Skip to main content
Log in

The characteristics of shear adhesive interface fracture of aluminum foam DCB bonded using a single-lap method

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens made of aluminum foam were manufactured according to the BS 7991 and ISO 11343 standards. The thickness variable was set as t, and five specimens with thicknesses of 25~65 mm were manufactured. The manufactured aluminum foam DCB specimens were bonded using a single-lap joint method, and the force reaction due to forced displacement was determined. The five specimens had the maximum force reaction when the forced displacement was approximately 10~15 mm. The force reaction decreased rapidly once the maximum force reaction occurred. Subsequently, when the forced displacement increased by approximately 20 mm, the force reaction was negligible, i.e., adhesive strength disappeared. To evaluate the data obtained from the experiment, ANSYS was used to perform finite element analysis. The analysis results closely matched the experimental data. However, because there are limitations to the application of the viscosity of adhesives to actual construction structures, a small difference was observed from the time when the maximum force reaction occurred to the time of adhesive interface failure. The experimental results of the present study can be applied to actual complex structures to analyze their fracture behavior and to determine their mechanical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, S. S., Han, M. S., Cho, J. U., and Cho, C. D., “Study on the Fatigue Experiment of TDCB Aluminum Foam Specimen Bonded with Adhesive,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 1791–1795, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Han, M. S., Choi, H. K., Cho, J. U., and Cho, C. D., “Experimental Study on the Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of DCB Specimen with Aluminum Foam,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 1395–1399, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, R. D., “Failure Strength Tests and their Limitations,” American Society of Metals (ASM) Adhesives Handbook, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goland, M. and Reissner, E., “The Stresses in Cemented Joints,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 17–27, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hart-Smith, L. J., “Further Developments in the Design and Analysis of Adhesive-Bonded Structural Joints,” Proc. of American Society for Testing and Materials Symposium on Joining of Composite Materials, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM D3163-01, “Standard Test Method for Determining Strength of Adhesively Bonded Rigid Plastic Lap-Shear Joints in Shear by Tension Loading,” 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM D950-03, “Standard Test Method for Impact Strength of Adhesive Bonds,” 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adams, R. D. and Harris, J. A., “A Critical Assessment of the Block Impact Test for Measuring the Impact Strength of Adhesive Bonds,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 61–71, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shokrieh, M., Heidari-Rarani, M., and Rahimi, S., “Influence of Curved Delamination Front on Toughness of Multidirectional DCB Specimens,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 1359–1365, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackman, B., Kinloch, A., Wang, Y., and Williams, J., “The Failure of Fibre Composites and Adhesively Bonded Fibre Composites under High Rates of Test,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 31, No. 17, pp. 4451–4466, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pradeep, K., Nageswara Rao, B., Srinivasan, S., and Balasubramaniam, K., “Interface FRACTURE ASSESSMENT on Honeycomb Sandwich Composite DCB Specimens,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 93, pp. 108–118, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. British Standard, “Determination of the Mode I Adhesive Fracture Energy GIC of Structure Adhesives using the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and Tapered Double Cantilever Beam (TDCB) Specimens,” British Standard Institution, BS7991, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marzi, S., Biel, A., and Stigh, U., “On Experimental Methods to Investigate the Effect of Layer Thickness on the Fracture behavior of Adhesively Bonded Joints,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 840–850, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michailidis, N., Stergioudi, F., Omar, H., and Tsipas, D., “An Imagebased reconstruction of the 3D Geometry of an Al Open-Cell Foam and FEM Modeling of the Material Response,” Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 142–147, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, J. A. and Adams, R. A., “Strength Prediction of Bonded Single Lap Joints by Non-Linear Finite Element Methods,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 65–78, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Ung Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, H.S., Cho, J.U. The characteristics of shear adhesive interface fracture of aluminum foam DCB bonded using a single-lap method. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 1345–1350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0475-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0475-x

Keywords

Navigation