Skip to main content
Log in

Stapled anopexy and STARR in surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 16 November 2014

Abstract

The treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using stapled anopexy (SA) is still burdened by a high incidence of recurrence. Probably this condition is secondary to inadequate removal of the prolapsed tissue due to the reduced capacity of resection from the adopted device. In order to limit the incidence of failures by providing a removal of a greater amount of prolapsed tissue was considered the opportunity to use the STARR technique even in the presence of haemorrhoidal disease not burdened by symptoms of obstructed defecation. We evaluated the early and at a distance results of 285 patients who had undergone in 2007–2011 surgical resection with trans-anal circular stapler for symptomatic III-IV degree haemorrhoids without obstructed defecation disorders. 237 patients were subjected to SA, while in the remaining 48, since on intervention prolapse committed the CAD more than half of the device, we performed a STARR. adopted the Chi square test (C) considering significant p-values less than 0.05. The anamnestic preoperative evaluation allowed to put the correct indication for surgical treatment in 80 % of patients. Mean operative times, hospital stay, incidence of early and more important complications, the symptomatic recurrence of disease (5 %) were not dissimilar in the two groups under consideration. Conversely (p < 0.05) the relief of residual asymptomatic disease (24 vs. 10 %) was significant . The overall satisfaction was significantly higher in the ST group (73.5 vs 58.6 %). The STARR in case of massive prolapse who express themselves with only haemorrhoidal disease is a safe technique, able to optimize the long-term effectiveness of trans-anal resection surgery, limiting the incidence of symptomatic recurrences. The information offered to the patient at the time of the consent to surgery must be extensive and detailed, always considering the possibility of adopting the two techniques alternately and that, at completion of the intervention, could be necessary also the removal of persistent skin tags.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landolfi V (2009) The unitary theory and proposal of a new classification. In: III world congress of coloproctology and pelvic disease, Roma

  2. NICE—National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatments of haemorrhoids. Nice technology appraisal guidance 128

  3. Naldini G, Martellucci J, Talento P, Caviglia A, Moraldi L, Rossi M (2009) New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(12):1383–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G (2007) Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of haemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Longo A (2004) Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). In: Annual Cleveland Clinic Florida colorectal disease symposium

  6. Tiandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (stapled hemohoidopexy). Dis Colon Rect 50:878–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehur PA, Gravie JF, Meurette G (2001) Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results. Colorectal Dis 3:374–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy. A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HG, Eberstein A, Pfister K (2001) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis ColonRectum 46:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Renzi A, Brillantino A, Di Sarno G, D’Aniello F, Giordano A, Stefanuto A, Aguzzi D, Daffinà A, Ceci F, D’Oriano G, Mercuri M, Alderisio A, Perretta L, Carrino F, Sernia G, Greco E, Picchio M, Marino G, Goglia A, Trombetti A, De Pascalis B, Panella S, Bochicchio O, Bandini A, Del Re L, Longo F, Micera O (2011) PPH-01 versus PPH-03 to perform STARR for the treatment of hemorrhoids associated with large internal rectal prolapse: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Surg Innov 18:241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landolfi V, Stuto A, Carriero A, Longo A (2007) Emorroidi e prolasso. Osp It Chir 13(3):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L, Romano N, Rossi M (2009) Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Candela PS, Sánchez A, Calpena R (2006) Prospective randomized clinical trial of single versus double pourse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids. Int J Colrectal Dis 21:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Papagrigoriadis S, Vardonikolaki A (2006) Stapled anopexy with double stapling: a safe and efficient treatment for fourth degree haemorrhoids. Acta Chir Belg 106:717–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stuto A, Favero A, Cerullo G, Braini A, Narisetty P, Tosolini G (2012) Double stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoidal prolapse: indications, feasibility and safety. Colorectal Dis 14:386–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, Accarpio GM, Dodi G, Cavallari F, Ravo B, Annibali R (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Italo Corsale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corsale, I., Rigutini, M., Francioli, N. et al. Stapled anopexy and STARR in surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Updates Surg 66, 217–222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0254-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0254-3

Keywords

Navigation