Skip to main content
Log in

Solving the Multiobjective Environmental/Economic Dispatch Problem using Weighted Sum and \(\upvarepsilon \)-Constraint Strategies and a Predictor-Corrector Primal-Dual Interior Point Method

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a technique for solving the multiobjective environmental/economic dispatch problem using the weighted sum and \(\varepsilon \)-constraint strategies, which transform the problem into a set of single-objective problems. In the first strategy, the objective function is a weighted sum of the environmental and economic objective functions. The second strategy considers one of the objective functions: in this case, the environmental function, as a problem constraint, bounded above by a constant. A specific predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point method which uses the modified log barrier is proposed for solving the set of single-objective problems generated by such strategies. The purpose of the modified barrier approach is to solve the problem with relaxation of its original feasible region, enabling the method to be initialized with unfeasible points. The tests involving the proposed solution technique indicate i) the efficiency of the proposed method with respect to the initialization with unfeasible points, and ii) its ability to find a set of efficient solutions for the multiobjective environmental/economic dispatch problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abido, M. A. (2003). Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(4), 1529–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abido, M. A. (2006). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for electric power dispatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arantes, M. B., Oliveira, G. T. S., & Saramago, S. F. P. (2006). Evolução diferencial aplicada à solução de alguns problemas de engenharia de produção. FAMAT em Revista, (06).

  • Balbo, A. R., Souza, M. A. S., Baptista, E. C., & Nepomuceno, L. (2012). A predictor corrector-primal-dual interior points method for solving economic dispatch problems: A post optimization analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayón, L., Grau, J. M., Ruiz, M. M., & Suárez, P. M. (2012). The exact solution of the environmental/economic dispatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 723–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, L. S., & Mariani, V. C. (2006). Otimização de despacho econômico com ponto de válvula usando estratégia evolutiva e método Quase–Newton. Learning Nonlinear Models—Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Redes Neurais (SBRN), 04(01), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Keib, A. A., Ma, H., & Hart, J. L. (1994). Environmentally constrained economic dispatch using the Lagrangian relaxation method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(4).

  • El-Hawary, M. E., El-Hawary, F., & GAN, M. (1992). NO\(_{\rm x }\) emission performance models in electric power system. In Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (Vol. 2) Paper MA 8.11.1.

  • Fiacco, A. V., & McCormick, G. P. (1990). Nonlinear programming: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques. Classics in applied mathematics (Vol. 4). Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.

  • Frisch, K. R. (1955). The logarithmic potential method of convex programming. Oslo, Norway: University Institute of Economics (manuscript).

  • Gent, M. R., & Lamont, J. W. (1971). Miminum-emission dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS–90(6), 2650–2660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granville, S. (1994). Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y., Lasdon, L., Wismer, & Wisme D. A. (1971). On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-1(3), 296-297.

  • Hu, Y.-L., & Wee, W. G. (1994). A hierarchical system for economic dispatch with environmental constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(2), 1076–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubril, A. M., Komolafe, O. A., & Alawode, K. O. (2013). Solving multi-objective economic dispatch problem via semidefinite programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(3), 2056–2064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, M., Mizuno, S., & Yoshise, A. (1989). A primal dual—interior point method for linear programming. In N. Megiddo (Ed.), Progress in mathematical programming: Interior-point and related methods (pp. 29–48). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, S., & Sun, J. (1992). An algorithm for convex quadratic programming that requires 0 (n\(^{3.5}\) L) arithmetic operations. Mathematics of Operations Research, 15, 342–363.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Boston: Kluwer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, R. C., Adler, I., & Resende, M. C. (1990). A polynomial-time primal-dual affine scaling algorithm for linear and convex quadratic programming and its power series extension. Mathematics of Operations Research, 15, 191–214.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Polyak, R. A. (1992). Modified barrier functions. Mathematical Programming, 54(2), 177–222.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. (1994). Emission constrained economic dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(4), 1994–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, V. A., Baptista, E. C., & Costa, G. R. M. (2012). Optimal reactive power flow via the modified barrier Lagrangian function approach. Electric Power Systems Research, 84(1), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, V. A., Baptista, E. C., & Costa, G. R. M. (2009). Loss minimization by the predictor-corrector modified barrier approach. Electric Power Systems Research, 79(5), 803–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, M. A. S. (2010). Investigação e aplicação de métodos primal—dual de pontos interiores em problemas de despacho econômico e ambiental. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESP, Bauru-SP.

  • Steinberg, M. J. C., & Smith, T. H. (1943). Economic loading of power plants and electric systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferial, J. H. T., & EI-Hawary, M. E. (1994). A summary of environmental/economic dispatch algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(3), 1508–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. P., Fan, B., Chang, C. S., & Liew, A. C. (1995). Multi-objective generation dispatch using bi-criterion global optimisation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(4), 1813–1819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. J. (1997). Primal-dual interior point methods. SIAM Journal, 289-304.

  • Wu, Y. C., Debs, A. S., & Marsten, R. E. (1994). A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(2), 876–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A., Zhang, J., Shang, J., & Qin, J. (2009). Security and Economic Dispatch of Power. IEEE PES General Meeting, pp. 1-6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Nepomuceno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Lorena Stanzani, A., Balbo, A.R., Nepomuceno, L. et al. Solving the Multiobjective Environmental/Economic Dispatch Problem using Weighted Sum and \(\upvarepsilon \)-Constraint Strategies and a Predictor-Corrector Primal-Dual Interior Point Method. J Control Autom Electr Syst 25, 503–515 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-014-0122-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-014-0122-x

Keywords

Navigation