Skip to main content
Log in

The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship between students’ interests, their use of certain specific learning strategies and causal attributions which they made for their academic achievement. In this manner, we attempted to explore the relationships between some important variables from three different, but connected phases of self-regulated learning: the forethought phase (interests), the performance control phase (learning strategies) and the self-reflective phase (causal attributions).

Results confirmed the presumption that learning strategies could be a potential mediator in the relationship between students’ interests and their academic achievement. Also, results indicate that the causal dimension of controllability could have a partial mediating role between students’ academic achievement and their interests. Generally, our findings indicate a dynamic and cyclical nature of learning process — interest is an integral part of this process and it could be conceptualized as both a consequence and an antecedent of cognitive aspects of learning.

Résumé

Ce travail de recherche se propose comme but d’examiner le rapport entre l’intérêt manifesté par l’étudiant, les stratégies d’apprentissage mises en oeuvre et le principe de causalité d’attributions justifiant selon lui son parcours universitaires. Nos recherches ont porté sur le rapport entre quelques variables d’importance relatives aux trois étapes de l’apprentissage auto-régulé, en l’occurence l’étape de réflexion préliminaire (intérêt), l’étape de mise en oeuvre (stratégie de l’apprentissage) et l’étape de la réflexion proprement dite (causalité d’attributions).

Les résultats de nos recherches confirment le fait que les stratégies d’apprentissage peuvent jouer un rôle de médiateur quant au rapport entre l’intérêt manifesté par l’étudiant et le diplôme obtenu. Par ailleurs, les résultats de nos recherches montrent que la dimension causale de la contrôlabilité de médiateur au niveau du rapport entre le diplôme universitaire acquis et l’intérêt manifesté. D’une manière générale, les résultats que nous avons obtenus révèlent le caractère dynamique et cyclique du processus d’apprentissage — l’intérêt de l’étudiant étant partie intégrante du dit processus et pouvant être envisagé à la fois comme ayant précédé ou suivi l’aspect cognitif de l’apprentissage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., & Chan, J. (2006). Emotions and task engagement: Affect and efficacy and their contribution to information processing in during a writing task.Paper presented at the Meetings ofthe American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Schnabel, K., & Lehrke, M. (1998). Does interest really matter? In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.),Interest and learning (pp. 327–336). IPN 164. Kiel: Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D.C. (1992). Telling the stories of educational psychology.Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chye, S., Walker, R.A., & Smith, I.D. (1997). Self-regulated learning in tertiary students: the role of culture and self-efficacy on strategy use and academic achievement. http://www.aare.edu.au./97pap/chyes350.htm

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R.A. Dienstbier (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour.Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2002).Handbook of self-determination research. New York, USA, University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S. (1999).Self Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, R.E. (1989). Educational psychology: The master science. In M.C. Wittrock & F. Farley (Eds.),The future of educational psychology (chapter 1, pp. 318). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Tauer, J.M., Carter, S.M., & Elliot, A.J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest or performance over time.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children.Child Development, 53, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Miyake, N. (1991). What does a cultural approach offer to research on learning.Learning and Instruction, 1, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable.Educational Research Review, 1, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellog, R.T. (1995).Cognitive psychology. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Kenny, D.A. (2008). Reflections on Mediation.Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D.A., Korchmaros, J.D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models.Psychological Methods, 8(2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.),Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–431). University of Rochester Press.

  • Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations.Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.),The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., Renninger, K.A., & Hoffman, L. (1998). Some thoughts about the development of a unifying framework for the study of individual interest. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.)Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 455–468). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köller, O., Daniels, Z., & Baumert, J. (2000a). Multiple frames of reference, academic interests, and coursework selection in upper secondary schools in Germany.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). New Orleans, USA.

  • Köller, O., Schnabel, K.U., & Baumert, J. (2000b). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, USA.

  • Lapan, R.T., Kardash, C.M., & Turner, S. (2002). Empowering students to become self-regulated learners.Professional School Counseling, 5, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1996).Cognitive psychology. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

  • Niemivirta, M. (1996). Motivational-cognitive components in self-regulated learning.Paper presented at the “5th International Conference on Motivation”, Landau, Germany.

  • O’Donnell, A. (2004). A commentary on design research.Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., & Cunningham, A.E. (1995). Children becoming students. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 117–148). Simon & Schuster Macmillan. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.),Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M.L. Maehr (Eds.),Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (vol. 6, pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R. (2003). Motivation and Classroom Learning. In W.M. Reynolds & G.E. Miller (Eds.),Handbook of psychology — Educational psychology (vol. 7, pp. 103–122). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Haboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (1996).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Inc. NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, C., & Smith, J.L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The Relation between having to and wanting to. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.),Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 343–366). Academic Press.

  • Sansone, C., & Thoman, D.B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation.European Psychologist, 10(3), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 26(2&3), 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning — What we know and what we don’t know. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.),Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 91–104). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., Wild, K.-P., & Krapp, A. (1995). Course-specific interest and exstrinsic motivation as predictors of specific learning strategies and course grades.Paper presented at the 6th EARLt Conference at Nijmegen.

  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., Wild, K.-P., & Winteler, A. (1993). Der “Fragebogen zum Studieninterresse”(FSI).Diagnostica, 39, 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.),Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 125–153). Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

  • Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In W.M. Reynolds & G.E. Miller (Eds.),Handbook of psychology — Educational psychology (vol. 7, pp. 59–79). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Haboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorić, I. (2002). Students’ causal attributions, self-regulated learning and study interests.Poster presented at the 6th Alpe-Adria Conference of Psychology, Rovereto, Italy.

  • Sorić, I., & Palekčić, M. (2002). Adaptacija i validacija LIST-upitnika za ispitivanje strategija učenja kod studenata [Adaptation and validation of LIST].Suvremena psihologija [Contemporary Psychology], 5(2), 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992).Human motivation. Sage Publications. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1996). Target article: Searching for order in social motivation.Psychological Inquiry, 7(3), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2007).Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

  • Weinert, F.E. (1994). Lernen lernen und das eigene lernen verstehen. In K. Reusser & M. Reusser-Weyeneth (Eds.),Verstehen: psychologisher Prozess und didaktische Aufgabe (pp. 183–205). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D.R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 728–744). Academic Press.

  • Wild, K.-P., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens.Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15(4), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. (1997). Decision-making in language learning: A lens for examing learner strategies.The Language Teacher Online 21.10, http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/files/97/oct/woods.html

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–35). Academic Press.

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 172–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publishers

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by grant no. 269-1301676-0821 from the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport. The authors thank the editor and the reviewers for their helpful comments, which greatly improved this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SoriĆ, I., PalekčiĆ, M. The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions. Eur J Psychol Educ 24, 545–565 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178767

Key words

Navigation