Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Reputation Matter? Case Study of Undergraduate Choice at a Premier University

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The changing facets of the Malaysian higher education created market-based competition among higher education institutions. With increasing competition in the higher education environment, a clearer understanding of why and how students choose universities is more important to help universities develop their marketing strategies. This paper investigates the reasons for pursuing higher education and the key factors influencing their decision to study at university. This paper also considers the issue of whether the lower fees and reputation of a premier university is adequate to attract the best students. The data from a sample of 1st-year undergraduate students enrolled in various courses at the University of Malaya were analysed using coherence analysis and logistic regression. The study infers latent factors affecting university choice and uses a model that allows the interaction of these multiple factors. The findings suggest that career prospects and reputation of the University and its programmes were the most important factors in the students’ decision of a place to further studies. Significant others in the life of the student as well as the student’s own desire for personal development are strong influences that lead the student to consider reputation of the University. While the reputation of the University of Malaya is extremely important, the lower fee structure plays an important role in university choice. The university needs to be proactive in recruiting students. The marketing of educational services is important, both to create a favourable image and as well to successfully recruit the best students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘coherence’ has special meanings is business, economics and physics. Here, we use it in the sense of a state of cohering, of consistent relationship of parts.

  2. The score is a standardized variable from the hypergeometric distribution. We have assumed α = 0.05. For the calculation, see the Appendix.

References

  • Al Jamil, M. A., Sarker, M. M., & Abdullah, M. (2012). Students’ choice criteria to select a private university for their higher education in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(17), 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, B. P. (2009). The association between race and college destinations. Social Science Research, 39, 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancheh, K. S. B., Krishnan, A., & Nurtjahja, O. (2007). Evaluative criteria for selection of private universities and colleges in Malaysia. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baharun, R., Awang, Z., & Padlee, S. F. (2011). International students choice criteria for selection of higher learning in Malaysian private universities. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4704–4714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggin, A. (2000). Marketing education: The good, the bad and the unthanked. Education Marketing, 20, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image, and impression management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (2000). Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image, and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (2002). Comparing corporate reputations: League tables, quotients, benchmarks, or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury, R. (1999). Higher education marketing: A challenge. Journal of College Admission, 165, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization Studies, 26, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (1998). Marketing of further and higher education: An equal opportunities perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 22(2), 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. L. (2010). An exploratory study of factors influencing the decision of students to study at Universiti Sains Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 28(2), 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2003). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett, N., Dyke, M. & Maringe, F. (2003, 11th September). The influence of the school on the decision to participate in learning post-16. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.

  • Gatfield, T., Barker, M., & Graham, P. (1999). Measuring communication impact for university advertising materials. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J.E., & Hung, C F. (2002). The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: A cognitive, behavioral study. Paper presented at the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) Educator’s Academy 5th Annual International, Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida.

  • Haji Hassan, F., & Mohamad Sheriff, N. (2006). Students’ need recognition for higher education at private colleges in Malaysia: An exploratory perspective. Sunway Academic Journal, 3, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. V., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, A. J., & Knight, P. T. (1999). Postgraduates’ choice of programme: Helping universities to market and postgraduates to choose. Studies in Higher Education, 24(2), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivy, J. (2008). A new higher education marketing mix: The 7Ps for MBA marketing. International Journal of Management Education, 22(4), 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Baldwin, G., & McInnis, C. (1999). Which university? The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

  • Joseph, M., Mullen, E. W., & Spake, D. (2012). University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution. Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, K. M., James, J. D., & Aurand, T. W. (2004). Marketing the university to student athletes: Understanding university selection criteria. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthik, D. & Basant, R. (2004). Empirical Assessment of Coherence in Information Technology firms. Retrieved from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2005-1637.pdf.

  • Kaur, S., & Chapman, K. (2008). UM leads in rankings. The Star Online. Retrieved from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/17/nation/21283255&sec=nation.

  • Koe, W. L., & Saring, Siti Noraisah. (2012). Factors influencing the foreign undergraduates’ intention to study at Graduate School of a Public University. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 19, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2004). Marketing management (11th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1985). Strategic marketing for educational Institutions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumawati, A., Yanamandram, V. K. & Perera, N. (2010). Exploring student choice criteria for selecting an Indonesian Public University: A preliminary finding. ANZMAC 2010 Doctoral Colloquium (pp. 1–27). Christchurch: ANZMAC.

