Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A three-dimensional forward dynamics model of the golf swing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously, forward dynamic models of the golf swing have been planar, two-dimensional (2D) representations. Research on live golfers has consistently demonstrated that the downswing is not planar. This paper introduces and evaluates the validity of a 3D six-segment forward dynamics model of a golfer. The model incorporates a flexible club shaft and a variable swing plane. A genetic algorithm was developed to optimise the coordination of the model’s mathematically represented muscles (torque generators) in order to maximise clubhead speed at impact. The kinematic and kinetic results confirmed previous findings on the proximal to distal sequencing of joints and the muscles powering those joints. The validity of the mathematical model was supported through comparisons of the model’s swing kinematics and kinetics with those of a live golfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman SG, Rankin AJ (2005) A three-dimensional examination of the planar nature of the golf swing. J Sports Sci 23:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neal RJ, Wilson BD (1985) 3D kinematics and kinetics of the golf swing. Int J Sports Biomech 1:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lampsa M (1975) Maximal distance of the golf drive: an optimal control study. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 97:362–367

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vaughan CL (1981) A three-dimensional analysis of the forces and torques applied by a golfer during the downswing. In: Morecki A, Fidelus K, Kedzior K, Wit A (eds) International series of biomechanics VII-B, 1st edn. University Park Press, Warsaw, pp 325–331

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winter DA (2005) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, Mississauga

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sprigings EJ, MacKenzie SJ (2002) Examining the delayed release in the golf swing using computer simulation. Sports Eng 5:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CC, Inoue Y, Shibara K (2007) Numerical study on the wrist action during the golf downswing. Sports Eng 10:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cochran AJ, Stobbs J (1968) The search for the perfect swing. Morrison & Gibb Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgensen TP (1970) On the dynamics of the swing of a golf club. Am J Phys 38:644–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgensen TP (1994) The physics of golf. American Institute of Physics Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milne RD, Davis JP (1992) The role of the shaft in the golf swing. J Biomech 25:975–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pickering WM, Vickers GT (1999) On the double pendulum model of the golf swing. Sports Eng 2:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp RS (2008) On the mechanics of the golf swing. Proc R Soc A 466:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sprigings EJ, Neal RJ (2000) An insight into the importance of wrist torque in driving the golfball: a simulation study. J Appl Biomech 16:356–366

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki S, Haake SJ, Heller BW (2006) Multiple modulation torque planning for a new golf-swing robot with a skilful wrist turn. Sports Eng 9:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams D (1967) The dynamics of the golf swing. Q J Mech Appl Math 20:247–264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nesbit SM (2005) A three dimensional kinematic and kinetic study of the golf swing. J Sports Sci Med 4:499–519

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kenny IC, McCIoy AJ, Wallace ES, Otto SR (2008) Segmental sequencing of kinetic energy in a computer-simulated golf swing. Sports Eng 11:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ashby BM, Delp SL (2006) Optimal control simulations reveal mechanisms by which arm movement improves standing long jump performance. J Biomech 39:1726–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pandy MG, Zajac FE, Sim E, Levine WS (1990) An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping. J Biomech 23:1185–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pandy MG, Zajac FE (1991) Optimal muscular coordination strategies for jumping. J Biomech 24:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miao T, Watari M, Kawaguchi M, Ikeda M (1998) A study of clubhead speed as a function of grip speed for a variety of shaft flexibility. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and Golf III: proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf, 1st edn. Human Kinetics, Leeds, pp 554–561

    Google Scholar 

  23. Budney DR, Bellow DG (1979) Kinetic analysis of a golf swing. Res Q 50:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  24. United States Golf Association (2007) The rules of golf. USGA, USA

  25. MacKenzie SJ (2008) Three dimensional dynamics of the golf swing: a forward dynamics approach with a focus on optimizing shaft stiffness. VDM Verlag, Saarbruecken

    Google Scholar 

  26. Butler JH, Winfield DC (1994) The dynamic performance of the golf shaft during the downswing. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and Golf II: proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf, 1st edn. E & F Spon, London, pp 259–264

    Google Scholar 

  27. Caldwell G (1995) Tendon elasticity and relative length: effects on Hill two-component muscle model. J Appl Biomech 11:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alexander RM (1990) Optimum takeoff techniques for high and long jumps. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 329:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zatsiorsky VM (2002) Kinetics of human motion. Human Kinetics, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacKenzie SJ (2005) Understanding the role of shaft stiffness in the golf swing. PhD dissertation/thesis. University of Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan, Canada. http://library2.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12212005-163850/

  31. Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. McTeigue M, Lamb SR, Mottram R, Pirozzolo F (1994) Spine and hip motion analysis during the golf swing. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and Golf II: proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf, 1st edn. E & FN Spon, London, pp 50–58

    Google Scholar 

  33. Milburn PD (1982) Summation of segmental velocities in the golf swing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schultz A, Haderspeck K, Warwick D, Portillo D (1983) Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks. J Orthop Res 1:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuhlman JR, Iannotti JP, Kelly MJ, Riegler FX, Gevaert ML, Ergin TM (1992) Isokinetic and isometric measurement of strength of external rotation and abduction of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1320–1333

    Google Scholar 

  36. Williams KR, Sih BL (2002) Changes in golf clubface orientation following impact with the ball. Sports Eng 5:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee N, Erickson M, Cherveny P (2002) Measurement of the behavior of the golf club during the golf swing. In: Thain E (ed) Science and Golf IV: proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 375–386

    Google Scholar 

  38. Teu KK, Kim W, Fuss FK, Tan J (2006) The analysis of golf swing as a kinematic chain using dual Euler angle algorithm. J Biomech 39:1227–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for providing funding support. The authors thank Pierre Gervais for the use of the Biomechanics Lab at the University of Alberta, and his Ph.D. student, Steve Leblanc for helping verify the results via high-speed videoing of a live golfer.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sasho James MacKenzie.

Appendix

Appendix

The following graphs, from Butler and Winfield [26], represent the deflection of the clubhead during the downswings of three different golfers (Fig. 10). Each of the golfers attained the same clubhead speed of 46 m/s at impact. Butler and Winfield used strain gauges which collected shaft deflection data at 50,000 Hz. They used the same conventions as the current paper for describing the direction of deflection. Traces representing shaft twisting, which they found to be minimal (<0.6°) as well as data following impact has not been included on the graphs below; this improved the clarity of the graphs and made them easier to compare to Fig. 9 in the current paper. While each of the swings below has unique deflection characteristics, they also all show the same general pattern as the model used in the current paper.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Toe-up/toe-down and lead/lag deflections during the downswings of three different golfers. All traces end at impact with the ball. Reprinted, by permission, from Butler and Winfield [26, pp 261–262], Figs. 1, 2 and 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacKenzie, S.J., Sprigings, E.J. A three-dimensional forward dynamics model of the golf swing. Sports Eng 11, 165–175 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0020-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0020-9

Keywords

Navigation