Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

German High School Students’ Attitudes and Interest in Cancer and Factors Influencing Proactive Behaviour for Cancer Prevention

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer diseases are pertinent topics to young people, who are confronted with the issue through media or family members that suffer from these diseases. Based on a paper-and-pencil questionnaire, we investigated German high school students’ (N = 369, 16–18 years old) interest in and their attitudes towards cancer. Attitude was assessed measuring multiple dimensions that included scales to measure several components: the cognitive (beliefs about the controllability of cancer), the affective (emotional responses towards cancer) and the behavioural (intention for proactive behaviour towards cancer) components. A student assessment of carcinogenic risk factor was executed. Our results suggest that students’ willingness to deal with the topic cancer (e.g. to communicate about cancer or to reconsider their lifestyle) is highly dependent on their interest, their emotional responses and their beliefs about the controllability of cancer. Their assessment of carcinogenic risk factors does not have a direct influence on their intentions to behave proactively against cancer but might have an indirect influence on their beliefs about the controllability of cancer. Based on these results, we have drawn teaching implications and discussed which factors should be included in teaching processes in order to stimulate proactive behaviour related to cancer prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mukherjee, S (2010) The emperor of all maladies—a biography of cancer. Scribner, New York

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62:10–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100(1):57–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer—the next generation. Cell 144(5):646–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Koch Institute and the Association of Population-based Cancer Registries in Germany [RKI] (eds.) (2010) Cancer in Germany 2005/2006. Incidence and trends. Seventh edition.

  6. Jemal A, Bray F, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bybee R, McCrae B, Robert L (2009) PISA 2006—an assessment of scientific literacy. J Res Sci Teach 46(8):865–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cribb A (1990) School teachers’ perceptions of the relative importance of cancer education in the United Kingdom. J Cancer Educ 5(4):225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey P (1992) Teachers’ attitudes to cancer education: a discussion in the light of a recent English survey. J Cancer Educ 7(2):153–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey P, Sloper P, Charlton A, While D (1995) Cancer education and the primary school teacher in England and Wales. J Cancer Educ 10(1):48–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oakley A, Bendelow G, Barnes J, Buchanan M, Nasseem Husain OA (1995) Health and cancer prevention: knowledge and beliefs of children and young people. Br Med J 310(6986):1029–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray M, McMillan CL (1993) Sex differences in perceptions of cancer. J Cancer Educ 8(1):53–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Yanke L, Remington PL, Love RR (2006) What causes cancer? Reports from sixth-grade girls. J Cancer Educ 21:142–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill TG, Briant KJ, Bowen D, Boerner V, Thuy V, Lopez K, Vinson E (2010) Evaluation of cancer 101: an educational program for native setting. J Cancer Educ 25:329–336

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiekbusch S, Hannich H-J, Isacsoon Å, Johannisson A, Lindholm LHJ, Sager E, Slaug B, Möller TR (2000) Impact of cancer education multimedia device on public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a controlled intervention study in Southern Sweden. J Cancer Educ 15:232–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Torabi MR, Seffrin JR (1986) Evaluation of the effects of cancer education on knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of university undergraduate students. J Cancer Educ 4(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schernhammer E, Haidinger G, Waldöhr T, Vargas R, Vutuc C (2010) A study of trends in beliefs of attitudes toward cancer. J Cancer Educ 25:211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change—the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63(2):167–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maio GR, Haddock G (2010) The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC

  20. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace & Company, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krapp A (2007) An educational-psychological conceptualization of interest. Int J Educ Vocat Guid 7:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elster D (2007) Student interest—the German and Austrian ROSE survey. J Biol Educ 42(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranmal R, Prictor M, Scott JT (2008) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858

  24. Maslon E (ed.) (2001) Health education and health promotion in schools/Federal Centre for Health Education. Concepts/Federal Centre for Health Education 2. Cologne – Die Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA) [in German]

  25. Busch H (2005) Is science education relevant? Rev Educ Res 36(5):162–167

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marteau TM, Lerman C (2001) Genetic risk and behavioural change. Br Med J 322:1056–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marcus Hammann for the thoughtful comments to the first draft of the manuscript and Livia Roth and Tanya Handa for proofreading. Reviewer’s comments improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Didaktik der Biologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Schlossplatz 34, 48143, Münster, Germany

    Benedikt Heuckmann & Roman Asshoff

Authors
  1. Benedikt Heuckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roman Asshoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Asshoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heuckmann, B., Asshoff, R. German High School Students’ Attitudes and Interest in Cancer and Factors Influencing Proactive Behaviour for Cancer Prevention. J Canc Educ 29, 497–505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0634-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0634-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation