Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of memorization in students’ self-reported mathematics learning: a large-scale study of Chinese eighth-grade students

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined over 48,000 eighth-grade Chinese students’ mathematics performance and use of learning strategies. In particular, this study explored how the use of learning strategies and their combinations are related to students’ mathematics performance in Chinese context. This study examined three kinds of learning strategies derived from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012: memorization, elaboration, and control. The findings indicate that few students chose the memorization strategy as their predominant way of learning mathematics. Instead, students usually chose a combination of learning strategies. The choice of combinations of learning strategies was highly correlated with students’ mathematics performance. Students who chose control strategies outperformed those who chose memorization strategies or elaboration strategies. This study also examined the relationship between learning strategy use and mathematics performance of students who were only children (students with no siblings, born under the “one child” policy) and students living in nonagricultural residential locations (hukou status), both of which are background variables unique to Chinese context. The findings indicate that only-child and nonagricultural students outperformed non-only-child and agricultural students when choosing the same learning strategies. However, those who chose control-dominant strategies performed better than those who chose memorization-dominant strategies, regardless of their background. This study provides a new lens for considering the relationship between learning strategy use and mathematics performance, demonstrating that various learning strategies should be considered together rather than separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Areepattamannil, S. (2014). Are learning strategies linked to academic performance among adolescents in two states in India? A Tobit regression analysis. The Journal of General Psychology, 141(4), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.957637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areepattamannil, S., & Caleon, I. (2013). Relationships of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies to mathematics achievement in four high-performing east Asian education systems. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(6), 696–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2013.799057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, B., & Clanchy, C. (1991). Teaching students from overseas. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00386.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning process really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1994). What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West (The radford memorial lecture). Australian Educational Researcher, 21, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Insights into teaching the Chinese learner. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 277–300). Hong Kong: Centre for Comparative Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Ding, M. (2015). On mathematical understanding: Perspectives of experienced Chinese mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Ding, M., & Wang, T. (2014). How do exemplary Chinese and U.S. mathematics teachers view instructional coherence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9513-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Hwang, H. (2015). Characterizing mathematics education in China: A perspective on improving student learning. In B. Sriraman, J. Cai, K.-H. Lee, F. Fan, Y. Shimuzu, C. S. Lim & K. Subramanium (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Asian research in mathematics education: China, Korea, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia and India (pp. 3–23). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W. (2009). Internal labor migration in China: Trends, geography, and policies. In United Nations population division, urbanization, spatial distribution of the population, internal migration, and development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T., & Selden, M. (1994). The origin and social consequences of China’s hukou system. The China Quarterly, 139, 644–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9214-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J., & Elkins, J. (1999). Lack of automaticity in the basic addition facts as a characteristic of arithmetic learning problems and instructional needs. Mathematical Cognition, 5(2), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467999387289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Mendez, I., Denis, V., & Rech, G. (2016). How teachers teach and students learn: Successful strategies for school (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 130). Paris, France: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm29kpt0xxx-en.

  • Eshel, V., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000060093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Wong, N. Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman-Green, S. M., Brien, C., Wood, C. L., & Hitt, S. B. (2015). Effects of the SOLVE strategy on the mathematical problem solving skills of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(2), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Q., & Ren, Q. (2010). Educational inequality under China’s rural-urban divide: The hukou system and returns to education. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful solver is unsuccessful in his/her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S., & Goldstein, A. (1991). Permanent and temporary migration differentials in China. Papers of the East–West Population Institute, No. 117. Honolulu, HI: East–West Center.

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A., Niemivirta, M., Nieminen, J., & Lonka, K. (2010). Interrelations among university students’ approaches to learning, regulation of learning, and cognitive and attributional strategies: A person oriented approach. Higher Education, 61(5), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Maul, A. (2011). Examining evidence for the validity of PISA learning strategy scales based on student response processes. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.529977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiliç, S., Çene, E., & Demir, I. (2012). Comparison of learning strategies for mathematics achievement in Turkey with eight countries. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(4), 2594–2598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P., Lietz, P., & Roberts, R. (2010). Cross-cultural comparative questionnaire issues. Paper prepared at the PISA 2012 Questionnaire Expert Group (QEG) meeting, Hong Kong.

  • Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Tai, W. (2015). Latent class analysis of students’ mathematics learning strategies and the relationship between learning strategy and mathematical literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liukkunen, U. S., & Chen, Y. (2016). Developing fundamental labour rights in China: A new approach to implementation. In U. Liukkunen & Y. Chen (Eds.), Fundamental labour rights in China—Legal implementation and cultural logic (pp. 1–17). Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23156-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). The effects of learning strategies on mathematical literacy: A comparison between lower and higher achieving countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.77083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Tse, L. K. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D. M. (2011). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 442–464). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesiti, C., & Clarke, D. (2010). A functional analysis of mathematical tasks in China, Japan, Sweden, Australia and the USA: Voice and agency. In Y. Shimizu, B. Kaur, R. Huang & D. J. Clarke (Eds.), Mathematical tasks in classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2001). Mathematics curriculum standards for full-time compulsory education (trial version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). Mathematics curriculum standards for full-time compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouziraji, A., & Mouziraji, A. (2015). Memorization makes progress. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(4), 870. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0504.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010543-en.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris, France: Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264048096-en.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Mathematics teaching and learning strategies in PISA. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris, France: Author.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA in focus. Is memorization a good strategy for learning mathematics? Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/infocus.

  • Oxford, R. L., & Griffiths, C. (2014). Language learning strategy research in the twenty-first century. Special issue, System: International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics. 43, 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine Series, 5(302), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440009463897. 50 ) .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. (1997). The case for explicit, teacher-led, cognitive strategy instruction. Chicago: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppenbach, M., Perry, M., Miller, K. F., Sims, L., & Fang, G. (2007). The answer is only the beginning: Extended discourse in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 380–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorić, I., & Palekčić, M. (2009). The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 545–565. ISSN: 0256–2928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudbeck, K. (2012). The effects of China’s one-child policy: The significance for Chinese women. Nebraska Anthropologist, 179. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/179

  • Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Bortoli, L. D. (2013). A teacher’s guide to PISA mathematical literacy. Australia: Acer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, B. (2003). Zhongguo diyi zhengjian (China’s No. 1 Document). Huizhou: Guangzhou Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Victoria. Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong and the Australian Council for Educational Research Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2010). Learning strategies. In B. McGaw, P. L. Peterson & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd edn., pp. 323–329). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 126, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–567). Orlando: Guilford Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. (2002). Conceptions of doing and learning mathematics among Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860220151096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. Y. (2008). Confucian heritage culture learner’s phenomenon: From “exploring the middle zone” to “constructing a bridge.” ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education. 40, 973–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (2018). Cognition strategies, metacognition strategies and academic performance in Taiwan. In C. W. Michael & Yip (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition and academic performance: An East Asian perspective (pp. 70–86). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. L., Adams, R. K., & Wilson, M. R. … Camberwell (1997). ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [computer programme manual]. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. (2006). Has the one-child policy improved adolescents’ educational wellbeing in China? Population Research and Development Center People’s University of China.

  • Yigzaw, A., & Fentie, A. (2013). The impact of students’ self-regulated language learning on their reading achievement in Ethiopian high schools: Grade 9 in focus. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 5(5), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Li, S., & Tang, R. (2004). The “two basics”: Mathematics teaching and learning in Mainland China. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 189–207). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. S., & Wang, D. (2016). A Chinese approach to learning? A comparative study on time use patterns of 15-year-old students in PISA 2012. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W. X. (2003). The one child family policy. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88(6), 463–464. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.88.6.463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Beijing Normal University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Qimeng Liu, Xiaofeng Du, Shuxin Zhao & Jian Liu

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Jinfa Cai

Authors
  1. Qimeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaofeng Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuxin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinfa Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Du, X., Zhao, S. et al. The role of memorization in students’ self-reported mathematics learning: a large-scale study of Chinese eighth-grade students. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 361–374 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09576-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09576-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation