Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate change ignorance: an unacceptable legacy

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change effects will be most acutely felt by future generations. Recent prior research has shown that school students’ knowledge of climate change science is very limited in rural Australia. The purpose of this study was to assess the capacity of preservice teachers and parents to transmit climate change information and understanding to school students in a rural tropical part of Australia using Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory as a guiding theoretical framework. Samples consisted of parents of school-age children in northern Queensland (n = 267) and first year pre-service teachers (n = 199) attending a local university serving the same geographic region of Australia. Survey results gathered in the aftermath of cyclone Yasi highlighted gaps in pre-service teachers’ knowledge of climate change science and parental concerns about climate change impacts and a mistrust of climate change communication. Findings suggested that home and school influences upon school aged students were unlikely to support students’ understanding of climate change or to be able to empower them to adapt to and mitigate climate change impacts. Implications of these findings, which are potentially applicable to other rural and remote parts of the world, are discussed within the context of teacher training and climate science communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A., & Strecker, M. (2012). Sustainable development: A case for education. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 54(6), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Jeanneret, T., Gardner, J., & Shaw, H. (2011). Communication and climate change: What the Australian public thinks. Report No. EP112769. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2006). Census of population and housing. Canberra: ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). The Australian Curriculum. At October 15, 2013 www.acara.edu.au/curriculum.html.

  • Australian Government, DCCEE. (2011). Fact Sheet. Climate Changepotential impacts and costs: Queensland.

  • Back, E., Cameron, C., & Tanner, T. M. (2009). Children and disaster risk reduction: Taking stock and moving forward. Children in a changing climate report. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behaviour, 39(4), 435–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, M., Fien, J., & Neil, C. (2004). Sustainable consumption: Young Australians as agents of change. Canberra: NYARS Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet-Cohen, N. (2008). Taking a stance: Child agency across the dimension of early adolescents’ environmental involvement. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2011). Valuing the Invaluable. Effects of individual, school and cultural factors on the environmental values of children. Belgium: Garant Uitgevers nv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2008). Students at risk: A bioecological investigation. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Muller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2009). Climate change? When or where? Australian Educational Researcher, 36(3), 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2010). Climate change? Who knows? A comparison of secondary students and pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2012). Regional Queensland parents’ views of science education: Some unexpected perceptions. Australian Educational Researcher, 39(1), 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J., Brown, L., Clark, B., Pagliano, P., Tsey, K., & Usher, K. (2011). Schools, climate change and health promotion: A vital alliance. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 22(Special Issue), S68–S71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J., Millar, J., Lake, D., Cottrell, A., & King, D. (2012). Recovery from disaster: Resilience, adaptability and perceptions of climate change. Gold Coast: National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Crouter, A. C. (1983). The evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In P. H. Munsen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. History, theory and methods (Vol. 1, pp. 357–414). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L., & Flanders Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 4, 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum. Barton, ACT: Science National Curriculum Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). (2007). Climate change technical report 2007. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). (2011). Climate change: Science and solutions for Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Bureau of Meteorology (BoM). (2007). Climate change in Australia: Technical report 2007. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H., & Fleming, P. (2004). Situational influences upon children’s beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J., Ryan, L., Davis, J., Cavanagh, M., & Thomas, J. (2009). Mainstreaming sustainability into pre-service teacher education in Australia. Canberra: Prepared by the Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability for the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.

  • Fleer, M. (2002). Curriculum compartmentalisation? A future perspective on environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair and transformation: Climate change and the promotion of metal health and wellbeing. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 7(2), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J., & Ashworth, P. (2007). Public attitudes towards electricity alternatives: Results from a survey of Australian householders. P2008/994. October. Pullenvale: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görlitz, D., Valsiner, J., Harloff, H. J., & Mey, G. (1998). Children, cities, and psychological theories: Developing relationships. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2008). Social norms: An underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change. International Journal for Sustainability Communication, 3, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 414–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, F., & Pugh, A. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perception of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, R. S., Kovats, D., Campbell-Lendrum, D., & Corvalan, C. (2006). Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability, and public health. Public Health, 120(7), 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansla, A., Gable, A., Juliusson, A., & Polivka-West, L. (2006). Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy, 36, 768–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heft, H., & Chawla, L. (2006). Children as agents in sustainable development: The ecology of competence. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces (pp. 199–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, K., Fitzharris, B., Bates, B. C., Harvey, N., Howden, S. M., Hughes, L., Salinger, J., & Warrick, R. (2007). Australia and New Zealand. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Holden, C. (2007). Young people’s concerns. In D. Hicks & C. Holden (Eds.), Teaching the global dimension: Key principles and effective practice (pp. 31–42). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behaviour with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, A., Stolberg, A., & Wagner, U. (2007). Coping with global environmental problems development and first validation of scales. Environment and Behaviour, 39, 754–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jickling, B. (2013). Normalizing catastrophe: An educational response. Environmental Education Research, 19(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children’s prosocial behavior: Genetic and environmental links. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, A. (1999). Inter-individual relationships in groups of young children and susceptibility to an environmental constraint. Environment and Behaviour, 31, 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2012). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change,. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2013). The future lies in our hands: Children as researchers and environmental change agents in designing a child-friendly neighbourhood. Local Environment, 18(3), 372–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhold, J. L., & Malkus, A. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviours: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behaviour, 37, 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climatic Change, 1, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. (2014). Climate change education knowledge of rural teachers in Northern Australia. Journal of Environmental Education. Forthcoming.

