Skip to main content
Log in

Changes of microstructure of different quench sensitivity 7,000 aluminum alloy after end quenching

  • Published:
Rare Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quench sensitivity and their influential factors of 7,021, 7,085, and 7,050 alloys were investigated by the end quenching test method and the measurement of electrical conductivity, hardness, and microstructure after aging. The results indicate that 7,050 alloy has the largest changes with hardness decreasing from HV 199 to HV 167, and electrical conductivity increases from 16.6 to 18.2 MS·m−1 when the distance from quenched end increases from 2 to 100 mm. Alloys 7,085 and 7,021 have relatively smaller changes. According to the relationship between the hardness and electrical conductivity of a supersaturated solid solution, 7,050 alloy has higher quench sensitivity than 7,085 and 7,021 alloys. The microstructure of 7,050 alloy with higher major alloy element (Zn + Mg + Cu) addition and Cu element addition is mostly affected by the changes of distance from quenched end. In 7,050 alloy, the size of intragranular precipitates is from about 10–200 nm, and the (sub) grain boundary precipitates are about 20–300 nm. Alloy 7,085 with lower Cu content is moderately affected, while 7,021 is least affected. It is found that with the increase of distance from quenched end, quenched-induced precipitate preferentially nucleates and grows in the (sub) grain boundary and then on the pre-existing Al3Zr particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiong BQ, Li XW, Zhang YA, Li ZH, Zhu BH, Wang F, Liu HW. Quench sensitivity of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Chin J Nonferrous Metals. 2011;21(10):2631.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li ZH, Xiong BQ, Zhang YA, Zhu BH, Wang F, Liu HW. Microstructure and properties of 7B04 Al alloy pre-stretched thick plates. Chin J Rare Met. 2007; 31(4):440.

  3. Eskin DG. Decomposition of supersaturated solid solutions in Al–Cu–Mg–Si alloys. J Mater Sci. 2003;38(2):279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farber VM. Initial stages of decomposition of supersaturated solid solutions. Met Sci Heat Treat. 1995;37(10):391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakrabarti DJ, Liu J, Sawtell RR, Venema GB. New generation high strength high damage tolerance 7085 thick alloy product with low quench sensitivity. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aluminum Alloys, Vancouver, 2004:969.

  6. Thompson DS, Subramanya BS, Levy SA. Quench rate effects in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Metall Trans. 1971;2(4):1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan L-M, Shen J, Li J-P, Mao B-P. Static softening behaviors of 7055 alloy during the interval time of multi-pass hot compression. Rare Met. 2013;32(3):241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conserva M, Dirusso E, Caloni O. Comparison of the influence of chromium and zirconium on the quench sensitivity of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Metall Trans. 1971;2(4):1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conserva M, Fiorini P. Interpretation of quench-sensitivity in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Metall Trans. 1973;4(3):857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang DL, Zheng L. The quench sensitivity of cast Al–7Si–0.4Mg alloy. J Metall Mater Trans A. 1996;27(10):3983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Tsung-Rong, Peng Guan-Jye, Huang JC. Low quench sensitivity of superplastic 8090 Al–Li thin sheets. Metall Mater Trans A. 1996;27(10):2923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiryakioglu Murat, Ralph Shuey T. Quench sensitivity of an Al-7 Pct Si-0.6 Pct Mg alloy: characterization and modeling. Metall Mater Trans B. 2007;38(4):575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang XS, Nie B, Xie YC. Effect of heat-treatment institutions on conductivity of 7,075 aluminum alloy. Light Alloy Fabr Technol. 2001;29(7):40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xi GR, Zhang JY. Influence of composition on quench sensitivity of aluminum alloy. Light Alloy Fabr Technol. 1994;22(11):36.

  15. Zhang XM, Liu SD, You JH, Zhang C, Zhang XY. Influence of aging on quench sensitivity effect of 7,055 aluminum alloy. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2007;17(2):394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Starink MJ, Li XM. A model for the electrical conductivity of peak-aged and overaged Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2003;34(4):899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu YN. Fundamentals of Science and Engineering. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2008. 201.

  18. Qi WJ, Wang SC, Chen XM, Nong D, Zhou Z. Effective nucleation phase and grain refinement mechanism of Al–5Ti–1B master alloy. Chin J Rare Met. 2013;37(2):179.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liscic B, Tensi HM, Canale LCF, Totten GE. Quenching Theory and Technology. 2nd ed. New York: Chemical Rubber Company; 2010. 56.

  20. Zhang XM, Liu SD, You JH, Zhang C, Zhang XY. Influence of aging on quench sensitivity effect of 7,055 aluminum alloy. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2007;17(2):261.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu WJ, Zhang XM, Liu SD, Zhou XW. Effect of homogenization on quenching sensitivity of 7,050 aluminum alloy plates. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2010;20(6):1103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51274046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Hui Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, ZH., Xiong, BQ., Liu, SF. et al. Changes of microstructure of different quench sensitivity 7,000 aluminum alloy after end quenching. Rare Met. 33, 270–275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-014-0258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-014-0258-7

Keywords

Navigation