Skip to main content
Log in

Environmentally Benign Dyeing of Polyester Fabric with Madder: Modelling by Artificial Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Optimized by Genetic Algorithm

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, polyester fabric was dyed with madder as an environmentally friendly natural dye. According to Box-Behnken experimental design, 46 samples were dyed under various levels of five parameters including dye concentration, dyebath pH, temperature, time, and liquor ratio, and the color strength (K/S) of the dyed samples was measured. To evaluate the effect of each parameter on the color strength, the data was evaluated using multiple analysis of variance. Then, the artificial neural network (ANN) and fuzzy logic models were used to predict the measured K/S values. As both models contain different parameters, the genetic algorithm was implemented to optimize the model accuracy. It was observed that the best obtained ANN and fuzzy models can predict the K/S values with mean absolute percentage error of 2.52 and 3.01, respectively. Also, the effect of each input parameter on ANN was determined according to the partial derivative method and it was found that the maximum and minimum effects on ANN corresponds to dye concentration and liquor ratio, respectively. Finally, the effects of each dyeing parameter on the color strength was investigated based on the established optimal ANN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Baaka, W. Haddar, M. Ben Ticha, and M. F. Mhenni, J. Nat. Fibers, 16, 652 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. İ. Bahtiyari and F. Yilmaz, Ind. Textila, 69, 369 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kadam, A. Sharma, S.-U. Islam, I. Bramhecha, and J. Sheikh, J. Nat. Fibers., 17, 1508 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Yusuf, M. Shabbir, and F. Mohammad, Nat. Prod. Bioprospect., 7, 123 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Jabli, N. Sebeia, M. Boulares, and K. Faidi, Ind. Crop. Prod., 108, 690 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Haji, Mater. Sci., 18, 267 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. J. Rather, Q. F. Dar, Q. Zhou, L. Haofan, and Q. Li, J. Text. Inst., doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1779166 (2020).

  8. A. Singh and J. Sheikh, Sustainable Chem. Pharm., 17, 100286 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Gong, L. J. Rather, Q. Zhou, W. Wang, and Q. Li, J. Text. Inst., 111, 1038 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Dumitrescu, S. P. Vankar, J. Srivastava, A. M. Mocioiu, and O. G. Iordache, Ind. Textila, 63, 327 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Haji, Color. Technol., 136, 137 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Haji, J. Text. Inst., 111, 467 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Haji, S. S. Qavamnia, and F. K. Bizhaem, Ind. Text., 67, 244 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Haji, S. Ashraf, M. Nasiriboroumand, and C. Lievens, Fiber. Polym., 21, 743 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Haji, Pigm. Resin Technol., 49, 483 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Adeel, S. Kiran, N. Habib, A. Hassan, S. Kamal, M. A. Qayyum, and K. Tariq, Text. Res. J., 90, 744 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Baaka, W. Haddar, M. Ben Ticha, M. T. P. Amorim, and M. F. M’Henni, Nat. Prod. Res., 31, 1655 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Adeel, M. Hussaan, F. U. Rehman, N. Habib, M. Salman, S. Naz, N. Amin, and N. Akhtar, J. Nat. Fibers., 16, 1026 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kiran, A. Hassan, S. Adeel, M. A. Qayyum, M. S. Yousaf, M. Abdullah, and N. Habib, Ind. Text., 71, 227 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Tayyab, A. A. Javeed, R. Y. Sayed, A. Mudassar, R. Faisal, F. Ahmad, W. Wang, and A. Muhammad, Ind. Text., 71, 350 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Sebeia, M. Jabli, H. Ghanmi, A. Ghith, and T. A. Saleh, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 21 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Adeel, F.-U. Rehman, M. Kaleem Khosa, T. Anum, M. Shahid, K. Mahmood Zia, and M. Zuber, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 39, 159 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Baaka, A. Mahfoudhi, W. Haddar, M. F. Mhenni, and Z. Mighri, Nat. Prod. Res., 31, 22 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Syrine, M. Jabli, S. B. Abdessalem, and S. G. Almalki, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 145, 1106 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Haji, Cell. Chem. Technol., 51, 975 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Ul Islam and B. S. Butola, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 124, 708 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Elnagar, T. Abou Elmaaty, and S. Raouf, J. Text., 2014, 363079 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Dave, L. Ledwani, N. Chandwani, P. Kikani, B. Desai, M. B. Chowdhuri, and S. K. Nema, Compos. Interfaces, 19, 219 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Dave, L. Ledwani, N. Chandwani, P. Kikani, B. Desai, and S. Nema, J. Polym. Mater., 30, 291 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Shahidi, M. Ghoranneviss, and J. Wiener, J. Plast. Film Sheeting, 31, 286 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. F. Shahin, R. M. Ahmed, and M. M. Marie, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 4, 35 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. A. Rahman Bhuiyan, A. Ali, A. Islam, M. A. Hannan, S. M. Fijul Kabir, and M. N. Islam, Fashion Text., 5, 2 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. L. R. Liman, M. T. Islam, M. M. Hossain, and P. Sarker, Fiber. Polym., 21, 2301 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. T. Abate, Y. Zhou, J. Guan, G. Chen, A. Ferri, and V. Nierstrasz, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 157, 104703 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. M. T. Abate, A. Ferri, J. Guan, G. Chen, and V. Nierstrasz, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 152, 104548 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. N. Vedaraman, K. V. Sandhya, N. R. B. Charukesh, B. Venkatakrishnan, K. Haribabu, M. R. Sridharan, and R. Nagarajan, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., 114, 46 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Ben Ticha, W. Haddar, N. Meksi, A. Guesmi, and M. F. Mhenni, Carbohydr. Polym., 154, 287 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Haji, M. Nasiriboroumand, and S. S. Qavamnia, Fiber. Polym., 19, 2359 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Haji and M. Rahimi, J. Nat. Fibers, https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1821293 (2020).

