Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslide susceptibility zoning in a catchment of Zagros Mountains using fuzzy logic and GIS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide is one of the dangerous types of natural hazards. This phenomenon causes damages in many countries every year. A detailed landslide hazard assessment is necessary to reduce these damages. This research aims to map the landslide susceptibility zoning (LSZ) using the fuzzy logic method and GIS in the Sorkhab basin as a part of the Zagros fold and thrust belt (FTB), northwestern Iran. All slide types were recorded in fieldwork as landslide inventory. Based on the results, four types, i.e., debris slide, earth slide, and rock fall and complex of landslides, was identified in the region. Then, the effect of each landslide contributing factor including topographical elevation heights, slope classes, aspect classes, geological units, proximity to faults, land covers, rainfall classes, and proximity to streams was constructed in GIS and subsequently normalized using fuzzy membership functions. Finally, by combining all standardized layers using the fuzzy gamma operator, a final map of LSZ was produced. The results showed that a 0.9 fuzzy gamma operator has a high accuracy for the LSZ map in the study area. Besides, the accuracy of the LSZ map revealed a strong relationship (R2) between susceptibility classes, and landslide inventory was calculated using a scatter plot equal to 0.79. Hence, the method represented an appropriate accuracy in predicting the landslide susceptibility in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgun A, Sezer EA, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B (2012) An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm. Comput Geosci 38(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün A, Bulut F (2007) GIS-based landslide hazard for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region. Environ Geol 51(8):1377–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58(1):21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R, Kumar R, Lakshmanan K, Parida S, Neethu S (2015) Landslide hazard zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic approach, a case study of Lachung Valley Sikkim. Geoenviron Disasters 2:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1–2):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh A, Gholizadeh A (2018) Qualitative land suitability evaluation by parametric and fuzzy approaches for sugar beet crop in Sabzevar Plain, Northeast of Iran. Agric Res 5(3):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information system for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Pergamon/ Elsevier Science Ltd, Amesterdam, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, MacMillan RA, Van Deursen W (1992) Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography. Eur J Soil Sci 43:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaddad F, Senesi SI, Palau H, Vilella F (2009). The emergence ofhybrid forms in Argentina’s grain production sector. In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Association World Food and Agribusiness Symposium 19, Budapest, Hungary, June 20–21, 2009

  • Champatiray PK, Dimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S (2007) Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 4:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbiri AG (2001) Prediction models for landslide hazard zonation using a fuzzy set approach. In: Marchetti M, Rivas V (eds) Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides—investigation and mitigation special report 257. Transportation Research Board, National Academic Press, Washington, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Das I, Stein A, Kerle N, Dadhwal VK (2011) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment using homogeneous susceptible units (HSU) along a national highway corridor in the northern Himalayas, India. Landslides 8:293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill MA, Seyrafian A, Moghaddam HV (2010) The Asmari Formation, north of the Gachsaran (Dill anticline), southwest Iran: facies analysis, depositional environments and sequence stratigraphy. Carbonates Evaporites 25:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (North of Yenice, NW Turkye) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75(3/4):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Sawage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2015) Geological sheets at scale 1:100,000 Archived by Geological Survay of Iran. https://www.gsi.ir. Accessed 2018.

  • Guerrero JA, Moreno G (2007). Optimizing fuzzy logic programs by unfolding, aggregation and folding. In: Proceedings of 8th international workshop on rule-based programming (RULE’07), 29 Jun. University of Paris, Paris, France

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25(15):1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85(3–4):347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Anbalagan R (2015) Landslide susceptibility zonation in part of Tehri reservoir region using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 124(2):431–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri Daneshvar MR (2014) Landslide susceptibility zonation using analytical hierarchy process and GIS for the Bojnurd region, northeast of Iran. Landslides 11:1079–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2011) The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) Archived by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). https://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/search.jsp. Accessed 2018.

  • Neaupane KM, Piantanakulchai M (2006) Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Eng Geol 85(3–4):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2012) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63:965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Goli Jirandeh A, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 122:349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. Int J Comput Intell Syst 3(3):370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner M (2010a) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogramm Fernerkund GeoInform 1:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010b) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Neuro-Fuzzy Approach in a Landslide-Prone Area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash TN (2003) Land suitability analysis for agricultural crops: a fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach. Msc thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede, The Netherland

  • Ramesh V, Anbazhagan S (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping along Kolli hills Ghat road section (India) using frequency ratio, relative effect and fuzzy logic models. Environ Earth Sci 73:8009–8021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saboya F, Alves MG, Pinto WD (2006) Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes using fuzzy logic. Eng Geol 86(4):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahana M, Sajjad H (2017) Evaluating effectiveness of frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and logistic regression models in assessing landslide susceptibility: a case from Rudraprayag district India. J Mt Sci 14(11):2150–2167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neurofuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope stability: recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Turner A, Shuster R (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 129–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Soori S, Baharvand S, Farhadinejad T (2014) Landslide hazard zonation using fuzzy logic (a case study of Cham Sangar watershed). RS GIS Nat Resour 4(4):47–60 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebian M, Jackson J (2004) A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran. Geophys J Int 156(3):506–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangestani M (2008) A Comparative Study of Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy models for landslide susceptibility mapping using a GIS: An experience from Zagros Mountains, SW Iran. J Asian Earth Sci 35:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2016) Landsat 8 Data Products Archived by United States Geological Survey. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-8. Accessed 2018.

  • Vakhshoori V, Zare M (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping by comparing weight of evidence, fuzzy logic, and frequency ratio methods. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7(5):1731–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movements types and processes. National Academy of Sciences, Special Report, p 11–33

  • Xiang WN, Gross M, Fabos JG, MacDougall EB (1992) A fuzzy group multicriteria decision making model and its application to land-use planning. Environ Plan B 19:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. CATENA 72(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeganeh BY, Feiznia S, van Loon AJ (2012) Sedimentary environment and palaeogeography of the? Palaeocene-Middle Eocene Kashkan Formation, Zagros fold-thrust belt SW Iran. Geologos 18(1):13–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:253–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, p 435

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Deputy of Research and Technology of Khorramabad Azad University supported this research. We thank our colleagues who provided insight and expertise and greatly assisted the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siamak Baharvand.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baharvand, S., Rahnamarad, J., Soori, S. et al. Landslide susceptibility zoning in a catchment of Zagros Mountains using fuzzy logic and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 79, 204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08957-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08957-w

Keywords

Navigation