  • Lau, S. H. (2009). Higher education marketing concern: Factors influencing Malaysian students’ intention to study at higher educational institutions. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.

  • Lim, E. S. & Nagaraj, S. (2007). Obstacles to innovation: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing firms. MPRA Paper No. 18077. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18077/.

  • Looker, D. & Lowe, G. S. (2001). Post secondary access and student financial aid in Canada: Current knowledge and research gaps. doi:www.millenumscholarship.ca/en/foundation/publications/pareport/cprn-bkgnd.pdf.

  • Malaysia. (2006). The Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010. Federal Territory of Putrajaya, Malaysia.

  • Malaysian Qualifications Agency, Malaysia. (2010). SETARA’09. Retrieved from http://www.mqa.gov.my/portal2012/red/en/ratings_setara09.cfm.

  • Malaysian Qualifications Agency, Malaysia. (2012). SETARA’11. Retrieved from http://www.mqa.gov.my/portal2012/red/en/ratings_setara11.cfm.

  • Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia. (2011). Malaysian higher education statistics 2011. Federal Territory of Putrajaya.

  • Misran, N., Sahuri, S. N. S., Arsad, N., Hussain, H., Zaki, W. M. D. W., & Abd Aziz, N. (2012). The influence of socio-economic status among matriculation students in selecting university and undergraduate program. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J., Harris, J., Morgan, E., Clark, K., & Sims, D. (1995). Marketing in higher education: The MBA experience. International Journal of Management Education, 9(2), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padlee, S. F., Kamaruddin, A. R., & Baharun, R. (2010). International students’ choice behavior for higher education at Malaysian private universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2, 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paik, S. & Shim, W. (2012).Tracking and college major choices in academic high schools in South Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher: doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0035-z.

  • Paramewaran, R., & Glowacka, A. E. (1995). University image: An information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6(2), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poo, B. T., Ismail, R., Sulaiman, N., & Othman, N. (2012). Globalization and the factors influencing households’ demand for Higher Education in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 3(6), 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1985–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2007). A model of university choice: An exploratory approach. Munich personal RePec archive. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/5523/1/MPRA_paper_5523.pdf.

  • Samsinar Md. S., Siti Rahayu H., & Tan, H. S. (2003). An exploratory study of factors influencing the college choice decision of undergraduate students in Malaysia Asia Pacific. Management Review, 8(3), 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G., & Turner, J. (2002). Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachowski, C. A. (2011). Educational marketing: A review and implications for supporting practice in tertiary education. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, M., & Yang, S.-U. (2008). Toward the model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(4), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., & Darling, J. (1991). Perceptions towards marketing higher education: Do academic disciplines make a difference? In T. Hayes (Ed.), New strategies in higher education marketing. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valcano, S., & Vannoni, D. (2003). Diversification strategies and corporate coherence evidence from Italian leading firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veloutsou, C., Lewis, J. W., & Paton, R. A. (2004). University selection: Information requirements and importance. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, K. & Fard, P.Y. (2009). Factors influencing Malaysian students’ Intention to study at a higher educational institution. Kuala Lumpur: E-Leader.

  • Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M. S., & Huisman, J. (2011). Student Choice in Higher Education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(5), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2011). Student recruitment at international branch campuses: Can they compete in the global market? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S.-U. (2007). An integrated model for organization-public relational outcomes, organizational reputation, and their antecedents. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., & Grunig, J. E. (2005). Decomposing organizational reputation: The effects of organization-public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organizations and evaluations of organizational performance. Journal of Communication Management, 9, 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, M., Ahmad, S. N. B., Tajudin, M. M., & Ravindra, R. (2008). A study of factors influencing the selection of a higher education institution. UNITAR E-Journal, 4(2), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by University of Malaya under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FS174/2008A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Susila Munisamy & Noor Ismawati Mohd Jaafar

  2. Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Shyamala Nagaraj

Authors
  1. Susila Munisamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noor Ismawati Mohd Jaafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shyamala Nagaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noor Ismawati Mohd Jaafar.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 Coherence scores for 36 pairs of reasons for furthering studies at an Institution of Higher Learning
Full size table
Table 8 Coherence scores for 91 pairs of reasons for choosing to study at the University of Malaya
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munisamy, S., Mohd Jaafar, N.I. & Nagaraj, S. Does Reputation Matter? Case Study of Undergraduate Choice at a Premier University. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 451–462 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0120-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0120-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation