Skip to main content
Log in

Left ventricular dyssynchrony and abnormalities in wall motion, assessed by gated-SPECT as ischemic auxiliary markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

A Correction to this article was published on 13 February 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Left ventricular dyssynchrony (LVD) quantified by gated myocardial perfusion studies (MPS), through phase analysis (PA), has shown controversial results in myocardial stunning.

Objectives

Assessment of LVD and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in normal and ischemic patients.

Methods

A cohort of 172 patients were studied. Summed Stress Score (SSS), Summed Resting Score (SRS), and Summed Difference Score (SDS) were evaluated. Group 1-patients with normal MPS (N = 133) and Group 2-patients with myocardial ischemia in the MPS (N = 39). LVD was evaluated through PA and RWM by visual analysis.

Results

SSS 0 vs 9.8 ± 3.9 P = .0001; SDS 0 vs 9.8 ± 3.9 P = .0001; SRS 0 vs 0 P = NS, in G1 and G2. Significant differences were found in LVD between G1 and G2, bandwidth 36 ± 14 vs 63 ± 46 P = .0001; standard deviation 16 ± 10 vs 26 ± 15 P = .0001. In G1, 16% had LVD vs RWMA in 0%, P = .0001 and in G2, 59% with LVD vs 33% with RWMA, P = .03. Sensitivity for LVD 59% and for RWMA 33%, P = .03 and specificity for LVD 83% and for RWMA 100%, P = .0001.

Conclusion

Ischemic patients have LVD post-stress due to myocardial stunning. LVD measured by PA could be a useful tool to identify ischemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 13 February 2019

    In Figure 3, sensitivity and specificity were interchanged. The corrected Figure 3 is shown below. The author names listed in reference 14 have been corrected; the correct reference reads: Nakanishi R, Gransar H, Slomka P, Arsanjani R, Shalev A, Otaki Y, et al. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:530-41. The units of standard deviation (SD) and bandwidth (BW) in the abstract, results and in table 3 are expressed in degrees from 0 to 360°.

Abbreviations

LVD:

Left ventricular dyssynchrony

PA:

Phase analysis

MPS:

Myocardial perfusion study

RWMA:

Regional wall motion abnormalities

SSS:

Summed stress score

SRS:

Summed resting score

SDS:

Summed difference score

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

BW:

Bandwidth

K:

Kurtosis

References

  1. Zoghbi GJ, Iskandrian AE. Nuclear cardiac imaging. Exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (chapter 15). 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, de Yang L, Hayes SM, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:521-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emmett L, Ng A, Ha L, Russo R, Mansberg R, Zhao W, et al. Comparative assessment of rest and post-stress left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction on gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and echocardiography in patients with transient ischaemic dilation on adenosine MPI: Myocardial stunning or subendocardial hypoperfusion? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:735-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camilletti J, Fabris N, Escudero E, Ronderos R, Corneli D, Mele A. Correlacion entre Gated SPECT y Eco 2D en la valoracion de la funcion ventricular izquierda. Rev Fed Arg Cardiol 2000;29:489-93.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, Xavier RC, Nott LT, Campanella NW, et al. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on poststress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1641-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daou D, Coaguila C, Delahaye N, Houzet F, Lebtahi R, Le Guludec D. Discordance between exercise SPECT lung Tl-201 uptake and left ventricular transient ischemic dilation in patients with CAD. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:53-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Tauxe EL, et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by Phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial Perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:687-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marsan NA, Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Ghio S, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography as a novel approach to quantify left ventricular dyssynchrony: A comparison study with phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:801-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AlJaroudi W, Alraies MC, Hachamovitch R, Jaber WA, Brunken R, Cerqueira MD, et al. Association of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with survival benefit from revascularization: A study of gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction and narrow QRS. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:1581-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. AlJaroudi W, Aggarwal H, Venkataraman R, Heo J, Iskandrian AE, Hage FG. Impact of left ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:1058-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial Perfusion SPECT compared to tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1708-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marsan NA, Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Ghio S, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by two three-dimensional imaging modalities: Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:166-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang WS, Huang CH, Lee CL, Chen CP, Hung GU, Chen J. Relation of early post-stress left ventricular dyssynchrony and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:1048-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakanishi R, Gransar H, Slomka P, Doppalapudi H, Venkataraman R, Heo J, et al. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:530-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AlJaroudi W, Koneru J, Heo J, Iskandrian A. Impact of ischemia on left ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:36-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest between the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erick Alexanderson-Rosas MD.

Additional information

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

Funding

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 56264 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camilletti, J., Erriest, J., Espinola-Zavaleta, N. et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony and abnormalities in wall motion, assessed by gated-SPECT as ischemic auxiliary markers. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 27, 2261–2268 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01544-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01544-4

Keywords

Navigation