Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From the cradle of agriculture a handful of lentils: History of domestication

  • Published:
RENDICONTI LINCEI Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature on lentil domestication is reviewed, particularly considering archeobotanical, phylogenetic, and molecular evidence.

Lentils are one of the oldest crops cultivated and domesticated by man. Carbonized small lentil seeds have been found in several archaeological remains starting from the Neolithic. It is probable, however, that the most ancient remains refer to wild lentils; this is difficult to ascertain since seed size was probably selected after the establishment of a domesticated lentil. It is general opinion that cultivation occurred before domestication, but for how long is still an open question. It is now well accepted that the domestication of lentils was accomplished in the Near East, in an area called “the cradle of agriculture”. The genus Lens is very small, containing only 6 taxa. A wide range of morphological and molecular evidence supports the idea that the lentil wild progenitor is Lens culinaris ssp. orientalis. On the other hand, the most distantly related species within the genus appears to be L. nigricans, whose domestication was also attempted without success.

The first characters involved in lentil domestication were pod dehiscence and seed dormancy. These traits are under a simple genetic control, and therefore mutants must have been fixed in a relatively short time. These and other morphological traits possibly involved in lentil domestication have been mapped in several linkage maps. However, generally these maps are not easily integrated since they are based on a limited number of markers. Newer maps, mainly built on different kinds of molecular markers, have been more recently produced. A consensus map is needed to fill the gap in lentil breeding and, at the same time, endow with deeper information on the genetics of lentil domestication, giving new insight into the origins of this crop, which present fragmented knowledge is unable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbo S, Gopher A, Rubin B, Lev-Yadun S (2005) On the origin of Near Eastern founder crops and the “dump-heap hypothesis”. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 352: 491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abo-elwafa A, Murai K, Shimada T (1995) Intra- and inter-specific variation in Lens revealed by RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 335–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balter M (2007) Seeking Agriculture’s Ancient Roots. Science 316: 1830–1835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barulina H (1930) Lentil of the U.S.S.R. and of other countries. Bulletin of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding Supplement 40: 1–319

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blair MW, Iriarte G, Beebe S (2006) QTL analysis and yield traits in an advanced backcross population derived from a cultivated Andean × wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 1149–1163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumer MA (1991) Modelling the origin of legume domestication and cultivation. Economic Botany 45: 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collis J (1978) Carbonized seeds from a Roman burial at Lussat (Puy-de-Dôme), France. Antiquity 52: 238–239

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cubero JI (1981) Origin, taxonomy and domestication. In: Webb C, Hawtin G (eds) Lentils C.A.B., London, UK: 15–38

  9. De Candolle A (1883) Origine des Plantes Cultivées. Librairie Germer Baillière et Cie. Paris

  10. Durán Y, Fratini R, García P, Pérez de la Vega M (2004) An intersubspecific genetic map of Lens. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 1265–1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Erskine W (1997) Lessons for breeders from land races of lentil. Euphytica 93: 107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erskine W (1998) Use of historical and archaeological information in lentil improvement today. In: Damania AB, Valkoun J, Willcox G, Qualset CO (eds): The origins of agriculture and crop domestication. Proceedings of the Harlan Symposium, 10–14 May 1997: 191–197, Aleppo, Syria

  13. Erskine W, Smartt J, Muehlbauer FJ (1994) Mimicry of lentil and the domestication of common vetch and grass pea. Economic Botany 48: 326–332

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eujayl I, Baum M, Powell W, Erskine W, Pehu E (1998) A genetic linkage map of lentil (Lens sp.) based on RAPD and AFLP markers using recombinant inbred lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 83–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson ME, Robertson LD (1996) Genetic diversity and taxonomic relationships within the genus Lens as revealed by allozyme polymorphism. Euphytica 91: 163–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson ME, Maxted N, Van Slageren M, Robertson LD (2000) A re-assessment of the taxonomy of Lens Mill. (Leguminosae, Papilionideae, Vicieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ford R, Mustafa B, Inder P, Shaikh R, Materne M, Taylor PWJ (2007) Lensomics: Advances in genomics and molecular techniques for lentil breeding and management. In: Yadav SS (ed) Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times, Springer Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Friedrich WL, Wagner P, Tauber H (1989) Radiocarbon Dated Plant Remains from the Akrotiri Excavation on Santorini, Greece. In: Hardy DA, Renfrew AC (eds) Thera and the Aegean World III, volume three: “Chronology”. Proceedings of the Third International Congress, Santorini, Greece, 3–9 September 1989. The Thera Foundation Editor, London, England: 188–196

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fuller DQ (2007) Contrasting patterns in crop domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany 100: 903–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Galasso I (2003) Distribution of highly repeated DNA sequences in species of the genus Lens Miller. Genome 46: 1118–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Galasso I, Schmidt T, Pignone D (2001) Identification of Lens culinaris ssp. culinaris chromosomes by physical mapping of repetitive DNA sequences. Chromosome Research 9: 199–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gepts P (1990) Biochemical evidence bearing on the domestication of Phaseolus beans. Economic botany 44: 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hammer K (1984) The domestication syndrome. Kulturpflanzen 32: 11–34 (in German, Engl. Summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammer K (1988) Preadaptation and the domestication of crops and weeds. Biologische Zentralblatt 107: 631–636 (Germ., Engl. Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hammer K (1990) Breeding system and phylogenetic relationships in Secale L. Biologische Zentralblatt 109: 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hammer K (2003) Evolution of cultivated plants and biodiversity. Nova Acta Leopoldina NF 87: 133–146 (Germ., Engl. Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammer K (2004) Resolving the challenge posed by agrobiodiversity and plant genetic resources — An attempt. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 76: 184

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hammer K, Hanelt P, Knüpffer H (1982) Studies towards a monographic treatment of wild plant collections: Agrostemma L. Kulturpflanze 30: 45–96 (Germ., Engl. summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamwieh A, Udupa SM, Choumane W, Sarker A, Dreyer F, Jung C, Baum M (2005) A genetic linkage map of Lens sp. based on microsatellite and AFLP markers and the localization of fusarium vascular wilt resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 669–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanelt P (2001) Lens Mill. In: Hanelt P (ed). Mansfeld’s Encyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Vol. 2: 849–852

  31. Harris DR, Hillman GC (1989) Foraging and Farming: The Evaluation of Plant Exploitation. Unwing Hyman, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  32. Havey MJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1989) Variability for restriction fragment lengths and phylogenies in lentil. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 839–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heiser Jr CB (1981) Seed to civilization: the history of food. 2nd edition. Freeman WH, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  34. Helbaek H (1969) Plant collecting, dry-farming and irrigation agriculture in prehistoric Deh Luran. In: Hole F, Flannery KV, Neely JA (eds). Prehistory and human ecology of the Deh Luran Plain, pp. 383–426. Memoirs Museum Anthropology No. 1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Horneburg B (2003) Developing locally adapted varieties. A study with landraces of lentils. Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen 21. ZADI, Bonn (Germ.)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kahraman A, Kusmenoglu I, Aydin N, Ayodogan A, Erskine W, Muehlbauer FJ (2003) Genetics of winter hardiness in 10 lentil recombinant inbred line populations. Crop Science 44: 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P (1996) Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Science 36: 1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ladizinsky G (1979) The genetics of several morphological traits in lentil. The Journal of Heredity 70: 135–137

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ladizinsky G (1985) The genetics of hard seed coat in the genus Lens. Euphytica 34: 539–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ladizinsky G (1987) Pulse domestication before cultivation. Economic Botany 41: 60–65

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ladizinsky G (1997) A new species of Lens from south-east Turkey. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 123: 257–260

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ladizinsky G (1999) Identification of lentil’s wild genetic stock. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ladizinsky G, Abbo S (1996) Genetic diversity in the genus Lens. In: Pickergill B, Locks JM (eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, part 8. Legumes of Economic Importance. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ladizinsky G, Braun D, Goshen D, Muehlbauer FJ (1983) Evidence for domestication of Lens nigricans (M. Bieb.) Godron in S. Europe. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 87: 169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ladizinsky G, Braun D, Goshen D, Muehlbauer FJ (1984) The biological species of the genus Lens. Botanical Gazette 145: 253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A, Abbo S (2000) The cradle of agriculture. Science 288: 1602–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mayer MS, Bagga SK (2003) The phylogeny of Lens (Leguminosae): new insight from ITS sequence analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mayer MS, Soltis PS (1994) Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of Lens (Leguminosae): Origin and diversity of cultivated lentil. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 773–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Muench DG, Slinkard AE, Scoles GJ (1991) Determination of genetic variation and taxonomy in lentil (Lens Miller) species by chloroplast DNA polymorphism. Euphytica 56: 213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 5269–5273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nesbitt M, Samuel D (1998) Wheat domestication: archaeobotanical evidence. Science 279: 1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Papa R, Bellucci E, Rossi M, Leonardi S, Rau D, Gepts P, Nanni L Attene G (2007) Tagging the signatures of domestication in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by Mmeans of pooled DNA samples. Annals of Botany 100:1039–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Phan HTT, Ellwood SR, Ford R, Thomas S, Oliver R (2006) Differences in syntenic complexity between Medicago truncatula with Lens culinaris and Lupinus albus. Functional Plant Biology 33: 775–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Preiss S, Matterne V, Latron F (2005) An approach to funerary rituals in the Roman provinces: plant remains from a Gallo-Roman cemetery at Faulquemont (Moselle, France). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 14: 362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pringle H (1998) Neolithic Agriculture: the slow birth of agriculture. Science 282: 1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Renfrew JM (1969) The archeological evidence for the domesticastion of plants: methods and problems. In: Ucko PJ, Dimbleby GW (eds) The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  57. Renfrew JM (1973) Paleoethnobotany. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rubeena, Ford R, Taylor PWJ (2003) Construction of an intraspecific linkage map of lentil (Lens culinaris ssp. culinaris). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 910–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rupp DW, Murray MA, Reese DS (2000) Prastio Agios Savvas tis Karonis Monastery (Pafos District, Cyprus): Tentative Conclusions and 1992–1995 Ecofact Analyses. Echos du monde classique Classical Views XL: 255–300

