Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between the Surface Properties of the Textiles and the Deposition of Cationic Softener

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

In this study we categorised the surface properties of different knitted fabrics by their electro-kinetic behaviour and liquid up-take phenomena of the knitted textiles in order to understand the interaction of the surface properties of the textiles with cationic softener deposition. The electro-kinetic and liquid uptake properties of textiles were measured by their zeta-potential and liquid absorption ability. We also examined the influence of fabric softener on the surface characteristics of the textiles. We used solvent extraction followed by cationic titration to determine the cationic softener level present on the textiles. The major finding of this study was the different behaviour of individual loads and mixed loads in terms of cationic pick up from the rinse cycle softener. Fibre type plays the most critical role in determining the zeta potential of the fibre, filtration efficiency and water retaining capability of the fabrics, which in turn play the most important role in softener deposition on the textile. The charge on the textile surface is negative; this plays a key role in the deposition of the cationic softener in both kinds of loading conditions. Capillary diffusion could be a key parameter only in the individual load condition. It was found that there is a significant reduction in the liquid adsorption weight when fabrics are treated with levels of softener that are much higher than those associated with normal consumer use. As soon as the fabric comes into contact with the liquid, the fabric softener molecules transfer from the fabric to the liquid and reduce the surface energy of the liquid. This results in an increase in the wetting weight of the fabric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laughlin RG (1991) Fabric softening in cationic surfactants physical chemistry. In: Rubingh DN, PM Holland (eds) Marcel Dekker. New York, Surfactant science series, 37, 449

  2. Prasad AK (2007) Novel effects in garment processing and value added finishes. J Textile Association 39–43

  3. Mishra S, Tayagi VK (2007) Ester quats: the novel class of cationic fabric softeners. J Oleo Sci 56:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daukanitiene V, Bernotiene B, Gutauskas M (2005) Textile hand: the influence of multiplex washing and chemical liquid softener. Fib Tex Eastern Europe 13:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Linfield MW, Sherrill CJ, Davis AG, Raschke MR (1958) Fabric treatment with cationic softeners. J Am Oil Chem Soc 35:590–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levinson LM (1999) Rinse added fabric softener technology at the close of the twentieth century. J Surf Deterg 2:223–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kong YC, Tildesley DJ, Alejandre J (1997) The molecular dynamics of boundary-layer lubrication. Mol Phys 92:7–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumert JK, Penney JC, Carroloton (1996) Influence of household fabrics softeners on properties of selected woven fabrics. Tex Chemist Colorist 28:36–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bishop DP Physical and chemical effects of domestic laundering process. Chemistry Textile Industry 195: 125–172

  10. Schindler WD, Hauser PJ (2004) Softening finishes. Chemical finishes of textiles, Woodhead Publishing 29–42

  11. Reddy N, Salam A, Yang Y (2008) Effect of structures and concentrations of softeners on the performance properties and durability to laundering of cotton fabrics. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:2502–2510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carrion FJ (2006) The influence of the temperature on the sorption of microemulsionated cationic softeners on cotton. Coll Surf A 288:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal G, Koehl L, Perwuelz A (2010) The influence of constructional properties of knitted fabrics on cationic softener pick up and deposition uniformity. Tex Res J 80:1432–1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ribitsch V, Stana-Kleinscheck K (1998) Characterizing textile fibre surface with streaming potential measurements. Tex Res J 68:701–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris CJ (1958) Electrical forces affecting soil and substrate in the detergency process- Zeta Potential. Tex Res J 28:912–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo L, Campagne C, Perwuelz A (2009) Zeta potential and surface physico-chemical properties of atmospheric air-plasma-treated polyester fabrics. Tex Res J 79:1371–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Capablanca JS, Watt IC (1986) Factors affecting the zeta potential at wool fibre surfaces. Tex Res J 56:49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Algie JE, Baird K, Foulds RA, Robinson VN (1974) The felting of wool fabrics washed at various values of pH, and the isoelectrical point determination by streaming potential measurements. Tex Res J 44:767–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellmann C, Caspari A, Doan LTT, Mader E (2004) Electokinetic properties of natural fibres. Presented at international electrokinetics conference, Pittsburgh, PA

  21. Capagne C, Devaux E, Perwuelz A, Caze C (2002) Electrokinetic approach of adhesion between polyester fibres and latex matrices. Polymer 43:6669–6676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teli MD, Rao BR (1995) Electrokinetic properties of modified Polyester fibres. Tex Res J 65:693–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stephen BS, Catherine VS (1981) Surface modification of synthetic textiles. Pure App Chem 53:2211–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stana KK, Ribitsch KT, Fras L (2002) Determination of the adsorption character of cellulose fibres using surface tension and surface charge. Mat Res Innovat 6:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bredereck K, Hermanutz F (2005) Man-made cellulosics. Rev Prog Color 35:59–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Vroman P, Lewandowski M, Perwuelz A, Zhang Y (2009) Study of influence of fibre diameter and fibre blending on liquid absorption inside nonwoven structures. Tex Res J 79:1364–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhuang Q, Harlock SC, Brook DB (2002) Longitudinal wicking of weft knitted fabrics part II: wicking mechanism of knitted fabrics used in undergarments for outdoor activities. J Tex Inst 93:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibson P, Rivin D, Kendrick C, Schreuder-Gibsion H (1999) Humidity-dependent air permeability of textile materials. Tex Res J 69:311–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Unilever Research and Development Laboratory, Port Sunlight for providing their valuable suggestions and guidelines. It would not have been possible to carry the present work without their technical and financial support. Thanks are also due to Alexandre Louart, ENSAIT for his help in the finishing lab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Agarwal.

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, G., Perwuelz, A., Koehl, L. et al. Interaction between the Surface Properties of the Textiles and the Deposition of Cationic Softener. J Surfact Deterg 15, 97–105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1273-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1273-4

Keywords

Navigation