Abstract
There is a growing interest in the use of bioinoculants to assist mineral fertilizers in improving crop production and yield. Azotobacter and Pseudomonas are two agriculturally relevant strains of bacteria which have been established as efficient bioinoculants. An experiment involving addition of graded concentrations of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles was undertaken using log phase cultures of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas. Growth kinetics revealed a clear trend of gradual decrease with Pseudomonas; however, Azotobacter exhibited a twofold enhancement in growth with increase in the concentration of ZnO concentration. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), supported by energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyses, illustrated the significant effect of ZnO nanoparticles on Azotobacter by the enhancement in the abundance of globular biofilm-like structures and the intracellular presence of ZnO, with the increase in its concentration. It can be surmised that extracellular mucilage production in Azotobacter may be providing a barrier to the nanoparticles. Further experiments with Azotobacter by inoculation of wheat and tomato seeds with ZnO nanoparticles alone or bacteria grown on ZnO-infused growth medium revealed interesting results. Vigour index of wheat seeds reduced by 40–50% in the presence of different concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles alone, which was alleviated by 15–20%, when ZnO and Azotobacter were present together. However, a drastic 50–60% decrease in vigour indices of tomato seeds was recorded, irrespective of Azotobacter inoculation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auld DS (2001) Zinc coordination sphere in biochemical zinc sites. Biometals 14:271–313. doi:10.1023/A:1012976615056
Chopra I (2007) The increasing use of silver-based products as antimicrobial agents: a useful development or a cause for concern? J Antimicrob Chemother 59:587–590. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm006
Dalton H, Postgate JR (1969) Growth and physiology of Azotobacter chroococcum in continuous culture. Microbiology 56:309–317. doi:10.1099/00221287-56-3-307
De La Rosa G, López-Moreno ML, Hernández-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa PR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2013) Effects of ZnO nanoparticles in alfalfa, tomato, and cucumber at the germination stage: root development and X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies. Pure Appl Chem 85:2161–2174. doi:10.1351/pac-con-12-09-05
Dhas SP, Shiny PJ, Khan S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2014) Toxic behaviour of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles on environmental microorganisms. J Basic Microbiol 54:916–927. doi:10.1002/jobm.201200316
Dimkpa CO, Calde A, Britt DW, McLean JE, Anderson AJ (2011) Responses of a soil bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 to commercial metal oxide nanoparticles compared with responses to metal ions. Environ Pollut 159:1749–1756. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.020
Gorczyca A, Pociecha E, Kasprowicz M, Niemiec M (2015) Effect of nanosilver in wheat seedlings and Fusarium culmorum culture systems. Eur J Plant Pathol 142:251–261. doi:10.1007/s10658-015-0608-9
Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195. doi:10.1104/pp.26.1.192
He L, Liu Y, Mustapha A, Lin M (2011) Antifungal activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. Microbiol Res 166:207–215. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2010.03.003
Herrmann R, García-García FJ, Reller A (2014) Rapid degradation of zinc oxide nanoparticles by phosphate ions. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:2007–2015. doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.209
Khare SK, Sinha R, Karan R, Sinha A (2011) Interaction and nanotoxic effect of ZnO and Ag nanoparticles on mesophilic and halophilic bacterial cells. Bioresour Technol 102:1516–1520. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.117
Kumari M, Khan SS, Pakrashi S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2011) Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on root cells of Allium cepa. J Hazard Mater 190:613–621. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.095
Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1915–1921. doi:10.1897/07-481.1
Lin D, Xing B (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ Pollut 150:243–250. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016
Lin D, Xing B (2008) Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42:5580–5585. doi:10.1021/es800422x
Ma X, Geisler-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A (2010) Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ 408:3053–3061. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.031
Mahajan P, Dhoke SK, Khanna AS (2011) Effect of nano-ZnO particle suspension on growth of mung (Vigna radiata) and gram (Cicer arietinum) seedlings using plant agar method. J Nanotechnol Article ID 696535 7 pages 2011. doi: 10.1155/2011/696535
Mallevre F, Fernandes TF, Aspray TJ (2014) Silver, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticle ecotoxicity to bioluminescent Pseudomonas putida in laboratory medium and artificial wastewater. Environ Pollut 195:218–225. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.002
Miralles P, Church TL, Harris AT (2012) Toxicity, uptake and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ Sci Technol 46:9224–9239. doi:10.1021/es202995d
Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E (2012) The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Sci Total Environ 438:225–232. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.066
