions (relational networks) rather than simple associations.

References

  • Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: a relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Haydn, E., Milne, R., Power, P., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you know what you really believe? Developing the implicit relational evaluation procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., & Lyddy, F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: experimental evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 45–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., Colbert, D., Stewart, I., & Grey, I. M. (2016). A relational frame skills training intervention to increase general intelligence and scholastic aptitude. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 179–197. doi:10.1901/jeab.2007.45-05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than and less-than. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Advances in relational frame theory: research and application. CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, E., Luciano, C., Ruiz, F., & Salas, S. (2012). A preliminary demonstration of transformation of functions through hierarchical relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001a). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E., Wilson, K., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001b). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. K., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence classes. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J., & Stewart, I. (2016). Comparing the effects of derived relational training and computer coding on intellectual potential in school-age children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 397–411. doi:10.1111/bjep.12114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2011). On the formation and persistence of implicit attitudes: New evidence from the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP). The Psychological Record, 61, 391–410.

  • Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). Relational frame theory: the basic account. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, R. Zettle, & T. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: a voyage through implicit cognition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, W. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2008). Verbal establishing stimuli: testing the motivative effect of stimuli in a derived relation with consequences. Psychological Record, 58, 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen, P. R., & Jacobs, K. W. (2017). Coal is not black, snow is not white, food is not a reinforcer. The Behavior Analyst . doi:10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7.

  • Luciano, C., Gómez-Becerra, I., & Rodríguez-Valverde, M. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, J. W., & Herron, M. D. (2008). Does biology need an organism concept? Biological Reviews, 83(4), 621–627. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, J. C., Stewart, I., Dahl, J., & Lundgren, T. (2009). In search of meaning: values in modern clinical behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 85–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Perspective-taking as relational responding: a developmental profile. Psychological Record, 54, 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152–159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. (2004). Derived relational networks as novel instructions: a possible model of generative verbal control. Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2014). A relational network model of derived instructional control: antecedent and consequential control of derived instruction following. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(1), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., Pelaez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Amesty, L. (2005). Derived relational responding and human language: evidence from the WAIS-III. Psychological Record, 55, 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K., & Chaudhary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS—III. Psychological Record, 58(4), 569–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. E. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorder. Psychological Record, 57, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and human sexual categorization: a critical test of the derived difference relation. Psychological Record, 46, 451–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). The behavior of organisms? Psychological Record, 47, 597–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Learning and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5–22.

  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 23–44. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, B., & Stewart, I. (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555. doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (2016). The fruits of a functional approach for psychological science. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 15–27. doi:10.1002/ijop.12184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. W. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., Hooper, N., Walsh, P., O’Keefe, R., Joyce, R., & McHugh, L. (2015). Transformation of thought suppression functions via same and opposite relations. Psychological Record, 65(2), 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2009). Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: an apparent inconsistency and clarification. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 309–317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2013). Language generativity, response generalization, and derived relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29(1), 137–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., & Roche, B. (2013). Relational frame theory: an overview. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

  • Vahey, N., Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, T. M., Hayes, S. C., & Capurro, P. (2011). Establishing a deictic relational repertoire in young children. Psychological Record, 61, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dymond, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86(3), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zettle, R. D., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Biglan, A. (2016). The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Ian Stewart

Authors
  1. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Stewart.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This article was not supported by funding.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, I. RFT as a Functional Analytic Approach to Understanding the Complexities of Human Behavior: A Reply to Killeen and Jacobs. BEHAV ANALYST 40, 65–74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0099-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0099-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation