Pacing in Swimming: A Systematic Review
- 754 Downloads
Pacing strategy, or how energy is distributed during exercise, can substantially impact athletic performance and is considered crucial for optimal performance in many sports. This is particularly true in swimming given the highly resistive properties of water and low mechanical efficiency of the swimming action.
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the pacing strategies utilised by competitive swimmers in competition and their reproducibility, and to examine the impact of different pacing strategies on kinematic, metabolic and performance variables. This will provide valuable and practical information to coaches and sports science practitioners.
The databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and PubMed were searched for published articles up to 1 August 2017.
A total of 23 studies examining pool-based swimming competitions or experimental trials in English-language and peer-reviewed journals were included in this review.
In short- and middle-distance swimming events maintenance of swimming velocity is critical, whereas in long-distance events a low lap-to-lap variability and the ability to produce an end spurt in the final lap(s) are key. The most effective strategy in the individual medley (IM) is to conserve energy during the butterfly leg to optimise performance in subsequent legs. The pacing profiles of senior swimmers remain relatively stable irrespective of opponents, competition stage or type, and performance time.
Implementing event-specific pacing strategies should benefit the performance of competitive swimmers. Given differences between swimmers, there is a need for greater individualisation when considering pacing strategy selection across distances and strokes.
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Mark Osborne for his support and assistance in preparing this manuscript. This work was supported by the Queensland Academy of Sport’s Sport Performance Innovation and Knowledge Excellence unit.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
Katie McGibbon, David Pyne, Megan Shephard and Kevin Thompson declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Thompson KG. Pacing—individual strategies for optimal performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2015.Google Scholar
- 9.Chollet D, Pelayo P, Tourny C, Sidney M. Comparative analysis of 100 m and 200 m events in the four strokes in top level swimmers. J Hum Movement Stud. 1996;31:25–37.Google Scholar
- 11.Hellard P, Dekerle J, Avalos M, Caudal N, Knopp M, Hausswirth C. Kinematic measures and stroke rate variability in elite female 200-m swimmers in the four swimming techniques: Athens 2004 Olympic semi-finalists and French National 2004 Championship semi-finalists. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(1):35–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Maglischo EW. Swimming fastest. Leeds: Human Kinetics; 2003.Google Scholar
- 41.Miley P. AQUAPACER—a new methodology control of swimming accuracy. Am Swim. 1998;3:4–6, 8–11.Google Scholar
- 42.Keskinen KL, editor. Reliability of pool testing: ability of swimmers to swim at predetermined speeds. In: XVI congress of the international society of biomechanics; 1997; University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
- 43.Keskinen KL, editor. Test-retest reliability of a pool testing method in swimmers. In: 2nd Annual congress of the European college of sport sciences book of abstracts 1; 1997; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
- 44.Keskinen KL, Keskinen OP, editors. Performance test for swimmers - a new approach utilising pace-maker lights—a pilot study. In: VIII international symposium biomechanics and medicine in swimming; 1998; University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.Google Scholar