Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fault monitoring approach using model-based and neural network techniques applied to input–output feedback linearization control induction motor

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a contribution to the fault monitoring approach and input–output feedback linearization control of the induction motor (IM) in the closed-loop drive. Two kinds of faults are considered in the machine, particularly the broken rotor bars and stator inter-turn short circuit faults. This approach has been employed to detect and identify simple and mixed defects during motor operation by utilizing advanced techniques. To achieve it, two procedures are applied for the fault monitoring: The model-based strategy, which used to generate a residual speed signal to indicate the presence of possible failures, by means the high gain observer in the closed-loop drive. However, this strategy is not able to recognise the type of faults but it can be affected by the disturbances. Therefore, the neural network (NN) technique is applied in order to identify the faults and distinguish them. However, the NN required a relevant database to achieve satisfactory results. Hence, the stator current analysis based on the HFFT combination of the Hilbert transform and fast Fourier transform is applied to extract the amplitude of the harmonics and used them as an input data set for NN. The obtained results show the efficiency of the fault monitoring system and its ability to detect and diagnosis any minor faults in a closed loop of the IM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IM:

Induction motor

IOFL:

Input-output feedback linearization

HGO:

High gain observer

NN:

Neural network

SCE:

Stator current envelope

n ccK′ :

K′ stator shorted turns

Uds, Uqs :

(d, q) Axis voltages of the stator

Ids, Iqs :

(d, q) Axis current components of the stator

Idr, Iqr :

(d, q) Axis current components of the rotor

I e :

Short circuit ring current

[U]:

Voltage vector

[I]:

Current vector

[L]:

Inductance matrix

[R]:

Resistance matrix

R :

Average radius of the air-gap

U dc :

Direct voltage

Ua, Ub, Uc :

Three phases voltages as, bs, cs

Ia, Ib, Ic :

Three phases current as, bs, cs

U, U :

(α, β) Axis voltages of the stator

ω r :

Electrical rotor speed in rpm

ωref, Φref :

Rotor reference speed and flux

N bbk′ :

k′ broken rotor bars

y :

Measurable output

u :

Control variable

x :

State variable

f :

Fundamental frequency

s :

Motor slip

R bfk :

Resistance of the bar index k

i ek :

Short circuit ring current of the portion k

μ 0 :

Magnetic permeability of the air

p :

Number of pole pairs

e :

Air-gap mean diameter

α :

Angle between two broken rotor bars

R s :

Stator resistance

R r :

Rotor resistance

R b :

Rotor bar resistance

R e :

Resistance of end ring

L b :

Rotor bar inductance

L e :

Inductance of end ring

L sf :

Leakage inductance of stator

M sr :

Mutual inductance

N s :

Number of turns per stator phase

N r :

Number of rotor bars

l :

Length of the rotor

J :

Inertia moment

F :

Coefficient of damping

Te, TL :

Electromagnetic torque, load torque

i bk :

Current of the bar k

i rk :

Current of the loop k

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Parameters for the simulation of the IM

Appendix: Parameters for the simulation of the IM

P n

Output power

1.1 kW

U s

Stator voltage

220 V

p

Number of pole pairs

1

R s

Stator resistance

7.58 Ω

R r

Rotor resistance

6.3 Ω

R b

Rotor bar resistance

0.15 mΩ

R e

Resistance of end ring segment

0.15 mΩ

L b

Rotor bar inductance

0.1 μH

L e

Inductance of end ring

0.1 μH

L sf

Leakage inductance of stator

26.5 mH

M sr

Mutual inductance

46.42 mH

N s

Number of turns per stator phase

160

N r

Number of rotor bars

16

R

Average radius of the air-gap

35.7 mm

l

Length of the rotor

65 mm

e

Air-gap mean diameter

2.5 mm

J

Inertia moment

0.0054 kg m2

F

Coefficient of damping

0.0029 Nm/rad/s

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harzelli, I., Menacer, A. & Ameid, T. A fault monitoring approach using model-based and neural network techniques applied to input–output feedback linearization control induction motor. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11, 2519–2538 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01307-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01307-0

Keywords

Navigation