Skip to main content
Log in

Impact resistance performance and optimal design of a sandwich beam with a negative stiffness core

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical analyses were carried out to investigate the response of a sandwich beam with a negative stiffness (NS) core under quasistatic compression and low-velocity impact at the center. By varying the thicknesses of face sheets and interlayers and the lengths of segments, a parametric study on the impact resistance of the sandwich beam is conducted. The maximal deflection of the top face sheet and the strain energy stored in the NS beam were recorded at the moment when the impactor’s velocity decreased to zero. Based on the impact simulation, a multi-objective optimization problem on the beam configuration was set up to find out the most efficient anti-deformation design at the impact velocity of 2500 mm/s. To solve the problem with the surrogate model method, an optimal Latin hypercube sampling (OLHS) technique and a two-phase differential evolution (ToPDE) algorithm were utilized to generate calculation points in the design space, respectively. Then different surrogate models including the RSM model, the Kriging model and the RBF model, were compared to give the best approximation of the original problem. In the end, the genetic algorithm (GA) dealing with discrete optimization problems was employed to obtain the optimum solutions. Results indicate that different parts of the NS beam dominate the resistance to deformation under different levels of impact intensity. The largest portion of the strain energy is stored in the four curved plates. In the obtained optimization solution, the longest segment is near the two ends and the flat plates near the top are thicker, which is instructive to the beam design on improving impact resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Liu, Z. C. Deng and T. J. Lu, Design optimization of truss-cored sandwiches with homogenization, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43 (2006) 7891–7918.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Liu, W. He, D. Xie and B. Tao, The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures, Composites Part B: Engineering, 111 (2017) 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Xue and J. W. Hutchinson, A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 30 (2004) 1283–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Xiao, J. Fang, G. Sun and Q. Li, Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled bumper beam, Advances in Engineering Software, 85 (2015) 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Birman and G. A. Kardomateas, Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures, Composites Part B: Engineering, 142 (2018) 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Liang, M. Yang and P. Wu, Optimum design of metallic corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to blast loads, Ocean Engineering, 28 (2001) 825–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Cheng, H. Hou, C. Wang and Y. Li, Dynamic response of metallic trapezoidal corrugated-core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading — An experimental study, Materials & Design (1980–2015), 65 (2015) 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Cheon and H. Kim, An equivalent plate model for corrugated-core sandwich panels, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (2015) 1217–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. J. Rathbun, D. D. Radford, Z. Xue, M. Y. He, J. Yang, V. Deshpande, N. A. Fleck, J. W. Hutchinson, F. W. Zok and A. G. Evans, Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43 (2006) 1746–1763.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. B. P. Russell, T. Liu, N. A. Fleck and V. S. Deshpande, The soft impact of composite sandwich beams with a square-honeycomb core, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 48 (2012) 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Ivañez and S. Sanchez-Saez, Numerical modelling of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams with honeycomb core, Composite Structures, 106 (2013) 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Jin, Z. Wang, J. Ning, G. Xiao, E. Liu and X. Shu, Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading, Composites Part B: Engineering, 106 (2016) 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. J. McShane, D. D. Radford, V. S. Deshpandea and N. A. Fleck, The response of clamped sandwich plates with lattice cores subjected to shock loading, European Journal of Mechanics — A/Solids, 25 (2006) 215–229.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Q. Qin, C. Xiang, J. Zhang, M. Wang, T. J. Wang and L. H. Poh, On low-velocity impact response of metal foam core sandwich beam: A dual beam model, Composite Structures, 176 (2017) 1039–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. U. Caliskan and M. K. Apalak, Low velocity bending impact behavior of foam core sandwich beams: Experimental, Composites Part B: Engineering, 112 (2017) 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Sun, E. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Xiao and Q. Li, Low-velocity impact behaviour of sandwich panels with homogeneous and stepwise graded foam cores, Materials & Design, 160 (2018) 1117–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T. M. McCormack, R. Miller, O. Kesler and L. J. Gibson, Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38 (2001) 4901–4920.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Wang, Q. Qin, J. Zhang and T. J. Wang, Low-velocity impact response of geometrically asymmetric slender sandwich beams with metal foam core, Composite Structures, 98 (2013) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Topkaya and M. Y. Solmaz, Investigation of low velocity impact behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (2018) 3161–3167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Uth and V. S. Deshpande, Response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to high-velocity impact by sand slugs, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 69 (2014) 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. A. Yahaya, D. Ruan, G. Lu and M. S. Dargusch, Response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact — An experimental study, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75 (2015) 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Sun, D. Chen, H. Wang, P. J. Hazell and Q. Li, High-velocity impact behaviour of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels with different structural configurations, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 122 (2018) 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Huang, W. Zhang, D. Li, N. Ye, W. Xie and P. Ren, Dynamic failure of honeycomb-core sandwich structures subjected to underwater impulsive loads, European Journal of Mechanics — A/Solids, 60 (2016) 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Ebrahimi, L. K. Someh, J. Norato and A. Vaziri, Blast-resilience of honeycomb sandwich panels, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 144 (2018) 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Wang, Q. Qin, M. Wang, W. Yu, J. Wang, J. Zhang and T. J. Wang, Blast response of geometrically asymmetric metal honeycomb sandwich plate: Experimental and theoretical investigations, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 105 (2017) 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Magnucki, P. Jasion, M. Krus, P. Kuligowski and L. Wittenbeck, Strength and buckling of sandwich beams with corrugated core, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 51 (2013) 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. St-Pierre, V. S. Deshpande and N. A. Fleck, The low velocity impact response of sandwich beams with a corrugated core or a Y-frame core, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 91 (2015) 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Cheng, T. Zhou, H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Liu and P. Zhang, Numerical investigation on the dynamic response of foamfilled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading, Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials (2018) 425909453.