Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

There were some case–control studies, nested case–control studies, and cohort studies with controversial results on the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and breast cancer risk. Case–control studies are prone to selection bias, which limit the strength and quality of the evidence. To overcome the shortcoming of the case–control studies, the meta-analysis of prospective studies including nested case–control studies and cohort studies was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched, and the last retrieval date was March 24, 2013. For the highest versus the lowest level of serum 25(OH)D, the relative risks (RRs) and its 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were used to estimate summary RR and its 95 % CI. Subgroup analyses by geographic region, menopausal status, and adjusted status of RR were also performed, respectively. A dose–response association between serum 25(OH)D concentration and breast cancer risk was assessed. Fourteen articles with 9,110 breast cancer cases and 16,244 controls were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, serum 25(OH)D levels were inversely significantly associated with breast cancer risk (RR = 0.845, 95 % CI = 0.750–0.951). Inversely statistically significant associations were observed in North American studies, postmenopausal women, and studies with adjusted and unadjusted RR, respectively. No statistically significant associations were observed in European studies and premenopausal women, respectively. Dose–response analysis showed that every 10 ng/mL increment in serum 25(OH)D concentration was associated with a significant 3.2 % reduction in breast cancer risk. This meta-analysis provides evidence of a significantly inverse association between serum 25(OH)D concentration and breast cancer risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

25(OH)D:

25-Hydroxyvitamin D

1,25(OH)2D:

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D

lα(OH)D3 :

1-α-Hydroxycholecalciferol

RR:

Relative risk

CI:

Confidence interval

SE:

Standard error

VDR:

Vitamin D receptor

References

  1. Plum LA, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Welsh J. Cellular and molecular effects of vitamin D on carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;523:107–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED, et al. The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:252–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:266–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Essebag V, Genest Jr J, Suissa S, Pilote L. The nested case–control study in cardiology. Am Heart J. 2003;146:581–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenland S, Longnecker MP. Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose–response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:1301–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert R, Martin RM, Beynon R, et al. Associations of circulating and dietary vitamin D with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:319–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bertone-Johnson ER, Chen WY, Holick MF, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1991–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chlebowski RT, Johnson KC, Kooperberg C, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1581–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freedman DM, Chang SC, Falk RT, et al. Serum levels of vitamin D metabolites and breast cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:889–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCullough ML, Stevens VL, Patel R, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: a nested case control study in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rejnmark L, Tietze A, Vestergaard P, et al. Reduced prediagnostic 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in women with breast cancer: a nested case–control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2655–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Almquist M, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Malm J, Manjer J. Serum levels of vitamin D, PTH and calcium and breast cancer risk—a prospective nested case–control study. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2159–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Engel P, Fagherazzi G, Boutten A, et al. Serum 25(OH) vitamin D and risk of breast cancer: a nested case–control study from the French E3N cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2341–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eliassen AH, Spiegelman D, Hollis BW, Horst RL, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eliassen AH, Tworoger SS, Bertone-Johnson E, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Circulating vitamin D and breast cancer risk: repeated exposure assessment and 18 years of follow-up in the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amir E, Cecchini RS, Ganz PA, et al. 25-Hydroxy vitamin-D, obesity, and associated variables as predictors of breast cancer risk and tamoxifen benefit in NSABP-P1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133:1077–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Neuhouser ML, Manson JE, Millen A, et al. The influence of health and lifestyle characteristics on the relation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with risk of colorectal and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:673–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohr SB, Gorham ED, Alcaraz JE, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer in the military: a case–control study utilizing pre-diagnostic serum. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24:495–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ordonez-Mena JM, Schottker B, Haug U, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer risk in older adults: results from a large German prospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:905–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Green AK, Hankinson SE, Bertone-Johnson ER, Tamimi RM. Mammographic density, plasma vitamin D levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:667–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Colston KW, Chander SK, Mackay AG, Coombes RC. Effects of synthetic vitamin D analogues on breast cancer cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44:693–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen P, Li M, Gu X, et al. Higher blood 25(OH)D level may reduce the breast cancer risk: evidence from a Chinese population based case–control study and meta-analysis of the observational studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e49312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohr SB, Gorham ED, Alcaraz JE, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and prevention of breast cancer: pooled analysis. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2939–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin L, Grandi N, Raum E, Haug U, Arndt V, Brenner H. Meta-analysis: serum vitamin D and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2196–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gandini S, Boniol M, Haukka J, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and colorectal, breast and prostate cancer and colorectal adenoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:1414–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen P, Hu P, Xie D, Qin Y, Wang F, Wang H. Meta-analysis of vitamin D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121:469–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30972516), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (no. C2010000481), and Hebei Province Health Bureau Foundation (no. 20090004).

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dian-Wu Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, D., Vélez de-la-Paz, O.I., Zhai, JX. et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Tumor Biol. 34, 3509–3517 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0929-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0929-2

Keywords

Navigation