Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the impact properties of adhesively-bonded aluminum alloy based on impact velocity

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an experiment and a simulation were carried out on colliding an adhesively-bonded tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) at the impact velocities of 5 m/s, 7.5 m/s and 12.5 m/s. The analysis method of the corrected beam theory (CBT) was used to obtain the rate of energy release in the bonded area according to the crack progression, and a simulation was performed to determine the maximum strain energy during the impact analysis as a means to examine the mechanical properties of aluminium alloy. The experimental data were found to be higher than the simulation data. This is deemed to explicable by the fact that the adhesive strength was maintained even after the specimen separated in the experiment. Crack progression occurred, irrespective of the impact velocity, and high strain energy occurred at the end of the bonded region, thereby causing the strain energy to increase in the final stages. Also, the maximum load applied on the pin and the maximum strain energy in the bonded area were shown increase at higher impact velocities. The results of the experiment and simulation performed in this study are expected to serve as important data in developing a safety design for composite materials that can help prevent the progression of cracks caused by impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. G. Liee, K. S. Kim and Y. T. Im, An experimental study of fatigue strength for adhesively bonded tubular single joints, International Journal of Adhesives, 35 (1991) 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Kadar, F. Chmelik and Z. Rajkovits, Acoustic emission measurements on metal foams [J], Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 378 (2003) 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Pang, Y, Du and K. Y. Wu, Fatigue analysis of adhesive joints under vibration loading, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 89 (2013) 899–920.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. C. Batra and Z. Peng, Development of shear bands in dynamic plane strain compression of depleted uranium and tungsten blocks [J], International Journal of Impact Engineering, 16 (3) (1995) 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. D. Kenny, Mechanical properties of particle stabilized aluminum foam [J], Materials Science Forum, 217–222 (3) (1996) 1883–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Briskham and G. Smith, Cyclic stress durability testing of lap shear joints exposed to hot-wet conditions, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 20 (1) (2000) 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Mukai, T. Miyoshi, S. Nakano, H. Somekawa and K. Higashi, Compressive response of a closed-cell aluminum foam at high strain rate [J], Scripta Materialia, 54 (4) (2006) 533–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. U. Cho, S. J. Hong, S. K. Lee and C. Cho, Impact fracture behavior at the material of aluminum foam [J], Materials Science and Engineering A, 539 (2012) 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. X. Teng and T. Wierzbicki, Dynamic shear plugging of beams and plates with an advancing crack [J], International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31 (2005) 667–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Børvik, O. S. Hopperstad, M. Langseth and K. A. Malo, Effects of target thickness in blunt projectile penetration of Weldox 460 E steel plates [J], International Journal of Impact Engineering, 28 (4) (2003) 413–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X. W. Chen and Q. M. Li, Shear plugging and perforation of ductile circular plates truck by a blunt projectile [J], International Journal of Impact Engineering, 28 (2003) 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pirondi and G. Nicoletto, Fatigue crack growth in bonded DCB specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 71 (2004) 859–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. Shokrieh, M. Heidari-Rarani and S. Rahimi, Influence of curved delamination front on toughness of multidirectional DCB specimens, Composite Structures, 94 (4) (2012) 1359–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. R. K. Blackman, J. P. Dear, A. J. Kinloch, H. MacGillivray, Y. Wang, J. G. Williams and P. Yayla, The failure of fibre composites and adhesively bonded fibre composites under high rates of test part III mixed-mode I/II and mode II loadings, Journal of Materials Science, 31 (17) 4467–4477.

  15. K. R. Pradeep, B. Nageswara Rao, S. M. Srinivasan and K. Balasubramaniam, Interface fracture assessment on honeycomb sandwich composite DCB specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 93 (2012) 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Marzi, A. Biel and U. Stigh, On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 31 (8) (2011) 840–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Qiao, J. Wang and J. F. Davalos, Tapered beam on elastic foundation model for compliance rate change of TDCB Specimen, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70 (2) (2003) 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. U. Cho, A. Kinloch, B. Blackman, S. Rodriguez, C. D. Cho and S. K. Lee, Fracture behavior of adhesively-bonded composite materials under impact loading, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 11 (1) (2010) 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Cooper, A. Ivankovic, A. Karac, D. McAuliffe and N. Murphy, Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints, Polymer, 53 (24) (2012) 5540–5553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Michailidis, F. Stergioudi, H. Omar and D. N. Tsipas, An image-based reconstruction of the 3D geometry of an Al open-cell foam and FEM modeling of the material response, Mechanics of Materials, 42 (2) (2010) 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. K. Parida and A. K. Pradhan, 3D finite element analysis of stress distributions and strain energy release rates for adhesive bonded flat composite lap shear joints having preexisting delaminations, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28 (2) (2014) 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. U. Cho, S. K. Lee, C. Cho, F. S. Rodriguez Sanchez, B. R. K. Blackman and A. J. Kinloch, A study on the impact behavior of adhesively-bonded composite materials, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21 (10) (2007) 1671–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Ung Cho.

Additional information

Recommended by Chief-in-Editor Emeriti Haecheon Choi

Teng-Gao received his B.S. degree in in Div. of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering from Kongju University, Korea, in 2013. Now he is at the course of M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Graduate School of Kongju University. He is interested in the areas of fracture mechanics (dynamic impact), composite material, fatigue and strength evaluation.

Jae-Ung Cho received his M.S. and Doctor Degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Inha University, Incheon, Korea, in 1982 and 1986, respectively. Now he is a professor in Mechanical & Automotive Engineering of Kongju National University, Korea. He is interested in the areas of fracture mechanics (dynamic impact), composite material, fatigue and strength evaluation, and so on.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, T., Kinloch, A.J., Blackman, B.R.K. et al. A study of the impact properties of adhesively-bonded aluminum alloy based on impact velocity. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 493–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0109-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0109-y

Keywords

Navigation