Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Qualitative Evaluation of the Avon Foundation Community Education and Outreach Initiative Patient Navigation Program

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a qualitative evaluation of the Avon Foundation Community Education and Outreach Initiative (CEOI) Patient Navigation Program. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with breast cancer patients (N = 18) of the CEOI Patient Navigation Program. Primary strengths of the program include the nature of the relationship between the patient and navigator, the availability of navigators to attend appointments, and the fact that navigators were breast cancer survivors. The process of enrolling patients into the program was a weakness. Participants described positive experiences with this program. They also identified areas of improvement that are relevant to other patient navigation programs in the US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2007) Breast cancer facts & figures 2007–2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) 2006 Women’s health behavioral risk factor surveillance system prevalence data. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Available at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/BRFSS/display.asp?cat=WH&yr=2006&gkey=4421&state=GA. Accessed 1 July 2008

  3. Freeman HP, Chu K (2005) Determinants of cancer disparities: barriers to cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 14(4):655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lantz PM, Mujahid M, Schwartz K et al (2006) The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Am J Public Health 96(12):2173–2178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lund MJ, Brawley OP, Ward KC, Young JL, Gabram SGA, Eley JW (2007) Parity and disparity in first course treatment for invasive breast cancer among black and white women in Atlanta. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109:545–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman HP (2004) Poverty, culture, and social injustice: determinants of cancer disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 54:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S (1999) Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med 14:537–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM (2002) Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med 162:2458–2463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shavers-Hornaday VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Torner JC (1997) Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethn Health 2:31–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman HP (2006) Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health 83(2):139–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman HP, Muth BJ, Kerner JF (1995) Expanding access to cancer screening and clinical follow-up among the medically underserved. Cancer Pract 3(1):19–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Earp JA, Eng E, O’Malley et al (2002) Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. Am J Public Health 92:646–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gary TL, Bone LR, Hill MN et al (2003) Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk behaviors for diabetes-related complications in urban African Americans. Prev Med 37:23–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kegler MC, Malcoe LH (2004) Results from a lay health advisor intervention to prevent lead poisoning among rural Native American children. Am J Public Health 4:1730–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dohan D, Schrag D (2005) Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients. Cancer 104(4):848–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman HP (2006) Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality. J Cancer Educ 21(suppl):S11–S14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Avon Foundation Breast Cancer Crusade.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly Jacob Arriola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlueter, D.F., Thompson, W.W., Mason, T.A. et al. A Qualitative Evaluation of the Avon Foundation Community Education and Outreach Initiative Patient Navigation Program. J Canc Educ 25, 571–576 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0073-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0073-2

Keywords

Navigation