Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An investigation was undertaken to screen, select and evaluate a set of bacterial and cyanobacterial isolates from the wheat rhizosphere for their role as biofertilizers in wheat. From an initial set of 23 cyanobacterial strains and 110 bacterial isolates from wheat rhizospheric soil, 3 bacterial and 3 cyanobacterial strains were selected based on their plant growth promoting potential under laboratory and controlled greenhouse conditions. In vitro compatibility studies revealed positive interactions among the six strains. Pot experiments were conducted with wheat variety HD 2687, with a total of 51 treatments, along with recommended fertilizer controls. Various combinations of the selected set of three bacterial (PW1, PW5 and PW7) and three cyanobacterial isolates (CW1, CW2 and CW3) were used along with 1/3 N and full dose of P and K fertilizers. Significant enhancement in the soil microbiological (Dehydrogenase activity, FDA hydrolase, Alkaline phosphatase and microbial biomass) and plant growth/yield parameters were recorded. Observations revealed a two-fold increase in panicle weight in selected combinations (PW1+PW7+CW3; PW1+ CW1+CW2/CW1+CW3; CW2+CW3), as compared to control treatment involving full dose of chemical fertilizers. Such combinations, which also provided N savings of 40–80 kg N/ha are being further evaluated in field experiments. This study for the first time illustrated the positive and dynamic interactions among bacterial and cyanobacterial strains and their promise in integrated nutrient management of wheat crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD, Jastrow JD (2006) Activities of extracellular enzymes in physically isolated fractions of restored grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3245–3256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Khalid A (2002) Plant growth regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv Agron 62:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Casida LE Jr, Klein DA, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98:371–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1993) Significance and potential use of soil enzymes. In: Blaine F (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Applications in agricultural and environmental managment. Dekker, New York, pp 95–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2003) Plant growth promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:107–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot LF, Lynch JM (1984) Pseudomonas as a factor in the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Soil Biochem 16:69–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WT Jr, Dick WA (1983) Relationship between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:945–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frieberg E (1998) Microclimatic parameters influencing nitrogen fixation in the phyllosphere in a Costa Rican premontane rain forest. Oecologia 117:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gantar M, Kerby NW, Rowell P, Obreht Z (1991) Colonization of wheat (Triticum vulgare L.) by nitrogen fixing cyanobacteria: I. a survey of soil cyanobacterial isolates forming associations with roots. New Phytol 118:477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Bashan Y (1997) Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of phytopathogens. Biotechnol Adv 15:353–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green VS, Stott DE, Diack M (2006) Assay of fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity-optimization of soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 38:693–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal P, Prasanna R, Nayak S, Sood A, Suseela MR (2008) Characterization of rhizo-cyanobacteria and their associations with wheat seedlings. Egyptian J Biol 10:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan N, Prasanna R, Lata N, Kaushik BD (2007) Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat. Eur J Soil Biol 43:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan N, Prasanna R, Sood A, Jaiswal P, Nayak S, Kaushik BD (2009) Physiological characterization and electron microscopic investigations of cyanobacteria associated with wheat rhizosphere. Folia Microbiol 54:43–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96(3):473–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW (1993) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. In: Metting FB Jr (ed) Soil microbial ecology-applications in agricultural and environmental management. Dekker, New York, pp 255–274

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinney G (1941) Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J Biol Chem 140:315–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak S, Prasanna R, Pabby A, Dominic TK, Singh PK (2004) Effect of urea and BGA-Azolla biofertilizers on nitrogen fixation and chlorophyll accumulation in soil cores from rice fields. Biol Fertil Soils 40:67–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Normander B, Prosser JI (2000) Bacterial origin and community composition in the barley phytosphere as a function of habitat and pre-sowing conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4372–4377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan N, Morgan MA, Herlihy M (1998) Ultraviolet absorbance (280 nm) of compounds released from soil during Chloroform fumigation as an estimate of the microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 30(12):1599–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna R, Tripathi U, Dominic TK, Singh AK, Yadav AK, Singh PK (2003) An improvised technique for measurement of nitrogen fixation by blue-green algae and Azolla using intact soil cores. Expl Agric 39:145–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna R, Jaiswal P, Singh YV, Singh PK (2008) Influence of biofertilizers and organic amendments on nitrogenase activity and phototrophic biomass of soil under wheat. Acta Agron Hung 56(2):149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna R, Jaiswal P, Nayak S, Sood A, Kaushik BD (2009a) Cyanobacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of rice and its ecological significance. Indian J Microbiol 49:89–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna R, Nain L, Ancha R, Shrikrishna J, Joshi M, Kaushik BD (2009b) Rhizosphere dynamics of inoculated cyanobacteria and their growth-promoting role in rice crop. Egyptian J Biol 11:26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai AN, Bergman B (2002) Creation of new nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria associations. Proc Royal Irish Acad 102B:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippka R (1972) Photoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy among unicellular blue-green algae. Arch Microbiol 87:94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilising bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley HW Jr, Van Demark PJ (1962) Microbes in action-a laboratory manual of microbiology. Freeman, USA, pp 52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Shende ST, Apte RG, Singh T (1977) Influence of Azotobacter on germination of rice and cotton seeds. Curr Sci 46(19):675–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit E, Leeflang P, Gommans S, Van den Broek J, Van Mil S, Wernars K (2001) Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2284–2291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanier RY, Kunisawa R, Mandel M, Cohen-Bazire G (1971) Purification and properties of unicellular blue green algae (Order: Chroococcales). Bacteriol Rev 35:171–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasari E, Patwardhan AM (2007) Effects of Azotobacter and Azospirillium inoculations and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of Canola. Asian J Plant Sci 6(1):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radha Prasanna.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Petra Marschner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nain, L., Rana, A., Joshi, M. et al. Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat. Plant Soil 331, 217–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0247-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0247-z

Keywords

Navigation