Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the fatigue experiment of TDCB aluminum foam specimen bonded with adhesive

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, TDCB specimen adhesively bonded with aluminum foam, which is the porous metallic material, is fabricated and critical fracture energy is measured in accordance with British standards (BS 7991 and ISO 11343). The specimens are classified by m value into 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 for comparison. “m refers to gradient which is expressed in the length (a) and (height) of the specimen. According to the result of reviewing axial displacement graph on crack length, displacement tends to increase in line with a growing crack, and the less the value of m, the higher the displacement. On the other hand, energy release rate tends to increase based on developing cracks, and the less the value of m, the higher the energy release rate. Based on correlations obtained in this study, the fracture behavior of bonding material is analyzed and aluminum foam material bonded using adhesive is applied to a composite structure in various fields, thereby analyzing the mechanical and fracture characteristics of the material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pirondi, A. and Nicoletto, G., “Fatigue crack growth in bonded DCB specimens,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 71, No. 4–6, pp. 859–871, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shokrieh, M. M., Heidari-Rarani, M., and Rahimi, S., “Influence of curved delamination front on toughness of multidirectional DCB specimens,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 1359–1365, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackman, B. R. K., Dear, J. P., Kinloch, A. J., MacGillivray, H., Wang, Y., Williams, J. G., and Yayla, P., “The failure of fibre composites and adhesively bonded fibre composites under high rates of test,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 31, No. 17, pp. 4467–4477, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pradeep, K. R., Nageswara Rao, B., Srinivasan, S. M., and Balasubramaniam, K., “Interface fracture assessment on honeycomb sandwich composite DCB specimens,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 93, No. 0, pp. 108–118, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marzi, S., Biel, A., and Stigh, U., “On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 840–850, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qiao, P., Wang, J., and Davalos, J. F., “Tapered beam on elastic foundation model for compliance rate change of TDCB specimen,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 339–353, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, J. U., Kinloch, A., Blackman, B., Rodriguez, S., Cho, C. D., and Lee, S. K., “Fracture behaviour of adhesively-bonded composite materials under impact loading,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 89–95, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, V., Ivankovic, A., Karac, A., McAuliffe, D., and Murphy, N., “Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints,” Polymer, Vol. 53, No. 24, pp. 5540–5553, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Michailidis, N., Stergioudi, F., Omar, H., and Tsipas, D. N., “An image-based reconstruction of the 3D geometry of an Al open-cell foam and FEM modeling of the material response,” Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 142–147, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, H., Yang, D., He, S., and He, D., “Fabrication of open-cell Al foam core sandwich by vibration aided liquid phase bonding method and its mechanical properties,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 423–428, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. BS 7991, “Determination of the Mode I Adhesive Fracture Energy GIC of Structure Adhesives Using the Double Cantilever Beam (DBC) and Tapered Double Cantilever Beam (TDCB) Specimens,” 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J. A., Yu, S. R., Hu, Z. Q., Liu, Y. H., and Zhu, X. Y., “Deformation and energy absorption characteristic of Al2O3f/Zn-Al composite foams during compression,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 506, No. 2, pp. 620–625, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO 11343, “Adhesives-Determination of dynamic resistance to cleavage of high strength adhesive bonds under impact conditions-Wedge impact method,” 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raju, P., Rajesh, S., Satyanarayana, B., and Ramji, K., “Evaluation of stress life of aluminum alloy using reliability based approach,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 395–400, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hur, J. W., “An experimental study on fatigue safety life assessment of aircraft engine support structure,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 843–848, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Ung Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SS., Han, MS., Cho, JU. et al. Study on the fatigue experiment of TDCB aluminum foam specimen bonded with adhesive. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 14, 1791–1795 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0239-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0239-z

Keywords

Navigation