Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Adhesions to Intraperitoneally Placed Fixation Materials: A Laparoscopic Study in Rats

Adhesions to Fixation Materials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, the nature of the adhesions to fixation materials or to mesh had not been clarified. We examined adhesion formation specific to the fixation material in rats. We designed an experimental laparoscopy setup, and placed four intraperitoneal fixation materials on the peritoneum of rats without a mesh graft. Another group of researchers documented the incidence and intensity of postoperative adhesion formation. The adhesion scores for the nickel-titanium anchor were significantly greater than those for polylactic acid (p = 0.004), a titanium tacker (p < 0.0001), and fibrin glue (p < 0.0001). No adhesions occurred in the fibrin glue group. Fibrin glue is the preferred fixation material because it produced no postoperative adhesions. The nickel-titanium anchor produced heavy adhesions but may be applicable for recurrent hernia cases and in patients with thin abdominal walls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I, Brondon P, Soltz BA, Devore DP (2005) Preliminary assessment of postoperative adhesion formation after laser assisted mesh fixation to the peritoneal surface. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech A 15(2):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joels CS, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Austin C, Norton HJ, Williams TC, Heniford BT (2005) Evaluation of adhesion formation, mesh fixation strength and hydroxyproline content after intraabdominal placement of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh secured using titanium spiral tacks, nitinol anchors, and polypropylene suture or polyglactin 910 suture. Surg Endosc 19(6):780–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Novitsky YW, Harrell AG, Cristiano JA, Paton BL, Norton HJ, Peindl RD, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2007) Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long term intraabdominal implantation in a rabbit. J Surg Res 140:6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kayaoğlu HA, Özkan N, Hazinedaroğlu SM, Ersoy ÖF, Erkek AB, Köseoğlu RD (2005) Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty. J Invest Surg 18(2):89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U, Weiss C, Polivoda M, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V (2005) Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh, influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. Surg Endosc 19(6):798–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eller R, Twaddell C, Poulos E, Jenevein E, McIntire D, Russell S (1994) Abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic hernia repair- an experimental study. Surg Endosc 8:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mc Ginty JJ, Hogle NJ, Mc Carthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19:786–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malazgirt Z, Ulusoy AN, Gok Y, Karagoz F, Tac K (2000) Bioabsorbable membrane prevents adhesions to polypropylene mesh in rats. Hernia 4:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Blanc KA, Stout RW, Kearney MT, Paulson DB (2003) Comparison of adhesion formation associated with Pro-Tack (US Surgical) vs a new mesh fixation device, Salute (ONUX Medical). Surg Endosc 17:1409–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Boffa D, Fowler DI (2004) Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 8:108–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karahasanoğlu T, Onur E, Baca B, Hamzaoğlu I, Pekmezci S, Boler DE, Kılıç N, Altuğ N (2004) Spiral tacks may contribute to intraabdominal adhesion formation. Surg Today 34:860–864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winslow ER, Diaz S, Desai K, Meininger T, Soper NJ, Klingensmith ME (2004) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in a porcine model: what do transfixion sutures add? Surg Endosc 18(3):529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazuji MK, Fadhli HA (1965) Peritoneal adhesions; prevention with povidone and dextran 75. Arch Surg 91(6):872–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Avital S, Bollinger TJ, Wilkinson JD, Marchetti F, Hellinger MD, Sands LR (2005) Preventing intraabdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: an animal study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(1):153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Attwood SEA, Caldwell MTP, Marks P, McDermott M, Stephens RB (1994) Adhesions after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A comparison of extra versus intra peritoneal placement of a polypropylene mesh in an animal model. Surg Endosc 8:777–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zong X, Li S, Chen E, Garlick B, Kim KS, Fang D, Chiu J, Zimmerman T, Brathwaite C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2004) Prevention of postsurgery-induced abdominal adhesions by electrospun bioabsorbable nanofibrous poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based membranes. Ann Surg 240(5):910–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baykal A, Onat D, Raşa K, Renda N, Sayek I (1997) Effects of polyglycolic acid and polypropylene meshes on postoperative adhesion formation in mice. World J Surg 21:579–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, LaPerle KM, Fowler DI (2004) Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model. Hernia 8:358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saed GM, Kruger M, Diamond MP (2004) Expression of transforming growt factor –beta and extracellular matrix by human peritoneal mesothelial cells and by fibroblasts from normal peritoneum and adhesions: effect of Tisseel. Wound Repair Regen 12(5):557–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Katkhouda N (2004) A new technique for laparoscopic hernia repair using fibrin sealant. Surg Technol Int 12:120–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulze S, Kristiansen VB, Hansen BF, Rosenberg J (2005) Biological tissue adhesive for mesh application in pigs. Surg Endosc 19:342–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzales R, Rodeheaver GT, Moody DL, Foresman PA, Ramshaw BJ (2004) Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity. Hernia 8:213–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bulent Gungor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gungor, B., Malazgirt, Z., Topgül, K. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Adhesions to Intraperitoneally Placed Fixation Materials: A Laparoscopic Study in Rats. Indian J Surg 72, 475–480 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0168-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0168-3

Keywords

Navigation