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Catapano and M. Montemurro, A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part II: The optimisation strategy, Composite Structures, 118 (2014) 677–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Hou, S. Zhao, L. Ren, X. Han and Q. Li, Crashworthiness optimization of corrugated sandwich panels, Materials & Design, 51 (2013) 1071–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Shi and M. Shimoda, Interface shape optimization of designing functionally graded sandwich structures, Composite Structures, 125 (2015) 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. B. Chai and S. Zhu, A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 225 (2011) 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Abrate, Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Chen, S. Hou, K. Fu, X. Han and L. Ye, Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structures: Modelling and experiment, Composite Structures, 168 (2017) 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Q. Qin, X. Zheng, J. Zhang, C. Yuan and T. J. Wang, Dynamic response of square sandwich plates with a metal foam core subjected to low-velocity impact, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 111 (2018) 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T. Klatt, M. Haberman and C. C. Seepersad, Selective laser sintering of negative stiffness mesostructures for recoverable, nearly-ideal shock isolation, 24th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium — An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2013, Austin, USA (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. D. X. Correa, T. Klatt, S. Cortes, M. R. Haberman, D. Kovar and C. Seepersad, Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (2015) 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. X. Correa, C. C. Seepersad and M. R. Haberman, Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 4 (2015) 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Vangbo, An analytical analysis of a compressed bistable buckled beam, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 69 (1998) 212–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Qiu, J. H. Lang and A. H. Slocum, A centrally-clamped parallel-beam bistable MEMS mechanism, 14th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Interlaken, Switzerland (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Qiu, J. H. Lang and A. H. Slocum, A curved-beam bistable mechanism, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13 (2004) 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. P. Cazottes, A. N. Fernandes, J. Pouget and M. Hafez, Bistable buckled beam: Modeling of actuating force and experimental validations, Journal of Mechanical Design, 131 (2009) 101001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. C. Ren, D. Yang and H. Qin, Mechanical performance of multidirectional buckling-based negative stiffness metamaterials: An analytical and numerical study, Materials, 11 (2018) 1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. A. Rafsanjani, A. Akbarzadeh and D. Pasini, Snapping mechanical metamaterials under tension, Advanced Materials, 27 (2015) 5931–5935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. T. Frenzel, C. Findeisen, M. Kadic, P. Gumbsch and M. Wegener, Tailored buckling microlattices as reusable light-weight shock absorbers, Advanced Materials, 28 (2016) 5865–5870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Shan, S. H. Kang, J. R. Raney, P. Wang, L. Fang, F. Candido, J. A. Lewis and K. Bertoldi, Multistable architected materials for trapping elastic strain energy, Advanced Materials, 27 (2015) 4296–4301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. B. A. Fulcher, D. W. Shahan, M. R. Haberman, C. C. Seepersad and P. S. Wilson, Analytical and experimental investigation of buckled beams as negative stiffness elements for passive vibration and shock isolation systems, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 136 (2014) 31009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. X. Zhang, H. Zhang and Z. Wang, Bending collapse of square tubes with variable thickness, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 106 (2016) 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. X. Song, G. Sun, G. Li, W. Gao and Q. Li, Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 47 (2013) 221–231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Jin, W. Chen and T. W. Simpson, Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 23(1) (2001) 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Sixth Ed., Wiley, New York, USA (2005).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Olsson, G. Sandberg and O. Dahlblom, On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis, Structural Safety, 25 (2003) 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R. Jin, W. Chen and A. Sudjianto, An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 134 (2005) 268–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Y. Wang, B. Xu, G. Sun and S. Yang, A two-phase differential evolution for uniform designs in constrained experimental domains, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 21(5) (2017) 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. G. Sun, J. Fang, X. Tian, G. Li and Q. Li, Discrete robust optimization algorithm based on Taguchi method for structural crashworthiness design, Expert Systems with Applications, 42(9) (2015) 4482–4492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. K. Deep, K. P. Singh, M. L. Kansal and C. Mohan, A real coded genetic algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 212(2) (2009) 505–518.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support for this work, provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479115), High-tech Ship Research Projects by MIIT ([2014]148, [2016]548) and Opening Project by the State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering (GKZD010071), is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deqing Yang.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Junhong Park

Chenhui Ren is a Ph.D. student in the School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. He received his M.S. in Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering in 2016 from Harbin Engineering University, China. He has been researching on nonlinear mechanics, cellular materials, and computer modeling and simulation of mechanical problems.

Deqing Yang is a Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. He works at the School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering and also the State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanics from Dalian University of Technology, China, in 1998. His current research topics include metamaterial mechanics, vibration and acoustics, and structural optimization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, C., Yang, D. & Li, Q. Impact resistance performance and optimal design of a sandwich beam with a negative stiffness core. J Mech Sci Technol 33, 3147–3159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0610-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0610-9

Keywords

Navigation