  • O’Neill, S. J., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). Fear won’t do it: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through imagery and icons. Science Communication, 30, 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osano, P. M., & Corcoran, P. B. (2009). Introduction: Young people, education and sustainable development: Exploring principles, perspectives and praxis (Chap. 1) (pp. 21–34). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palutikoff, J. (2010). Dire climate change warning to Australia. Sydney Morning Herald [Internet] 2010 June 25. [cited 2010 June 30]; Environment:. Available from June 30, 2010 http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/dire-climate-change-warning-to-australia-20100625-z911.html.

  • Percy-Smith, B., & Burns, D. (2013). Exploring the role of children and young people as agents of change in sustainable community development. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 18(3), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D., Weaver, A. J., & Raptis, H. (2012). Assessing students’ learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 665–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puk, T. G., & Stibbards, A. (2012). Systemic ecological illiteracy? Shedding light on meaning as an act of thought in higher learning. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J. P., Pidgeon, N., Spence, A., Bradley, G., Glendon, A. I., & Ellul, M. (2011). Public risk perceptions, understandings, and responses to climate change in Australia and Great Britain: Interim report to the national climate change adaptation research facility. Gold Coast: Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J. P., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robelia, B., & Murphy, T. (2012). What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roiko, A., Mangoyana, R. B., McFallan, S., Carter, R. W., Oliver, J., & Smith, T. F. (2012). Socio-economic trends and climate change adaptation: The case of South East Queensland. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 19(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronan, K. R., & Johnston, D. M. (2001). Correlates of hazard education programs for youth. Risk Analysis, 21, 1055–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(1), 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to act sustainably influenced by flood experiences. Nature Climate Change, 1, 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. (2009). Climate change 2009: Faster change & more serious risks. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Misra, S., Runnerstrom, M. G., & Hipp, A. J. (2009). Psychology in an age of ecological crisis. From personal angst to collective action. American Psychologist, 64(3), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strikwerda-Brown, J., Oliver, R., Hodgson, D., Palmer, M., & Watts, L. (2008). Good teachers/bad teachers: How rural adolescent students’ views of teachers impact on their school experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(6), Article 3. Available at http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol33/iss6/3. Accessed 17 Feb 2014.

  • Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J. P., et al. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges (report by the task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J.K., Stern, P.C., Doherty, T.J., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P. & Weber, E.U., et al. (2011). Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 241–250.

  • Tucci, J., Mitchell, J., & Goddard, C. (2007). Children’s fears, hopes and heroes: Modern childhood in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Childhood Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2006). Disaster risk reduction begins at school, 2006–2007 international disaster risk reduction campaign. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen J. Boon.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1: Teachers survey

  1. 1.

    Greenhouse gases in the lower atmosphere (troposphere) absorb:

    1. (a)

      incoming ultraviolet radiation

    2. (b)

      infrared radiation emitted by the earth’s land surfaces and oceans

    3. (c)

      incoming solar radiation reflected by clouds

    4. (d)

      incoming solar radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum.

  2. 2.

    Climate change is caused by…

    1. (a)

      a hole in the earth’s atmosphere

    2. (b)

      natural climate fluctuations

    3. (c)

      increased cloud cover

    4. (d)

      increased carbon emissions.

  3. 3.

    The major source of anthropogenic carbon emissions comes from:

    1. (a)

      using coal to generate electricity

    2. (b)

      burning carbon containing fossil fuels and destroying forests

    3. (c)

      increased run-off of nutrients from farmland

    4. (d)

      increased populations of animals and humans breathing out carbon dioxide and producing methane gas.

  4. 4.

    Some water, a small amount of soil, a few green aquatic plants and a fish were placed in a large bottle. The bottle was sealed to prevent the exchange of gases and other materials between its contents and the outside. The bottle was placed in a window to receive light during the daytime. Is carbon dioxide produced by the plants?

    1. (a)

      Yes, but it is produced only at night when the plants can no longer carry on photosynthesis.

    2. (b)

      Yes, it is produced all the time as a result of cellular respiration.

    3. (c)

      No, it is a waste product of animals only.

    4. (d)

      No, plants take in only the waste products exhaled by animals.

    5. (e)

      No, plants only produce oxygen.

  5. 5.

    The major human impact on the water cycle is:

    1. (a)

      increasing population breathing out more carbon dioxide and water vapour

    2. (b)

      acidifying rain water by the burning of fossil fuels

    3. (c)

      run off from industry, agriculture and sewage which dissolve in water and pollutes it

    4. (d)

      humans cannot have an impact upon the water cycle as it is governed by the sun, circulating water through its phases

    5. (e)

      over use causing water to run out.

  6. 6.

    The ozone layer has been mainly depleted by…

    1. (a)

      burning of fossil fuels

    2. (b)

      pollution from garbage tips

    3. (c)

      the release of CFC’s into the atmosphere

    4. (d)

      the increasing temperature of the sun’s rays.

  7. 7.

    The biggest environmental threat to Australian farmland as a result of climate change is …

    1. (a)

      soil salinity

    2. (b)

      land clearing

    3. (c)

      drought

    4. (d)

      pesticides.

  8. 8.

    Water shortages are caused in Australia because:

    1. (a)

      fast growing urban development is utilising available water sources

    2. (b)

      agricultural irrigation consumes most available water

    3. (c)

      climate change is exacerbating Australia’s arid climate

    4. (d)

      hydroelectricity uses most available water.

Appendix 2: Parental survey

  1. (1)

    I trust what scientists say about the environment

  2. (2)

    I am concerned about climate change

  3. (3)

    I trust what the government says about the environment

  4. (4)

    I feel I know a lot about climate change

  5. (5)

    I trust what the media says about the environment

  6. (6)

    I think climate change is a serious problem right now

  7. (7)

    I think climate change is caused by human activities

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boon, H.J. Climate change ignorance: an unacceptable legacy. Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 405–427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0156-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0156-x

Keywords

Navigation