Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses theoretical issues relating to an apparent terminological inconsistency between two recent studies involving relational responding. These studies employed a functionally similar protocol to establish contextual cues for arbitrarily applicable relational responding by using a nonarbitrary relational responding procedure; however, one employed the term nonarbitrary regarding this procedure, and the other used arbitrary. Both can be legitimately described as correct, but they use apparently contradictory descriptions because they focus on different aspects of the protocol; in one, the label is based on traditional conditional discrimination task nomenclature, whereas in the other, it is based on the type of relational responding being performed. The current article describes and then explains the issue. In doing so, it touches on an important topic concerning the relation between relational responding and the conditional discrimination procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). A behavior-analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1961). Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179–197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healey, O. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21–49). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, R., & Hayes, S. C. (2009). Producing and recognizing analogical relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 105–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. L., Thorsteinsson, J. R., Yu, C. T., Martin, T. L., & Vause, T. (2008). The assessment of basic learning abilities test for predicting learning of persons with intellectual disabilities: A review. Behavior Modification, 32, 228–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195–213.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., Jackson, J., & Galizio, M. (2000). Acquisition of arbitrary conditional discriminations by young normally developing children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 177–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Dymond, S. (2008). A transformation of functions in accordance with the nonarbitrary relational properties of sexual stimuli. The Psychological Record, 58, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, K., & Williams, D. (1998). Stimulus control procedures. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 193–228). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination versus matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). A derived transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, St. Anthony’s Building, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway City, Ireland

    Ian Stewart

  2. Step-by-Step, Pennsylvania, USA

    John McElwee

Authors
  1. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John McElwee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, I., McElwee, J. Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification. BEHAV ANALYST 32, 309–317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392194

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392194

Key words

Search

Navigation