  40. A. Haji and P. Payvandy, Pigm. Resin Technol., 49, 171 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. M. R. Gadekar and M. M. Ahammed, J. Environ. Manage., 231, 241 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. P. Soltani, M. Vadood, and M. S. Johari, Fiber. Polym., 13, 1190 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Vadood, P. Kheirkhah Barzoki, and M. Safar Johari, J. Text. Inst., 108, 2166 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Kheirkhah Barzoki, M. Vadood, and M. Safar Johari, J. Text. Polym., 4, 101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Vadood, J. Text. Inst., 105, 779 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. V. Ghorbani, M. Vadood, and M. S. Johari, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 41, 19 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Vadood and D. Semnani, Fiber. Polym., 12, 821 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. R. R. Yager and D. P. Filev, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2, 209 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Gevrey, I. Dimopoulos, and S. Lek, Ecol. Modell., 160, 249 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. P. M. d. S. Silva, V. H. Franca, R. S. d. Queiroz, F. S. d. Lima, H. S. Freeman, S. A. d. Costa, and S. M. D. Costa, Nat. Prod. Res., doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2021.1872567 (2021).

  51. M. Shabbir, S. U. Islam, M. N. Bukhari, L. J. Rather, M. A. Khan, and F. Mohammad, Text. Clothing Sustainability, 2016, 1 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. Shabbir, L. J. Rather, I. Shahid ul, M. N. Bukhari, M. Shahid, M. A. Khan, and F. Mohammad, J. Adv. Res., 7, 473 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. S. M. M. Kabir and J. Koh, Fiber. Polym., 18, 2315 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. G. Agarwal, A. Perwuelz, L. Koehl, and K. S. Lee, J. Surfactants Deterg., 15, 97 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. M. Teli, R. D. Kale, and L. Bhatt, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 42, 125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. Sen, A. Bhowal, and S. Datta, Prog. Color Color. Coat., 11, 165 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. T. Agnhage, A. Perwuelz, and N. Behary, Vlakna Text., 23, 4 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. G. Gedik, O. Avinc, A. Yavas, and A. Khoddami, Fiber. Polym., 15, 261 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Vadood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haji, A., Vadood, M. Environmentally Benign Dyeing of Polyester Fabric with Madder: Modelling by Artificial Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Optimized by Genetic Algorithm. Fibers Polym 22, 3351–3357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-1161-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-1161-0

Keywords

Navigation