Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The ideal mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is not yet identified.

Methods

We laparoscopically placed polypropylene (PPM), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), and polyester with antiadhesive collagen layer (PCO) in eight pigs using sutures and tacks for fixation. After 28-day survival, we compared adhesion formation, fibrous ingrowth, and shrinkage among the types of mesh.

Results

Mean area of adhesions to PCO (8.25%) was less than that to ePTFE (57.14%, p < 0.001) or PPM (79.38%, p < 0.001). Adhesions peel strength was less for PCO (2.3 N) than for PPM (16.1 N, p < 0.001) or ePTFE (8.8 N, p = 0.02). Peel strength of mesh from the abdominal wall was less for ePTFE (1.3 N/cm of mesh width) than for PCO (2.8 N/cm, p = 0.001) or PPM (2.1 N/cm, p = 0.05). ePTFE area (94.4 cm2) was less than that for PCO (118.6 cm2, p < 0.001) or PPM (140.7 cm2, p < 0.02).

Conclusion

PCO had fewer and less severe adhesions than ePTFE or PPM while facilitating excellent ingrowth of the adjacent parietal tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PK Amid AG Shulman IL Lichtenstein et al. (1994) ArticleTitleExperimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines J Biomed Mater Res 28 373–375 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jbm.820280312 Occurrence Handle8077252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JM Bellon LA Contreras J Bujan et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of relaparotomy through previously integrated polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene experimental implants in the abdominal wall J Am Coll Surg 188 466–472 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00029-0 Occurrence Handle10235573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Doffa D, Fowler DF (2004) Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 18: 108–112

    Google Scholar 

  4. H Ellis BJ Moran JN Thompson et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAdhesion related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study Lancet 353 1476–1480 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4 Occurrence Handle10232313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. BT Heniford A Park BJ Ramshaw G Voeller (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias Ann Surg 238 391–400 Occurrence Handle14501505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Z Kaufman M Engelberg M Zager (1981) ArticleTitleFecal fistula: a late complication of Marlex mesh repair Dis Col Rectum 24 53–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. GE Leber JL Garb AL Alexander et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLong term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias Arch Surg 133 378–382 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378 Occurrence Handle9565117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RW Luijendijk DC Lange Particlede CC Wauters et al. (1996) ArticleTitleForeign material in postoperative adhesions Ann Surg 223 242–248 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003 Occurrence Handle8604903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, vand den Tol MP, et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343: 392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F Marchal L Brunaud H Sebbag et al. (1999) ArticleTitleTreatment of incisional hernias by placement of an intraperitoneal prosthesis: a series of 128 patients Hernia 3 141–147 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01195314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. BD Matthews BL Pratt HS Pollnger et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAssessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh J Surg Res 114 126–132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00158-6 Occurrence Handle14559437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D Mutter FR Jamali GT Moody et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe concept of protected mesh to minimize adhesion foraiation in inteaperitoneal abdominal wall reinforcement. Preclinical evaluation of a new composite mesh Hernia 4 S3–S9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01387175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AE Park DW Birch P Lorics (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study Surgery 124 816–822 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.1998.92102 Occurrence Handle9781006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Rives JC Pire JB Flament et al. (1985) ArticleTitleTreatment of large eventrations. New therapeutic indications apropos of 322 cases Chirurgie 111 215–225 Occurrence Handle2934236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. RE Stoppa (1989) ArticleTitleThe treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias World J Surg 13 545–554 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01658869 Occurrence Handle2683400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M Therin D Mutter P Diemunsch GT Rodeheaver (1998) ArticleTitlePreclinical evaluation of a new composite mesh (collagen-polyester) for intraperitoneal hernia repair with the selective property of tissue incorporation on one side without adhesion formation on the opposite side Hernia 2 S27

    Google Scholar 

  17. GR Voeller B Ramshaw AE Park BT Heniford (1999) ArticleTitleIncisional hemia J Am Coll Surg 189 635–637 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00224-0 Occurrence Handle10589602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. GE Wantz (1991) ArticleTitleIncisional hernioplasty with Mersilene Surg Gynecol Obrstet 172 129–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by a grant from Sofradim Corporation, Trévoux, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. L. Fowler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGinty, J.J., Hogle, N.J., McCarthy, H. et al. A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19, 786–790 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8174-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8174-9

Keywords

Navigation