Mousavi Kouhi SM, Lahouti M, Ganjeali A, Entezari MH (2015) Long-term exposure of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to ZnO nanoparticles: anatomical and ultrastructural responses. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:10733–10743. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4306-0
Nain L, Rana A, Joshi M, Jadhav SD, Kumar D, Shivay YS, Paul S, Prasanna R (2010) Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat. Plant Soil 331:217–230. doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0247-z
Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839. doi:10.1289/ehp.7339
Palmqvist NGM, Bejai S, Meijer J, Seisenbaeva GA, Kessler VG (2015) Nano titania aided clustering and adhesion of beneficial bacteria to plant roots to enhance crop growth and stress management. Sci Rep 5:1–12. doi:10.1038/srep10146
Pokhrel LR, Dubey B (2013) Evaluation of developmental responses of two crop plants exposed to silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 452:321–332. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.059
Prasanna R, Kumar A, Babu S, Chawla G, Chaudhary V, Singh S, Gupta V, Nain L, Saxena AK (2013) Deciphering the biochemical spectrum of novel cyanobacterium based biofilms for use as inoculants. Biol Agric Hortic 29:145–158. doi:10.1080/01448765.2013.790303
Raffi M, Hussain F, Bhatti TM, Akhter JI, Hameed A, Hassan MM (2008) Antibacterial characterization of silver nanoparticles against E. coli ATCC-15224. J Mater Sci Technol 24:2192–2196
Raghupathi KR, Koodali TR, Manna AC (2011) Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 27:4020–4028. doi:10.1021/la104825u
Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agric Res 2:48–57. doi:10.1007/s40003-012-0049-z
Raliya R, Biswas P, Tarafdar JC (2015) TiO2 nanoparticle biosynthesis and its physiological effect on mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Biotechnol Rep 5:22–26. doi:10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.009
Rana A, Joshi M, Prasanna R, Shivay YS, Nain L (2012) Biofortification of wheat through inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and cyanobacteria. Eur J Soil Biol 50:118–126. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.01.005
Rana A, Saharan B, Joshi M, Prasanna R, Kumar K, Nain L (2011) Identification of multi trait PGPR isolates and evaluating their potential as inoculants for wheat. Ann Microbiol 61:893–900. doi:10.1007/s13213-011-0211-z
Reed RB, Ladner DA, Higgins CP, Westerhoff P, Ranville JF (2012) Solubility of nano-zinc oxide in environmentally and biologically important matrices. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:93–99. doi:10.1002/etc.708
Sil PC, Sarkar A, Ghosh M (2014) Nanotoxicity: oxidative stress mediated toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:730–743. doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.8752
Tarafdar JC, Raliya R, Mahawar H, Rathore I (2014) Development of zinc nanofertilizer to enhance crop production in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum). Agric Res 3:257–262. doi:10.1007/s40003-014-0113-y
Vijayaraghavan R, Padmavathy N (2008) Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles—an antimicrobial study. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9:35004–35010. doi:10.1088/1468-6996/9/3/035004
Vu B, Chen M, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EI (2009) Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides involved in biofilm formation. Molecules 14:2535–2554. doi:10.3390/molecules14072535
Wu L, Zaborina O, Zaborin A, Chang EB, Musch M, Holbrook C, Shapiro J, Turner JR, Wu G, Lee KYC, Alverdy JC (2004) High-molecular-weight polyethylene glycol prevents lethal sepsis due to intestinal Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gastroenterology 126:488–498. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.011
Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, Shi H, Yeh JI, Zink JI, Nel AE (2008) Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 2:2121–2134. doi:10.1021/nn800511k
Yamamoto O (2008) Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Intl J Inorg Mat 3:643–646. doi:10.1016/S1466-6049(01)00197-0
Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D (2007) Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J Nanopart Res 9:479–489. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9150-1
Zucconi F, Forte M, Monaco A, Bertoldi M (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. Biocycle 22:27–29
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to ICAR for providing funds through the projects, National Fund for Basic, Strategic and Frontier Application Research in Agriculture and ICAR—AMAAS, towards undertaking the research work.
Authors’ contributions
AB contributed to the experimental conception, design and its implementation, along with the acquisition of data and its interpretation, besides drafting the manuscript. RT and AS were also involved in the experimentation, acquisition of data and analyses. SS provided critical suggestions for improving the manuscript. RP and LN provided valuable inputs to the editing of the manuscript, particularly in writing the discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Fig. 1
EDX Spectra obtained for Azotobacter chroococcum W5 sample treated with zinc oxide nanoparticles (PPT 337 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boddupalli, A., Tiwari, R., Sharma, A. et al. Elucidating the interactions and phytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles with agriculturally beneficial bacteria and selected crop plants. Folia Microbiol 62, 253–262 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0495-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0495-x