Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pacing in Swimming: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pacing strategy, or how energy is distributed during exercise, can substantially impact athletic performance and is considered crucial for optimal performance in many sports. This is particularly true in swimming given the highly resistive properties of water and low mechanical efficiency of the swimming action.

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the pacing strategies utilised by competitive swimmers in competition and their reproducibility, and to examine the impact of different pacing strategies on kinematic, metabolic and performance variables. This will provide valuable and practical information to coaches and sports science practitioners.

Data Sources

The databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and PubMed were searched for published articles up to 1 August 2017.

Study Selection

A total of 23 studies examining pool-based swimming competitions or experimental trials in English-language and peer-reviewed journals were included in this review.

Results

In short- and middle-distance swimming events maintenance of swimming velocity is critical, whereas in long-distance events a low lap-to-lap variability and the ability to produce an end spurt in the final lap(s) are key. The most effective strategy in the individual medley (IM) is to conserve energy during the butterfly leg to optimise performance in subsequent legs. The pacing profiles of senior swimmers remain relatively stable irrespective of opponents, competition stage or type, and performance time.

Conclusion

Implementing event-specific pacing strategies should benefit the performance of competitive swimmers. Given differences between swimmers, there is a need for greater individualisation when considering pacing strategy selection across distances and strokes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Reproduced with permission from Thompson et al. [40]

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foster C, De Koning JJ, Hettinga F, Lampen J, La Clair KL, Dodge C, et al. Pattern of energy expenditure during simulated competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(5):826–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbiss CR, Laursen PB. Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med. 2008;38(3):239–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson KG. Pacing—individual strategies for optimal performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Pacing strategy and athletic performance. Sports Med. 1994;17(2):77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Veiga S, Roig A. Effect of the starting and turning performances on the subsequent swimming parameters of elite swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2017;16(1):34–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veiga S, Roig A. Underwater and surface strategies of 200 m world level swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(8):766–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson KG, Haljand R, MacLaren DP. An analysis of selected kinematic variables in national and elite male and female 100-m and 200-m breaststroke swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(6):421–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig A, Pendergast DR. Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1979;11(3):278–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chollet D, Pelayo P, Tourny C, Sidney M. Comparative analysis of 100 m and 200 m events in the four strokes in top level swimmers. J Hum Movement Stud. 1996;31:25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Craig AB, Skehan PL, Pawelczyk JA, Boomer WL. Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17(6):625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hellard P, Dekerle J, Avalos M, Caudal N, Knopp M, Hausswirth C. Kinematic measures and stroke rate variability in elite female 200-m swimmers in the four swimming techniques: Athens 2004 Olympic semi-finalists and French National 2004 Championship semi-finalists. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(1):35–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mauger AR, Neuloh J, Castle PC. Analysis of pacing strategy selection in elite 400-m freestyle swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor JB, Santi G, Mellalieu SD. Freestyle race pacing strategies (400 m) of elite able-bodied swimmers and swimmers with disability at major international championships. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(20):1913–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson E, Pyne D, Hopkins W, Anson J. Analysis of lap times in international swimming competitions. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(4):387–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Pacing in age-group freestyle swimmers at the XV FINA world masters championships in Montreal 2014. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(12):1165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dormehl S, Osborough C. Effect of age, sex, and race distance on front crawl stroke parameters in subelite adolescent swimmers during competition. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2015;27(3):334–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Skorski S, Faude O, Rausch K, Meyer T. Reproducibility of pacing profiles in competitive swimmers. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(2):152–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maglischo EW. Swimming fastest. Leeds: Human Kinetics; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Koning JJ, Foster C, Lucia A, Bobbert MF, Hettinga FJ, Porcari JP. Using modeling to understand how athletes in different disciplines solve the same problem: swimming versus running versus speed skating. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6(2):276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbosa TM, Bragada JA, Reis VM, Marinho DA, Carvalho C, Silva AJ. Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: updating the state of the art. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(2):262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer—correlation with the height of a vertical jump. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987;56(6):650–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mytton GJ, Archer DT, Turner L, Skorski S, Renfree A, Thompson KG, et al. Increased variability of lap speeds: differentiating medalists and nonmedalists in middle-distance running and swimming events. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2015;10(3):369–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huot-Marchand F, Nesi X, Sidney M, Alberty M, Pelayo P. Variations of stroking parameters associated with 200 m competitive performance improvement in top-standard front crawl swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2005;4(1):89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson KG, MacLaren DP, Lees A, Atkinson G. The effect of even, positive and negative pacing on metabolic, kinematic and temporal variables during breaststroke swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;88(4–5):438–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D, Hogie S, Papparodopoulos C. Kinematic analysis of butterfly turns of international and national swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(5):383–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Skorski S, Faude O, Caviezel S, Meyer T. Reproducibility of pacing profiles in elite swimmers. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2014;9(2):217–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lipińska P. Kinematic tactics in the women’s 800 m freestyle swimming final at the Beijing 2008 Olympic games. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2009;1(1):86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lipińska P, Allen SV, Hopkins WG. Modeling parameters that characterize pacing of elite female 800-m freestyle swimmers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(3):287–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipińska P, Allen SV, Hopkins WG. Relationships between pacing parameters and performance of elite male 1500-m swimmers. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2016;11(2):159–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Invernizzi PL, Limonta E, Bosio A, Scurati R, Veicsteinas A, Esposito F. Effects of a 25-km trial on psychological, physiological and stroke characteristics of short- and mid-distance swimmers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014;54(1):53–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Saavedra JM, Escalante Y, Garcia-Hermoso A, Arellano R, Navarro F. A 12-year analysis of pacing strategies in 200- and 400-m individual medley in international swimming competitions. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mytton GJ, Archer DT, Gibson AS, Thompson KG. Reliability and stability of performances in 400-m swimming and 1500-m running. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):674–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pyne DB, Trewin CB, Hopkins WG. Progression and variability of competitive performance of Olympic swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(7):613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Foster C, Hendrickson KJ, Peyer K, Reiner B, Dekoning JJ, Lucia A, et al. Pattern of developing the performance template. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(10):765–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Barbosa TM, Fernandes R, Keskinen KL, Colaço P, Cardoso C, Silva J, et al. Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(11):894–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Veiga S, Mallo J, Navandar A, Navarro E. Effects of different swimming race constraints on turning movements. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;36:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Skorski S, Faude O, Abbiss CR, Caviezel S, Wengert N, Meyer T. Influence of pacing manipulation on performance of juniors in simulated 400-m swim competition. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2014;9(5):817–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bailey SJ, Vanhatalo A, DiMenna FJ, Wilkerson DP, Jones AM. Fast-start strategy improves VO2 kinetics and high-intensity exercise performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(3):457–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson KG, MacLaren DPM, Lees A, Atkinson G. Accuracy of pacing during breaststroke swimming using a novel pacing device, the Aquapacer (TM). J Sports Sci. 2002;20(7):537–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson KG, MacLaren DPM, Lees A, Atkinson G. The effects of changing pace on metabolism and stroke characteristics during high-speed breaststroke swimming. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(2):149–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Miley P. AQUAPACER—a new methodology control of swimming accuracy. Am Swim. 1998;3:4–6, 8–11.

