Abstract
Relational frame theory (RFT) explicitly suggests that derived relational responding underlies complex verbally-based cognitive performances. The current study investigated whether the ability to respond in accordance with temporal relations between stimuli was predictive of performance on the four indices of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition (WAIS-III). In line with RFT predictions, for 81 undergraduate students between 18 and 48 years old, successfully completing a temporal relational task predicted better performance on the Verbal Comprehension and Perceptual Organization indices but not on the Working Memory or Processing Speed indices. In addition, correlations observed between the percentage of correct temporal relational responses and individual subscales demonstrated strong within-index homogeneity, which highlights the utility of the index factor structure in WAIS-III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALLAN, L. G. (1979). The perception of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 340–354.
ALLAN, L. G. (1998). The influence of scalar timing on human timing. Behavioural Processes, 44, 101–117.
ANDREWS, G., & HALFORD, G. S. (1998). Children’s ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity. Cognitive Development, 13, 479–513.
ANDREWS, G. & HALFORD, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153–219.
ANDREWS, G., HALFORD, G. S., BUNCH, K. M., BOWDEN, D., & JONES, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74, 1476–1499.
BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 1–11.
BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & CULLINAN, V. (2001). Education. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 181–195). New York: Plenum.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., STAUNTON, C., WHELAN, R., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., ET AL. (2005). Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 417–433.
BATTELLI, L., PASCUAL-LEONE, A., & CAVANAGH, P. (2007). The “when” pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 204–210.
BIZO, L. A., CHU, J. Y. M., SANABRIA, F., & KILLEEN, P. R. (2006). The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and time production. Behavioural Processes, 71, 201–210.
BZOCH, K. R., & LEAGUE, R. (1991). The Bzoch-League Receptive-Expressive. Emergent Language Scale (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
CHRISTOFF, K., PRABHAKARAN, V., DORFMAN, J., ZHAO, Z., KROGER, J. K., HOLYOAK, K. J., ET AL. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136–1149.
COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257–271.
DALE, R. (2005). Cognitive and behavioral approaches to language acquisition: Conceptual and empirical intersections. Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 336–359.
DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C. & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
DICKINS, D. W., SINGH, K. D., ROBERTS, N., BURNS, P., DOWNES, J. J., JIMMIESON, P., ET AL. (2001). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. NeuroReport, 12, 1–7.
DICKINS, T. E., & DICKINS, D. W. (2001). Symbols, stimulus equivalence, and the origins of language. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 221–244.
DYMOND, S., & REHFELDT, R. A. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.
GALIZIO, M., STEWART, K. L., & PILGRIM, C. (2001). Clustering in artificial categories: An equivalence analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 609–614.
GENTNER, D., & RATTERMANN, M. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman and J. P. Byrnes (Eds.) Perspective on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 225–277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
GOSWAMI, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
GOSWAMI, U. (1995). Transitive relational mappings in 3- and 4-year-olds: The analogy of Goldilocks and the three bears. Child Development, 66, 877–892.
GRONDIN, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.
HALFORD, G. S. (1982). The development of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HALFORD, G. S. (1992). Analogical reasoning and conceptual complexity in cognitive development. Human Development, 35, 193–217.
HALFORD, G. S., BAKER, R., MCCREDDEN, J. E., & BAIN, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70–76.
HALFORD, G. S., WILSON, W. H., GUO, J., GAYLER, R. W., WILES, J., & STEWART, J. E. M. (1994). Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. In K. J. Holyoak & J. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 363–415). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
HALL, S. S., DEBERNARDIS, G. M., & REISS, A. L. (2006). The acquisition of stimulus equivalence in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 50, 643–651.
HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & Roche, B. T. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800–802.
LIPKENS, G., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.
MARCUS, G. F., VIJAYAN, S., BANDI RAO, S., & VISHTON, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.
MCHUGH, L., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2004). Perspective-taking as relational responding: A developmental profile. The Psychological Record, 54, 115–144.
O’HORA, D., PELÁEZ, M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal subtests of the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155–175.
PELÁEZ, M., GEWIRTZ, J. L., SANCHEZ, A., & MAHABIR, N. M. (2000). Exploring stimulus equivalence formation in infants. Behavior Development Bulletin, 9, 20–25.
RATTERMANN, M. J., & GENTNER, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children’s performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13, 453–478.
REESE, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: Discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic Press.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Author’s Cooperative.
SUGARMAN, S. (1982). Developmental change in early representational intelligence: Evidence from spatial classification strategies and related verbal expressions. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 410–449.
VISKONTAS, I. V., MORRISON, R. G., HOLYOAK, K. J., HUMMEL, J. E., & KNOWLTON, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581–591.
WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAK, K. J., BOONE, K. B., MISHKIN, F. S., DE MENEZES SANTOS, M., ET AL. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125.
WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAK, K. J., BOONE, K. B., BACK-MADRUGA, C., MCPHERSON, S., ET AL. (2004). Relational integration and executive function in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 18, 296–305.
WEARDEN, J. H. (1991). Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties? Learning and Motivation, 22, 59–83.
WEARDEN, J. H. (1999). “Beyond the fields we know …”: Exploring and developing scalar timing theory. Behavioural Processes, 45, 3–21.
WECHSLER, D. (1981). Wais-R manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
WECHSLER, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
YOUNGER, B. (1993). Understanding category members as “the same sort of thing”: Explicit categorization in ten month infants. Child Development, 64, 309–320.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank Rick Dale, Gary Adamson, and two anonymous reviewers for their astute comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D. et al. Temporal Relations and Intelligence: Correlating Relational Performance With Performance on the Wais-III. Psychol Rec 58, 569–584 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395638
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395638