Skip to main content
Log in

Preventing Intra-Abdominal Adhesions With Polylactic Acid Film: An Animal Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an absorbable polylactic acid film (SurgiWrapTM) in preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in an animal model.

METHODS

Forty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent laparotomy with subsequent cecal wall abrasion and abdominal wall injury. Rats were divided equally between untreated and treated groups. Treated rats had a polylactic acid film (SurgiWrapTM) placed between the cecal and abdominal wall defects. Rats in the untreated group received no barrier material. The animals were killed on postoperative day 21. Two blinded observers, using predetermined criteria, graded the cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions and estimated the percent of cecal surface area involved in the adhesion. The adhesions were classified as absent, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

Four rats died postoperatively. Of surviving rats, all of the rats in the untreated group had cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions, whereas 42.1 percent of rats in the treated group had no adhesions between the cecum and the abdominal wall (two-tailed, P = 0.001). Altogether, 28.6 percent and 71.4 percent of untreated rats experienced moderate and severe adhesions, respectively, compared to 47.4 percent and 10.5 percent of treated rats (two-tailed, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Strategic placement of polylactic acid film during abdominal surgery is associated with a significantly reduced rate and severity of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in this model. A technique for film placement is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D Menzies (1992) ArticleTitlePeritoneal adhesions. Incidence cause, and prevention Surg Annu 24 27–45 Occurrence Handle1727325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H Ellis BJ Moran JN Thompson et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAdhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study Lancet 353 1476–80 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3kslaksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10232313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. H Ellis (1997) ArticleTitleThe clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction Eur J Surg Suppl 577 5–9 Occurrence Handle9076446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JF Hulka (1982) ArticleTitleAdnexal adhesions: a prognostic staging and classification system based on a five-year survey of fertility surgery results at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Am J Obstet Gynecol 144 141–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL383otFGhug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6214187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. V Gomel B Urman T Gurgan (1996) ArticleTitlePathophysiology of adhesion formation and strategies for prevention J Reprod Med 41 35–41 Occurrence Handle8855074 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fgslyitw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. HG Saravelos TC Li (1996) ArticleTitlePhysical barriers in adhesion prevention J Reprod Med 41 42–51 Occurrence Handle8855075 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FgslyitA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DW Cahill GJ Martin SuffixJr MV Hajjar W Sonstein LB Graham RW Engelman (2003) ArticleTitleSuitability of bioresorbable cages for anterior cervical fusion J Neurosurg 98 195–201 Occurrence Handle12650405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R Dunn MD Lyman PG Edelman PK Campbell (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the SprayGel adhesion barrier in the rat cecum abrasion and rabbit uterine horn adhesion models Fertil Steril 75 411–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01677-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ktlCnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11172849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MG Hull CM Glazener NJ Kelly et al. (1985) ArticleTitlePopulation study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility BMJ 291 1693–710 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1693 Occurrence Handle3935248 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FnvVCnsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. AM Kappas GH Barsoum JB Ortiz MR Keighley (1992) ArticleTitlePrevention of peritoneal adhesions in rats with verapamil, hydrocortisone sodium succinate, and phosphatidylcholine Eur J Surg 158 33–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383itlWqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1348638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AG Turkcapar C Ozarslan E Erdem C Bumin N Erverdi J Kutlay (1995) ArticleTitleThe effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin on adhesion formation in experimental rat model Int Surg 80 92–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzos1emtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7657504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. C Belluco F Meggiolaro D Pressato et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePrevention of postsurgical adhesions with an autocrosslinked hyaluronan derivative gel J Surg Res 100 217–21 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jsre.2001.6248 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntlOksbY%3D Occurrence Handle11592796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. BW Hellebrekers GC Trimbos-Kemper CA Blitterswijk Particlevan EA Bakkum JB Trimbos (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of five different barrier materials on postsurgical adhesion formation in the rat Hum Reprod 15 1358–63 Occurrence Handle10.1093/humrep/15.6.1358 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ptlaguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10831569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. LE Claes AA Ignatius KE Rehm C Scholz (1996) ArticleTitleNew bioresorbable pin for the reduction of small bony fragments: design, mechanical properties and in vitro degradation Biomaterials 17 1621–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0142-9612(95)00327-4 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XkvFWis70%3D Occurrence Handle8842367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. RK Kulkarni KC Pani C Neuman F Leonard (1966) ArticleTitlePolylactic acid for surgical implants Arch Surg 93 839–43 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaF2s%2FitFCrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle5921307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K Bessho T Iizuka K Murakami (1997) ArticleTitleA bioabsorbable poly-l-lactide miniplate and screw system for osteosynthesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 941–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90065-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svktVWqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9294503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. WC Welch KA Thomas GB Cornwall et al. (2002) ArticleTitleUse of polylactide resorbable film as an adhesion barrier J Neurosurg 97 413–22 Occurrence Handle12449195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. L Holmdahl B Risberg DE Beck et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAdhesions: pathogenesis and prevention – panel discussion and summary Eur J Surg 577(Suppl) 58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Division of Veterinary Resources at the University of Miami School of Medicine, particularly clinical veterinarian Dr. Donna Avison and veterinary staff members Ms. Martha Mineau and Mr. James Geary for their dedication to maintaining the animals and to seeing that procedures in the operating room went smoothly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence R. Sands M.D..

Additional information

Macropore Biosurgery, Inc. supported this work.

About this article

Cite this article

Avital, S., Bollinger, T., Wilkinson, J. et al. Preventing Intra-Abdominal Adhesions With Polylactic Acid Film: An Animal Study. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 153–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0748-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0748-z

Key words

Navigation