Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The main goal of this study is to produce landslide susceptibility map using GIS-based support vector machine (SVM) at Kalaleh Township area of the Golestan province, Iran. In this paper, six different types of kernel classifiers such as linear, polynomial degree of 2, polynomial degree of 3, polynomial degree of 4, radial basis function (RBF) and sigmoid were used for landslide susceptibility mapping. At the first stage of the study, landslide locations were identified by aerial photographs and field surveys, and a total of 82 landslide locations were extracted from various sources. Of this, 75% of the landslides (61 landslide locations) are used as training dataset and the rest was used as (21 landslide locations) the validation dataset. Fourteen input data layers were employed as landslide conditioning factors in the landslide susceptibility modelling. These factors are slope degree, slope aspect, altitude, plan curvature, profile curvature, tangential curvature, surface area ratio (SAR), lithology, land use, distance from faults, distance from rivers, distance from roads, topographic wetness index (TWI) and stream power index (SPI). Using these conditioning factors, landslide susceptibility indices were calculated using support vector machine by employing six types of kernel function classifiers. Subsequently, the results were plotted in ArcGIS and six landslide susceptibility maps were produced. Then, using the success rate and the prediction rate methods, the validation process was performed by comparing the existing landslide data with the six landslide susceptibility maps. The validation results showed that success rates for six types of kernel models varied from 79% to 87%. Similarly, results of prediction rates showed that RBF (85%) and polynomial degree of 3 (83%) models performed slightly better than other types of kernel (polynomial degree of 2 = 78%, sigmoid = 78%, polynomial degree of 4 = 78%, and linear = 77%) models. Based on our results, the differences in the rates (success and prediction) of the six models are not really significant. So, the produced susceptibility maps will be useful for general land-use planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Figure 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgun A 2011 A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey; Landslides, doi: 10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A and Bulut F 2007 GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region; Environ. Geol. 51(8) 1377–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A and Turk N 2010 Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multi criteria decision analysis; Environ. Earth Sci. 61(3) 595–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A, Dag S and Bulut F 2008 Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models; Environ. Geol. 54(6) 1127–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A, Kıncal C and Pradhan B 2011a Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey); Environ. Monit. Assess., doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A, Sezer E A, Nefeslioglu H A, Gokceoglu C and Pradhan B 2011b An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm; Comput. Geosci. 38(1) 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee O F, Pradhan B and Lee S 2012 Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping; Comput. Geosci. 44 120–135, doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L and Yamagishi H 2005 The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan; Geomorphology 65(1/2) 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H and Kanno T 2005 Landslide in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparison of results from two methods and verifications; Eng. Geol. 81 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K and Kirkby M J 1979 A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology; Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui D T, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I and Dick O B 2011 Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS; Comput. Geosci., doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui D T, Pradhan B, Lofman O and Revhaug I 2012a Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree and Naïve Bayes models; Math. Problems in Eng., http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/aip/974638/.

  • Bui D T, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I and Dick O B 2012b Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using Artificial Neural Network; Geomorphology, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui D T, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I and Dick O B 2012c Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Vietnam: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models; Catena 96 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianini N and Shawe-Taylor J 2000 An introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; ISBN 0521780195.

  • Dai F C and Lee C F 2002 Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong; Geomorphology 42 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota K C, Regmi A D, Pourghasemi H R, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu I C, Dhital M R and Althuwaynee O F 2012 Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya; Nat. Hazards, doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENVI Version 4.3, 2006. ITT industires, Inc. http://www.RSInc.com/envi.

  • Ercanoglu M and Gokceoglu C 2002 Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (North of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach; Environ. Geol. 41 720–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M and Gokceoglu C 2004 Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey); Eng. Geol. 75 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H and Ercanoglu M 2000 Discontinuity controlled probabilistic slope failure risk maps of the Altindag (settlement) region in Turkey; Eng. Geol. 55 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golestan Regional Water Co. 2007 Golestan province meteorological information report.