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sharma SK, Knox MR, Ellis THN (1996) AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 751–758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Smartt J (1990) Grain Legumes — Evolution and Genetic Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sonnante G, Orlando M, Pignone D (2004) A gene coding for cytosolic glutammine synthetase in lentil. Procc. XLVII SIGA Annual Congress, Lecce 15–18 settembre 2004, p. 106, C64

  63. Sonnante G, De Paolis A, Pignone D (2005) Bowman-Birk inhibitors in Lens: identification and characterization of two paralogous gene classes in cultivated lentil and wild relatives. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 596–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Sonnante G, Galasso I, Pignone D (2003) ITS sequence analysis and phylogenetic inference in the genus Lens Mill. Annals of Botany 91: 49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sonnante G, Stockton T, Nodari RO, Becerra Velasquez VL, Gepts P (1994) Evolution of genetic diversity during the domestication of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tahir M, Muehlbauer F (1993) Gene mapping in lentil with recombinant inbred lines. The Journal of Heredity 85: 306–310

    Google Scholar 

  67. Van Oss H, Aron Y, Ladizinsky G (1997) Chloroplast DNA variation and evolution in the genus Lens. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 428–434

    Google Scholar 

  68. Weeden NF, Muehlbauer FJ, Ladizinsky G (1992) Extensive conservation of linkage relationships between pea and lentil genetic maps. Journal of Heredity 83: 123–129

    Google Scholar 

  69. Weeden NF (2007) Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the “domestication syndrome” for legumes? Annals of Botany 100: 1017–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Weiss E, Kislev ME, Hartmann A (2006) Autonomous cultivation before domestication. Science 312: 1608–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Westphal E (1974) Pulses in Ethiopia, Their Taxonomy and Agricultural Significance. Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  72. Williams JT, Sanchez AMC, Jackson MT (1974) Studies on lentil and their variation. I. The taxonomy of the species. SABRAO Journal 6: 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zohary D (1972) The wild progenitor and the place of origin of the cultivated lentil, Lens culinaris. Economic Botany 26: 326–332

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zohary D (1989) Pulse domestication and cereal domestication: how different are they? Economic Botany 43: 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zohary D (1992) Domestication of the Neolithic Near Eastern crop assemblage. In: Préhistoire de l’agriculture: Nouvelle approches experimentales et ethnographiques, pp. 81–86. Monographie du CRA No. 6, CNRS, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zohary D (1999) Monophyletic vs. polyphyletic origin of the crops on which agriculture was founded in the Near East. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Zohary D, Hopf M (1993) Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Africa, Europe and the Nile Valley. 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  78. Vavilov NI (1917) On the origin of cultivated rye. Tr. Bjuro prikl. bot. 10: 561–590 (Russ., Engl. Summary)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istitute of Plant Genetics, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126, Bari, Italy

    Gabriella Sonnante & Domenico Pignone

  2. Department of Agricultural Biodiversity, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany

    Karl Hammer

Authors
  1. Gabriella Sonnante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl Hammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Domenico Pignone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriella Sonnante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonnante, G., Hammer, K. & Pignone, D. From the cradle of agriculture a handful of lentils: History of domestication. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 20, 21–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-009-0002-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-009-0002-7

Keywords

Subject Codes

Search

Navigation