  42. Keskinen KL, editor. Reliability of pool testing: ability of swimmers to swim at predetermined speeds. In: XVI congress of the international society of biomechanics; 1997; University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

  43. Keskinen KL, editor. Test-retest reliability of a pool testing method in swimmers. In: 2nd Annual congress of the European college of sport sciences book of abstracts 1; 1997; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  44. Keskinen KL, Keskinen OP, editors. Performance test for swimmers - a new approach utilising pace-maker lights—a pilot study. In: VIII international symposium biomechanics and medicine in swimming; 1998; University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Mark Osborne for his support and assistance in preparing this manuscript. This work was supported by the Queensland Academy of Sport’s Sport Performance Innovation and Knowledge Excellence unit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, ACT, Australia

    Katie E. McGibbon & D. B. Pyne

  2. Queensland Academy of Sport, Nathan, QLD, Australia

    Katie E. McGibbon & M. E. Shephard

  3. Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, ACT, Australia

    D. B. Pyne

  4. New South Wales Institute of Sport, Sydney Olympic Park, NSW, Australia

    K. G. Thompson

Authors
  1. Katie E. McGibbon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. B. Pyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. E. Shephard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. G. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie E. McGibbon.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

Katie McGibbon, David Pyne, Megan Shephard and Kevin Thompson declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGibbon, K.E., Pyne, D.B., Shephard, M.E. et al. Pacing in Swimming: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 48, 1621–1633 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0901-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0901-9

Search

Navigation