  • Gomez H and Kavzoglu T 2005 Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela; Eng. Geol. 78 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gritzner M L, Marcus W A, Aspinall R and Custer S G 2001 Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho; Geomorphology 37 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinalli M and Reichenbach P 1999 Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-case study, central Italy; Geomorphology 31 181–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Gruber S and Shrestha D P 2003 Digital Terrain Analysis in ILWIS. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede (The Netherlands), 62p.

  • Iranian Landslide working party 2007 Iranian landslides list, Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Association, Iran, p. 60.

  • Jenness J 2002 Surface Areas and Ratios from Elevation Grid, Jenness Enterprises, http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/surface_areas.htm (connected: 10.08.2003).

  • Kanevski M, Pozdnoukhov A and Timonin V 2009 Machine Learning for Spatial Environmental Data: Theory, Applications and Software; CRC Press.

  • Lee S and Pradhan B 2006 Probabilistic landslide risk mapping at Penang Island, Malaysia; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 115(5) 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S and Pradhan B 2007 Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models; Landslides 4 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu J H, Won J S and Park H J 2004 Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network; Eng. Geol. 71 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović M, Kovaèević M, Bajat B and Voženílek V 2011 Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm; Eng. Geol. 123 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti N 2011 Landslide susceptibility mapping using adaptive support vector machines and feature selection, A Master Thesis submitted to University of Lausanne Faculty of Geosciences and Environment for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Geosciences, 99p.

  • Moore I D, Grayson R B and Ladson A R 1991 Digital terrain modeling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications; Hydrol. Proc. 5 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu K, Petrou M, Tarantino C and Blonda P 2008 Landslide possibility mapping using fuzzy approaches; IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 46 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu H A, Gokceoglu C and Sonmez H 2008 An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps; Eng. Geol. 97 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu H A, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir A S and Duman T Y 2010 Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the Metropolitan Area of Istanbul, Turkey; Math. Problems Eng. Volume, doi: 10.1155/2010/901095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh H J and Pradhan B 2011 Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in tropical hilly area; Comput. Geosci. 37(9) 1264–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri A K, Gupta P V and Chander R 1998 Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas; Environ. Geol. 36(3–4) 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M and Moradi H R 2012a Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran; Arab. J. Geosci., doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C and Deylami Moezzi K 2012b A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and Weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS; Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2012.662915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Pradhan B and Gokceoglu C 2012c Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran; Nat. Hazards 63(2) 965–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B and Deylami Moezzi K 2012d Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multicriteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran; (eds) Pradhan B and Buchroithner M, Terrigenous Mass Movements (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag), pp. 23–49, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25495-6-2.

