Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal Relations and Intelligence: Correlating Relational Performance With Performance on the Wais-III

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relational frame theory (RFT) explicitly suggests that derived relational responding underlies complex verbally-based cognitive performances. The current study investigated whether the ability to respond in accordance with temporal relations between stimuli was predictive of performance on the four indices of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition (WAIS-III). In line with RFT predictions, for 81 undergraduate students between 18 and 48 years old, successfully completing a temporal relational task predicted better performance on the Verbal Comprehension and Perceptual Organization indices but not on the Working Memory or Processing Speed indices. In addition, correlations observed between the percentage of correct temporal relational responses and individual subscales demonstrated strong within-index homogeneity, which highlights the utility of the index factor structure in WAIS-III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALLAN, L. G. (1979). The perception of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALLAN, L. G. (1998). The influence of scalar timing on human timing. Behavioural Processes, 44, 101–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ANDREWS, G., & HALFORD, G. S. (1998). Children’s ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity. Cognitive Development, 13, 479–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANDREWS, G. & HALFORD, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ANDREWS, G., HALFORD, G. S., BUNCH, K. M., BOWDEN, D., & JONES, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74, 1476–1499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & CULLINAN, V. (2001). Education. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 181–195). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., STAUNTON, C., WHELAN, R., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., ET AL. (2005). Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 417–433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BATTELLI, L., PASCUAL-LEONE, A., & CAVANAGH, P. (2007). The “when” pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 204–210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BIZO, L. A., CHU, J. Y. M., SANABRIA, F., & KILLEEN, P. R. (2006). The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and time production. Behavioural Processes, 71, 201–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BZOCH, K. R., & LEAGUE, R. (1991). The Bzoch-League Receptive-Expressive. Emergent Language Scale (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTOFF, K., PRABHAKARAN, V., DORFMAN, J., ZHAO, Z., KROGER, J. K., HOLYOAK, K. J., ET AL. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136–1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DALE, R. (2005). Cognitive and behavioral approaches to language acquisition: Conceptual and empirical intersections. Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 336–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C. & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DICKINS, D. W., SINGH, K. D., ROBERTS, N., BURNS, P., DOWNES, J. J., JIMMIESON, P., ET AL. (2001). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. NeuroReport, 12, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DICKINS, T. E., & DICKINS, D. W. (2001). Symbols, stimulus equivalence, and the origins of language. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & REHFELDT, R. A. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GALIZIO, M., STEWART, K. L., & PILGRIM, C. (2001). Clustering in artificial categories: An equivalence analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 609–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GENTNER, D., & RATTERMANN, M. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman and J. P. Byrnes (Eds.) Perspective on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 225–277). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • GOSWAMI, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOSWAMI, U. (1995). Transitive relational mappings in 3- and 4-year-olds: The analogy of Goldilocks and the three bears. Child Development, 66, 877–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRONDIN, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HALFORD, G. S. (1982). The development of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALFORD, G. S. (1992). Analogical reasoning and conceptual complexity in cognitive development. Human Development, 35, 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HALFORD, G. S., BAKER, R., MCCREDDEN, J. E., & BAIN, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HALFORD, G. S., WILSON, W. H., GUO, J., GAYLER, R. W., WILES, J., & STEWART, J. E. M. (1994). Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. In K. J. Holyoak & J. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 363–415). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALL, S. S., DEBERNARDIS, G. M., & REISS, A. L. (2006). The acquisition of stimulus equivalence in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 50, 643–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & Roche, B. T. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOCHBERG, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIPKENS, G., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MARCUS, G. F., VIJAYAN, S., BANDI RAO, S., & VISHTON, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MCHUGH, L., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2004). Perspective-taking as relational responding: A developmental profile. The Psychological Record, 54, 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’HORA, D., PELÁEZ, M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal subtests of the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PELÁEZ, M., GEWIRTZ, J. L., SANCHEZ, A., & MAHABIR, N. M. (2000). Exploring stimulus equivalence formation in infants. Behavior Development Bulletin, 9, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RATTERMANN, M. J., & GENTNER, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children’s performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13, 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REESE, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: Discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Author’s Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUGARMAN, S. (1982). Developmental change in early representational intelligence: Evidence from spatial classification strategies and related verbal expressions. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 410–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VISKONTAS, I. V., MORRISON, R. G., HOLYOAK, K. J., HUMMEL, J. E., & KNOWLTON, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAK, K. J., BOONE, K. B., MISHKIN, F. S., DE MENEZES SANTOS, M., ET AL. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAK, K. J., BOONE, K. B., BACK-MADRUGA, C., MCPHERSON, S., ET AL. (2004). Relational integration and executive function in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 18, 296–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEARDEN, J. H. (1991). Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties? Learning and Motivation, 22, 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEARDEN, J. H. (1999). “Beyond the fields we know …”: Exploring and developing scalar timing theory. Behavioural Processes, 45, 3–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WECHSLER, D. (1981). Wais-R manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • WECHSLER, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • YOUNGER, B. (1993). Understanding category members as “the same sort of thing”: Explicit categorization in ten month infants. Child Development, 64, 309–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis O’Hora.

Additional information

The authors thank Rick Dale, Gary Adamson, and two anonymous reviewers for their astute comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D. et al. Temporal Relations and Intelligence: Correlating Relational Performance With Performance on the Wais-III. Psychol Rec 58, 569–584 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395638

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395638

Navigation