  • Pourghasemi H R, Mohammady M and Pradhan B 2012e Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran; Catena 97 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2010a Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis; Int. J. Comput. Intel. Sys. 3(3) 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2010b Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches; J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sen. 38(2) 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2010c Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia; Adv. Space Res. 45(10) 1244–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2011a Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with geoinformation techniques coupled with geoinformation techniques for landslide susceptibility analysis; Environ. Ecol. Stat. 18(3) 471–493, doi: 10.1007/s10651-010-0147-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2011b Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia; Environ. Earth Sci. 63(2) 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Buchroithner M F 2010 Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 16(2) 107–126, doi: 10.2113/gseegeosci.16.2.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Lee S 2009 Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites; Int. J. Physic. Sci. 3(11) 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Lee S 2010a Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: Back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling; Environ. Modell. Softw. 25 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Lee S 2010b Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia; Environ. Earth Sci. 60 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Pirasteh S 2010 Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping; Disaster Adv. 3(2) 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Youssef A M 2010 Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models; Arab. J. Geosci. 3(3) 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Singh R P and Buchroithner M F 2006 Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data; Adv. Space Res. 37 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Mansor S, Buchroithner M F, Jallaluddin N and Khujaimah Z 2008 Utilization of optical remote sensing data and geographic information system tools for regional landslide hazard analysis by using binomial logistic regression model; Appl. Remote Sens. 2 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S and Buchroithner M B 2009 Use of geospatial data for the development of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide hazard mapping: A case study in Malaysia; Appl. Geomatics 1 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C and Buchroithner M F 2010a Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide prone area (Cameron Highland, Malaysia); IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48(12) 4164–4177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef A M and Varathrajoo R 2010b Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model; Geospatial Information Sci. 13(2) 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S and Buchroithner M F 2010c Remote sensing and GIS based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model; Photogramm. Fernerkundung Geoinformation 1 17–32, doi: 10.1127/14328364/2010/0037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Oh H J and Buchroithner M 2010d Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area; Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk 1(3) 199–223, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2010.498151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Mansor S, Pirasteh S and Buchroithner M 2011 Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model; Int. J. Remote Sens. 32(14) 4075–4087, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.484433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J and Buchroithner M F 2012 Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: A case study at Penang Island, Malaysia; Environ. Monit. Assess. 184(2) 715–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer E A, Pradhan B and Gokceoglu C 2011 Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia; Expert Syst. Appl. 38(7) 8208–8219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shou K J and Wang C F 2003 Analysis of the Chiufengershan landslide triggered by the 1999 Chi–Chi earthquake in Taiwan; Eng. Geol. 68 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R and Troch P A 2007 Soil moisture storage and hillslope stability; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 7 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu M C, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu H A and Sonmez H 2008 Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: A case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey); Environ. Geol. 54 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia M H, Alesheikh A A, Alimohammadi A and Hosseinali F 2010 A GIS-based neurofuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping; Comput. Geosci., doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G and Vandekerckhove L 2006 Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium); Geomorphology 76 392–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes D J 1978 Slope movement types and processes; In: Landslide analysis and control (eds) Schuster R L and Krizek R J, Special Report. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, New York, 176 12–33.

  • Vapnik V N 1995 The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (New York: Springer Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H B and Sassa K 2005 Comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Minamata area, Japan; Environ. Geol. 47 956–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dai F, Xu X and Lee Y H 2012 GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China; Geomorphology, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A and Bulut F 2007 Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: A case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey); Nat. Hazards 41 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Tham L G and Dai F C 2008 Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China; Geomorphology 101 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar E K 2005 The Application of Computational Intelligence to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Turkey; Ph.D Thesis, Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne, 423p.

  • Yesilnacar E and Topal T 2005 Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey); Eng. Geol. 79(3–4) 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I 2009a A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas–Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks; Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ 68(3) 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I 2009b Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey); Comput. Geosci. 35(6) 1125–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I 2010a The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability (CP) and artificial neural network (ANN); Environ. Earth Sci. 60 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I 2010b Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: Conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine; Environ. Earth Sci. 61 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef A M, Pradhan B, Gaber A F D and Buchroithner M F 2009 Geomorphological hazard analysis along the Egyptian Red Sea coast between Safaga and Quseir; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Pourghasemi H R, Vafakhah M and Pradhan B 2012 Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: A comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms; Arab. J. Geosci., doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful reviews on the earlier version of the manuscript. Thanks to Dr Nibir Mandal for his valuable suggestions that improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Watershed Management Engineering, College of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Mazandaran, Iran

    HAMID REZA POURGHASEMI

  2. Spatial Academy Team, Tehran, Iran

    ABBAS GOLI JIRANDEH

  3. Geospatial Information Science Research Centre (GISRC), University Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

    BISWAJEET PRADHAN

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    BISWAJEET PRADHAN

  5. Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Volcano, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, 100029, People’s Republic of China

    CHONG XU

  6. Applied Geology Division, Department of Geological Engineering, Hacettepe University, Hacettepe, Turkey

    CANDAN GOKCEOGLU

Authors
  1. HAMID REZA POURGHASEMI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ABBAS GOLI JIRANDEH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. BISWAJEET PRADHAN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. CHONG XU
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. CANDAN GOKCEOGLU
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to BISWAJEET PRADHAN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

POURGHASEMI, H.R., JIRANDEH, A.G., PRADHAN, B. et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 349–369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0282-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0282-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation